Performance interviews involve discussing employee performance with employees to provide feedback. The goals are to change behaviors of underperforming employees, maintain acceptable performance, and recognize superior performance. Conducting effective performance interviews includes asking for self-assessments, inviting participation, minimizing criticism, expressing appreciation, focusing on problem solving over criticism of individuals, being supportive, and establishing and following up on goals. Common issues with performance reviews include difficulty separating personal biases when multiple raters are involved, time consumption in analyzing multi-source feedback, and potential for employees to manipulate ratings.
Performance interviews involve discussing employee performance with employees to provide feedback. The goals are to change behaviors of underperforming employees, maintain acceptable performance, and recognize superior performance. Conducting effective performance interviews includes asking for self-assessments, inviting participation, minimizing criticism, expressing appreciation, focusing on problem solving over criticism of individuals, being supportive, and establishing and following up on goals. Common issues with performance reviews include difficulty separating personal biases when multiple raters are involved, time consumption in analyzing multi-source feedback, and potential for employees to manipulate ratings.
Performance interviews involve discussing employee performance with employees to provide feedback. The goals are to change behaviors of underperforming employees, maintain acceptable performance, and recognize superior performance. Conducting effective performance interviews includes asking for self-assessments, inviting participation, minimizing criticism, expressing appreciation, focusing on problem solving over criticism of individuals, being supportive, and establishing and following up on goals. Common issues with performance reviews include difficulty separating personal biases when multiple raters are involved, time consumption in analyzing multi-source feedback, and potential for employees to manipulate ratings.
1. Once appraisal is made of employees, the ratters should
discuss and review the performance with the ratees so that they will receive a proper feedback.
2. Interview has three goals: A.) To change behaviour employees whose performance does not meet organisational requirements or their own personal goals,
B.) To maintain the behaviour of employees who perform in an acceptable manner, and
C.) To recogonise superior performance behaviours so that they will be continued. CONDUCTING THE APPRAISAL INTERVIEW... 1
Ask for Self Assessment. Invite Participation
2
Minimise Criticism Express Appreciation.
3
Change behaviour, not the person. Focus on solving problems.
4 Be supportive. Establish Goals Follow up day-to-day.
Where does it fail?
1. With the increase in the number of raters from one to five (commonly), it becomes difficult to separate, calculate and eliminate personal biases and differences.
2. It is often time consuming and difficult to analyze the information gathered through 360 degree Appraisal.
3. The results can be manipulated by the employees towards their desired ratings with the help of the raters. 720 DEGREE FEEDBACK 1. 720 degree as the name suggests is 360 degree twice.
2. It provides for two round of feedback (a pre and post ) or a feedback approach which is done again after nine to twelve months.
3. This system is more development focused than performance alone, and supplements training and development functions in a better way.
4. A powerful developmental tool because when conducted at regular intervals it helps to keep a track of the changes, others perceptions about the employees.