The document compares two movie versions of the Battle of the Alamo from the 1960s and 2004. It notes that the 1960s version does not fully explain why the American army was established at the Alamo and just tells the story of the conflict, while the 2004 version provides more context around why and how the American forces came to occupy the Alamo, including that it was an old Spanish mission used for shelter that had strategic importance due to cannons aiding the defense against the Mexican forces.
The document compares two movie versions of the Battle of the Alamo from the 1960s and 2004. It notes that the 1960s version does not fully explain why the American army was established at the Alamo and just tells the story of the conflict, while the 2004 version provides more context around why and how the American forces came to occupy the Alamo, including that it was an old Spanish mission used for shelter that had strategic importance due to cannons aiding the defense against the Mexican forces.
The document compares two movie versions of the Battle of the Alamo from the 1960s and 2004. It notes that the 1960s version does not fully explain why the American army was established at the Alamo and just tells the story of the conflict, while the 2004 version provides more context around why and how the American forces came to occupy the Alamo, including that it was an old Spanish mission used for shelter that had strategic importance due to cannons aiding the defense against the Mexican forces.
2. The characters. 3. The armies. 4. The beginning of of the history. 5. The development. 6. Backhistory 7. Comments. 1. The movie doesnt explain why the army established at the Alamo, just tells us about how the conflict started and how it is developed
1. This movie explains better why and how the North American forces establish in the Alamo. The Alamo was an old Spanish mission or church took as a shelter and whose importance lies in the fact that there was and cannon that helped during the fight against Mexican forces. .