.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.
.

.


.
:

:
.

.
.
.

.
.
. .
.
:

- - . -
- -
- .
- . %
.
4 % .
-
(. ).
-
.
.

- .

.
-
.
.
.
USGS

( ) 1 Cm/s/s




. .
.

Comp L: 1
.

(a
().
(b
().

Comp L: 2
.
(a
()
(b
()

.
:
-
-
-


. .

.

. .

. .
.
.
.

Donoho

Wavelet shrinkage denoising .

:
-
-
-
:
f :
yi f ti zi i 1,...,N

ti i 1N
zi
)

N(0,

.
)) (f=(f

 . f

,....,

.

AVE E EXPECTED VALUE .
:

)=1/N.E

gi ci e i

)g W

.
Donoho

thershold :
Soft thresholding :

Hard thresholding :

.
THRESHOLD :
TRESHOLD .

:SINGLE TRESHOLD-1
SINGLE TRESHOLD VISUSHRINK
:

 n :

: Level dependent thresholds-2
. sure shrink .

- .
.
.


.
:
- - - .
- .

-

.


.

1 - Ansari, A and Noorzad, A and Zare, M. (2007). Application of wavelet multi-resolution analysis for
correction of seismic acceleration records. J. Geophys. Eng. Vol. 4, PP. 116.
2 - Boore, D. M. and Bommer, J. J. (2005). Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and
consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, PP. 93115.
3 - Donoho, D. L. and Johnstone, I. M. (1994). Idea 1 spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika,Vo1
81. PP. 425-455.