Chicago Illinois Attorney and Adjunct Professor of Law at Itt Chicago Kent Law School filed her response to an Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Complaint. This is the complainant's Reply.
Disclaimer; Attorney Sarah E. Buck is considered innocent until proven guilty.
Original Title
Reply to Illinois Attorney Sarah E. Buck Response to a attorney Disciplinary Complaint
Chicago Illinois Attorney and Adjunct Professor of Law at Itt Chicago Kent Law School filed her response to an Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Complaint. This is the complainant's Reply.
Disclaimer; Attorney Sarah E. Buck is considered innocent until proven guilty.
Chicago Illinois Attorney and Adjunct Professor of Law at Itt Chicago Kent Law School filed her response to an Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Complaint. This is the complainant's Reply.
Disclaimer; Attorney Sarah E. Buck is considered innocent until proven guilty.
--------------------------------------------------- ) In the Matter of: ) ) ) Supreme Court No: ) ) ) Andrew Hays ) No 2014IN3330 Antona Hays ) No 2014IN3331 Sarah !u"# ) No 2014IN3332 $espondents ) --------------------------------------------------- TO: Andrew Hays Antona Hays Sarah !u"#% Hays Firm LLC, 55 W. Wacker Drive, 14 th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 NOTICE OF FILING A RESPONSE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the _________ day of Septe!e" ##$ #%&'% I f&ed wth the C&er# of the A$'C the atta"hed Attorney 's"p&nary $ep&y to Sarah !u"# No 2014IN3332
Chrstopher Sto&&er (04) *+ ,rand Apt 414 Ch"a-o% I&&nos (0(3. 312-/34 .010 1 ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS --------------------------------------------------- ) In the Matter of: ) ) ) Supreme Court No: ) ) ) Andrew Hays ) No 2014IN3330 Antona Hays ) No 2014IN3331 Sarah !u"# ) No 2014IN3332 $espondents ) --------------------------------------------------- REPLY TO ATTORNEY SARAH (UCK & RESPONSE #
1 Ms. Buck is a graduate of Valparaiso University (1999) and Chicago-ent College of !a" (#$$9). %hile in la" school& Ms. Buck "as a 'e'(er of the Moot Court )onor *ociety and the "inner of the +ational )ealth !a" 'oot court co'petition. Upon graduation& Ms. Buck clerked for the )onora(le !ee ,reston "hile he served in (oth the !a" -ivision and Chancery -ivision of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Ms. Buck is also an ad.unct-professor at Chicago-ent College of !a"& teaching /llinois Civil ,rocedure. /n this course& she teaches second and third year la" students the court rules and court procedures necessary to litigate clai's in /llinois state courts. 21he Attorney $e-straton and 's"p&nary Commsson was esta2&shed 2y the I&&nos Supreme Court to dea& wth ssues of professona& ms"ondu"t of attorneys+ 1he serous a&&e-atons of professona& ms"ondu"t that the Comp&anant has rased re-ardn- the $espondents are ssues that are not 2efore the I&&nos Court n No. 2014 CH06759 + 1he ssues of professona& ms"ondu"t rased 2y ths Attorney 2 0he 1espondent& *arah Buck& provides irrefuta(le evidence that she violated 21-C 1ules 1.# (d) 2 la"yer shall not counsel a client to engage& or assist a client& in conduct that the la"yer kno"s is cri'inal or fraudulent&Cri'inal& 3raudulent and ,rohi(ited 0ransactions. %ith kno"ingly and "illfully assisting their client Mark *toller to co''it a cri'e 4 or fraud in Cook County Civil Case No. 2014 CH06759 (Exhibit 1 to complaint.) The Repon!ent" *arah Buck& p#o$i!e i##e%&table e$i!ence that he $iolate! 'R(C R&le1.7) C*N+,-CT *+ -NTERE.T) R/,E 0.7(a)) ,'12ER '. 1-TNE... 1U!5 6.17 01U0)3U!+5** /+ *0205M5+0* 08 80)51* /n the course of representing a their client Mark *toller& the *arah Block kno"ingly7 (a) 'ake false state'ent(s) of 'aterial fact or la" to a third person. 1he $espondents% Sarah !u"#% pro3des rrefuta2&e e3den"e that she 3o&ated A$'C $u&es 1U!5 9.67 M/*C8+-UC0(a)&(()&(c)& (d) violating or atte'pt to violate the 1ules of ,rofessional Conduct& kno"ingly assist or 's"p&nary "omp&ant are ssues that the Commsson s so&e&y empowered to a"t upon under the I&&nos $u&es of 4rofessona& Ms"ondu"t and N51 any State Court 6ud-e+ 3:9; ,aragraph (d) prohi(its a la"yer fro' kno"ingly counseling or assisting a client to co''it a cri'e or fraud. 3 induce another to do so& or do so through the acts of another. *arah Buck provided evidence against her of creating a false affidavit of Mark *toller 'arked as Exhibit ( (ACKGROUND FACTS $espondents Andrew Hays% Antona Hays and Sarah !u"#% represent % Mar# Sto&&er% 43 the son of Chrstopher Sto&&er% () the "omp&anant n Coo# County Case No. 2014 CH06759 where Mar# Sto&&er s "har-ed wth defraudn- hs father out of 7(0%000% aded and a2etted 2y the sad respondents who are named defendants+ 8See 9:h2t 1 to "omp&ant) 1he response of Sarah !u"# "&ear&y esta2&shes e3den"e of her professona& ms"ondu"t and "&ear 3o&atons of the I&&nos 4rofessona& $u&es of 4rofessona& Condu"t+ SARAH (UCK ENGAGED IN A CO)ERUP AND THREATENED OPPOSING COUNSEL$ FORMER COOK COUNTY *UDGE +AYNE RHINE$ +ITH A RULE &,- MOTION UNLESS SARA (UCK +AS IMMEDIATELY DISCHARGED AS DEFENDANT FROM CASE No. 2014 CH06759 (.ee Exhibit lette# %#om Repon!ent 3&c4 to 'tto#ne5 1a5ne Rhine" 6hich !#o$e %o#me# 7&!8e Rhine o&t o% Cae No. 2014 Ch06759 attache! to 'n!#e6 Ha5 #epone) 4 2fter *ara Buck received service of su''ons na'ing her as a defendant in case +o. #$16 C)$<=>9& she "rote a letter 6 to counsel for the ,laintiff?Co'plainant& %ayne 1hine threaten hi' "ith a frivolous 1ule 14= sanction 'otion unless *ara Buck "as "ithdra"n fro' case +o #$16 C)$<=>9& as a defendant in order to cover up her professional 'isconduct and cri'inal conduct.(2ssisting Mark *toller& under the color of la" to defraud his father the co'plainant out of @<=&$$$& "hen her la" fir' )ays 3ir' !!C is not even registered "ith the /llinois *upre'e Court& licensed to practice "ithin the state of /llinois.) 4 1he &etter s atta"hed to Andrew Hays $esponse+ ) 1espondent Buck "ho pro'otes herself as an ad.unct professor at ent *chool of !a". %here -ean *tephen *o"le 5sA and -ean )arold B. rent kne" or should have kno"n that 2d.unct ,rofessor *arah Buck "ho represented to the Chicago ent *chool of !a" that she "as a ClicensedD practicing attorney& "hen 2d.unct ,rofessor *arah BuckEs la" fir' that she ackno"ledged in her response !etter at F 1 C/ take 'y role as an attorney and as an e'ployee of the )ays 3ir' very seriously > .D )o"ever& -ean *tephen *o"le 5sA and -ean )arold B. rent kne" or should have kno"n that the fir'& )ays !a" 3ir' !!C& that *arah Buck ackno"ledges (eing an e'ployee& is not registered nor licensed "ith the /llinois *upre'e Court a #e9&i#e! b5 R&le 721(c). 1ecently the conseAuences of a la" fir'Es failure to o(tain a 1ule =#1(c) certificate of registration "ere addressed in Ford Motor Credit Company v. Sperry, 2ppellate Court of /llinois& *econd -istrict& +o. #-$#-$6<#& -ecided7 +ove'(er 4& #$$4. /n /llinois& it is "ell esta(lished that only persons duly ad'itted to practice la" in this state 'ay appear on (ehalf of other persons. 0he nor'al effect of a personEs unauthoriGed practice on (ehalf of a party is to reAuire the dis'issal of the ) !u"# 3o&ated A$'C $u&e 4+1 1ruthfu&ness n Statements to 5thers+ ( cause or to treat the particular actions taken (y the representative as a nullity.D Patt-Holdampf, 449. app. 4- at 1$94& /ll. -ec. =$9& =99 +.5.ed. Ford Motor Credit Company v. Thomas B. Sperry +o. #-$#-$6<# -ecided +ove'(er 4& #$$4& 2ppellate Court of /llinois& *econd -istrict. 0o enforce court orders entered (y unlicensed and therefore unregulated la" fir's "ould a(rogate the state purpose of the 1ule =#1(c) certificate of registration < . 0he 1espondent violated 21-C 1ule >.> UnauthoriGed ,ractice of !a". *ara Buck as an e'ployee of the unlicensed la" fir' of )ays 3ir' !!C has no right to represent& Mark *toller in case +8. +o. #$16 C)$<=>9. -ean *tephen *o"le& 5sA.& and -ean )arold B. rent 5sA.& kne" or should have kno"n that the )ays !a" 3ir' !!C& that *arah Buck 'ade a 'isrepresentation to her students at Chicago ent *chool of !a" that she ( 0he /llinois *upre'e Court has pro'ulgated certain rules on the discipline of attorneys and their ad'ission to the state (ar. 0hese rules provide the reAuire'ents for those "anting to attain a license to practice la" in the state. *ee 199 /ll. #- 1. =$1. 0he rules also provide for additional reAuire'ents for those seeking to practice la" through a professional corporation. *ee 1<< /ll. #d. 1.=#1. 3or instance& rule =#1(a) reAuires that the corporation do nothing that "ould violate the standards of professional conduct applica(le to attorneys. *ee 1<< /ll. #d. 1. =#1((). 1ule =#1(c) reAuires each corporation that seeks to practice la" to register "ith the /llinois *upre'e Court. *ee 1<< /ll. #- 1. =#1(c) C+o corporation or association or li'ited lia(ility co'pany shall engage in the practice of la" in /llinois or open or 'aintain an esta(lish'ent for that purpose in /llinois& "ithout a certificate of registration issued (y this courtD 1<< /ll #d. 1. =#1(c) as "ell kno"n to -ean *o"le 5sA and -ean )arold B. rent. 0he Co'plainant "as har'ed (y the )ays 3ir' for their failure to register. 0 is e'ployee of the )ays !a" 3ir' !!C& and licensed to practice la" "ithin the *tate of /llinois& "hen the )ays !a" 3ir' !!C is not licensed "ithin the *tate of /llinois as "ell kno"n to -ean rent and -ean *o"le. 0he 21-C should reAuire that the 1espondent )ays !a" 3ir' !!C.& send a letter to all of their clients and infor' the' that they are not licensed to practice la" "ithin the *tate of /llinois and to void all orders that have (een entered (y the 1espondent )ays !a" 3ir' !!C. 0he 21-C should reAuire that the )ays !a" 3ir' disgorge itself of all of the attorney fees that have (een paid to the unregistered )ays la" 3ir'. /ncluding all attorney fees paid to )ays (y Mark *toller. 0he )ays !a" fir' respondents "ere served "ith 2d'issions in Buly of #$16 in "hich they failed to respond dee'ing all ad'issions as ad'itted& including the 'ost da'ning ad'ission 1=& C2d'it that Mark *toller (64) has conspired "ith his attorney(s) Buck to defraud his father out of @<=&$$$D *ee Exhibit C. *arah Buck ad'its drafting Mark *tollerEs (per.ured) affidavit "hich is 'ade in (ad faith 'arked as Exhibit (. *ee Christopher *tollerEs attached conflicting affidavit Exhibit E& "hich contradicts the Mark *tollerEs affidavit& "hich has no" for the 21-C created a CAuestion of factD that can and 'ust (e decided at a evidentiary hearing conducted (y the /nAuiry Board. 0he / Christopher *toller& <> affidavit should (e given significant "eight. /t is clear that *arah Buck has failed to de'onstrate the full acceptance and recognition of the seriousness of her professional 'isconduct.
1HERE+*RE" Co'plainant prays that the /nAuiry Board i''ediately assign this 'atter to a hearing& panel& that a date for hearing (e i''ediately set& that the hearing (e conducted and that the panel 'ake findings of fact& conclusions of la" and a reco''endation for such discipline as is "arranted (y its findings. + Chrstopher Sto&&er (04) *+ ,rand Apt 414 Ch"a-o% I&&nos (0(3. 312-/34 .010 )ERIFICATION I% the unders-ned% state that I ha3e made reasona2&e n3est-aton n the fa"ts "ontaned heren and "ertfy ths p&eadn- pursuant to se"ton 1-10. of the I&&nos Code of C3& 4ro"edure+ ; C."/0top.e" Sto11e" . Ce"t/f/2ate of Ma/1/34 I here2y "ertfy that ths moton s 2en- deposted wth the <+S+ 4osta& Ser3"e as frst C&ass ma& n an en3e&ope addressed to: 6erome =ar#n 're"tor Attorney Admssons I&&nos Attorney $e-straton 9astern 'str"t and 's"p&nary Commsson 21. S+ 'ear2orn St 130 N+ $ando&ph Street% Sute 1)00 Ch"a-o% I&&nos (0(04 Ch"a-o% I&&nos (0(01 6ames Comey 're"tor of >!I Ch"a-o 2111 *+ $oose3e&t $d+ Ch"a-o% I& (0(0( 312-/2.-)032 Ch"a-o?e+f2+-o3 @a"hary 1+ >ardon <ntes States Attorney 5ff"e Northern 'str"t of I&&nos% 9astern '3son 21. S+ 'ear2orn St% ) th >&oor Ch"a-o% I&+ (0(04 312-3)3-)300 =sa Mad-an I&&nos Attorney ,enera& 100 *+ $ando&ph St+ Ch"a-o% I&&nos (0(01 Ma/1 F"a5d D/6/0/o3 :*.T',-N.:ECT-*N.ER;-CE 4001.H'RR-.*N"R00<50190 CH-C'=* -, 60669>2201
10 Chrstopher Sto&&er 'ate: 9AHI!I1 A 11 9AHI!I1 ! 12 9AHI!I1 C 13 9AHI!I1 ' 14 9AHI!I1 9 1)
2014-10-12 Letter to ACRI Chief Legal Counsel Dan Yakir: 1) Your October 11, 2014 response, and 2) Request for a statement for publication - ACRI's position on due Service and Notice in the Israeli courts. // מכתב לדן יקיר - יועץ משפטי בכיר באגודה לזכויות האזרח: 1) תשובתך מיום 11 לאוקטובר, 2014, 2) בקשה לתגובה לפרסום - עמדת האגודה על המצאה והודעה כדין בבתי המשפט בישראל.
Motion To Default Attorneys From Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Zuckerman Spaeder LLC, Wright, Finaly & Zak, For Failure To Respond To Criminal Contempt Charges