Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cesar Chavez
The University of Texas at El Paso
injustice, crime, and inequality do exist. The author tried to convey the story in its most natural
way in a manner to inform and being very realistic.
The author also has a very unique way of using pathos in this story by writing about the wheat
operations in different points of views. At the beginning of the story the author recounts the
story of Sam Lewiston; a wheat farmer who losses everything after the drop in the price of
wheat, which was selling at sixty-two cents a bushel. After losing everything Sam and his wife
had to turn over their entire property to their creditors, and, leaving Kansas for good, had to
abandon farming, his wife moved to her sisters boarding house in Topeka while he founded a
steady job in Chicago. The author then moves on to the story of two powerful men in the wheat
business; Truslow and Hornungs, who fight for the complete control of the wheat business. In
order to get Truslow out of the business, Hornungs sells him wheat properties, with the plan of
leaving him in bankruptcy. Later it turned out that Truslow was selling the same wheat that
Hornungs was selling him, but selling it a higher price; causing the increase on the price of
wheat. The author knowledge on the matter of monopolies and capitalism is very strong which
made the story very solid in pathos.
The story has a unique use of logos throughout the story. The author use of speech and
metaphors stand out in the story. The author divides the short story in five parts in which he
describes the point of view in the wheat issue of Sam Lewiston, Truslow and Hornungs. The
way he divided the story makes it simpler for the reader to understand the situation that is being
presented and understand how is being a challenge to different people. Frank also uses quotes
which give voice to the people being portrayed in the story. By doing so the readers can
understand more in depth the feelings and the way each character express themselves according
to the situation they are confronting. The use of metaphors also stand out in the story, the author
uses several metaphors as when he portrays the thoughts of Hornungs towards Truslow,
Truslow once dead was dead, but the Bear was never more dangerous than when desperate.
The story focuses on the devastation of the wheat business, how a farmer struggles to survive in
a time of crisis, but at the end losses all of his possessions, giving him no other alternative but to
seek job in order to survive and support himself and his wife. Then he goes into detail as to how
the farmer struggle was affected by the inconsiderate decisions of two powerful men in the wheat
business. This storys complications and desperate decisions for survival in a monopoly generate
a very good use of rhetoric because it uses ethos, pathos, and logos very effectively.
References:
Norris, F. (1903). A deal in wheat. United States. Doubleday, Page & Company. Retrieved from:
http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/24917/
PBS. (2007) The American Novel. Retrieved from:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americannovel/timeline/norris.html