Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MagLev Control
Simulink model
TASK: compare
1) PID
2) IMC
3) MPC
Report + Progs to:
Robain.DeKeyser@UGent.be
198 .1
Inp
s2 +10 s+1962
From
Workspace
Transfer Fcn 1
DisInp
DisOut
From
Workspace1
From
Workspace2
B (q 1 ) 0.0003933q 1 + 0.0003907 q 2
=
A(q 1 )
1 1.9724q 1 + 0.9802q 2
IMC speed parameter: a = 0.85
Out
To Workspace
sampling period: 2 ms
N1 1,=
N 2 20,=
Nu 1
MPC parameters: =
MPC process model: use parallel model (EPSAC text p.8-9)
MPC disturbance model: C ( q 1 )= 1
D( q 1 )= (1 q 1 ) * A( q 1 )
Robin DE KEYSER Ghent University EeSA Department of Electrical energy, Systems & Automation
z
Z (s)
I (s)
2 gk
*
z=
m
2
s2 + * g
z
0.1981
s 2 + 1962
MAGnetic LEVitation
2 gk
floating train, 500 km/hr
Z (s) z* m
= =
air gap z=1cm
2
I (s)
s2 * g
2
2
levitation FL = k i z
z
i (t ) 2
force equilibrium (for left design): mz(t ) = FL (t ) mg = k
mg
2
z (t )
(m 10000
=
kg k 0.001 Nm 2 /A 2 )
0.1981
s 2 1962
Robin DE KEYSER Ghent University EeSA Department of Electrical energy, Systems & Automation
Robin DE KEYSER Ghent University EeSA Department of Electrical energy, Systems & Automation
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Robin DE KEYSER Ghent University EeSA Department of Electrical energy, Systems & Automation