Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
I.
Executive Summary.4
Purpose and Scope .4
Audience.4
Data Collection and Analysis4
Findings..5-6
Recommendations6
II.
Introduction..6
Purpose of the Evaluation..7
Design of the Evaluation..7
III.
Methodology
Methods of Data Collection..7
On-Task Behavior Chart..7-8
Picture Survey.8-9
Pre-and Post Modified KWL for Sixth Graders..9
Photo Interview Questions for Elementary Students10
Interview Questions for Sixth Grade10
Limitations of Evaluation..11
IV.
Results..12
Evaluation Findings12
Pre and Post -Sixth Grade Modified KWL Intrinsic and Extrinsic Findings.12
VI.
References..16
I.
Executive Summary
Purpose and Scope
Interactive white boards (IWBs) are used in almost every classroom in this school district. They
are used across content areas and have a variety of applications and uses. IWBs are currently
used to promote learning in K-6 reading programs. The scope and purpose of this evaluation
was to determine whether IWBs impact students attending behaviors and organizational
strategies in K-6 reading programs. Student behavior logs, student interviews, SEN surveys and
Photo wh questions were used to determine effectiveness of the IWBs.
Based on the percentage data results of this evaluation, we found that the use of interactive
white boards in K-6 reading programs does improve students attending behaviors and
organizational strategies; therefore, this program should be maintained.
Audience
This evaluation took place from February 22, 2013 to April 5, 2013 in the KW School System and
seeks to inform the stakeholders at KW School System on the impact of IWBs on K-6 reading
programs.
Data Collection and Analysis
Data were collected through behavior logs, interview sessions, self-reporting and surveys of 58
students participating in K-6 reading programs. Behavior logs were tracked during white board
segments, while daily observational data was collected by the evaluator. All of the evaluation
participants were observed for attentiveness during their academic period. In the study,
attentiveness was identified and operationally defined as active learning (i.e., looking at the
speaker, focusing on the whiteboard, utilizing books, clipboards/dry erase boards, manipulating
props and materials). Students off task behavior was identified and operationally defined as
disengaged (i.e., playing with clothes, shoes, distracted, looking up at the ceiling, etc.).
Attention to task was discussed at the beginning of each lesson and defined by the students as
well. Data was recorded on a 5 minute-interval tally chart during a thirty-minute lesson. Active
learners received a plus sign (+) and disengaged students received a minus sign (-). Weekly
conferences were held for general education students, during which students completed photo
interview questions assessing information retrieval. Participating sixth grade students
completed pre and post evaluations to determine if there were correlations between IWBs and
students utilization of organizational strategies. Participating AU students took part in a three
session visual survey to determine if there were correlations between IWBs and students
utilization of organizational strategies. Data herein is compiled into several charts, displaying
Findings
The findings of the evaluation are listed below, categorized into four areas.
Student Behavior Logs
*(IWB = Interactive white board, WWB=with white board & WOWB=without white board)
Daily 30 minute behavior logs were utilized by observers, at 5 minute intervals for six
weeks to determine students on-task behavior. Both Group A and B were assigned
numbers for student identification. Data on all eight students in Group A were recorded
daily. Data on the 48 students in Group B was randomly taken due to class size. The
qualitative data was tabulated weekly to measure on task behavior with an IWB and
without IWB with a baseline of zero and a goal of 85%. Time on task was reported
higher with the IWB in both the AU self-contained group (WWB=72%, WOWB=65%) and
the inclusion group (WWB=78%, WOWB 52%). Although the researchers did not make
their intended goal of 85%, there was active growth in each group. These data
fluctuations were attributed to outliers of age and development of students, class-size,
pre CRCT and post CRCT variables, and prior knowledge fluency.
Interviews
A modified version of the KWL format was employed before and after the study with the
sixth grade inclusion group to measure the impact of IWB lessons on students
confidence and expression of detail and interest. The qualitative interview questions
were intrinsic and extrinsic in nature, and open-ended. The responses were rated on a
3-point rubric scale (1 little detail, 2- some details, 3 very detailed). Pre-Evaluation
results were; averaged intrinsic responses, (1.75) and averaged extrinsic responses,
(2.25). Post-Evaluation results were; averaged intrinsic responses, (2.5) and averaged
extrinsic responses, (2.66). The results were compared and a percentage growth rate
was tabulated. Intrinsic responses increased by .75 and extrinsic responses increased by
.16. These data validated that IWB lessons contributed to students increased
confidence and expression of detail and interest.
SEN Survey
A qualitative SEN survey was used with the AU self-contained group. The survey was
visually designed (the employment of visual answers in place of verbal or written
responses), to measure how the IWB influenced their intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
in correlation with their implementation of organizational and retrieval strategies. An
emotion survey rating scale (1-4) was employed for the intrinsic questions (1-2) and
numbers were assigned for the students responses for the extrinsic based questions (3-
Introduction
The majority of classrooms in KW School District contain Interactive White Boards (IWBs). These
white boards are often used in reading programs. This program evaluation sought to determine
the effectiveness of IWBs in K-6 reading programs. Two evaluation questions drove this study:
a. Can the incorporation of an interactive white board impact students attending
behaviors during guided reading?
b. Can the incorporation of an IWB increase students (general education and SWD)
utilization of organizational strategies?
Methodology
Methods of Data Collection
Data were collected from February 22, 2013 to April 5, 2013. Behavior logs were tracked for the
duration of the study, six interview sessions took place from March 1st to April 5th, self-reporting
for sixth grade students took place on February 22nd and April 5th, and SEN surveys were
distributed three times, March 1st, March 15th and March 29th.
Figure A. -On-Task Behavior Chart
The chart below was used to record on-task behavior with and without an IWB on all
participants.
With IWB
Days of the Week
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Number __ +/-
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Totals
Average
Without IWB
Student Number____
Time______
Date________
When I use scissors to cut out story pictures then glue stick to glue them in a square, I feel.
When I use the white board and pen to move story pictures to a square, I feel..
I can see the bigger words, story characters, story settings, when I look at
When I watch stories on the white board and see the big words and pictures, I
2- some details
3 very detailed
2- some details
3 very detailed
1 little detail
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
Do you think the IWB will change the way you think
about reading? How?
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
2- some details
3 very detailed
2- some details
3 very detailed
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
When you look at the picture: Do you remember the day off the week?
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
2- some details
3 very detailed
1 little detail
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
1 little detail
2- some details
3 very detailed
Student Number:____ Time:_____ Date:_________
Results
Findings
Research showed that IWBs positively impact students attending behaviors and organizational
strategies, as displayed in Pre-and Post-Sixth Grade Modified KWL Chart, SEN K-2 Intrinsic and
Extrinsic Survey chart, on-task behavior chart and photo questions survey chart, found in the
appendices.
Figure F - Pre and Post -Sixth Grade Modified KWL Intrinsic and Extrinsic Findings
1
1.75
2
2.5
Post
2.25
2.66
The Pre and Post KWL Interview data were utilized to determine IWBs impact on students
personal and academic (intrinsic and extrinsic) organizational strategies. These data illustrated a
positive correlation between students intrinsic and extrinsic organizational strategies with the
use of IWBs in reading programs.
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
2
1
3.25
2
3
3
3.5
1.5
1.5
Elementary students intrinsic scores significantly improved with the utilization of IWBs in their
reading programs. These data can signify that the students are personally invested in their
academic tasks.
0.5
0
1
Week Number
Group A NWB
1
0.56
2
0.63
3
0.59
4
0.65
5
0.71
6
0.74
Group A WB
0.62
0.67
0.73
0.77
0.75
0.81
Time on Task:
Group B
without IWB
0.4
0.33
0.55
0.65
0.7
0.5
Time on Task:
Group B with
IWB
0.75
0.7
0.7
0.85
0.9
0.7
3
2.5
3,2,1 Averaged Rubric
Scores
2
1.5
1
0.5
Group A
0
1
Group B
Week Number
V.
Group A
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2.5
6
3
Group B
2.25
2.5
2.25
2.75
2.75
2.5
Reference Page
Honorary Mention
The following are articles that supported and gave perspective to the Evaluation Study.
Carnahan, C., Williamson, P., Hollingshead, A., & Israel, M. (2012). Using technology to support
balanced literacy for students with significant disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children,
45(1), 20-29
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., & Keay-Bright, W. (2011). Designing technology for children with special
needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign, 7(1), 1-28. doi:
10.1080/15710882.2011.587013
McKenna, M., Labbo, L. & Reinking, D. (2003) Effective use of technology in literacy Instruction, in: L.
Morrow, L. Gambrell & M. Pressley (eds), Best Practices in Literacy Education, 2nd edn. (New
York, The Guilford Press).
Solvie, P. (2007). Leaping out of our skins: postmodern considerations in use of an electronic
whiteboard to foster critical engagement in early literacy lessons. Educational Philosophy and
Theory, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00312.x