Madison Gunning August 27, 2014 The concept of social entrepreneurship is complex in that it has many levels that distinguish itself from conventional entrepreneurship. The root of entrepreneurship is grounded in innovation and revolution, as a means to take what we have and improve upon it or come up with completely new ideas. What makes social entrepreneurship different is that those ideas must hold a social value and make a positive and sustainable impact on society. The ideas that a social entrepreneur comes up with are expected to meet a certain challenge and offer a valuable solution that can be implemented into society. Oftentimes, a concept or product can be viewed as the perfect solution to the specific problem that the entrepreneur is trying to tackle, but it wont always work out as expected. In order for the concept/product to be worthwhile it not only has to be designed effectively, but also implemented effectively as well. The entrepreneur must be knowledgeable about who are what they are planning to serve, as well as their target consumer (if this is different than the people served). Ultimately, the social entrepreneur needs to generate social value that people want to be a part of, whether that be on the contributing or receiving end. By recognizing these components that differ from enterprises strictly wishing to garner monetary value, the social entrepreneur is committing oneself to taking risks. To create a business for good, one must look beyond their self, and potentially even their own skill set, to solve a problem in and inventive way. The title of social entrepreneur can easily be given to Albina Ruiz. The creation of her project, Ciudad Saludable, is a perfect example of how a business model can benefit the entire community and significantly improve living standards. By developing her waste collection system in Peru, she was not only able to collect the garbage that was flooding the rivers and streets, but also helped to reduce disease, provide jobs internally, and make room for more people to begin running their own businesses. Ruiz, and the country of Peru, have a success story on their hands. If Ciudad Saludable had not been implemented, the country would be facing disaster. Without the infrastructure needed to treat the trash correctly, the mess was piling up and people were even less likely to pay for collection. If Ruiz had not become involved the towns that these Peruvian people live in would be giant trash heaps, and essentially driven away from their homes, given they had not already died from such a significant health hazard. The cost of doing nothing is much greater than the commitment to thinking analytically and solving the problem.