Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Improvement Plan
2013 - 2014
NEEDVILLE INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Improvement Plan
2013-2014
VISION
To become an exemplary school district in which every child
achieves to his or her maximum ability through rigorous,
engaging curriculum and systems of support that cultivate
the potential and promote the well-being of every
individual child.
MISSION
Needville ISD strives to create an environment where
students reach their full potential and become productive,
successful citizens.
Needville Elementary
Amanda Polak
Peggy Mund
Elected Membership
Needville Middle
Needville Junior High
Jan Ley
Rebecca Kohleffel
Lisa Dibala
Cameron Raska
Needville High
Betha Lubojacky
Jimmie Amox
Marc Hackstedt
1 Middle School
436 students
1 High School
807 students
Total
4 Schools
2,776 students
Student Ethnicity (Percentages represent ethnicity of the diverse NISD student body)
Hispanic
White
Asian
African American
American Indian
Two or more Races
42.7%
51.1%
0.5%
4.0%
0.3%
1.4%
Faculty & Staff (Based on full time equivalents)
Teachers
188.3
Campus Administrative
9.0
Educational Aides
47.0
Professional Support
Central Administrative
Auxiliary Staff
Hispanic
Other
5.6%
0.0%
Masters
No Degree
36.0%
23.9%
0.0%
13.9
3.3
60.7
15.5%
0.0%
26.5%
13.6%
Vision
To become an exemplary school district in which every child achieves to his or her
maximum ability through rigorous, engaging curriculum and systems of support
that cultivate the potential and promote the well-being of every
individual child.
Standards of Belief
High Expectations for Everyone
Teaching and Learning for Everyone
Respect for Everyone
Objective 1: Needville ISD will increase staff, community, and parent communication and
participation to meet the needs of students, parents, and staff in an open,
honest, and timely manner.
District Goal 3:
District Goal 4:
The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the
reading and writing of the English language.
GOAL 2:
The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the
understanding of mathematics.
GOAL 3:
The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the
understanding of science.
GOAL 4:
The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the
understanding of social studies.
Reading/
Language Arts
Math
Science
Social
Studies
98%
95%
98%
99%
African American
100%
86%
86%
100%
Hispanic
97%
92%
97%
100%
White
99%
98%
99%
99%
Economically Disadvantaged
97%
87%
95%
100%
78%
78%
89%
100%
Special Education
83%
67%
83%
92%
Student Group
Exemplary
Recognized
Acceptable
Un-acceptable
Note: This AEIS indicator is one year behind the AEIS report year.
Note: This AEIS indicator is one year behind the AEIS report year.
This percent of student attendance was calculated for the entire year
(2011-12) for grades 1-12. For acknowledgement on 2011-12
Attendance Rates, a school district must reach at least 96.0%.
97.5
The dropout rate is the number of dropouts summed across grades 9,10,11 and 12
divided by the number of students summed across grades 9, 10, 11 and 12, for
2011-12. A district annual dropout rate of 1.8 % or less is considered
Exemplary.
2.6
97.1
2.4
2.5
97
96.5
96
95.9
1.5
96
95.5
0.5
0.1
95
NISD
Region IV
State
NISD
Region IV
State
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-13
Enrollment
Attendance
Enrollment
Attendance
Needville ISD
2589
96.7
2586
96.9
2641
97.0
2778
96.8
795
96.3
790
95.3
773
96.5
793
96.4
346
96.3
352
97.0
374
97.1
464
96.9
367
96.9
422
97.4
453
97.4
445
97.1
1080
97.1
1022
97.0
1041
97.3
1076
96.9
Assessment Data
STAAR Scores 2013 Compared to State Scores
Reading
Math
Writing
Social Studies
Science
Grade Level
District
State
District
State
District
State
District
State
District
State
76
81
63
70
83
72
77
69
82
70
84
77
85
74
82
73
84
72
81
74
89
78
88
72
88
71
87
83
85
76
70
64
86
75
Needville ISD beat the state averages in every area tested except third grade reading and math.
State
District
White
Hispanic
African
American
LEP
Special Ed.
ECO
Disadvantaged
Algebra I
78%
79%
85%
73%
58%
46%
65%
Geometry
85%
89%
91%
73%
58%
65%
79%
Biology
84%
86%
92%
79%
79%
55%
79%
English I Reading
69%
73%
82%
64%
63%
44%
66%
English I Writing
55%
61%
70%
50%
56%
26%
50%
World Geography
75%
82%
89%
77%
63%
75%
62%
76%
ELA Reading II
79%
79%
84%
76%
33%
69%
ELA Writing II
55%
58%
66%
49%
26%
50%
Algebra II
97%
95%
98%
87%
85%
Chemistry
84%
85%
90%
77%
53%
75%
World History
71%
69%
76%
62%
32%
51%
100
95 97
95
89
90
86
85
81
80
78
79
81
86
84
85 84
82
76
79 79
75
73
69 71
69
70
67
61
60
58
55
55
50
40
40
40
38
37
29
30
20
10
0
Algebra I
Geometry
Biology
State 2012
English I
Reading
English I
Writing
World
Geography
District 2012
State 2013
2012-2013
ELA
Reading II
District 2013
ELA I
Writing
Algebra II
Chemistry
World
History
90
85
80
83
81
78
77
76 76
77
72
70
69 68
70
79
68
77
75
69
71
84
84
84
82
77
82
77
74
70
73
73
63
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Grade 3 Reading
78
Grade 3 Math
69
Grade 4 Reading
85
Grade 4 Math
79
Grade 4 Writing
75
Grade 5 Reading
89
Grade 5 Math
92
Grade 5 Science
84
2012 State
76
68
77
68
71
77
77
73
2013 District
76
63
83
77
82
84
84
82
2013 State
81
70
72
69
70
77
74
73
2012 District
2012 District
2012 State
2013 District
2013 State
91
90
89
84
91
88
88
88
87
84
80
77
75
72
74
85
83
81
78
76
80
79
76
76
71
70
86
85
72
76
75
71
71
70
66
70
64
59
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
90
Grade 7
Reading
84
79
Grade 7
Writing
76
91
Grade 8
Social Studies
66
State 2012
75
77
76
71
71
80
76
59
70
District 2013
84
81
89
88
88
87
85
70
86
State 2013
72
74
78
72
71
83
76
64
75
District 2012
Grade 6
Reading
91
Grade 6 Math
District 2012
Grade 7 Math
State 2012
Grade 8
Reading
88
District 2013
Grade 8 Math
State 2013
Grade 8
Science
85
99
98
98
98
98
99
98
98
97
96
95
95
94
93
92
2012
Gr. 11 ELA
98
Gr. 11 Math
98
Gr. 11 Science
98
2013
98
95
98
99
2012
2013
Grade level performance was at exemplary level in all areas, except Grade 10 Math and Science.
15
17
15
17
17
15
15
14
11
7
9
6
5
4
Reading
17
Math
15
Writing
7
State 2012
15
14
District 2013
17
17
State 2013
17
15
District 2012
10
8
5
0
10
10
District 2012
State 2012
Science
11
Social Studies
8
10
10
District 2013
State 2013
Subject
English Language Arts (ELA)
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
NISD
Region
State
98
95
98
99
96
90
96
98
95
89
95
98
Completion Rate
NISD
Region
State
Class of 2012
% Graduated (4 years)
% Received GED
% Continued High School
% Dropped out (4 years)
93.4
0.0
4.8
1.8
86.7
0.8
5.3
7.2
87.7
1.0
5.0
6.3
Class of 2011
% Graduated
% Received GED
% Continued High School
% Dropped Out (4 years)
95.5
0.0
4.0
0.6
85.4
0.8
6.2
7.5
85.9
1.1
6.2
6.8
NISD graduation rate exceeds the State average. Most student groups show improvement.
State and locally, the percentage of students receiving GEDs continue to decrease.
NISD overall dropout rate was below the state level.
MAJOR FINDINGS
Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) scores remain steady while participation exceeds the State.
Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) scores over the past two years show that performance has decreased in scores for Needville ISD.
The District continues to outscore the State and Region each year.
1490
1371
1408
1422
1600
1461
District Performance
Mean SAT Scores
(Maximum Score 1600)
1043
1002
1029
1013
980
1029
1029
998
1017
993
981
1002
992
969
1000
1002
985
976
985
1200
987
1400
800
600
400
0
State
Region IV
Class of 2008
NISD
Class of 2009
African Am.
Class of 2010
0
0
200
Hispanic
Class of 2011
In the senior class of 2012, 65 of the 171 seniors took the SAT test.
High Expectations for Everyone
Teaching and Learning for Everyone
Respect for Everyone
White
Class of 2012
15
10
5
0
Region IV
Class of 2008
State
NISD
Class of 2009
African Am.
Class of 2010
Hispanic
Class of 2011
In the senior class of 2012, 53 of the 171 seniors took the ACT test.
High Expectations for Everyone
Teaching and Learning for Everyone
Respect for Everyone
White
Class of 2012
21.9
21.6
22.7
21.1
21.2
19.2
19
22.1
20
19.3
21.3
22
21.3
21.5
21.1
20.9
20.5
21
20.5
21.2
21.2
21
21.1
20.5
21.2
25
20.5
District
2013
2013
2012
2011
2010
Reading
Math
Writing
Composite
474
499
461
1437
484
527
409
1480
489
507
465
1461
503
527
481
1511
493
505
474
1472
N/A
65
67
70
70
ACT Scores
State
District
2013
2013
2012
2011
2010
English
Math
Reading
Science
Composite
19.8
21.5
21.0
20.9
20.9
21.7
23.2
22.8
22.6
22.7
20.0
21.8
21.9
21.2
21.3
21.3
22.4
22.0
21.6
22.0
20.7
20.8
20.8
21.5
21.1
N/A
53
53
68
73
Needs Assessment
To be exemplary, all student groups and subject areas must be at or above 90%. The following charts indicate which grade levels, subjects, and
student groups need to be targeted by the District to meet the recognized standard. Shown below are State Accountability Groups for Grade
11.
African
American
Hispanic
White
100
97
99
Special Ed.
83
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
97
78
Mathematics
Grade
Level
Grade 11
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco. Disadv.
ELL
86
92
98
67
87
78
Exemplary Recognized
Acceptable
Un-acceptable
Needs Assessment
Science
Grade
Level
Grade 11
African
American
Hispanic
White
86
97
99
Special Ed.
83
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
95
89
Social Studies
Grade
Level
Grade 11
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco. Disadv.
ELL
100
100
99
92
100
100
Exemplary Recognized
Acceptable
Un-acceptable
Needs Assessment
To be exemplary, all student groups and subject areas must be at or above 90%. The following charts indicate which grade levels, subjects, and
student groups need to be targeted by the District to meet the recognized standard. Shown below are State Accountability Groups for Grade
11.
ELA
Math
Science
Social Studies
95
89
95
99
African American
100
86
86
100
Hispanic
97
92
97
100
White
99
98
99
99
Special Education
83
67
83
92
Eco. Disadvantaged
97
87
95
92
ELL
78
78
89
Exemplary Recognized
Acceptable
Un-acceptable
Needs Assessment
The following charts indicate which grade levels, subjects, and student groups need to be targeted by the District. Shown below are State
Accountability Groups for Grades tested.
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
ELA Reading I
ELA Reading II
Grade 11 TAKS
76
83
84
84
89
87
73
79
98
*
80
86
89
78
80
63
*
*
71
75
75
78
84
88
64
76
97
87
89
93
90
93
87
82
84
99
48
56
70
36
42
39
66
69
83
68
78
75
75
86
82
66
68
97
*
59
65
45
*
57
*
*
78
Writing
Grade Level
Grade 4
Grade 7
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
82
88
60
67
76
81
88
93
40
50
74
79
59
83
Needs Assessment
Mathematics
Grade Level
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
Grade 3
63
62
68
57
57
Grade 4
77
74
82
31
67
56
Grade 5
85
71
76
94
75
81
70
Grade 6
81
67
80
84
43
72
64
Grade 7
88
89
82
91
35
65
45
Grade 8
85
40
85
89
44
80
43
Algebra I
79
58
73
85
46
65
Geometry
89
56
89
91
65
79
Algebra II
95
87
98
85
Needs Assessment
Science
Grade Level
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
Grade 5
82
71
72
93
59
68
67
Grade 8
86
81
92
56
78
50
Biology
86
79
79
92
55
79
Chemistry
85
80
77
90
53
75
Social Studies
Grade Level
All
Students
70
African
American
*
Grade 8
Hispanic
White
Special Ed.
Eco.
Disdavantaged
ELL
65
75
33
56
World Geography
82
63
77
89
62
76
75
World History
69
62
76
32
51
Needs Assessment
The following charts indicate which grade levels, subjects, and student groups need to be targeted by the District. Shown below are State
Accountability Groups.
All Tests
Reading
Math
Writing
Science
Social Studies
District
83
85
84
73
87
79
African American
62
67
58
53
71
56
Hispanic
78
80
82
64
81
76
White
88
90
88
80
93
84
Special Education
53
54
58
32
60
51
Eco. Disadvantaged
74
78
76
62
79
71
ELL
62
60
66
53
64
61
Goal 1:
Objective 1: Highly qualified staff; All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers who are assisted by
highly qualified paraprofessionals according to NCLB
Activity
Strategy
1.
Conduct recruitment
activities to ensure
highly qualified
personnel in all
positions. Job fairs,
postings in multiple
sites/ organizations
and maintain active
website
Person(s)
Responsible
Assistant Superintendent
Human Resources
Campus Principals
Timeline
August-May
Resources
Title II A
$5878
Local
Title III
$1000
No Child Left Behind Act
Texas Education Agency
Region IV ESC
Bilingual Allotment
Number of positions
posted
Number of applications
Mentor assignments
Mentor conference logs
Mentor journals
2. Establish an effective
teacher mentoring
system in order to
retain highly qualified
staff
Personnel Files
Teacher interviews
NCLB Highly Qualified
Teacher Report
Formative
Evaluation
Campus Attestations
AEIS
Performance Measures
1. 100% of core teachers will be highly qualified by the end of the school year.
2. 100% of instructional paraprofessionals will be highly qualified.
3. 100% of new hires will meet highly qualified status prior to employment.
4. NCLB 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 IndicatorsThe percentage of classes being taught by highly qualified, the percentage of teachers receiving high-quality
professional development and the percentage of instructional paraprofessionals who are highly qualified will be 100%.
High Expectations for Everyone
Teaching and Learning for Everyone
Respect for Everyone
Goal 1:
Objective 1: Highly qualified staff; All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers who are assisted by
highly qualified paraprofessionals according to NCLB.
Activity
Strategy
5. Assist teachers in maintaining
or attaining certification through
alternative programs
6.
Person(s)
Responsible
Assistant Superintendent
Human Resources
Principal
Timeline
August-July
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
Title II
$5878
Local
Title III
$1000
No Child Left Behind Act
Texas Education Agency
Professional Development
records
Applications
Number Hired
Personnel Files
Certification
Transcripts
Goal 1:
Objective 2: Ensure all Needville ISD special programs are in compliance with program effectiveness
indicators and ensure compliance and program effectiveness by providing staff development
to all NISD staff.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
1.
2.
3.
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
Needs Assessment
Program Evaluation
Self-Assessment
Sign-in Sheets
2013 State Assessment
2013 State Assessment
and self-assessment
Campus Records
4.
5.
Increase understanding of
legalities and TEA mandates
associated with special education
Implement a comprehensive
plan to ensure adequate data
collection and progress tracking
in all phases of general
education, early intervention and
pre-referrals
Campus Principals
Core Team
Completed Plans
Campus Data
PBMAS Report
Goal 1:
Objective 2: Ensure all Needville ISD special programs are in compliance with program effectiveness
indicators and ensure compliance and program effectiveness by providing staff
development to all NISD staff.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Director of Special
Education
Asst Superintendent
Campus Principals
Campus Principals
Teachers
Diagnostician
Campus Principals
Campus Principals
Core team
Campus Committees
Number of Referrals
Exit Numbers
Intervention Documentation
State Assessments
Benchmark Assessments
Lesson Plans
Progress Reports
Report Cards
Course Enrollment
AEIS
Formative
Evaluation
6. Implement a comprehensive
plan to ensure 100%
compliance of special
education folders
August-June
End of each six weeks
Resources
Goal 1:
Objective 2:
Ensure all Needville ISD special programs are in compliance with program effectiveness
indicators and ensure compliance and program effectiveness by providing staff
development to all NISD staff.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Parent Liaison
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Coordinator of Technology
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Special Education
ESL
Title III
$27,982
State GT
Formative
Evaluation
State Assessment
TELPAS
AMAOS
IEP Records
ARDS
Lesson Plans,
Curriculum
Observations
Completion Rate
Goal 1:
Objective 2: Ensure all Needville ISD special programs are in compliance with program effectiveness
indicators and ensure compliance and program effectiveness by providing staff
development to all NISD staff.
Activity
Person(s)
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Strategy
Responsible
Evaluation
18. Provide Special
Education classrooms
with appropriate
assistive technologies
designed to provide
increased access to
general curriculum
Coordinator of Technology
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Teachers
Special Ed Staff
Campus Principals
Special Ed Director
Diagnosticians
Campus Principals
Teachers
Ongoing
CMC
Special Ed
Goal 1:
Objective 3: State Assessments, TELPAS, TPRI, and achievement scores for all students and
special populations will improve yearly with a goal of 90% passing in each demographic group,
content area, and overall.
Activity
Strategy
1.
Continue Response to
Intervention (RTI) to identify,
serve, and monitor special
population groups
4.
Person(s)
Responsible
Assistant Superintendent
District Assessment
Coordinator
Counselors
Campus Principals
Coaches
Teachers
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Title I, Part A
$1,200
SCE
$1,152,682
Local
Campus
Texas Education Agency
Region IV ESC
Formative
Evaluation
Report Cards
Benchmark Tests
Title Budget
Decline in Referrals
Reduction of Special
Population Referrals
Goal 1:
Objective 3: State Assessments, TELPAS, TPRI, and achievement scores for all students and special
populations will improve yearly with a goal of 90% passing in each demographic group,
content area, and overall.
Activity
Person(s)
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Strategy
Responsible
Evaluation
6. Continue Math programs to work with teachers in
their classrooms as well as at-risk math students
in grades PK-8 and teachers grades 5-8
Campus Principals
Math Teachers
August-June
Campus Principals
Reading Teachers
Campus Principals
RTI Teams
Classroom Teachers
Specialists
Title I A
$253,439
Local
Region IV
Title III
$27,982
Goal 1:
Objective 4: Through the teaching of the TEKS, all students will perform at/or above the state standards
on the state tests in math, reading/writing/ELA, science, and social studies.
Activity Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Principal
Teachers
August-June
Asst. Supt.
Principals
Asst. Principals
Teachers
Campus Principals
Teachers
Fall/Winter
Administration
August-June
Principals
Asst. Principals
August-June
Teachers
August-June
Campus Principals
Teachers
August-June
May-September
Resources
Local
Title I
$9381
SCE
Region IV ESC
No Child Left Behind
Act
Texas Education
Agency
Thinking Maps
DMAC
Texas Academic
Performance Report
Formative
Evaluation
State Assements
Benchmark Results
Teacher Feedback
Lesson Plans
PBMAS
Principal Walk -throughs
Report Cards
STAAR
TPRI
Accountability Reports
Journal Writing
Six Weeks Test
Diagnostic Test
Summative Exams
Texas Academic
Performance Report
Goal 1:
Objective 4: Through the teaching of the TEKS, all students will perform at/or above the state standards
on the state tests in math, reading/writing/ELA, science, and social studies.
Activity Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Principal
Teachers
September,
January, and April
Campus Principals
Monthly
Campus Principal
August - July
Resources
Local
Title I
$9381
SCE
Region IV ESC
No Child Left Behind
Act
Texas Education
Agency
Thinking Maps
DMAC
Texas Academic
Performance Report
Formative
Evaluation
State Assements
Benchmark Results
Teacher Feedback
Lesson Plans
PBMAS
Principal Walk -throughs
Report Cards
STAAR
TPRI
Accountability Reports
Journal Writing
Six Weeks Test
Diagnostic Test
Summative Exams
Texas Academic
Performance Report
Goal 1:
Objective 5: Meet or exceed the annual student attendance rate threshold of 97.0% each year.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Campus Administrators
Teachers
August-June
Campus Principals
CARC Membership
Daily as Needed
3. Monitor attendance, by
campus, each six weeks
and report to school
board.
Superintendent
Assistant Superintendent
Campus Principal
District PEIMS Clerk
District PEIMS Coordinator
Teachers
Sept.-June
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
CARC Committee
PTA
Community/Corporate Sponsors
Awards Assemblies
PEIMS Clerk
PEIMS Coordinator
Justice of the Peace
NISD Police Officer
ADA
CARC Handbook
TxEIS
Texas Academic Performance Report
Goal 1:
Objective 6: Maintain exemplary drop-out rate which is less than or equal to 1% in all student groups.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Campus Administrators
Teachers
Counselors
Campus Administrators
Teachers
Counselors
Campus Administrators
Counselors
Teachers
Campus Principals
Sponsors
Coaches
Timeline
August-July
Resources
Counselors
Teachers
E2020
Credit Recovery Program
PALS
Mentor Program
Counselors
Discipline Records
Attendance Records
Grade Reports
Title I, Part A
$1,200
High School Allotment
SCE
$1,152,682
Formative
Evaluation
PEIMS
Attain 0% Dropout Rate
State Assessment Scores
AEIS Data
Six Weeks Monitoring
Semester Tracking
PEIMS
Attendance Reports
Discipline Reports
AEIS Reports
Number of Graduates
Number of Retentions
Grade Reports
Local
SCE
Kuder Program
Local
Increased Participation
Dropout Rate Decreases
Goal 1:
Objective 6: Maintain exemplary drop-out rate which is less than or equal to 1% in all student groups.
Activity
Person(s)
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Strategy
Responsible
Evaluation
5. High school students not
passing portions of state
assessment exam will be
assigned to specific
classes.
6. Develop personal
graduation plans for
students in grades 7-12 to
create rich planning,
monitoring, and
intervention strategies.
7. Implement training on
career clusters to create
awareness of existing
pathways to the world of
work.
Principal
Counselors
CATE Teachers
8. Implement a comprehensive
school based college enrollment process for all students
including the completion of a
college application, FAFSA,
and a college essay through
English classes.
Principal
Counselors
Teachers
Local
AEIS Data
Course Selections
Agendas
Sign-in sheets
Personal graduation plan
Kuder
August-July
August-July
CATE
Region IV
Texas Education Agency
September-November
Local
Goal 1:
Objective 7: Increase performance on all other assessments (AP, PSAT, SAT, and ACT) scores by 5%.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Campus Principals
Counselors
Timeline
August-July
Resources
Local
SCE
ACT/SAT Prep courses
State Assessment
classes
Formative
Evaluation
GPA, Distinguished Plans
ACT/SAT Scores
Student Participation
College Enrollment
AEIS Report
Increase number of students
mastering all objectives on tests
SCE Evaluation
Goal 1:
Objective 8: All students will graduate from high school on time, college and career ready.
Activity
Person(s)
Timeline
Resources
Strategy
Responsible
1. Facilitate Generation Texas week to
support a variety of college and
career readiness initiatives.
2. Expand the accessibility to technology
for all students to enhance computer
literacy skills for the 21st century and
reflected in college and career readiness
standards.
Assistant Superintendent
District Technology Team
Counselors
Principals
CTE Teachers
August - June
Instructional materials
allotment $385,012
Local funds
Region IV ESC
Texas Education Agency
Kuder
Counselor
CTE Funds
Title II - $500
CTE Curriculum
Formative
Evaluation
State Assessments
PBMAS
PEIMS Graduation Report
Personal Graduation Plans
End of Year Report Cards
Course Catalog
College Applications
Student Schedules
Pre-AP and AP Class Rosters
Number of Students Passing
Certification Test per Program
Scholarships Received
Goal 2:
Objective 1: Needville ISD will increase staff, community, and parent communication and participation to
meet the needs of students, parents, and staff in an open, honest, and timely manner.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
District Administration
Campus Principals
Teachers
Timeline
August-June
Asst. Superintendent
Coordinator of
Technology
Principals
Webmaster
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
Title I
$1,000
Local
Newsletters
Website
Local Newspaper
Texas Education Agency
SBDM Committees
NISD Legal/Local policy
Surveys
Sign-in sheets
Agendas
Technology Allotment
Local
Positive Press
Community Support
Goal 2:
Objective 1: Needville ISD will increase staff, community, and parent communication and participation
to meet the needs of students, parents, and staff in an open, honest, and timely manner.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Campus Administrators
Human Resource Director
Campus Administrators
Teachers
Log Participation
Parent-Teacher Conference
Forms
5. Communication by newsletters,
flyers, emails, phone calls, web
pages, and report card messages
will be encouraged
Campus Administrators
Teachers
Feedback
Superintendent
Campus Principals
Surveys
Feedback
Membership
Administrators
Feedback
Staff
Participation logs
Local
Community and Parent
Volunteers
Formative
Evaluation
Feedback
Website Visitors
Goal 2:
Objective 1: Needville ISD will increase staff, community, and parent communication and participation to
meet the needs of students, parents, and staff in an open, honest, and timely manner.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Staff
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
Staff
Feedback
Technology
Director
Technology Budget
Availability
Staff
Campus Principals
Staff
Principals
Hispanic Parent
Feedback
Counselors
Local
Sign in Sheets
Campus
Administrators
Teachers
CATE
$1,812,132
District Surveys
Parent-Teacher
Conferences
Goal 3:
Needville ISD will provide opportunities to enhance instruction through more effective
staff development.
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
1.
Special Education
Local
Region IV ESC
Texas Education Agency
DMAC
Title II A
$5878
PBMAS
Campus Plans
Program Evaluation
Texas Academic
Performance Standards
State Assessment results
System Safeguard
Report
AMAO
Goal 3:
Needville ISD will provide opportunities to enhance instruction through more effective
staff development.
Objective 2: Needville ISD will improve the skills, knowledge, and abilities of employees so that all
employees have a better understanding of what the district is striving to accomplish, have
current knowledge of new technologies and best practices, and are able to find meaningful
ways to better contribute to student success.
Activity
Strategy
1.
Person(s)
Responsible
Superintendent
Assistant Superintendent
Campus Principals
Human Resources
Timeline
August-July
Resources
Title II A
$5878
Local funds
DMAC Data
Region IV
TEA
TCEA Conference
Formative
Evaluation
Staff Development Records
Sign-In Sheets
Individual Program Evaluations
PDAS Summatives
PEIMS discipline report
PBMAS
Certificates of attendance
STAR chart data
90% of all teachers attaining Level
III Advanced Tech on the Texas
School Technology and Readiness
(STAR) chart
Goal 3:
Needville ISD will provide opportunities to enhance instruction through more effective
staff development.
Objective 3: Strengthen the ability of teachers and administrators to improve learning opportunities
and achievement for all students.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Evaluation
Human Resources/
District Admin
Campus Principals
Campus Principals
District Administration
100% Completion
August-July
Campus Principals
Campus Principals
Special Education
Director
Local
Title II A
$5878
Special Education
Region IV ESC
Thinking Maps
ESL
DMAC
TEA
Lead 4ward
Campus Scheduling
Principal Retention
Teacher Retention
PBMAS
Agendas
Sign-in sheets
Goal 3:
Needville ISD will provide opportunities to enhance instruction through more effective
staff development.
Objective 3: Strengthen the ability of teachers and administrators to improve learning opportunities
and achievement for all students.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Campus Principals
Teachers
Campus Principals
Teachers
Curriculum Director
Campus Principals
Teachers
Curriculum Director
Timeline
August-July
Assistant Superintendent
Principals
Teachers
Resources
Region IV ESC
Local
Title II A
$5878
Thinking Maps
TEA
DMAC
Lead 4ward
Formative
Evaluation
Meeting Agendas
Data Forms
Test Scores
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
PDAS Observations
PDAS Annual and Summative
Appraisal
Sign in Sheets
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Resources
District Administration
Maintenance
Department
Director of Technology
Ongoing
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Business Manager
February
Meeting Agendas
Staffing Numbers
Business Manager
August-July
Software Reports
TEA Reports
Asst. Superintendent
Principal
February-April
Budget worksheets
Formative
Evaluation
Plan Document
Board Approval
Financial Expenditures
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Resources
Campus Principals
Maintenance Department
Monthly
Campus Principals
Maintenance Department
Monthly
Business Manager
October-November
Formative
Evaluation
Work order summatives
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Objective 2: Needville ISD will implement more uniform and consistent procedures, classroom
management plans, and discipline plans to produce a safe environment conducive to learning.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline
Assistant Superintendent
Campus Principals
District Police
Superintendent
Assistant Superintendent
Campus Principals
Office Referrals
PEIMS Reports
Campus Principals
Counselor
Teachers
Lesson Plans
Campus Plans
Local
Formative
Evaluation
August-July
Resources
Teachers/Staff
Campus Principals
Classroom Teachers
August - June
Local
PDAS
Staff Evaluations
Signed receipt of the
Student Code of
Conduct and Student
Handbooks
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Objective 2: Needville ISD will implement more uniform and consistent procedures, classroom management
plan, and discipline plan to produce a safe environment conducive to learning.
Person(s)
Timeline
Resources
Formative
Activity
Responsible
Evaluation
Asst. Principals
August -June
Local
Region IV ESC
Campus Agendas
Maintenance Director
Transportation Director
Cleaning Services
Local
Documentation
Campus Principals
Asst. Principals
Local
Needville Volunteer Fire
Department
Feedback
Following Practice Drills
Campus Principals
Counselors
Feedback
Surveys
Reduced Incidents
Superintendent
Campus Principals
Asst. Principals
Asst. Superintendent
Nurse
Texas State
University
Sign-in sheets
Evaluation
January
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Objective 3: NISD will implement programs in health and wellness for students, faculty, and staff including
nutrition and physical education.
Activity
Strategy
1.
Person(s)
Responsible
Nurses
Asst. Superintendent
Campus Principals
Campus Principals
Counselors
Teachers
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Local
Community
Formative
Evaluation
Sign in Sheets
Minutes from Meetings
Meet and exceed state guidelines for
SHAC council
Sign-In Sheets
Monthly Absence From Duty
Reports
Attendance Awards
PEIMS
Monthly Attendance Records
Attendance Awards
Reports to School Board
Goal 4:
Needville ISD will provide a safe school environment conducive to student achievement.
Objective 3: NISD will implement programs in health and wellness for students, faculty, and staff
including nutrition and physical education.
Activity
Strategy
Person(s)
Responsible
Campus Nurses
Physical Education
Teachers
Campus Principals
Teachers
Assistant
Superintendent
Campus Nurses
Timeline
August-June
Resources
Health Charts
Fitness Gram Results
Local
November
Formative
Evaluation
Local Budget
Campus Master Schedule
Lesson Plans
90% of all students will meet
state guidelines on fitness
gram
Program
Purpose
Entitlement
Enhance and improve the regular education program to increase the academic
achievement and to reduce the dropout rate of identified students in at-risk
situations. Supplements Local Funds.
$1,152,682
Bilingual
Address the needs of students whose home language is one other than English.
$142,800
Special Education
$,487,002
$60,741
Develop more fully the academic and occupational skills of all segments of the
student populations, ultimately assisting to make the U.S. more competitive.
$17,562
$1,812,132
Title I, Part A
$263,215
$71,609
Title III
To help insure that limited English proficient children and immigrant children
attain English language proficiency and meet the same standards that all
children are expected to meet.
$29,374
The purpose is to improve high school graduation and college readiness rates.
$198,172
$385,012