Portfolio Rubric

Unsatisfactory 0%

Limited 80%

Proficient 90%

Exemplary 100%

Rating

Criteria
Selection of
Artifacts
Weight for this
criterion:
20% of total score

The artifacts and work

samples do not relate to
the purpose of the
portfolio.

Some of the artifacts and

work samples are related to
the purpose of the portfolio.

Most artifacts and work

samples are related to the
purpose of the portfolio.

All artifacts and work samples

are clearly and directly related
to the purpose of the portfolio.
A wide variety of artifacts is
included.

Some of the artifacts are

accompanied by a caption
that clearly explains how
artifact/work sample (s)
demonstrates achievement
of the standard, growth over
time in achieving the
standard

Most of the artifacts are

accompanied by a caption
that clearly explains how
artifact/work sample (s)
demonstrates achievement
of the standard, growth over
time in achieving the
standard

All artifacts are accompanied

by a caption that clearly
explains how (s)/work sample
(s) demonstrates achievement
of the standard, growth over
time in achieving the standard

Artifacts do not
demonstrate achievement
of standard

Only a few artifacts

demonstrate achievement of
standard

Most of artifacts
demonstrate achievement of
standard

All artifacts demonstrate

achievement of standard

No artifacts/work samples
created by others are cited
with accurate, properly
formatted citations.

Some of the artifacts/work

samples created by others
are not cited with accurate,
properly formatted citations.

Most artifacts/work samples

elements created by others
are cited with accurate,
properly formatted citations.

All artifacts/work samples

follow copyright guidelines
with accurate citations. All
content throughout the
portfolio displays the
appropriate copyright
permissions.

100%

The portfolio is difficult to

read due to inappropriate
use of fonts, type size for
headings, sub-headings
and text and font styles
(italic, bold, underline).
Many formatting tools are
under or over-utilized and

The portfolio is often

difficult to read due to
inappropriate use of fonts
and type size for headings,
sub-headings and text or
inconsistent use of font
styles (italic, bold,
underline). Some formatting

The portfolio is generally

easy to read.

The portfolio is easy to read.

100%

Reflection/Critique No artifacts are

accompanied by a caption
Weight for this
that clearly explains how
criterion:
the artifact/work sample
35% of total score
(s) demonstrates
achievement of the
standard, growth over time
in achieving the standard

Citations (if
appropriate)
Weight for this
criterion:
5% of total score

Layout and
Readability
Weight for this
criterion:
5% of total score

Layout is reasonable in its

flow.

Layout is excellent and creative

in its flow.

100%

I did not see

a caption
explaining
the
assignment,
so add that
and youll be
golden.

I really love
the layout
Kristine! It is
very easy to
navigate and

decrease the readers'

accessibility to the
content.

tools are under or overutilized and decrease the

readers' accessibility to the
content.

has a logical
flow. Great
work!

Layout has awkward flow.

Some areas have awkward
flow.

Professional
Development Plan
30% of total score

Quality of Writing
and Proofreading
Weight for this
criterion:
5% of total score

Since one of
your
headings
says,
welcome I
was kind of
expecting a
couple of
sentences
welcoming
the viewer to
the page. I
know its not
required, but
just think
about it.

Color of background and

fonts, decreases the
readability of the text, is
distracting and used
inconsistently throughout
the portfolio.

Color of background and

fonts, decreases the
readability of the text, is
distracting and used
inconsistently in some
places throughout the
portfolio.

Color, background, font

styles, and type size for
headings, sub-headings and
text are generally used
consistently throughout the
portfolio.

Color, background, font styles

(italic, bold, underline) and
type size for headings, subheadings and text are used
consistently and enhance the
readability throughout the
portfolio.

Horizontal and vertical

white space alignment is
used inappropriately, and
the content appears
disorganized and cluttered.

Horizontal and vertical

white space alignment is
sometimes used
inappropriately to organize
content.

Horizontal and vertical

white space alignment is
generally used appropriately
to organize content.

Horizontal and vertical white

space alignment is used
appropriately to organize
content.

No professional
development plan is
included.

Professional development
plan does not appear to be
based on a through selfassessment; plan is
superficial or vague

Professional development
plan/ goals seem to be based
on self-assessment; 3 or
fewer goals are established.

Evidence of self-assessment.
Just finish
Plan/ goals are well thought out
writing your
and reasonable; there is a goal
goals, and
for each area of self-assessment
youre good.

There are numerous

grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. The
style of writing does not
facilitate effective
professional
communication and
requires major editing and
revision.

The writing includes include

some grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors that
distract the reader and
requires some editing and
revision.

The writing is largely free

of grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. The
style of writing generally
facilitates professional
communication and minor
editing is required.

The writing is free of

grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. The style
of writing facilitates
professional communication
and no editing is required.

100%
As always

TOTAL

N/A