Anne Desotelle EDUC 683 Practicum Rubric Student 1:

Areas:

50 Points

25 Points

10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:

All directions were followed including

parental permission, practicum plan,
evaluations and parental report with
graduate level grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence structure.
The following details were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

One piece of information was missing.

There were a few written mistakes.

More than one piece of information

was missing and/or practicum was not
written at an acceptable level of
grammar, punctuation, spelling and
sentence structure.
Less than 5 of the following details
were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
An incomplete assessment of student
was submitted.

Background Information on Student

1: 50/50
This was very well written!

Assessment of Student 1:
50/50:
Solid assessment. Charts and
anecdotal explanations were easy to
understand for professionals and
parents.

The following information was

included in pre and post tests:
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results
Assessment was written
with graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure.

Daily Lesson Plans Student 1:

50/50:
The use of mirrors, color coding and
kinesthetic activities to understand
word study was very effective. Solid
use of graphic organizers! You were
absolutely correct when you said
that graphic organizers slow students
down and help them THINK about
their reading!

Lesson plans were:

Well-prepared
Focused on word study,
fluency and comprehension
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
The following pieces of information
were included:
Cover page
Background information on
student
Reason for referral
Case history
Family history
School history
Student attitude
Summary of assessment results
Areas of reading difficulty
Diagnostic teaching plan
Attendance/session summary
Narrative and expository text
Parent component
Results
Reflections
A through case study was written with
clear tables and/or graphs.
Graduate level grammar, punctuation
spelling and sentence structure were
used.

Case Study Student 1:

50/50
This was an exemplar case study and
reflected your mastery of literacy
evaluation and focused instruction.

Quality of Case Study:

50/50: Exemplar!

5 of the following details were

submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
The following information lacked one
or two of the listed ideas.
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results
Assessment was written
with a few graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure errors.
Lesson plans missed one or two pieces
of the following information:
Focused on 3 main ideas
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms

Incomplete lesson plans were

submitted.

One or two pieces of information were

missing.

More than two pieces of information

were missing.

Case study was well written with one

or two confusing parts. Clear tables
and/or graphs were presented.
Graduate level writing contained a few
errors.

Case study was not well written at a

graduate level.

Total Points: 300

This course has a rigorous schedule.

Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.

Rubric Student 2:
Areas:

50 Points

25 Points

10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:
50/50

All directions were followed

including parental permission,
practicum plan, evaluations and
parental report with graduate level
grammar, punctuation, spelling and
sentence structure.
The following details were
submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

One piece of information was

missing. There were a few written
mistakes.

More than one piece of information

was missing and/or practicum was
not written at an acceptable level
of grammar, punctuation, spelling
and sentence structure.

5 of the following details were

submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

Less than 5 of the following details

were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

Assessment of Student 2:
50/50:
Thorough and complete
assessment!

The following information was

included in pre and post tests:
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results.
Assessment was written
with graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure.

The following information lacked

one or two of the listed ideas.
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results.
Assessment was written
with a few graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure errors.

An incomplete assessment of
student was submitted.

Daily Lesson Plans Student 2:

50/50:

Lesson plans were:

Well-prepared
Focused on word study,
fluency and comprehension
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
A thorough parent report was
prepared with the following
information:
Student Name
Age
School
Author of Report
Supervisor
Date of parent conference
Background of student
Test results
Analysis
Recommendations
Graduate level writing. (See
above.)

Lesson plans missed one or two

pieces of the following information:
Focused on 3 main ideas
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms

Incomplete lesson plans were

submitted.

A report was prepared with 1-2

missing pieces of information.
Writing contained a few errors.

A thorough report was not prepared.

Graduate level writing was not
exhibited.

Background Information on
Student 2:
50/50

I loved the use of colored gel pens to

annotate! Word study through WTW
and the use of graphic organizers
along with auditory taping of reading
to listen for fluency created fantastic
intervention plans!

Conference/Parent Report Student

2:
50/50: This was easy to
understand at a professional level
as well as for parents. Nicely
targeted discussion!

Total points: 250

This course has a rigorous schedule.

Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.

Summary/Reflection: This is a separate assignment. Please include this document aligned to INTASC standards and it will be complete for your
portfolio submission.
Area:

50 Points

25 Points

10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:

A reflection of the practicum

experience was written including
the following ideas:
Professional growth
Growth of students
Teaching plans and their
effectiveness
Adjusting plans in the future
Application to your current job
Graduate level writing

One piece of information was

missing. One or two written errors
were made.

More than one piece of information

was missing. Graduate level writing
was not exhibited.

50/50
Reflection demonstrated a strong
ability to modify interventions as
student needs emerge.

Total points: 50
Anne,
Your evaluation, intervention sessions and quality of coursework were exemplar! You are truly a strong literacy interventionist and I would encourage you
to move toward your Reading Specialist degree. It was fabulous working with you! Best wishes to you.
Course Grade: A
Theresa Stanley, MAED
Theresa Stanley, MAED
Reading Specialist
Viterbo University

This course has a rigorous schedule.

Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.