Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title/Focus
Place Value
Date
Dec. 3rd/14
Subject/Grade
Level
Math 2
Time
Duration
75 min
Unit
Number Concepts
Teacher
Ms. Getschel
Specific
Learning
Outcomes:
Main Outcomes
I can illustrate with manipulatives and pictures place value to 60.
Daily Outcome(s)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will:
1.
ASSESSMENTS
Observations:
Key Questions:
Products/Performances:
Smart table
9-sided dice
Math journals
Red math binders
Number of the Day worksheet
PowerPoint file
Unifix & ten cubes.
PROCEDURE
Prior to lesson
Time
Attention Grabber
Advance
Organizer/Agenda
Transition to Body
Assessment of Prior
Knowledge
Body
Learning Activity #1
Calendar
Assessments/ Differentiation:
Learning Activity #2
Learning Activity #3
10 min
Mini-lesson
Assessments/ Differentiation:
Time
10 min
Students will roll dice and put number in tens column. They will roll
the dice again and put the number in the ones column.
They will build the number using blocks (if needed) and draw the
picture of blocks representing tens and ones.
They will write the number.
To challenge students, have them roll the dice 3 times and work with
place value up to the hundreds.
If students finish the activity, they can write in their math journals
45 min
Assessments/ Differentiation
Assessment of Learning:
Provide every student with sticky note and have them write their
name.
Roll the 2 dice using Smart Notebook.
Have each student represent the number rolled by drawing tens and
ones blocks (just like the dice activity worksheet).
Engage in discussion for review of place value (sing song again).
Provide every student with sticky note and have them write their
name.
Roll the 2 dice using Smart Notebook.
Have each student represent the number rolled by drawing tens and
ones blocks (just like the dice activity worksheet).
Engage in discussion for review of place value (sing song again).
Explain that place value is important when adding and subtracting in
older grades.
Thank the students for their attention.
Feedback To Students
Time
10 min
Reflection
The design of this lesson is well thought out to encourage differentiation and engagement in the class. The
learning activities are all segmented into short times with the purpose of maintaining students attention. The lesson
begins with calendar, followed by a mini-lesson and transitioning to a new activity every 15 minutes in math centers,
until the final closure.
During calendar, I utilize multiple opportunities within this time to discuss daily math skills like doubles and
double plus/minus one. The activity of calendar is delivered by the student of the week. By having a student lead each
calendar session, the students feel a sense of pride in their ability to teach others. In addition, all of the students are
excited to follow along during this activity. The calendar portion of the lesson occurs on the carpet, encouraging a close
community of learners. Often, I take this time to ask my pre-assessment questions that inform about the lesson that
day.
The mini-lesson is kept short, with a quick overview of key concepts and examples. This is one area of growth
that I have noticed in my lessons, for in the beginning of practicum my mini-lessons were actually quite long. I have
realized that students are better focused when the mini-lesson is kept to a minimum of time or separated by a brain
break activity. Often, I have students bounce on their balls (used as chairs) so that the students can refocus. The minilesson is delivered using simple PowerPoint slides, many of which contain pictures and prompted questions. In this minilesson in specific, I sang a song with the students to help them remember place value. Another valuable part of the
PowerPoint slides is the advanced organizer and displayed outcome(s). Furthermore, I always layout exactly what the
students are doing that day and share the learning objective of the day. I feel that this helps prepare the students for the
lesson and give meaning behind their learning.
The practice of curriculum outcomes occurs during math centers, where students are put into groups of mixed
math levels. The purpose behind mixed groups is to encourage more independence amongst two of the centers so that
the teacher can focus more on one center. Moreover, by having students with stronger math skills mixed in with lower
level learners, the stronger students are able to read instructions and help their peers. By arranging the centers in this
way, the teacher has the opportunity to gain a better understanding of what students know and help them more on a
one-on-one basis.
The design of the centers allows students to practice more daily math skills during Smart Table, while the
specific skills of the lesson are focused on during math journals and math by myself. I think that the math centers
provide good routine for the students and allow them to develop different skills in writing and technology. By
incorporating visuals during Smart Table, applying the use of manipulatives and writing during math journals and
having students move around in the classroom, it ensures that the needs of different types of learners, as specified by
Howard Gardner, are met. This is one way that instruction is differentiated for students.
Another way that it is differentiated is within the actual centers. For example, at journals the students who
struggle with place value have the opportunity to use manipulatives to learn ones and tens, whereas the students who
need a challenge have the opportunity to extend their knowledge to learn about place value in the hundreds. At the
Smart Table, the students have the opportunity to switch activities to a math bored game if they lose interest in what
they are doing.
The centers are delivered in a structured and yet independent way. For example, in Smart Table, the students
can only play the multiple choice activity that I have selected, however do have the option to play the board game
instead. To ensure that the groups are working fairly at this center, I have collectively designed rules with the students
that they must read before they play. I also choose a leader for the day that monitors the center within each group and
informs me if any misbehaviour is continual. The math by myself center is designed to be structured as the students
complete their number of the day worksheet, but also independent in that they are working mostly by themselves.
Lastly, the math journals center is structured by the type of activity that helps facilitate learning, but independent in
allowing students to freely express their thoughts and ideas in their journals. By creating structure and allowing
independence, it appears that students feel more engaged in their learning.
The closure of the lesson is designed to remind the students of key concepts, gain an understanding of what
they have learned (exit slip) and keep them excited to learn more (encouraged by use of technology).
The design of my lesson reflects many of the concepts that I have learned in C & I. Most specifically, it reflects
the importance of differentiated instruction in the classroom. I believe that my lesson utilizes many of the students
strengths as mathematical, linguistic, spatial, kinesthetic and visual learners. Within the lesson, there are many
opportunities for the students to learn in a way that is best suited to their needs. Additionally, there are chances for the
students to improve their skills in other areas. As already mentioned, differentiation is again accomplished in this lesson
by planning for the different levels of student learning. I have altered the activities to aid the students who struggle and
challenge the students who are excelling. My lesson also reflects what I have learned in regards to Blooms Taxonomy.
While I believe that the math by myself and Smart Table centers adhere to more of the application portion of
Blooms Taxonomy, I think that math journals fall into the create section. By having students share their thoughts in
a meaningful way in their journals, they are developing higher order thinking skills.
My experience will inform future planning and instruction in many ways. Going through PSI, I have realized how
important differentiated instruction truly is. While some of the students can read at an average level, they struggle
substantially at writing or vice versa. Students need multiple opportunities to succeed in their learning and it is my
responsibility to plan these opportunities. I will also segment my activities into shorter time frames. This is purposeful to
ensure that students are engaged and excited to learn. It also serves well for incorporating daily math outcomes that
need to be continually reviewed.
Lesson
Title/Focus
Testing Boats
Date
Dec. 3rd/14
Subject/Grade
Level
Science - 2
Time
Duration
50 min
Unit
Teacher
Ms. Getschel
2-7 Construct objects that will float on and move through the water, and evaluate various designs for
watercraft.
Specific
Learning
Outcomes:
Alter or add to a floating object so that it will sink, and alter or add to a nonfloating object so that it
will float
Assemble material so they will float, carry a load and be stable in water.
Evaluate the appropriateness of various materials to the construction of watercraft, in particular:
- the degree to which the material is waterproof (not porous)
- the ability to form waterproof joints between parts
- the stiffness or rigidity of the material
- the buoyancy of the material
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will:
2.
3.
ASSESSMENTS
Observations:
Key Questions:
Products/Performances:
What features of boats will make it hold more weight than others?
How many pennies did the aluminum boat hold last day? (81)
Students will fill in chart of work booklet.
PROCEDURE
Prior to lesson
Gather materials, hand out work booklets and arrange desks into pods of 5 with one
water bucket on each pod.
Introduction
Time
Attention Grabber
Assessment of Prior
10 min
Knowledge
Expectations for Learning
and Behaviour
Advance
Organizer/Agenda
Transition to Body
Why?
How many pennies did the paper boat hold last day? (45)
Students will actively participate in group discussion.
Students will individually fill out their worksheets & draw boats.
Students will respectfully work in groups to complete the penny task.
Review 4 influencing factors, yesterdays penny demo.
Discuss predictions
Explain layout of activities.
Boat testing.
Group Data Collection.
Learning Activity #1
Learning Activity #2
Assessments/ Differentiation:
Time
5 min
Closure
Consolidation of Learning:
Feedback To Students
Have students complete quick exit slip worksheet where they will
circle which object they think is best constructed to float or sink.
Exit slip will be formatively assessed and feedback will be written on
worksheets and returned. Thank the students for their attention.
Thank the students for their attention and all their hard work during
the unit.
As this is the last lesson of the unit, share with the class what the next
unit will be with their new teacher.
Time
10 min
Sponge Activity/Activities