You are on page 1of 1

Object / Component Oriented Requirements Analysis

Program for Networked Lean Manufacturing by Paul


G. Ranky 1992-to date

Enter customer rating for


competitor A's product

Enter customer rating for


competitor B's product

Enter customer rating for


competitor C's product

Design Under Patent

Wind Tunnel Experimented

Aerodynamic Dimples

RFID TAGS

Enter customer rating for


our product Drayer & Co.

Upkeep of Recycled Methods


Used
Established Relationships with
Suppliers for Price of
Weight, height, width mesured
before packaging

Biodegradability Time Lapse

ISO 9001:2008 Compliant

Controlled Quality Testing in


House
Manufacturing Equiptment
Maintenance

Goal/Quality Plan (1-5)

Describe the Requirement

10

11

12

13

14

15
9

2 Performance

3 Aesthetics

4 Weight

5 Value Engineering

6 Cost of Product

7 Availability

8 Longevity

9 Ergonomics

10 Warranty

11 Cradle-to-Cradle

12 Quality of Materials

13 Customer Service Helpfulness

14 Ease to Recycle Product

15 Resale Value

Target Values

(List here the


parameters that specify engineering
solutions accurately. If you don't
know the range of the acceptable
values, use our Taguchi Calculator
Program for Designing an
Experiment)

Properly Recycled
Customer and
Market Approved
Foster Lasting
Relationships

Availability
Customer
Guarantee

Proof of Concept
Market Standards
Met & Approved
Materiality
Performance
Resilience to
Breaking
Product
Optimization
Financial Gains &
Trust
Shipping is Fast &
Well Priced

Life of Product

Proven Reliability

1 Durability

Improved Tracking

S.No

Documented action videos to


see what golf balls look like
Submitted to United States
Golf Association
Submitted to the R&A for
testing
Available at Major Name
Sporting Goods Stores

Lean Manufacturing Manager:


Customer Requirements
(Reflecting component/ object
behavior related to customer needs)

Importance Rating (1-5)

Paul G. Ranky, 2000-2002


Engineering / Software Solutions
Responding to Customer
Requirements

Our product

5
4

Competitor A's product

Competitor B's product

2
1

Competitor C's product


1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Absolute Importance Rating

237 227 263 225 161 143 155 229 151 103

79 237 213 127 181

Relative Importance Rating

9.3

8.9

10

8.8

6.3

5.6

6.1

5.9

3.1

9.3

8.4

3.2

Enter Our Product ratings (1=Low, 5=Hig

Enter Competitor A's ratings (1-5); Graph

Enter Competitor B's ratings (1-5); Graph

Enter Competitor C's ratings (1-5); Graph

Competitor A's product


Competitor B's product
Competitor C's product

21

Our product

20

You might also like