You are on page 1of 19

*

. . **


, - .
,


. ,

(),
, .
,
,
,





( - )
,
,
,
()
.

- ,
,
, . ,
, , .
* (14-01-0022) 20142015 .
** Antonov Mikhail Valerievich candidate of legal sciences, associate professor of
the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Law Faculty of the National Research
University The Higher School of Economics St. Petersburg.
E-mail: mich.antonov@gmail.com
. ., 2014

24

-1_2014.indd 24

03.10.2014 14:58:52


. .

, ,

.
: , , ,
, , , .
ANTONOV M. V. THE SYSTEMACITY OF LAW AND SYSTEM NOTIONS IN LEGAL
SCIENCE
In this article the author discusses the limits of application of general theory of
systems in legal science. The author criticizes utilization of the notion systemacity
to describe the organization of legal norms and the structure of legal phenomena.
In the authors opinion, the term system has a number of meanings. Therefore, in
social sciences this term is sometimes applied to characterize fundamentally different
phenomena and realities. For that reason legal scientists should be especially careful
in using this term. In the Russian jurisprudence the term system is applied to
both the social reality of law and the set of norms which constitute the positive
law of the country. This use is tautological and has no conceptual justification. The
author proposes to use the term legal order to describe the structured set of
legal rules, leaving the concept system for the characterization of law in terms of
comparative jurisprudence, legal sociology and other sciences which examine the
relations between law and other spheres of social reality. Argumentation in favor
of systemacity of law is theoretically based on the philosophy of objectivism. It
results in vain illusions that the legal rules are capable of self-organization, and
that the positive law is characterized by functional integrity and other system
attributes. However, this systemacity is not inherent to the law a priori. Logical
coherence and consistence of norms always remain relative, being the outcome of
the conscious efforts of lawmakers, judges, and legal scholars. It is nave to suppose
that rules can enter into the law and find their adequate position there without human
intervention. Such understanding can lead to the apology of irresponsibility of those
who create excessive and inconsistent norms in the false hope that these norms will
automatically find their place in law due to the systemacity of the latter.
KEYWORDS: system of law, systemacity of law, legal system, objectivism,
systematization, positive law, structure of law.


,
1 -
. - , .2
1

, , , ,
. . , . . , , ,
.
2
. . . .
/, 2009.

25

-1_2014.indd 25

03.10.2014 14:58:52

( ),3

.4 ,
.

,
. ,
,
, , , , ,
, (, , 5) () .
,
:
, ,
( ) ,6
,
, . , (
),

, ( - !).
, . () :
( ),
3
, .
, ( ..
1) // . 2011. 3. C.5358;
2) : //
: : - . ., 2011. C.303306).
4
, (.: .. .
., 1974. . 9399).
, .
5
.., .. //
. 2010. 3. . 442 .
6
. . .
,
(.: . .
. ., 2012. . 251280, : . 265266).

26

-1_2014.indd 26

03.10.2014 14:58:52


. .

( , ,
)
, .
, , ()

, ,
- .
, .7


, ,
, , , ,
. , . . . ,
, ,8
, 9
, ,
( ),
.10
,
( ), 11
. , ,
( ) -

7
. , : Johnson K. On the Systematicity of Language and Thought//
The Journal of Philosophy. 2004. Vol. 101. N. 3. . 111139.
,
.
8
.. . ., 2001. . 177.
9
. . 171.
10
. . 166167.
11
,
, . , -
.., . . , . . , ,
, ( . . // . . C. .14. .,
1997. . 253282), - . ,

,
, , ,
(.: . . . .,
1978; . . . . ., 1980).

27

-1_2014.indd 27

03.10.2014 14:58:53

.12 , , .
, , - ,
.13 plus quam perfectum
, ,
. 14 , ,
( . . .).15
: ,
.16 ,
.17 , ,
, .


.
, ,
- ( , ,
.), ,18
, .19
12
. . ..
( .. //
. 2000. 3. . 6185).
13
. . . . . ., 1960. 5- . . 1. . 418.
14
,
( . .
. ., 1998. . 276).
15
.. . ., 1991. . 114.
:
, .
, , .
, , ,
( . . . . ., 1999. . 386; . . .).
16
. // . . . . 2- . .,
1955. . 4. . 133.
17
. -. ., 1957. . 250.
18
, ,
,
: , ( .., .. .
., 2008. . 52).
19

,
, ,

28

-1_2014.indd 28

03.10.2014 14:58:53


. .

. ,
,
.20 ,
. ,
( , , ,
, .),
, , .
, ,
,
.21 , ,
, ()

,22
, ,
.23 ,

,
.24 ,

, ., . , . . ,
, ( .. . //
/ . . . . , 2010. . 12),
, ,
, ( ..
// . 2002. 2. . 15).
20
.: . .
// . 1976. 3.
21
.: .., .. //
. 1998. 7. .170179.
22

,
(.: . . - . ., 1980),
.
23
.. . . 1112.
24
,
- .
(.
: . . // : . ., 1994. . 379392;
. : . - //
., . . ., 1969. . 272297).
- ,

.

29

-1_2014.indd 29

03.10.2014 14:58:53

(,
, ), ,
. , ,
, ,
. , . ,

.

, ,25
( ,
26), ,27 ,
28 (
, , , ,
29). , ()
.30 , ,
, , .

(
),
, - (. . , ) ,
, .
.
, , ,
,
25
, . .
, , ( /
. . . . . ., 2006. . 282).
26
. ., . . . . ., 2005. . 258.
27
.: ()

, ,
( . . : ,
, . ., 2000. . 251).
28
. .
( .. // . 1980. 1).
29
, .. , , , ( . .
// . 1998. 45).
30
.. . ., 2003. . 388 .

30

-1_2014.indd 30

03.10.2014 14:58:53


. .

,

. , ,
(), ,

(. ). ,
( ) .31 -

(.. ,
).
, ,
()
, ,
, ,
.
. , .
, , , () .32 , ,
, .33
31
,
( . ., ..
. ., 2012. . 113).
,

, , . ,
.
32
,
, , , ; , -
( . . ., 2004.
. 8). , ,
( )
. :
, (
. . 83; . . .).
33
, , , . . (..
// . 2006. 2.
.2643),
. ,
,
, ,
, .

31

-1_2014.indd 31

03.10.2014 14:58:53

,
-
.
,
34 , .
,
: , (1) , (2) ,
, (3) ,
.35 ,
.
, /
? ,
.
() .36 , , .
() (

). ( ),
,
34
:
,
( . . . ., 1991. . 15).
35
. . : . ., 2003.
. 123. . : ,
, .
,

. ,
, ,
, ..
.
, , , ( )
( .. . . 8384).
36

(.: . . .
., 1960). , , , ,
.

. , .
,
( . . 456; . . .).

32

-1_2014.indd 32

03.10.2014 14:58:54


. .

, (, .)
. , , , ( )
,
.
, ,
, ,
,
,37
.
,
,
.38
,

( ), , .39

,
(
). ,
-
( ).
- ,
, ( ,
, 40).
(
37
., .: .. : . .,
1998. . .
: Varga C. Codification as a socio-historical phenomenon. 2nd ed. Budapest, 2011 (.
: . . - //
. 2013. 1. .259268).
38
. . , , ,
. ,
( ., .
. . ., 1995. . 108).
39
, , ,
.
, .
.
40
: .. (..
: . ., 1995)
. ( . . ., 2005).

33

-1_2014.indd 33

03.10.2014 14:58:54

),
.41
,

.
( ) ,
. , ()
, , ( )
, .42 , , ,
, ( )
,
. ,

, .
.
( ) ,
,
,
, ()
.

, . .
. ,
.
- , .
,
41
.. 1) ?// . 2011. 4;
2) // . 2005. . III. 12.
42
. . ., 2012. . 147161.
,
,
, , , ,
.
,
.
, , ,
, ( .
. 148; . ).

34

-1_2014.indd 34

03.10.2014 14:58:54


. .

,
.
,

. : ,
,
. ,
.43 , , ,
, ,
. ,
, ;
,44 ,

.45 ,
,


.46
(
) , ,
, .
XIX . ,
, ( ).47 ,
- ,48
43
. // . 2011.
4. . 454.
44
.: . : // . 2011. 4. . 511530.
45
.. : //
. . 503.
46
..
( .. // / . .. . , 2010. . 137).
47
. . . . . 1. ., 2011.
,
( ) , XIX .
(.: . .
?// .
2009. 4. . 202226);
.. ( . .
: . . . . . . ., 2009).
48
. , .
,
( ..
: . ., 2010. . 10). ,
. -

35

-1_2014.indd 35

03.10.2014 14:58:54

,

( , .) , , 49
() ,
.
, ,
. ,
,
,
. ,
, , , , , .
,
. ,
( , , .) . ( )
? , ,
, (, , )

. ,
, ,
?
.
,
, ,

. , . ,
(. 4 . 15). ,
,
,
;
. , - , ( ..
. . 21).
(.: .. // . 2011. 1).
49
. : . .
// ? /.. ... ., 2013. .8898.

36

-1_2014.indd 36

03.10.2014 14:58:55


. .

-
. ,
(
, , ). ,
(

).
,

, , .
. 1188 : ,
,
, ,
. ,
, ( ) ,
, ,
,
. , ,
.
, ,
50- XX .
, -
.50 (. . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . .),51


.
, ,
,
, .

( , ) (, ).52
50
.. //
. . 4. ., 1955; .. // . 1957. 1; ..
// . 2; .., .. //
. 1957. 6; ..
// . 1958.
.: . . . ., 1975.
51
. : . . . 2 . , 2005. 2006.
52
. , .

37

-1_2014.indd 37

03.10.2014 14:58:55

,
, ,
- , ,
.53
,54
, .
(
), . . ,55
, .56
,
, ,
( ).
( 57)
( , ), . . .58 ,
.59
, ( ..
. . ., 2000. .104105).
53
.. . ., 1985. . 41 .
54
.. . . 234.
55
. : .. : . ., 2001. . 151154; .. . ., 2003. . 191 .
56
. .
, , ( . . .
// :
. , 2009. . 27).
57
.., .. .
58
,
, ( .
. ., 1986. . 176),
( ,
) ,
.

, ,
(
) , , ,

( . . 164).
59
.: . . // .
2003. 3. . 411.

38

-1_2014.indd 38

03.10.2014 14:58:55


. .

,
.
,
60
-
. , .61
:
, , () ( . . .).62
- ,
.
, ,
.
,
.
(
)

(, , ).63 , ,
,64

, ( ) (
). , -
, ,
- - .
(, . . . . ,
.) , , (, , .)

60

,
(.: .. // / . .. . .,
2010. . 377424).
61
, ,
,
,
( / .
.. . ., 2003. . 163164).
62
. ., . . . ., 2004. . 167.
63
.: .
- // . 2011. 5. C.826.
64
. . . 38 .

39

-1_2014.indd 39

03.10.2014 14:58:55

, , , . ., , ,
.

,
.
, ,
.65
, ,
: ,
- ,

.

, .
; .66
, (), , ,
.
. , , , ,
,
,
.

,
- .67

(
68)
65
.: ..
. , 2006. . 27 .
66
.: ,

, ( .., ..
: - . .,
2010. .143; . . .).
67
. : .3. . ., 1992. . 5158.
68
.. . ., 2008. . 277 .

40

-1_2014.indd 40

03.10.2014 14:58:55


. .

;69
- . . . . ,70

.
,
,
,
.71
, .
,

,72
, :
.
(
),
( ,
),
73 .74
,75
-

69
. : . . // . .. . 2006. 21.
70
,
, ,
( . .
// . 1999. 9. . 5).
, ,
, , .
,
.
71

.: .. // . 2005. 6. . 160179.
72
. . . . 1. ., 1981. . 8689.
73

.
74
.: .. ( )// : . , 2009.
. 5156.
75
, , , ,
.

41

-1_2014.indd 41

03.10.2014 14:58:56


. .

(, ),
.
. . ,
:
- , ( ),
( ) .76

. ,

, 77
. , XIX .,
, , .
.78

.

76
. . //
. 2001. 6.. 6.
77
. . .
. . 23.
78
. . : ( ). ., 2012.

42

-1_2014.indd 42

03.10.2014 14:58:56