Professional Documents
Culture Documents
18.0
18.5
19.0
19.0
Carite
-66.0
El Yunque
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1500
1000
1500
2000
1000
1500
2000
30
25
20
15
Frequency
10
5
Frequency
0.0
1.0
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
Slopes
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.0
30
20
10
8
6
Negative
slopes
1000
1500
0.0
xx
References:
Shipley
(2010)
From
plant
traits
to
vegeta0on
structure:
chance
and
selec0on
in
the
assembly
of
ecological
communi0es.
Cambridge
University
Press,
New
York.
Muscarella
et
al.
(2014)
ENMeval:
An
R
package
for
conduc@ng
spa@ally
independent
evalua@ons
and
es@ma@ng
op@mal
model
complexity
for
Maxent
ecological
niche
models.
Methods
in
Ecology
and
Evolu0on.
5(11):
1198-1205.
Phillips
et
al.
(2006)
Maximum
entropy
modeling
of
species
geographic
distribu@ons.
Ecological
Modelling.
190:
231-259.
We
extend
our
gra@tude
to
the
Departamento
de
Recursos
Naturales
y
Ambiente
for
permission
to
establish
permanent
plots
in
the
forests
of
Puerto
Rico
under
DRNA
permit
#2011-IC-046.
This
work
-66.0
10
60
CWMpi
0.2
Merging
func@onal
community
ecology
with
biogeography
represents
an
important
research
direc@on
for
improving
our
ability
to
predict
the
consequences
of
environmental
change
on
biodiversity.
Our
study
represents
a
key
step
for
linking
local
community
structure
with
species
geographic
distribu@ons.
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Acknowledgements:
0:10
-66.5
0.4
0.3
yy
0.3
yy
0.2
0.1
120
Relative
habitat
suitability
(ENMs)
80
abs(CWMp ti)
-67.0
=
Selec@on
towards
the
CWM
for
dierent
traits
might
promote
local
diversity,
depending
on
how
trait
axes
are
correlated.
In
ongoing
work
on
this
project,
we
are
evalua@ng
how
trait
axes
are
correlated
at
dierent
spa@al
scales
(among
co-occurring
species
vs.
between
sites)
as
a
way
to
further
understand
the
processes
driving
func@onal
paYerns
of
community
diversity.
Addi@onally,
we
are
incorpora@ng
demographic
informa@on
to
confront
poten@al
limita@ons
of
correla@ve
niche
models.
Finally,
we
are
con@nuing
to
expand
our
trait
database
to
incorporate
intraspecic
trait
varia@on
as
well
as
more
rened
physiological
traits.
0.0
50 km
CWM
100
0.9
0.8
0.7
R 2 = 0.93
0.6
17.5
17.5
30
20
5
10
H max (m)
200 350
100
50
25
2000
e.g.,
Species with
WD = 0.8
CWM
R 2 = 0.69
-1.0
OLS
sSlopes
lope
For
many
more
species
than
randomly
expected,
es@mated
habitat
suitability
was
lower
for
species
when
they
had
trait
values
more
distant
from
the
local
CWM
trait
value.
This
result
supports
for
the
CWM-op@mality
hypothesis
and
suggests
that
broad-scale
environmental
lters
act
to
constrain
local
func@onal
diversity
towards
the
CWM.
However,
a
lesser
number
of
species
(although
s@ll
signicantly
more
than
randomly
expected)
had
posi@ve
slopes
and
thus
appear
to
exploit
successful
alterna@ve
strategies.
0.4
1000
LMA (g m!2 )
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
R 2 = 0.75
-66.0
-2.0
The
tendency
for
func@onal
traits
to
vary
predictably
along
clima@c
gradients
suggests
trait-mediated
tness
dierences
that
act
to
constrain
local
func@onal
diversity.
However,
the
typically
large
propor@on
of
within
site
trait
varia@on
(high
func@onal
varia@on
within
sites)
implies
the
ac@on
of
mechanisms
that
maintain
local
func@onal
diversity.
Reconciling
these
contras@ng
paYerns
represents
a
major
challenge
for
predic@on
in
community
ecology.
-5suitability
0 at
each
5 study
10 plot
Separately
for
each
species
and
each
trait,
we
compared
es@mates
o-10
f
habitat
with
the
absolute
dierence
between
the
species-mean
trait
value
and
the
CWM
at
each
plot.
Under
the
xx
CWM-op@mality
hypothesis,
we
predicted
a
nega@ve
rela@onship
between
these
values.
We
used
OLS
regression
to
determine
the
sign
and
signicance
of
these
rela@onships
for
each
species-trait
combina@on
and
compared
the
results
with
a
null
model.
-66.5
0.00020
i=1
0.00015
-67.0
Trait value of
species i
= pi trait i
Analyses:
High
Relative estimated
habitat suitability
0.00010
Community-weighted
mean trait value
(CWM)
Low
0.00005
For
all
173
species,
we
measured
three
func@onal
traits:
WD
=
wood
density
[g
cm-3],
LMA
=
leaf
mass
per
area
[g
m-2],
and
Hmax=
maximum
height
[m].
We
calculated
the
community-weighted
mean
trait
(CWM)
value
in
each
plot
based
on
species
rela@ve
basal
area
and
species-mean
trait
values.
CWM
values
for
all
three
traits
varied
signicantly
with
respect
to
mean
annual
precipita@on.
In
the
gures
below,
red
circles
(
)
represent
CWM
values
and
grey
points
(
)
represent
individual
species
.
1000
0.6
50 km
Func0onal traits:
77%
of
signicant
slopes
are
nega0ve
p a c k a g e
Regularization Multiplier
Regularization
Multiplier
2000
18.0
18.0
Guanica
-2
Slopes
3000
Rio Abajo
81%
of
signicant
slopes
are
nega0ve
Maximum height
(m)
MAXHT
1.0
0.5
4000
LMA
(g
m-2)
LMA
Feature classes
-4
18.5
Mean
annual
precipitation
(mm yr!1)
18.5
ENM
e v a l
10 15 20 25 30 35
Frequency
Frequency
84%
of
signicant
slopes
are
nega0ve
80
CV
of
monthly
precipita0on
(unitless)
-66.0
4000
3000
2000
1000
Cambalache Vega
L
LQ
H
LQH
LQHP
LQHPT
Minimum
monthly
temperature
(C)
19.0
Toro Negro
10 15 20 25 30
Guajataca
= p < 0.05
Cambalache / Vega
0.0
60
yy
0.1
-66.5
Guilarte
-66.5
19.0
INPUT LAYERS
We
established
12,
50m
x
50m
forest
plots
in
4
protected
areas
of
Puerto
Rico.
These
plots
occur
along
a
precipita@on
gradient
that
ranges
from
ca.
900
to
2,500
mm
yr-1
on
limestone
soils.
In
each
plot,
we
counted,
iden@ed,
and
measured
all
woody
stems
>
1
cm
at
1.3
m
above
the
ground.
The
plots
contained
a
total
of
173
species.
1000
2000
3000
4000
Of
the
173
total
species,
slightly
more
than
half
had
signicant
rela@onships
(i.e.,
p
<
0.05;
both
posi@ve
and
nega@ve)
between
habitat
suitability
and
CWM.
These
were
many
more
than
predicted
by
random
chance
(null
model
not
shown).
Of
the
species
with
signicant
rela@onships,
about
80%
(for
each
trait)
had
nega@ve
slopes,
in
line
with
the
CWM-op@mality
hypothesis.
We
used
the
R
package
ENMeval
(Muscarella
et
al.
2014)
to
conduct
species-specic
tuning
of
environmental
niche
models
(ENMs)
in
MAXENT
(Phillips
et
al.
2006)
for
each
of
173
species.
We
used
AICc
to
average
models
based
on
sefngs
that
balance
model
t
and
predic@ve
ability.
We
used
the
target
group
background
approach
to
account
for
spa@al
bias
in
collec@on
locali@es.
Rio Abajo
0.2
Guanica
-67.0
Forest plots:
Contact: bob.muscarella@gmail.com
Results:
40
0.3
Guajataca
related to the dierence between its trait value and the local CWM.
ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK, NY USA
2DEPARTMENT OF BIOSCIENCE, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, AARHUS, DENMARK
AICc
delta.AICc
18.5
0.4
Introduc0on:
18.0
OF
20
17.5
0.2
1DEPARTMENT
2000
1000
0
1500
0
4 20006
CWMpi
10:0
Increasing
1000
8
10
1500
2000