Performance

Evaluation Report

Pakistan: Road Sector

Development Program


2013

: : 201319
: 32058
: 1891
: 768

: , .

. , ()
. , 2,

. . , ,
. , ,

,
,

.
()

. ,
, , .

/ (/)

( 2002)
1.00 = 0.0169
1.00 = 56.00

( 2008)
0.01464
59.00

( 2012)
0.0104
95.94

1:
.
s
.

1
1

2:
.

.

.

.
, ,
.

.

.

.

.

2
3
3
4
4
5
5
8
8
9

3:
.

.

11
11
12
12
12

4:
.

.

.

13
13
14

5:
.

15
15

1.

2.

17
23



. .
. .

, , .

.
, ,
.


1891:

( )

1891
50.0
50.0

1891
50.8
50.8

50.0

50.8

15 14 2001
10 10 2001
2124 2001
19 2001
1 2002
27 2002
28 2002
30 2007
5.0

= .

( )

2 2002
30 2007
5.2

18

1
1

2
8



() ,
19 2001.
200 .

50 .
150

. ,

.
.

.
.

1990. 11 2001,
.
. 11
2001
.
,
, , ,
.
,

.

, , , .

,
.
.

.

. ,
, , , ,
.
.

, ,
(. 9).

 :
,
, .

,
.
. ,


.
.
.
.

.

1.
,
, .

2.
()
() 1
2013.
()
, , , ,
, . 2

2013
.
2008 , ,
, , .3

.

, ,
(. 9).
3.

2012. ,

.

4.

,
, , ,
.
.

. 2001.
. .
. 2006.
. : .
. 2008. : . (
1891; . 32058).

5.
,
, ,
.
.
.

6.

.

: () , () , ()
, () , ()
, () .
7.

1990.
,
, , . 11 2001
,
, .
2001
.

.4 ,

.
8.

. ,
,

.


.
.

9.

,
.5

.
. ,

2000 .
,
. ,
1988 2000. 6 ,
,
.

10.
50
. ,
( 1).
11.
1 (83.2 )
( 1 ).
,
.

.

. ,

( 1 2 1)
. 7 ()
, 1996
. 8 ,
,
.

,
2001.
, . 2005.
of Pakistans Highways. . .
75. .
1996
1988.
, 1999, ,
.

4 :
1:
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

( )
2.0
15.0
15.0
1.0
10.0
8.0
2.5
5.0
2.2
14.0
2.5
5.0
1.0
83.2

12.

.
()9
.

, ,

13.
.
(35 )
.

, countrys
. ,
5 .10 (15 )
2003, 17 2002.
5 10 .

10

The Ministry of Communications (MOC) was formed after 2003, spinning off from Ministry of
Communications and Railways (MOCR).
()
, ()
, ()
.

14.

15.
24 5 ( 1).
() , () , ()
, () , () .
24 ,
. , ,
.
16.
.
.
,
. ,
:

?
.


,
.11 2007,
. 12
.
17.
.
, .
.
25 .
2006/2007. 13
:
.

.
1988,

( 3).
1999.
,
.
.14 ,

11
12

13
14

. 2003. . .
. 2004.
. ( . 4400, 30 290,000).
. 20062007. . .
. 2012. . 201213. .
.

6 :
, ,
.
.

.
,
s .15

. 16
.
1999,
.
.

. 1996,

()

. ,
.
, .
, ,
.

,
.
.
()
,
. 17
,
, . ,
.

2.5 2002 . . 2012,
19 . ,
, 10 .

. .

2002 (31 2001).

,
.

.
18.
.
.
1996,
.
, :
15
16

17

. 2008. 20082012 2020. .

, , ,
(, , .).
(). 2002. 4 2. .

()
()

()

.
. 6 .
.
2000
2001 2002 .
30
2002. 112
.
, 42 .

()

()

, 320 5 (5),
300400 2004 .

.
.

.
.
, ,

.

19.
.
. ,
:

()

()
()

,
1,670 1,219. 22% 28%
16. ,
. 3,500.
, ,
, 2007.
. .

.
.

()

.
.

20.

. 1996,
,
.
.
21.
.

. ,
. :

8 :

()

.
2001
. , ,

committees . ,
,
.
s .

()

. .
2002
.

()

, .

()

2002.

,
.

()

.
, .

22.

.

23.
.

, , , .


.
. .

, ,
, .
4 2002.
17 2002.

.
2.

24.
2001, ,
.
. 2000,
300%.
30%.

. .
25.
()
; ()
; () , ,
; ()


; ()
.
26.
, 30%
20% .
, .

. 500 , .
,
.
. ,
,
, .
27.

200,000 .

, ,
.

,

. ,

.
.
28.
sectors institutions have been initiated w .

,
,

10 :
. ,

,
.

29.

.

30.
,
, , , ,
. 2,
25% .
0 3.

2:
()

(25%)
1
0.25

(25%)
1
0.25

(25%)
1
0.25

(25%)
1
0.25

1.00

: Highly successful 2.7; 2.7 > successful 1.6; 1.6 > less than successful 0.8;
< 0.8.
: .

31.
. ,
.
, (. 36).18
, ,

. ,
. 19 , ,

.
. , ,
18

improving the countrys economic situation. Some argue that the increase in such assistance
11 2001 ,
. , , . 2011. 9/11: .
, . .
19
The swift fund transfer, which was the governments overriding concern, could only have been
.

, ,
, .
(. 23).

12 :

.
, , .
,
.
,
.

32.
.
. 24 , 3
6 .
. ,
, ,
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
. 20

.
33.
.

.
,
.

,
34.
.
,
.

.

20

,
,
. , ,
, .

35.
s
, .
.

36.
.
s , loans .
,
.

, 11
2001. , ,
.
,
.
37.
. .

. .
,
.

38.
. ,
, .

39.
.
,
. , ,
, ,
,
. 21

,

. ,

.

21

. 2011. . . 4/. .

14 :
.

40.
.

,
. , .

.

41.
.
.

42.
,
, .

,
.
, , .
,

(. 9).
.

.
(5 ) (17 )
.

43.


.
.

.

 1:

, ,
, ,

,





,

(. 16)

(. 17)

(. 17)

()

30

2001

31
2002

.
2007,

(
4400)

31
2002

2001

18 1

(. 17)

(. 17)

2.5

2002

15
2002.

2001,

2001,

38

2.5 .

 19

2002

(31
2001)

30

2002

15
2002.

31

2001,

2000.

2000

2001.

31
2002.

31

2001,

20 1

, ..,

,

320
5,


300400



2004

1,670
1,219
22%


28%


16

320
5.

15
2002.
,

31
2002.

31
2002

31

 21

,
,

,
,

2001

2002

2001

31
2002

,
,

committees
.

22 1

2002

2002

31

2001

31

2001

2002

= , = , = ,
= , 5 = 5, , =
, = .
.
: .

 2:
.
1

/



, , ,
.
,
, , , ,
,
,


.






.
,
,


.
,
,


,

.
()

,
,
,

, ()



,

.

,

.

, 4.01

, 4.02;
5, . 7

,
4.03

.

,



.

.


.

, 4.04
(); 5, . 3

, 4.05;
5, . 6

,
.

5, . 1

5, . 2

24 2

9
10

11

12

13

14
15

16

17

18

/

.





,

.

.


.


.

.
30

2002.
.

.
,
1,670 1,219.

28
16.
.

.



2002.

5, . 4

. ,




.

()
2 3
()
2
3
()
2 3

.
.

()
2
3
()
2 3

()
2 3
()
2 3

()
2
3
()
2 3

()
2 3

= , = , = ,
= , = .