DOCUMENT NO. REVISION DATE OF REVISION... WevuL2.012 8 ‘44 OGTOBER 2010 - Yulleroo-2 Well Hydraulic Fracturing Operations ‘Approvals ‘Signature hte: i Approyer: 4 ‘inser, E ciao 4 GetedaYullero0-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP REVISION DETAILS Date Revision | Reviewer Comments 13.09.10 A Issued for DMP approval Reviewed to include DMP comments bbslariee Ee and update distribution DISTRIBUTION Paper Copies ‘Name Position ‘Company Copy Buru Energy Limited 1 Buru Energy Limited 2 Buru Energy Limited 3 Buru Energy Limited 4 Bury Energy Limited 6 Senior Assessor ~ Chris Zadow Serr Aces rch | Department of Mines & Petroleum | 6 Electronic Copies Name Position Company Buru Energy Limited Buru Energy Limited Buru Energy Limited Buru Energy Limited Buru Energy Limited Bury Energy Limited Buru Energy Limited ‘Senior Assessor ~ 5 Chris Zadow easement Department of Mines & Petroleum Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Low Ecological Services (LES) for Buru Energy Limited (Buru) in accordance with an agreement with Buru. LES has prepared this document using the skill and care expected from professional scientists to provide factual and technical information and reasonable solutions to identified risks. It does not constitute legal advice. LES denies liability for any negative consequences arising from utilising this document. ‘TABuni Energy LiNNeABCD Controlled Docaments\BC05.00 Wells & Reservals\Yulleroo-2W-YUL2-012_Yulleroo-2 Wall EMP_Rev Bidoo Pago 2 of47Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 6.0, 64 62 63 634 6.3.2 633 634 635 7.0 8.0 .2.10 Emergency Planning and Response. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. BACKGROUND... Proponents... Proposed Works, f Purpose and Scope of this EMP..nnssmaneesess CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT POLICY... LEGISLATION... Commonwealth Environmental Legi State Environmental Legislation .. Overview.. DMP-EPA-MOU Vegetation clearing Native Title and Heritage... DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY Location of the Yulleroo-2 well Desoription of the hydraulic fracturing program.. ‘Well Desoription and Configuration... Hydraulic Fracturing Program.. Preparing Access Roads and Well Hydraulic Fracturing . Demobilsation. Rehabilitation sac Utlttes and Services... Information to be provided by Suppliers... Emergency Facilties and Communication... ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND RISKS.......... Scope... Koy Definitions ern Risk Assessment Methodology... Overview... Hazard Identification... Hazard Analysis os... Risk Evaluation. Risk Management... ws J" etietia ‘OBJECTIVES, STANDARDS AND GRITERIA..... IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY wero wuz 5 ~ Page soa?Yulloroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Key Performance Indicators (Targets). General Roles and Responsit Buru Operations Manager... Buru Well Site Manager / Company man.. Contract Crew Training for Personnel and Contractors Reporting Arrangements .. Auditing and Reporting on Routine Operations. ‘Auditing and Reporting on incidents... Contractor's reporting t0 BURL esse Monitoring, Audit and Review of this EMP... Consultation REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT PLAN... Objectives Scope. Environmental Management Actions... Rehabilitation Monitoring... REFERENCES....... LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4. Location of the Yulleroo-2 well in relation to towns, roads and watercourses. Figure 2. Location of Buru Energy Limited Yulleroo-2 welt in relation to areas of conservation significance and watercourses, 16 Figure 3. Location of Yulleroo-2 well in relation to watercourses and roads. 18 Figure 4. Vegetation typical of the Yulleroo-2 well area (aerial view). 24 Figure 5. Vegetation at the Yulleroo-2 well ste (facing north)... 24 Figure 6. Proposed layout of the dri pad for the Yulleroo-2 frac operations... 22 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Environmental Management Plan ~ Summary of Commitment 6 Table2 — Yulleroo-2 well data summary... 19 Table3 Design Characteristics of the Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Program 24 Table 4 Detailed assessment of environmental risks, impacts and management... 30 Table 5 Summary of Environmental Management Objectives, Standards and Performance Critetia. ne 37 Table6 Key Performance indicators... Table7 Relevant HSE Procedures. wruzom PagodaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Table 8 — Stakeholder Consultation..... Table 9 Rehabilitation Monitoring Schedule..... Table 10 Long term completion criteria ... LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 ......... Heseeeniauessnreeieee BUTU HSE Policy Attachment 2. .Buru Canning Basin Oil Spill Contingency Plan Attachment 3 sencansonsens Description of the local environment Attachment 4 .. . Works on access trails and well site already aproved by the DMP Attachment 5 soe Buru Risk Matrix Reference table and MSDSs for chemicals used during fracturing and Attachment 6 ........ CT operations at Yulleroo-02 Well wrulsoe Bape Fara?Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 4.0 INTRODUCTION Buru Energy Limited (‘Buru’) commissioned Low Ecological Services (‘LES") to prepare an Environmental Management Plan CEMP") for proposed hydraulic fracturing (fraccing’) operations in the Canning Basin, Table 1 presents a summary of Buru’s commitments to managing the environmental impacts of its fracturing activiies for the proposed exploration/development wells detalled throughout this EMP, in particular the implementation Strategy presented in Saction 8. This table forms the basis of conducting environmental audits. Table’ Environmental Management Plan ~ Summary of Commitment 1D] Comment Responsibility Evidence of Action BEFORE FRAC OPERATIONS —— pes 2 Sones + | Conduct a desktop review | Buu "Nlachment 3] Reviews show no declared rare andlor fiald based Authorised ‘or priotiyFsed flora wil be Teconnaissance eurvey to | Representative significantly impacted by the check for declared raro proposed diling operation or andlor priority liste flora associated actives. and other environmental senatvies. 2 | Plan access tracks and well | Bura Table4 | Access uses existing wacks to sttelocation tominimise | Authorised iminimise clearing. clearing of native vegetation | Representative and disturbance of native puahopbeymatas fina and avold protected ‘Areas to be cleared inspected by pecice bosed of outeomes authorised consuitan(s) 0 confirm of desktop review andlor lack of sensitivities. fold studies Resulls of inspections / audi 3 | Conduct prefiacethno- | Sura Tecilon 67 of | Report identifying cultural herloge araphic study (consultation | Authorised | Altachment 3. | sensitivities within area around the Andior field survey) to check | Representative wel se, for indigenous hortage sts. Resuls of inspections / aust 4 | Plan access tracke ond wel | Buru “tachment | Utlisng existing wel sit and shelocalion tominimise | Authorised access tracks disturbance of inaigenous | Representative he a Fee cnraiane Report identifying cultural heritage tie senetvlis with target area & | Conduet pe-fac Buna Seclion 86 | Hydraulic fracturing EMP consultation with relevant | Authovsed document shows outcomes of stakeholders and Representative stakeholder consultalon. incorporate outcomes of consultation into management stiategy. Obtain Hazard Analysis and_| Sura Tobe Document oulining the specs Risk Assessment of Authorised | obtained | oparalonal risks of hydraulic operational espects ofthe | Representative fracturing fracturing rogram, : 7 [ Obtain witten approval for | Bur Secllon 42 | Letter of approval rom ilevant hyedraule factoring Authorised WA government dopartmonts operations from relevant WA | Representative government departments. tf wruea Pane sora?‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 1D | Commitment Responsiblity | EMP Evidence of Action : Reference 8 | Obtain permitforclearing | Buru Section 8 | Aclearing permit issued from native vegetation from ‘Authorised relevant WA government rolevant WA government | Representative departments (if requied). departments (f required). ‘9 | inform public of proposed | Bura Section | Results of a compliance audit frac works to minimise ‘Authorised disturbance to traffic, Representative landholders and local residents. 70 | Review frac contractor HSE | Buru Section | Bur Diling SMP, BJ services Management Plan to enéure | Authorised (contractors) SMP, Bridging ‘compliance with Buru Safely | Representative document in place Management System (SMS) tequirements, 11 | Conduct safety and Burw Table 4 Rocords show that safely and ‘environmental Induction of | Authorised ‘environmental induction ofall Buru all Buru and frac contractor | Representative ‘and contractor personnel cared personnel, highlighting the out environmental sensitivities of the target area, and ‘appropriate management practices. _| ‘SITE PREPARATION Soe Be oe 12 | Ensure vehicles are washed | Buru Table 4 Inspection records. down, inspected and free of | Authorised ‘weeds and soll prior to Representative ‘mobilisation to drill sites. Results of a compliance audit, 78 | Eneurethat any cleared | Buru Teble4 Results of a compliance audit. vegetation is stockpiled for | Authorised site rehabittation Representative SS 74 | Enoure that topsoil and Bur Table 4 Results of a compliance audit subsoll are stockpiled Authorised separately for ske Representative rehabilitation and in low profie mounds to rinimise erosion. 46 | Enouro adriptrayis used | Buru Table 4 Rests of @ compliance audit. during refueling operations | Authorised althe wel site. A spill tls | Representative to be available on the construction refueling vehicle 46 | Ensure groundwater Bur Table 4 Enisting bore to utlised licences (Licence to Authorised Lice ke water ated consttuctand Licence fo | Representative Gaara” tis ter Seay Abstact) are obtained and dnered to, Flowmeter i installed and reading is taken when the water bore is ‘equipped for abstraction of water. ‘Abstraction volume is recorded at the completion of driling BEE ‘operations on the final daily report. wre ParaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP in pad construction have a fice extinguisher in the vehicle and a“fast attack" vehicle (which has a water tank, pump and hose) ‘maintained at the site during these construction operations. 1D | Commitment Responsibility | EMP Evidence of Action Reference 417 | Fire response equipment | Buru Table 4 Results of a compliance aucit. avaliable to construction | Authorised crews, All vehicles involved | Representative [DURING FRAC OPERATIONS 18 | Maintain a written dally rac and subsequent cleaningitesting reports including details of any incidents, all relevant ‘operational end technical ‘data, ist all personnel on- sito, operational and standby actives, repair time due to breakdown, and other non- operational activities. Buu Authorised Representative, Section 6.4 | Daily wnitten records. Results of a compliance aucit 49 | Ensure that all frac pproppants, chemicals end debris remain underground, ‘are burn in flare pit or are disposed of into.a PVC lined turkey’s nest during frac program and are dried, and the nest and flare pit rehabilitated at the ‘completion of program, Burw Authorised Representative Table 4 Resulis of @ compliance auclt. 720 | Ensure that the emergency response plan manual, oll spill contingency plan for ‘Yulleroo-02 fracturing and CT operations and appropriate spill clean-up ‘equipment are onsite and avalable in relevant areas. Bura Authorised Representative Table 4, ‘Attachment 2 Resulls of a compliance audi 21 | Report as soon as. practicable to DMP any spills of petroleum of greater than 500 L. as required, ‘under the Schedule of ‘Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991. Bury Authorised Representative Table 4 Records of incident reports. 22 | Maintain a log of wastes ‘generated including type and volumes. Bure Authorised Representative Table 4 Records of wastes generated. Wruizae Pages ofaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. 1D ‘Commitment Responsibility | EMP. Reference Evidence of Action 23 Ensure that all solid and industrial wastes are stored in covered skips and disposed of by a licensed ‘waste management contractor. Bur Table 4 Authorised Representative Resulis of compliance aucit. 24 Ensure that all liquid wastes are stored in appropriate containers and disposed of bya licensed waste management contractor. Buru Table 4 Authorised Representative Results of a compliance aueit, 26 Monitor dust emissions and ‘erosion and implement dust ‘and erosion control measures if required. Buu Table 5 ‘Authorised Representative Results of @ compliance audit Ensure that a compliance audit against the ‘commitents proposed in this Environment Pian takes place during BURU's Canning Basin Driling Program. BURU will obtain the support of relevant personnel when this Is. required, Buru ‘Section 8.4 Authorised Representative Results of a compliance auit AFTER FRAC OPERATIONS 2 Rehabiltate access tracks ‘and well sites in accordance with conditions as set out under the Schedule of ‘Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements ~ 1981 and the Environmental Protection Act 1986 and the Rehabilitation Management Plan, Buu Authorised Representative Results of a compliance audit. 28 Continue monitoring rehabilitated sites in accordance with the Rehabilitation Management Plan. Bun Table Authorised Representative Report presenting resulis of rehabilitation monitoring, Ensure that the site is inspected for the removal of all waste materials at the ‘completion of hydraulic facturing operations. Buu Table 4 Authorised Representative Resuils of a compliance audit. WwruLeor Pages ola7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP ‘Commitment e Responsibility | EMP Evidence of Action Reference 30 Ensure that the resulls of the | Buru Section 8.4 | Results of a compliance audit ‘compliance audit are Authorised forwarded to the relevant | Representative WA government department. statements describing environmental performance and any environmental Incldents that occurred during the audit period. 2.0 24 2.2 2.3 BACKGROUND Proponents Buru is an Australian company focused on exploring and developing petroleum resources in the Canning Basin in the Kimberley region of north-east Western Australia. Buru holds Interests and rights in tenements covering more than 140,000 km? throughout the Canning Basin, including the Blina Oilfield and associated facilities. Buru was formed by the demerger of ARC Energy Limited's ("ARC") Canning Basin assets as part of the ARC/AWE merger. Buru will build upon ARC's existing health, safety and environment (HSE") ‘management systems as activities in the Canning Basin increase, Buru is the custodian of this EMP and has overall responsibilty for its implementation, compliance and revision. Proposed Works Bury has identified an extensive hydrocarbon column in the Yulleroo accumulation which may be economically viable if commercial flow rates can be established. The Yulleroo-2 Well was drilled by ARC in 2008 but was suspended due fo technical issues during a cased-hole DST and contractual Issues. As testing of the well was never completed, the diill site and access roads were not rehabilitated. Therefore re-establishing the well site will fequire minimal clearing of vegetation and earthworks. At the Yulleroo-2 Well, Buru Is proposing three staged hydraulle fractures over a 250m gross interval in a “proof of concept ‘design’ in an attempt to stimulate gas flow. The fracs are proposed as high rate slick water fracs each requiring approximately 100,000 lbs. of proppant and 5,000 barrels of water. The Yullaroo-2 exploration well is located approximately 78km east of Broome, Wester Australia (Figure 4). The frac program is scheduled to ocour early October 2010. This EMP thas been prepared in order to manage the frac program at the Yulleroo-2 well site in an environmentally responsible manner. Purpose and Scope of this EMP ‘This EMP has been written to meet the following objectives: ‘+ Describe the environmental aspects of the Yulleroo-2 hydraulic fracturing program. ‘* Detail specific information on the environmental sensitivities of the receiving environment, Wroae Page 10 ofa?Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP + Identity the potential environmental impacts of the project. + Describe the control measures that. will be implemented to. minimise the environmental impact of the project and ensure that the environmental objectives are achieved. + Evaluate the environmental hazards and consequences associated with fracturing, ‘assess the environmental risk levels and develop management measures to ensure risks are Kept to an acceptable level. + Todocument this information: ©. For implementation by Buru’s employees and contractors. ‘0 For use by regulatory authorities in the environmental assessment and approval process. ‘This EMP has been prepared in accordance with the Western Australia (WA) Department of Industry and Resources (‘DoIR'YDepartment of Mines and Petroleum (DMP") ‘Environmental Guidance for Petroleum Operations in WA’, Version 6, July 2006 (DoIR, 2006). wruree Bago eta‘Yulletoo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP oe et Ete + Kaunas Sa Seeger S Reuiare Lice Eee me betnbttien ceil ae Ts ceemeeeenee Nee a seems ene tansy — ‘Baru Eneegy Limited Vetoes Tia onnaT aa aoe Figure 1. Location of the Yulleroo-2 well in relation to towns, roads and watercourses 3.0 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT POLICY Buru undertakes all operations with the highest regard for and commitment to HSE management, employee conditions and equipment and maintenance. Buru has developed wruzore Page 12 047‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. 4.0 at a corporate HSE Policy (Attachment 4) that is closely based on the ARC HSE Policy. All activities associated with the 2010 Yulleroo-2 hydraulic fracturing program will comply with Buru’'s Standard Operating Procedures and Policies, which are based on ARC's existing procedures. Buru will adopt specific procedures to minimise the Impact of the project on the local environment. The key environmental objectives are to: + Minimise the total area of disturbance consistent with environmentally responsible use of the site; + Maximise the use of existing tracks, selsmic ines and firebreaks for access; + Avoid disturbance to significant habitat; + Avoid clearing trees as far as possible; + Minimise soll damage by operating during the dry season and using dust abatement techniques if required; + Avoid sensitive sites, such as sites prone to erosion, where possible; + Minimise the potential for the introduction of weeds; = Minimise the risk of fre; + Minimise any adverse effects on amenity; + Prevent land and water contamination; and + Promote effective rehabilitation of disturbed areas. Buru's predecessor (ARC) has drilled wells in the Canning Basin including Yulleroo-2 and Buru has re-developed procedures and systems to ensure compliance with the ‘commitments made in this EMP, which are detailed in Table 1. LEGISLATION Buru is committed to maintaining the highest standards of management, occupational health and safety and environmental protection. Buru acknowledges its duty of care in all aspects of the proposed operation and the requirement to meet the following applicable legislation. ‘Commonwealth Environmental Legislation The Commonwealth Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC ‘Ac\) came into force in July 2000 and was amended in 2007. The EPBC Act requires a proponent to obtain Commonwealth approval of any action that will or is likely to have @ significant impact on matters of national environmental significance. The matters of national environmental significance identified in the Act as triggers for Commonwealth assessment and approval are: World heritage properties; © Ramsar wetlands; ‘+ Nationally threatened species and ecological communities; Migratory species; + Commonwealth marine areas; and + Nuclear actions. wrulzo Page 1 aTYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 4.2 424 42.2 A search of the EPBC Act Protected matters database did not identify any matters of national environmental significance that are likely to be impacted by the proposed hydraulic fracturing program. The nearest area protected under the EPBC Act is Roebuck Bay, listed ‘as a ‘wetland of international importance’ under the Ramsar convention, which is located approximately 60 km to the west-southwest of the well site (Figure 2). The Yulleroo-2 well is located within the catchment area for the Roebuck Bay wetlands. Therefore, the Yulleroo-2 ‘exploration well is considered unlikely to trigger the EPBC Act and has not been referred to the Commonwealth Government, For further information see Attachment 3, State Environmental Legislation Overview Buru is required to obtain approval under the WA Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 prior to commencing activities associated with the Yulleroo-2 exploration well, Buru will comply with the requirements of the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 and Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991, {In addition to obtaining approval from DMP who administer the petroleum legislation, Buru will comply with legislation and regulations administered by a number of State Government bodies. ‘The key legislation includes: + Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972; * Contaminated Sites Act 2003; * Environmental Protection Act 1986 (and Administrative Procedures 1993); ‘+ Explosives and Dangerous Goods Act 1961; ‘+ Health Act 1911; + Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990; + Land Administration Act 1997; + Rights in Water and irrigation Act 1914; ‘+ Soll and Land Conservation Act 1945; ‘+ Wildlife Conservation Act 1950; Under the Environmental Protection Act 1986, clearing of native vegetation is prohibited unless: + The clearing is exempt under the Environmental Protection Act 1988 or the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004. + Apormit has been granted. DMP-EPA.MOU ‘The DMP has a Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU") with the Environmental Protection Authority (‘EPA") that outlines the criteria used to determine if a petroleum proposal requires referral to the EPA for assessment under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA). Buru believes that this frac proposal does not trigger referral to the EPA given that the survey area does not contain any: Wrueee Page Ta etaT424 Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP + Protected areas e.g. ESAs. + Red book areas, ‘+ Sensitive riparian or groundwater areas. For further information see Attachment 3. As demonstrated during previous operations ‘completed by Buru in the Canning Basin, traccing operations can be managed to avold any potential significant impacts. ‘Vegetation clearing Under Regulation 5 Item 24 (Clearing Under the Petroleum Act) of the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 (WA), clearing as @ result of exploration under the Petroleum Act 1967, the Petroleum Pipeline Act 1969 or the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 is exempt if clearing occurs outside of an Environmentally Sensitive Area ("ESA"). The nearest ESA to the proposed well site, Taylors Lagoon, is located approximately 6 km to the north, Roebuck Plains, which is defined as an ESA, is located approximately 23 km to the west-southwest of the Yulleroo-2 exploration ‘well at its closest point (Figure 2). The proposal will not involve clearing of ESA’s and therefore is exempt from the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 (WA). The only area that requires clearing is the firebreak of 35 m as per FESA requirements for the flare pit. The total area cleared will be roughly 70 m x 35 m. Buru will not be applying for a Clearing Permit for the Yulleroo-2 well. Native Title and Heritage The Yulleroo-2 well and surrounds are located in land on which the Rubibi people hold Native Title. Consultation with the Kimberley Land Council in relation to the frac program is. ‘ongoing and Bur is committed to meeting any restrictions or guidelines set by the Traditional Owners. WwroDe Page a7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. ee oe Sete sein [yee a fo rrwoitae | atemowme REE Neca fo Camano RB Se eee a Visercouve Meas, ESAS fring biter) eh secs tenn te cco came eee ete vee ES, or ned ‘ro i ke aaa Conaig a Figure 2. Location of Buru Energy Limited Yulleroo-2 well in relation to areas of conservation significance and watercourses. wuz Page 16 0007| | ‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP | | | 5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY Buru's planning and management of onshore driling operations continues to build on the methods and systems developed by ARC. This proposal also encompasses appropriate ‘management actions developed specifically for the proposed Yulleroo-2 well frac program Buru proposed three staged hydraulic fractures over a 250 meter gross interval in order to stimulate gas flow at the previously drilled Yulleroo-2 well. 6.1 Location of the Yulleroo-2 welt The Yulleroo-2 well {s located within the Shire of Broome - West Kimberley, Western Australia approximately 75 km east of Broome and 95km south west of Derby (Figure 1). The Yulleroo-2 weil is located in permit EP391 which is wholly owned by Buru. The well is situated primarily on tussock grassland, shrubland and woodland, which is used as pastoral country. The closest major waterway is Deep Creek, roughly 18km to the north of the site (Figure 3). wruleon Page TAT |‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Gai Laue +. tenses ame, 8 Wesnenvenees Woes comeeer : ee oes 48 PybidPices —— asor Le Bice tonto feats ~ nn sine tee cerereenrinm, = Rab Memnths ——Sl e reorstehasd Ses uv knnoytintos ‘lao 02a he Ching Ba Figure 3, Location of Yulleroo-2 well in relation to watercourses and roads wruleor Page te ofa‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 6.2. Description of the hydraulic fracturing program 5.2.1. Well Description and Configuration The Yulleroo-2 well was drilled in 2008 by ARC to appraise promising but inconclusive resulls attained in 1987 while drilling the Yulleroo-1 exploratory well. Yulleroo-2 recorded strong gas shows at the same stratigraphic level as Yulleroo-1. The well was susponded early and a cased-hole DST never carried out following the failure of the perforating guns to fire downhole and contractual issues. A summary of the well configuration is presented in Table 2. Table2 Yulleroo-2 well data summary [Wal es ai satite see Deeoiaten ee Location Conning Basin Permit EPS0t Purpose of weil Exploration Surface coordinates (GDA 84 | 492916 E, 6025292 N Zone 51) Total depth '3730m TVORT, -3722m TVDSS ‘Ground Elevation (AMSL) | 672m iil Floor Elevation 29m (RTGL=B7M Well history and deviation summary Yulleroo-2 is a near vertical hole, Spudded on 22 January 2008 at 47:00 hours, ‘A.178mm (7°) liner was cemented in place on 9 April 2008 down to 3308.6m ‘A 482mm (6°) open hole section was drilled below this to TD ‘A maximum deviation of 11.1° was noted at 2820.67mMD Casing and finer ‘340mm (13 16°) conductor casing to 302mMD 244mm (9 516") Casing to 1850mMD 178mm (7") Liner from 1749.2mMD to 3308.SmMD PIP Tag —located in the 478mm liner at 2704.83mMD Logs LWD (Gamma Resistivity): 1860mMD to 2903mMD (Run |) 2850mMD to 325MM (Run I) EcoScope logging over: 2800 fo 2830mMD ADN4 (6° hole) MWD run from 3308.6m to 3730m_ ‘Cased Hole ~ Sonie-Gamma-Neutron Logs run from 2600mMD to ‘TD, priorto the DST run 6.2.2 Hydraulic Fracturing Program Buru will attempt to stimulate gas flow to a commercially viable level in the Yulleroo-2 well using a three stage frac (Table 3). The large wruzoe of the accumulation, the absence of any Bago To aa7‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 5.23 identifiable water zone and the relatively thin and dispersed sands suggest the system may Fespond well to the large scale frac techniques utllised in the US shale gas industry. Buru's Fairway Rig will be uflised for the frac procedures, The proposed operation includes: ‘« Re-establishing old access roads. ‘+ Re-establishing the old drilling platform, and expanding the original sump to ‘accommodate the extra fluid demands of the frac program. Mobilisation of Frac/CTU Equipment, personnel and supplies. Hydraulic fracturing of the well. Cleaning and testing of target zones. ‘+ Demobllisation of Frac/CTU spread, personnel and supplies. ‘+ Rehabiltating the sites following completion of operations including drying of turkey's nest, removal of PVC lining and tehabiltation by inflling. Removalistorage of any gravel from dril pads and campsites and re-spreading of topsoil and cleared vegetation. Examples of the vegetation of the Yulleroo-2 well site are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Preparing Access Roads and Well Site. As the Yulleroo-2 well was not sufficiently tested in 2008, rehabilitation of the access trails and welt site were not carried out, The minor works are required to return the access trails and well site to an acceptable operational standard have already been approved (see ‘Attachment 4 for details). The layout of the well site is shown in Figure 6. ‘As the crew will be limited, the original campsite will not be used and therefore wil not be fe-prepared. Instead an accommadation block to house the onsite supervisors and one other emergency spare bed will be positioned on the driling site, An ablution block to provide onsite faciities will also be provided. Three already existing septic tanks and two leach drains will be re-established on the well site for disposel of waste water, grey water and toilet effluent. Tanks will be emptied by a contractor on a regular basis and taken to the local waste water treatment faci ‘The remaining preparations on site include: + Re-establish and expand the old mud sump and convert to a “turkey's nest", This {involves widening and lining it with PVC fo handle 15000 bbis of water required for the frac program. The turkey’s nest will be fenced to prevent access by terrestrial fauna. + Re-establish and expand the flare pit at the well site with a firebreak of 35 meters as per FESA requirements. This was conveyed to Buru by the Emergency services manager in the Shire of Broome who coordinates flaring permits in the region. The site was also inspected by the Ranger for these purposes. + Re-establish a bunded area for specific chemicals, + Re-establish a specific area for conducting hot work, such as welding and oxy- cutting, ‘+ Re-establish a specific area for effluent and grey water. ‘+ Establishing a small accommodation area on site. wralzors Pages aTYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Frecturing Operations EMP. Figure 4. Vegetation typical of the Yulleroo-2 well area (aerial view). Figure. Vegetation at the Yulleroo-2 well site (facing north) WrUaore Pageat oa?Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Key © Fie Extingutaher Light Tower A Firat Ald Station ° Hyraton unit Primary Mustr Pont ] Hasarous Ares a ‘Suppor Equipment © © som © & Frac Pumps Support Equpment | Sunn Ea Yorn comes & cp ee SRR 140m Figure 6. Proposed layout of the drill pad for the Yulleroo-2 frac operations The flare pit will be re-established to reduce fire risk and will have a firewall and fire break in place. A new firebreak of at least 35 meters will need to be cleared for FESA requirements, ‘as some vegetation has overgrown the area. The total area cleared will be roughly 70 m x 35m. To accommodate the large volume of water the existing sump will be expanded and lined with PVG plastic In a ‘turkey's nest’ design. The ‘turkey's nest’ will be fenced off to prevent ‘access to the area by terrestrial animals. The water in the ‘turkey's nest’ will be treated with a blocide (Magnacide-575) to prevent bacterial and insect growth. Following the frac program, the plastic liner on the water reserve pit (turkeys nest) will be removed once its contents have evaporated, ‘The fuel is stored In a moblle 20,000 litre fuel tanker, which requires no bunding. However ‘any transfer pumps and hose connections will be bunded to minimise the effects of potential leaks. Oil drums (206 litres) containing engine and hydraulic oil will be stored on individual four drum stands with bunding built in underneath. Most of the chemicals are strapped on palettes and are accessible to a forklift wre Pape Doar6.24 ‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Some products are delivered in 20 litre and 206 litre drums, which are kept in a specific bunded area. A trilaminate polyethylene liner will cover the bunded area, with a dirt wall 0.25 m high. Meterial Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) will be on site during the operation. Septic concrete tanks and HDP (plastic) leach drains will be instelled near the rig site offices and also at the camp accommodation area to accommodate both grey water and tollet effluents. The concrete tanks and HDP leach drains will be allowed to dry out and In- filled at the completion of drilling activities. Hydraulic Fracturing To stimulate gas flow, a three stage hydraulic fracturing operation is carried out (Table 3). This involves the pumping of fluids at high pressure into the reservoir, using pumps and mixing and monitoring equipment. The first two fracs (2850 meters and 2980 meters) contact the two sections in the well that have interpreted porosity and conventional gas pays. These areas correlate with the zones that flowed gas in the Yulleroo-1 well. The third area (3100 meters) is designed to stimulate a series of thin sands (the OP sands) that are interpreted to shale out between Yulleroo-1 and 2 and are centrally located within the gas column and overpressured zone, Hydraulic fracturing involves the following key stages: + Run 24.5" frac string with a 10k psi frac packer into the well. + The well wil hen be perforated and fractured zone by zone with wire perforating runs for each fracture. + Cleaning out and tifting in the well with a coll tubing (CT) unit. + The well will be produced to flare for a week while the CT unit cleans up another well. +The CT unit will return and run in and lft the well back on production if it has died through condensate loading and the coil tubing left in the well to act as a velocity string, ‘+ The well will be produced through a surface well test spread to the ground flare for two weeks to obtain reservoir performance + ‘The well will then be shut in pending evaluation A sefety, environmental & Operational risk assessment of the frac/CTU spread and program is carried out prior to works commencing. A pre‘frao program safely and environmental meeting is also held with key members of the workforce prior to the commencement of the project, All members of the workforce are required to undergo a ‘safety and environmental induction. The fracturing program will run for approximately 7 days (which includes rigging up / down operations) and subsequent flaring and testing will run for approximately 21 days. Noise and light disturbance to surrounding landowners is not a concern due to the remote location of the walis. Wruleore PapeeteYuileroo-2 Hydrautic Fracturing Operetions EMP Table3 __Design Characteristics of the Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Program ‘Yulleroo:2" Hyaraulle” Fraoturing Program Design feature ‘Description Location ‘Canning Basin, ~78km west of Broome Permit P30 Well hole surface coordinates | 492016 E, 8025202 N {GDA 94 Zone 51) Frac timing ‘October 2010 Program duration 7 days for the frac, 21 days fo clean and test the wall ‘Work Pads Rig pad 740m x 95 m compacted gravel (the total area including access tracks and firebreaks for the rig will be approximately 470m x 130m) Clearing required ‘As the work Is being carried out at a pre-existing site, minimal clearing of regrowth will be required Number of face = Frac details: 850m frac 2a80m fae ‘Si00m frac Faacinienals Fracinievals “Frac intervals (2858-2857 1m 2977-2979 2m 3100-3102 2m 2869.5-28711.8m | 2982-2983 1m 3107-3119 3m 2874-2876 2m 3006-3008 2m 3118-3119 1m 2890-2891 1m 3014-3015 {m Total 6m, Total 5.5m, Total em Overall interval 19m Overall interval 35m | Overall interval 98m_ | Res press ~6300psi Res press ~5000psi_| Res press ~5800psi Proppant quantiles 80,000 Ibs. 100,000 ibs. 100,000 fs. Fluid quantities 5,000 barrels per Frac Frac type ‘Slick water frac Disposal of frac_materiais and fluids ‘As the materials used predominantly comprised of proppant, part of the proppant will get lited with gas into the pit however, itis intended that the bulk of material will remain in the reservoir. Workforce 30 people Dail Rig Fairway Rig will be used to run the tubing into the well Rig description Tralier mounted EMSCO GB 260, 480HP ‘Proposed rig mobilisation route ‘Great Northern Hwy, road to catlle yard, then ances track fo the well ‘A range of chemicals may be used during fraccing and. testing operations. These potentially include: ‘+ ceramic proppant (Terraprop Plus); + sand proppant; ‘+ guar gelling agent; ‘+ hydrochloric acid; ‘+ corrosion inhibitor, + oxidiser breaker, + clay stabilisers; + Iron controller; © friction reducers; * biocide (Magnacide-575); and wruleaie Page a oar6.2.5 5.2.6 B27 Yulleroo-2 Hydrauilc Fracturing Operations EMP » Nitrogen. For details regarding the composition, characteristics and ecotoxicology see the MSDSs in ‘Attachment 6. The materials will be pumped into the reservoir and consist primarily of proppant. The bulk of the materials should remain in the reservoir. The hydrochloric acid will be diluled underground by the large amounts of water used during the frac program. After fracturing, should the materials return to surface, they will either be contained in the flare sump or be combusted in the flare pit. Demobilisation Once the well Is evaluated, should there be significant indications of hydrocarbons on wire- line loge and itis decided to complete the well as a producer, an appropriate completion plan would be issued for approval and execution. In this case, the well would be left completed with a surface Christmas tree until suitable short and long term production strategies ate developed. Should there be no significant indications of success through the frac proof of concept, a posted decision will be made based on reservoir evaluation and should there be a need to abandon the well, Buru will do this in accordance with the Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements - 1991. ‘All excavations will be backfilled and the entire well site will be restored including removallstorage of road gravel and sheeting materials at the drill pad. The cleared surface will then be rehabilitated in accordance with the Rehabilitation Management Plan, and in accordance with Clause 637 of the Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements - 1991, all facilities will be decommissioned and dismantled. Rehabilitation In accordance with clause 638 of the Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements - 1994 the site will be rehabiltated and restored as far as practicable to its original condition. A post-survey inspection will be carried out to determine if there is any need for active rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will be in accordance with the Rehabilitation Management Plan. This activity would be completed within two years. of fracturing or production activities, provided no further operations are being contemplated. Utilities and Services. The ulllties and services for the well site are described below. Water Water for the rig and frac operations will be obtained from the bore established during the drilling operations in 2008, Water will be pumped to the usage locations via polypipes. Water requirements for each frecture are estimated to be 5,000 barrels and ‘accommodation facilities require an estimated 8,000L per day. A fenced ‘turkey’s nest’ dam will be established at the drill pad so ample water Is available. Electricity Portable on-site diesel generation provides power for the well site. wre Page 25007Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Offices and Storage Aras ‘These will be portable offices and sea cont Instrumentation, Lighting and Cabling All instrumentation, lighting and cabling is installed in accordance with AS 3000, Waste Disposal All domestic wastes will be removed via an approved waste disposal contractor to the nearest registered facility. Chemical Storage ‘Chemicals and other hazardous substances are stored in the bunded chemical storage area on the drill pad. The chemicals will be stored in accordance with the requirements of their relevant MSDS. MSDS‘s for each chemical used and stored onsite will be held in the site office. Purchase of Hazardous Materials and Substances Clear statements of obligations will be described on the purchase order. A requirement for the provision of an MSDS consistent with the Worksafe Australia Code of Practice for the Preparation of MSDS and the Code of Practice for Labelling of Workplace Substances. An MSDS that conforms to the WorkSafe Australia Code of Practice will be made available (to be easily accessed by all personnel) for each chemical substance to be brought onto Buru facilities. ‘A Hazardous Materials Register will be maintained by the Site Manager at the Project location that confirms the availability of MSDS information. The Site Manager Is responsible to monitor that the fracturing team maintains the Register of hazardous materials used on Buru facilities. Purchasing will be in compliance with the provisions of Explosives & Dangerous Goods Legislation, OH&S Legislation, Codes of Practice and Australian Standards as referred to under the Legislation. Purchase of Hazardous Substances and Dangerous Goods will be specified against: ‘+ Hazardous substances as defined by the National Occupational Health and Safety ‘Commission's List of Designated Hazardous Substances [NOHSC: 10008, (1999)] ‘* National Model Regulations for the Control of Workplace Hazardous Substances INOHSC: 1005, 1994) and National code of Practice for the Control of Workplace Hazardous Substances [NOHSC: 2007, 1994). Wwruleoa Page 78 a7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 6.2.8 Information to be provided by Suppliers Where items are classified as Hazardous Substances or Dangerous Goods, the supplier willbe required to provide the following information (as defined by the “Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail’ ADG Code Revision 6): + Technical Name; ‘+ United Nations (UN) Number; + Hazchem Code; ‘+. Dangerous Goods Class; + Subsidiary Risk; © Packaging Group; ‘+ Manufacturer's Name; + Manufacturer's Part Number, + Manufacturer's MSDS. 6.2.9 Emergency Facilities and Communication Medivac will be via road to medical faellties in Broome or Derby. If required, medivac by helicopter is available from Broome or Derby. The nearest substantial hospital is also located in Broome. First aid facilifes will be available at the rig site/Frac office. A satellite system will provide communications at the rig site. In case of alarm, muster points will be defined and clearly marked for the site. 6.2.10 Emergency Planning and Response Buru maintains up-to-date manuals as outlined below: . Buru Oil Spill Contingency Plan Yulleroo-02 Well Fracturing and CT Operations (Attachment 2, this manual). . Buru Emergency Response Manual Drilling Operations: + Buru Safety Management Plan (SMP) Driling Operations + Buru Environmental Management Plan Driling Operations this manual) ‘The Buru SMP Drilling Operations include details of the key processes of induction, safety meetings and reporting, permit to work system, job safety analysis, hazard and management control, A copy of the Buru EMP, ERM and SMP manuals will be maintained atthe well site, Wwruleem Page artaYulloroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND RISKS. 64 Scope ‘The scope of the environmental risk assessment covers all aspects of the proposed fracking program. 6.2 Key Definitions Incident Event: An event capable of causing critical, major, moderate, minor damage to the environment or negligible damage with no significant ‘environmental effect, Hazard: ‘A physical situation with the potential for damage to the environment, human injury, damage to property or some combination of these. Risk: The likelihood of @ specified undesired event occurring within a specified period or in specified circumstances. It may be elther a ‘frequency (the number of spacified events occurring in a time unit) or a probability (the probability of specified event following a prior event), depending upon circumstances. 6.3 Risk Assessment Methodology 6.3.1 Overview This section describes the environmental risk assessment for potential events that may impact the environment during operational activites, ‘The purpose of this assessment is to identify hazards and develop risk-reducing measures to prevent and mitigate impacts from operational activities. An environmental hazard-type assessment was. undertaken to identify, analyse and evaluate the environmental risks associated with operation and to recommend management actions to reduce the risk to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Environmental risk assessment consists of four basic steps: 1. Hazard identification 2, Hazard analysis 3. Risk evaluation 4, Risk management. These steps are described briefly below. 6.3.2. Hazard Identification Hazard Identification involves Identifying the sources of risk ie. those activities or incidents that could result in an environmental impact. Hazards are categorised into those arising from routine operations, and those arising from incidents, 6.3.3 Hazard Analysis Hazard analysis determines the likelihood of an activity or event occurring, and the consequences of that activity or event on the environment. ‘The Buru risk ranking matrix wautzar Page 26 476.3.4 6.3.6 Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP given in Attachment 5 was used to assess the consequence and likelihood of all identified events, The matrix is based on six classifications of severity and six for the likelihood of a hazard, Risk Evaluation Risk evaluation prioritises the risks i.e. determining If the risk of an activity of incident is acceptably low, or if management actions are required to reduce the risk to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). The risk evaluation presented in Table 4 takes existing safeguards/management measures into consideration Le. represents the residual risk with existing or planned safeguards in place. Risk Management Table 4 presents the detailed assessment of risks, impacts and their management for the proposed drilling operations. The Implementation Strategy in Section 9 focuses on the sighificant issues identified to ensure the ongoing management of environmental risks. WrULao age 2 oTYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Table 4 —_Detailed assessment of environmental risks, impacts and management. RISK IDENTIFICATION RISKANALYSIS RISK RISK TREATMENT EVALUATION Event incident Potential impact Causes Severity, [[Likelinood | Risk Ranking | Safeguards / Management Methods PREPARATION OF ACCESS ROUTES AND WELL SITE = Removal of ative + Loss of ratve + Onsite fora and + isting access tacks oro seismic nes used to vegetation and potenti vegetation fauna notpreviowsly | 3 2 Medium | minimise fecurement er deuing crave fauna habitat determined during + Loss of declared rare 7 aces assessment(s) + Destruction of fauna Uncontrolled vehicle habitat + OfFecad arving to Ba /+ On ground or desitop review of botane surveys cess sites undertaken to ensure dil st, camp sites and access tacks avoid DRF ane prionty fore speci. + Permitto clea native vegetation ebtained (f require). '* Vehicle collision with fauna | + Faunadeath orinjury | Unoredictable 2 2 Low mavernent of animals Vehicles traveling at high speeds . Sie . vehicle are inspected and have working | Neeeee ee lights andlor spet ight. } ties of poor vsbity > Soi disturbance + Erosion and > Poor drainage contol + Drainage controls implemented such as erosion sedimentaton ‘over cleared areas 2 2 Low berms and sit barters during operations. + Compaction and topsoil ‘+ Topsoil and spol stockriled separstely. + Subsidence 7 tne ae + Stockpiles constructed with low profile to reduce iE ecietansbisdas Latcomeees erosion potent. Woe Page 0 ofa7‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. RISK IDENTIFICATION, RISKANALYSIS: RISK RISKTREATMENT EVALUATION Event /ineidont Potential impact, Causes Severity | Likelihood | Risk Ranking | Safeguards / Managemont Methods ‘stebilty ‘+ Implement dust control measures (e.g. water Unstable subsoils spraying) if dust generation becomes a problem. '= Disturbance of ncigenous diseases * Damage to indigenous |» Onsite indigenous hentage stots) hertage stes| heftage sites not 4 4 Low previously determines during ethnographic study "+ Introduction of noxious [+ Infection ofsoilwith |» Weeds and weeds and vermin, exotic |” diseases and contaminated soil on |g 1 tow ‘species, fora and animal pathogens vehicles, Sapases + Infestation of weeds in cleared areas, + All mported materials weed fea, + Following the fist wet season ater [+ introduction of noxious weeds and vermin, exotic 4 1 Low species, fora and animal '» Exotic species monitored during auditing and inspection program, weruLzoTe Pageat ofa7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP RISKIDENTFICATION RISKANALYSIS | RISK, RISKTREATMENT EVALUATION Event incident Potential impact causes Severity [Likelihood | Risk Ranking | Safeguards Management Methods: + Disruption aflcalrefo | « Inconvenience to iocal |» Movement of heawy + Due to remot location, raf volumes minimal ‘nee feskients: imacnineny ‘on public 4 2 Low '* Public notification of proposed timing and location of ‘and other mad users meade. operations and predicted disruptions to traffic, + Tgniton sources eg, vehicle + Loss of vegetation and |» Grass fres and bush + Adequate fe equpment located on-te, including exhaust, smokers native fauna fires in uncieared 3 1 Low. ‘ep response vai, and persone! tained nfs reas fem Soures of igntion iste suai by 1m vt fo rake FYORAULIC FRACTURING + Viel contol event + Contaminated soi, | Release ofiuid 6 1 Medium [+ Blow out preventorbafely valves used during Surface water ncior |" fycrocarbone andlor fracaing and testing operons und he wel s gourd water fracking namical © plugged and abondoned or when the well head is ramen the ervronment frszled. + Releate of gaseous + O1Spit Contngency Pan: Yuteroo-02 wel hycrocarbors the fracurng and GT operations (Atachment 2) atmcephere }* Ground flare will be monitored round the clock and + Reinsrting wilstay ae eauipment into the }* Emergency response plan in place and emergency we ‘response drills conducted regularly. + ara care taken wien reopening wel » Fracturing fluids }* Physical orchemical |» Unplanned release of }* Chemicals to be handled in bunded area, or over 2 impacts or for, fracturing figs 3 1 Low large cp raycontainmont aca, J+ Any fuids that resurface wil be bumtin the flare pt ‘+ Splls while loading frometeased mids |" WoC er acunng + Turkey's nest fenced to prevent access by terestial animals. [+ Dri sites are not located within sensitve environments. > Fracturing fads Chemical mpacis on | Unplanned escape of [+ Fracturing taking place deep underground (2880 m) groundvaleiacutery) | fecunng fds 4 1 tow | ‘The welis steel cased, so fluids wil remain in Chemical impact on WraEae Page DOT‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP RISK IDENTIFICATION. RISK ANALYSIS, RISK RISK TREATMENT i EVALUATION Event /incident Causes ‘Severity, | Likelihood: | Risk Ranking || Safeguards / Management Methods }+ Chemical impact on Roebuck Plains wetlands > Frac out to surface @ Physical orchemical |e Excueding tested impacts on fora, pressure: 7 4 Low fauna, sol, surface |, 7 water or groundwater |* Eaementfafure from released fuids + Fracturing fid and [> Physical or chemical |» Loss of combustion in hydrocarbon contamination | i fare pit 3 2 Medium of fare pit /+ Failure to burn ait fluids in fare pit facility if required. > Nose > Generates as low popation densi 1 1 Low + Feeiity lighting 4 1 Low [> Third party access 2 2 Low |e Adequate signage (eg no unauthorised access) on {gates and access tral. + Site will be manned constanily during operations ‘Disturbance or damage 1 Unknown ‘+ Presfrac consultation with relevant utlty autnories Infrastructure and services, Infrastructure located | 9 2 tow for the early identification ofthe locations of existing in the planned ‘Overhead and buried cables, ines, pipes, water operations area. mains or other potentaly affected inftastucture. wruea Page 33 ofa‘Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP RISK IDENTIFICATION 5 RISKANALYSIS” RISK. RSK TREATMENT | 5 EVALUATION | Event Incident Potential impact Gauses, i] Severity: [ Likelihood | Risk Ranking | Safeguards (Management Methods + Damage fence ines |» Human enor ‘General area has low population density and is and fam getes remote from high density pepulations e.g, Broome 30 unlikely to have a high density of infastructure ‘and services, + Recnstatement of all ences and affected infrastructure to pre-diling conditons as agreed with the relevant landowners. [+ Fuel, oll and chemical storage areas appropriately [> Fuel cilor chemical spils [+ Contamination ofsoi, |» Lack of appropriate Surface water oF bundling around 2 3 Smbinee | apm ad Ne |, camer ne betey woh Sebo comers + baer ee ae chemicals during use, ‘= Insuficient raining = Unapproved gas faring |» Contribution to global |» Flaring required ‘+ Minimise volume of gaseous wastes tobe fared greennouse gas Suing Wel testing 4 6 Mesum | where pessibo. rine tli *+ Obtain approval from DMP (clause 627) and FESA Space snot uring restricted bum periods for fan. worming) + Associated gaseous wastes ate fared fn Wranee Page SolarYilleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. RISK IDENTIFICATION RISK ANALYSIS, RISK RISK TREATMENT Pes EVALUATION. Event incident Potential Impact Causes ‘Severity Likelihood | Risk Ranking” | Safeguards / Management Methods ‘consultation wih DMP) in accordance wth cause 818 of the Schecule cf Onst Exploration and Preduction Requirements - 1991, (> Potential for fee + Loss ofvegetaton | Flaring of gaseous (> Combustible materials envronment + Loss of rubbish into the environment J+ Mortaity of fora and fauna arising frem soil, |» ‘surface and ‘groundwater ‘contamination ‘Visual potaon from rubbish ; a Seiler tow |" sermons afore Restsion otra Eeaktong Reeubies + Adequnte re es Se seas |_FESA permitto flare obtained (if required). "Bost auna wad ag |v Gas oes = Bw ut preven ney vas present oe ‘or fracking 4 Low }* Blow out preventers/safety valves tumed on in the Serale Sowea ante eteone selotte s > Carano cfs > 7 Us epi wasi ranogaret ented are.groundwetar: 1 Low '» Regular inspection of piping and grey water and Solage Satie cad > Rewane oats ois | Severo war Us ofp waste anager ona Sarasin Sagara Cel gee + Program in place to minimise he volume of wastes ‘+ Wastewater disposed to turkey's nest, ‘+ Solid wastes such as sorap wood, metal, packaging J+ Waste ols and chemicals wil be stored separately generated erated, and the turkeys nest buried on site after al quids have been evaporated. ‘and liter segregated and stored in covered rubbish in a lined bund. 1 Waste oils and chemicals labelled and stored ‘waste records including type and volumes. £624 and 625 ofthe Schedule of Onshore Petroleum _| WrULaae Page 35 ofaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. RISK IDENTIFICATION RISKANALYSIS RISK EVALUATION [RISK TREATMENT. Event incident Potential impact ‘Causes ‘Severity [ Likelihood | Risk Ranking ‘Safeguards / Management Methods, ‘Exploration and Production Requirements - 1987. + Fate pt tested for contamination following program. + Site inspected at conclusion of program. ‘DEMOBILISATION AND/SITE RESTORATION [+ Disturbed ses abandoned [6 Production Reaurement- 1091 progressively 3 2 Medium isgused to imi tird party access. [+ Rehablitation of fraccing site and access track to + Monitoring of rehabilitated sites and assessment of rehabiltation success against completion critoria. }+ Continued monitoring and remediation works Undertaken untl the complation eritria have been achieved. wre Page 8 oarYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. 7.0 OBJECTIVES, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA Buru's environmental performance objectives, standards and criteria for frac operations are summarised in Table 5. ‘The management objectives relate to medium risk hazards identified in Section 6 (Le., there were no risks rated higher than medium in Section 6). TableS — Summary of Environmental Management Objectives, Standards and Performance Criteria, ‘Objective | Objectives | Standards Criteria No. 7 Minimise Bura Health, Safely | Pre-raccing desktop and field survey carried out impacts of | and Environment prior to project commencement. vegetation | Policy Permit to clear native vegetation obtained (if elearingon | This EMP required). native fauna Environmental induction ofall personn and tlora Use of existing access tracks and well site minimises requirements for clearing, ‘Access track and wel sites avoid Declared Rare Flora and Priority species, mangroves and native fauna, Vegetation material and topsoil will be placed ‘over the well site and camp to rehablitate area with use of top sol stock piles to provide a source of seed and biological carbon ‘Well sito rehabiitated to former condition. ‘On completion of program, mud sumps and flare pit will be fenced off unti the sump dries, toxicity testing has been completed on the sump and flare pit and they have been rehabilitated. 2 [Minimise risks | O Spi Contingancy | Buru Oil Spil Contingency Plan in place, ‘of adverse | Plan: Yulleroo-02 wel! | Blow out preventerisafety valves used during effects tothe | fracturing end CT | fracturing and testing operations environment | operations All storage areas bunded to AS1940. from (Aitachment 2, this | Mixing and loading of chemicels to occur in hydrocarbon | EMP) buinded areas, ‘orchemical | BuruHealth, Safety | Bunding around fuel hose connections and spils and | and Environment transfer pumps. teaks Policy All oll spills to be recorded on Buru Incident Schedule of Onshore | Report Form. Petroleum Exploration | Well not lecated In creek lines of drainage ‘and Production Containing water to limit environmental risk to Requirements - 1991 | surface or groundwater Use of drip tray while refueling. 3 Minimise risks | Schedule of Onshore | DMP and FESA (inside prohibited burn periods) | of adverse | Petroleum Exploration | approval obtained for all gas flaring. effects tothe | and Production No unauthorised venting or flaring. environment | Requirements - 1991 | Daily Reports showing gas volumes flared, from fering | BuruHealth, Safety | Flare pit tested for contaminants folowing (specticaty air | and Environment ‘operations wna Papear raYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP ‘Objective | Objectives | Standards criteria No. quailty impacts | Policy andwild fie | This EMP risk) 4 PMinimise BuruHeallh, Safely | All wastes disposed of by an approved waste ‘environmental_| and Environment ‘management contractor. effects from | Policy Weste records show quantity and type of wastes waste disposal | This EMP disposed of. No wastes left on site. & | Minimise iong- | Burs Health, Safely | Rehablitalion requirements as per Schedule of term effects of | and Environment ‘Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production fracand Policy Requirements — 1991, and the Environmental testing Schedule of Onshore | Protection Act 1986. activites on | Petroleum Exploration | Well site rehabilitated to former condition. the local and Production ‘All aquifers and permeable formations remain environment _ | Requirements — 1991 | isolated. This EMP. Pads re-contoured into the surrounding landform to approximate pre-existing contours with ‘original sol and to a stable physical state ‘No rubbish left on-site All above ground structures removed Pads re-contoured into the surrounding landform to approximate pre-existing contours with criginal sol to a stable physical state Minimise chance of introducing noxious weeds ‘and vermin, exotic flora and fauna and animal diseases by ensuring vehicles are inspected and washed down 6 | Minimise Buru Health, Safely | In the event of @ fire as a result of operations, impacts of fie | and Environment Bury will ensure that the affected area has a Policy representative suite of species found in the ‘Schedule of Onshore | surrounding area Petroleum Exploration | Any weeds that establish in the affected area and Production will bs removed. Requirements ~ 1994 This EMP 7 [Socio- ‘Buru Health, Safely | Regular consultation with focal inhabiants economic | and Environment No. complaints regarding noise, light and Impacts (eq | Policy disturbances to local activities, infrastructure nose, light | This EMP and services. and disturbance to local activities, infrastructure and services) wron Page BoaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 8.1 Key Performance Indicators (Targets) Buru has made a number of commitments in this EMP to ensure that environmental performance objectives for the fraccing are met. These are summarised in Table 6. Table Key Performance Indicators 1D] Subject Commitment Results of Audit S to be filled out during ae & : ie audit) ‘Waste Disposal ‘Ail wastes to be disposed of in a responsible manner. ‘Gaseous Emissions _ | Ailfiaring to be approved by the DMP and FESA, No unauthorised tlaring, Hydrocarbon and [OW Spit Contingency Plan: Yulleroo-02 weil chemical loss (spills | fracturing and CT operations (Attachment 2, and leaks) this EMP) in place. ‘Al oil spills to be recorded on Buru Incident Report Form. Storage areas to be bunded as per AS1940. Flare Pit tested for contaminants Protection oflocal | Clearing of Native Vegetation Permit Obtained Flora (required) ‘Maintenance Procedures in place for all activities. Permit to Work System in place. ‘All environmental incidents to be recorded on Bury Incident Report Form, Rehabilitation of well site to meet agreed criteria ‘Well fracturing ‘All aquifers and permeable formations remain | achieved in isolated, ‘accordance with the {racking program. wrorZe Page a0 ota?Yalleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Opere ions EMP 8.2 General The environmental performance objectives outlined in Section 6 of this EMP will be achieved throughout the frac program at Yulleroo-2 well through effective: * Delegation of roles and responsibilities in regard to this EMP. + Induction programs. + Communication and reporting arrangements (Section 8.4). + Consultation with key stakeholders (Section 8.6). ‘The feasibtity, planning and assessment of all frac programs are undertaken within the framework of the Buru Energy Limited Safety Management System, which incorporates. environmental management. The key elements of the Safely Management System include: ‘+ ‘The matching of legal obligations to the practical needs of all operations. + The assignment of responsibilities required to meet the commitments set out in the Buru Energy Limited Policy. + Acommon measurement process to check that standards are complied with. ‘+ Through feedback processes, the encouragement of Improvement In process and performance. + Appropriate and comprehensive documentary support. = Application to all levels and areas of the organisation (including work by contractors), ‘and to all working conditions and any activities that may have the potential to affect the health and safety of people or harm the environment. Table 7 lists all relevant HSE procedures within Buru Safety Management system that are applicable to fraceing. Table? Relevant HSE Procedures Procedure, ‘Objective of Procedure Cocation ‘Code of practice for Buru | To outline the main HSE criteriatobe | Bury Health Safety & Energy welts observed at Buru,Itis intended that Environment Policy personnel folowing these criteria willbe in | Buru Drug and Alcohot Policy a positon to prevent a mishap rather than react to one. TSE Management "To demonstrale that the HSE ‘Buru Safely Management Plan ‘System ‘Management Systems (SMS) is compited_| (SMP) Driling Operations in with during frac progrem placo Emergency Response | To ensure that Buruhas an effective ‘Buru Diiling Operations ‘emergency response management and recovery system, Emergency Response Manual (ERM) in place Emergency Shutdown To ensure effective siuidown response to ‘emergency situations. Buru Driling Operations Emergency Response Manual in place. Hiydrocarbon Spill (non “This OW Spill Contingency Plan (OSCPY Oi Spit Contingency Planz vavulzor Bagea0 47Yuteroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Procedure ‘Objective of Procedure Location emergency) provides instruction on response toa | Yulleroo-02 well fracturing and hydrocarbon spi or leak, CT operations (Attachment 2) in place Tncident Investigation — | To ensure that a system exisis for al | Burd Safely Management Plan and Reporting employees to report all health, safety and_| (SMP) Driling Operations in environmental incidents and to ensure | place that all incidents are investigated to an appropriate level 8&3 Roles and Responsibilities ‘All fraccing camp Ins are managed by Buru. The following responsibilities allocated during each drilling campaign, 8.3.1 Buru Operations Manager It is the responsibility of the Operations Manager — Hydraulic Fracturing to: Ensure that the requirements of this EMP are Implemented. Ensure that all environmental Incidents are reported to the Buru Management and (where required) to the regulator. Ensure that appropriate communications are in place between Buru, the property ‘owner and other local stakeholders and to keep them Informed of project issues and developments that may affect their activites. 8.3.2 Buru Well Site Manager / Company man It is the responsibilty of the Bur Well Site Manager to: Ensure all aspects of this EMP for which he/she is responsible are cartied out. Ensure a site/project specific induction is conducted prior to any contractor commencing work on site together with a "Site Orientation Checklist” prior to the performance of any work on site. Ensure a “Visitor Induction” is conducted prior to allowing any casual persons {anyone who does not have work to perform on the site) to enter the well site. Ensure a ‘Site Orientation Checklist’ is conducted prior to any contractor ‘commencing work on site together with a site/project specific induction conducted by the Well Site Manager, prior to the performance of any work on site. Ensure all employees and visitors comply with HSE policies and safe systems of work. Compliance with all relevant legislative requirements. Maintaining operating practices, which meet Buru environmental standards. Ensure that all new employees receive relevant induction training, Provide ongoing training at sites to ensure all employees have the skills and knowledge to carry out assigned tasks in a safe and productive manner. Ensure all reported hazards, incidents and near misses are promptly reported, investigated and appropriate corrective action completed. wrulebe Page a78.3.3 834 Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP ‘* Identify potential hazards through regular workplace inspections and implementing corrective action. + Encourage employee participation in safetyitraining programs and initiatives. © Ensure that all site construction vehicles are free of vegetative material and soil prior to mobilising to the well sites. Contract Crew Itis the responsibilty of the Rig Crew to: + Apply operating procedures outlined in this EMP in tetter and in spirit, ‘+ Follow good housekeeping procedures and work practices. * Encourage improvement wherever possible. © Promptly reporting all HSE hazards, incidents and near misses to their immediate supervisor. + Take all reasonable care to ensure his or her safely and that of other persons Is never compromised. + Report to work in a fit condition, i.e, not influenced by aleohol, drugs, fatigue or any condition that may affect the employee's abllty to complete any assigned task in a safe and effective manner. + Comply with Buru HSE policies and safe systems of work. + Correctly use. tools, equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with agreed safe work practices. » Ensure that work is not undertaken for which the employee feels they have not received adequate information and/or instruction. + Never undertake any task that does not meet Buru HSE standards. * Cooperate with rehabiltation programs to assist. in. the recovery of work-related injuryiliness, + Actively participate in HSE and training initiatives. ‘Training for Personnel and Contractors ‘Training is a means of sharing knowledge and developing skills and abiites. It is one of a number of strategies that can be used to influence behaviour and improve work performance, ‘The basic tenet of HSE tr ing (Information and Instruction) fs that employee behaviour can be modified towards greater environmental awareness. Broadly, employees need to know what their environmental responsibiliies are, how to participate in the management of environment within the organisation, and how to undertake their work as environmentally responsibly as possible. In integrating a high standard of environmental performance with the organisation's business performance goals, a systematic approach to training can have the following advantages: + Training emphasises the best work methods and procedures. Wruleere Page a2 ofaYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 84 + Training communicates the organisation's. commitment to. high performance standards. ‘+ Training clarifies people's roles. * Training is a means of ensuring people are clear about what they have to do and how it is to be done - in relation to their job, in carrying out specific Fesponsibilites under the organisation's health, safely environment policies and in line with the specific provisions of relevant legislation. * Training ensures that the requirements of health, safely and environmental legistations are met. ‘+ Most modern environmental legislation requires that employees be trained in the environmental aspects of their jobs. Where specific performance standards are provided in legislation, for example, the handling of certain hazardous material, sub- standard operations may result from a lack of training. + Training reduces costs (©. The costs of not having HSE training include those assosiated with work-related accidents, damage to plant and equipment, environmental. harm, higher Insurance premiums and staff turnover. Operations in breach of legislation may attract fines. Itis important to Buru and its contractors to identify the appropriate training needs of each employee/consultant and develop a systematic plan to deliver and follow up on this training. All members of the workforce are required to undergo a safely and environmental induction. ‘The induction will cover Buru Energy HS8E policy, PPE use, Buru Energy drug and alcohol policy, potential hazards, Emergency plans, driving rules and first aid facilites. Bury will ‘ensure that all personnel and contractors will be informed of Buru's environmental policies and procedures during inductions andlor pre-spud meetings. As a minimum, Buru Eneray will ensure all rig personnel are trained in and are aware of the following Buru systems: ‘+ Permit to Work system + Isolation and tagging procedures + JHAS + Emergency Response Plans + This Environmental Management Pian ‘Additional training will be provided on a required basis, Reporting Arrangements This section outlines the following reporting requirements: ‘+ Auditing and reporting by Buru on routine operations + Reports by Buru to the DMP for incidents outside of routine operations. + Reports by contractors to Buru. + Monitoring, audit and review of this EMP. wrorzors Page Sora844 842 Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Auditing and Reporting on Routine Operations A Daily Report is produced by the well site personnel that document any unusual ‘occurrences or incidents and a summary of routine operations. A visitor's log is maintained to record all persons visiting the site. Buru will record and report relevant information pertaining to any Spills, incidents, Emergencies and Audit findings on the fraccing and testing of the well to demonstrate that the environmental performance objectives and standards outlined in this EMP have been ‘met. Regular internal inspections and auditing will be undertaken by Buru management to ensure compliance with this EMP. Buru will also undertake a compliance audit as stated in this document. Auditing and Reporting on Incidents Bury, will report all incidents involving fire, flora damage or fauna injury/death to the DECIDMP. Buru will report to the DMP in accordance with all sections of clause 290 of the Schedule of ‘Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991. The report will include: ‘+The date, time and place of the occurrence. + The estimated quantity of liquid (or gas) that escaped. + Particulars of damage caused by the escape. + The events so far as they are known or suspected that caused or contributed to the escape. + Particulars of methods used to control the escape, + Particulars of methods used or proposed to be used to repair property damaged by the escape. ‘+ Measures taken, or to be taken, to prevent a possible recurrence of the escape. ‘Any incident that is outside the environmental performance conditions for this activity, as.agreed upon by Buru and the DMP during the approval process will be reported if significant and described in a close-out report to DMP and to DEC. Buru will also report to the DMP in accordance with the requirements of the direction sent for ‘ADDITIONAL WA ONSHORE SPILL REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION OPERATORS’ on 22 April 2003. This direction includes the requirement to report any spillage of hydrocarbons or other material thet affects a ground surface area greater than 100 m2, Other materials may Include {racking fluids, chemicals, produced formation water or substances that have the potential to adversely affect surface vegetation, soil or subsurface ground water. Reporting requirements will be communicated to all staff as part of the Buru induction including the requirement to report spills of greater than 500 L, petroleum in a gaseous from greater than 600 m3 and uncontrolled escapes or ignitions of petroleum or any other flammable or combustible materials. wvuLaare ages O47Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP ‘Buru will report all reportable incidents to the OMP within 2 hours by calling the DMP phone 0419 960 621, Further reference to the management of spills is made in the Oil Spill Contingency Plan: Yulleroo- 02 well fracturing and CT operations (Attachment 2). 8.4.3, Contractor's reporting to Buru 85. 8.6 Contractors are required to provide a report to Buru on request that shall include all relevant operational and technical data for the Contractor's Equipment and list all personnel involved in fraccing/welt test at the facility. Lost and damaged equipment or other incidents (@g., spills) that may occur during contractor activities shall be reported orally to the Buru Energy Site Manager immediately, and be formally reported on the Buru Incident Report Form, ‘Monitoring, Audit and Review of this EMP This EMP will be reviewed: ‘* When there is a significant change in fraccing operations that is not covered by this EMP. ‘* When there is a significant change to the regulatory framework within which fraccing Is carried out Consultation Buru will consult with relevant government authorities, interested persons and organisations ‘on all operations. Consultation has been or will be undertaken with the following ‘stakeholders regarding the fracturing program and will continue during the operations: + Kimberley Land Council ‘+ Pastoral Stations (where applicable). + Derby-West Kimberley Shire. ‘+ Department of Mines and Petroleum. Buru will make itself available for consultation with relevant government authorities, interested persons or organisations as required. An overview of consultations to date is provided in Table 8. Table8 Stakeholder Consultation ‘Stakehorder ‘Consultation Project Related Resolution Issues Yawaru PBC etter None Pastoralist Telephone call None Depi. of Water ‘Application form None WevULRore Page as a7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP 9.0 REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 94 Objectives ‘The Rehabilitation Management Plan has the following objectives: To return the well site to a safe, stable landform that blends with the surrounding landscape. The well site wil be rehabilitated as soon as the sump has dried out. This Could take at least 3 months after completion of the operations. However, should the well be delayed and as a result the sump does not dry out prior fo the wet season then the rehabiltation may take place in the next dry season of the Canning Basin beginning May 2011, In this case, as much work will be done prior to the wet season as possible and the top soll and vegetation will be re-spread and/or temporary bunding and whoa boys may be installed to reduce the risk of top soil loss and runoff. To establish vegetation on the frac pad site that is Indigenous to the surrounding area, ensure the vegetation community contains a mix of local species that suit the ‘sil types present, and provides cover to prevent erosion and habitat fragmentation. Buru Energy will ensure that if rehabilitation is not adequately achieved through passive methods (¢.g. vegetation re-spread) then active seeding with local provenance seed will be undertaken. To ensure that the fraccing operations do not leave any future management labilty for the land manager (if applicable). 9.2 Scope ‘This Rehabilitation Management Plan applies to the following frac operations: Well abandonment. Infrastructure decommissioning and removal. Rehabilitation of well site, access tracks and camp site. 9.3. Envlronmental Management Actions Rehabiltation of cleared areas will Include some or all ofthe following methods: Removal of all above ground structures including those erected to provide secondary services and infrastructure, Removal of all rubbish. Imported fil for pad base will be removed. ‘Turkeys nest will be buried on site after all iquids have been evaporated and the liner removed, (On completion of frac program, sumps and flare pit will be fenced off until the sump dries and toxicity testing has been completed and the sump has been rehabiltated. Pads re-contoured into the surrounding landform to approximate pre-existing contours with original soil and to a stable physical state. wruom Paget a7Yulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP. ‘Lightly scarify compacted soils following the removal of imported fill if required (Le. ground noticeably firmer, or vegetation fails to re-establish). + Vegetation material and topsoil will be placed over the well site and camp to Tehabilitate area with use of top soil stock piles to provide a source of seed and biological carbon, These management actions will be completed within 3 months of facing ectivities, depending on weather conditions referred to in Section 10.1. Buru has made a number of commitments in this EMP to ensure that their environmental management strategies are met. These are summarised in Table 1. The completion criteria outlined in Section 7 of this EMP will be used to measure the success of the rehabilitation. 9.4 Rehabilitation Monitoring Rehabilitation will be monitored as outlined in Table 9. Criteria to measure longer term success of rehabilitation are outlined in Table 10. Note that Buru will undertake annual ‘monitoring of the well site untl it is deemed unnecessary or completion criteria are reached. Table 9 Rehabilitation Monitoring Schedule Monitoring | Factors Reason Timing Perlod Assessed/Activities ‘Abandonment | Infrastructure ‘entity whether rehabiltation | Within 3 months of well remaining earthworks can commence | closure Rubbish Contamination ‘On completion | Landform profile ‘Assess quality of earthworks | Within 3 months of well of rehabilitation | surface fish prior to pulling in edge soil. | closure earthworks i, and vegetation and Searity completing the rehabilitation process ‘After fstwet | Erosion ‘Assess early success of Within $ months of well season Plant germination rehabilitation and identty | closure, or inthe next dry Issues lo be remediated prior | season commencing Mey bare ares, to fll vegetation 2011 Weeds establishment (such as erosion or Weed infestations) ‘Assess need for addtional monitoring Table 10 Long term completion criterla* Factor Criteria Timing ‘Area Stabilly | No erosion present and no blockingidiversion | Within 1 year of rehabiltation and of water flow demonstrated stabilty after a significant rain event or wet season Vegetation | Vegetation re-growih species similar to those | Within 3 years (noting that some characteristics _| in the surrounding area species are more suited to growinglre- wraroe PageaT oarYulleroo-2 Hydraulic Fracturing Operations EMP Factor Criteria Timing ‘establishing in disturbed areas) Percent ground | Percent ground cover increasing overtime | Within 3 years of rehabilitation cover and similar fo that of the surrounding area Nonew 'No new noxious weeds present on the well | Within 4 years of rehabilitation noxious weeds | site or surrounding area “Note this criteria is highly dependent on weather and rainfall history 10.0 REFERENCES Australian Standard (AS) 1940-1993. The storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids, Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW. ‘Australian Standard (AS) 4360-1999. Risk Management, Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW. Department of Industry and Resources (DolR). 2008. Environmental Guidance for Petroleum Operations in WA. Version 5, July 2006. Page a8 ofa?ATTACHMENTSDocumenta: eePOL OF 2 HEALTH, SAFETY & fecete—17Fely 20 eas ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY | AMsmsisir, Dosnst Cont Czosen ——Emcie Groce POLICY AIMS ‘Buru Energy Limited is committed to pursuing the objective of, Heath, Safety and Environmental Excellence forall ofits activities, To ensure this commitment is met, Buru maintains 2 Corporate Health, Safely and Environmental (HSE) Management System that continually identifies, assesses and manages ‘operational and environmental isk, ensuring compliance with regulatory and community ‘obligations and adding value to our activities for al stakeholders. GUIDELINES ‘To accomplish is objective of health, safely and environmental excellsnce, Buri: + Supports all managers and supervisors in providing leadership by example: ‘© Supports all employees and contractors in applying risk management processes to protect the environment and their felow workers; ‘+ Ensures all incidents are investigated and analysed so that the lessons are leamed and applied fo reduce the potential of reoccurrence; ‘+ Ensures the minimum standard for is operations are compliance with al heath, safety ‘and environment laws and reguations; ‘© Uses internal standards and procedures to achieve its HSE objectives; + Audits its HSE performance, regularly reports the results and establishes an audit trail ‘and improvement procedure; ‘+ Incorporates social responsibilty and sustainabily into Its decision making process; + Maintains and tests Its ably to respond effectively to operational emergencies; and ‘+ Has timely and transparent communication with ils stakeholders, OBJEGTIVE “HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE” Date: 17 February 2010Government of Western Australia Deparment of Mines and Petroleum og BaRsTD: 20016 | Buru Energy Limited POBox 7794 RE: Application for Approval to Prepare the Rig Site and to Run Tubing Into Yulleroo- 02 in EP-391 Onshore Canning Basin ‘The Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) acknowledges receipt of the above application on 27 August 2010. As the environmental risks associated with this proposal will be managed in accordance with the commitments outlined in the Onshore Drilling and Workovers - Bunda and Paradise Wells ~ Environmental Management Plan ~ Revision D accepted on 22 April 2010 and the additional management commitments outlined in the above document, the proposal is considered acceptable. Please note that this acceptance does not remove the need for necessary approvals from other agencies. Ifyou have any questions or comments regarding the above, please contact Chris Zadow 100 9222-3159, Yours sincerely, WLTinapple EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PETROLBUM DIVISO! 3! August 2010 inorat House 100 Pain Steet Eas Perth Wester Ausaia 6004 “elophone #61 89222 8333 Facsimlo 461 89222 3852 \wentdmpava. govt ‘wire gorauZ BJ SERVICES COMPANY Tee MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET I 1D COMPANY IDENTIFICATI Product Name: TerraProp Plus Item Number: 499962, 499963 Product Use: Proppant for fracturing epplications ‘Supplier: BJ Services Company 14211 FM2920, Tombal, Texas 77375 (281)354-8131 IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: (800) 424-9300 for CHEMTREC (703) 527-3887 for International Hivis HAZARD INDEX HEALTH: 1 FLAMMABILITY ° REACTIVI: ° PERSONALPROTECTION: 9 2 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS Hazardous Component sm [Atwminan [amorphous slica lronowde __itant ' [Manium dodo 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: Eye contact Ingestion. ahaaton Skin contact wT PECTS: INHALATION: Inhalation of ust may case respiratory ect ition Breathing citfculy may oocur INGESTION: — None known EYE CONTACT: May cause ey tation SKIN CONTACT: May cause skin ation EXPOSURE LIMITS: HAZARDOUS COMPONENT ‘OSHAPEL }L€60 ihlaon) L050 (era [Aluminum “8mgim3 Total Dust [NA “bmgins Resprabie [Rradlon |Amorphous silica NA INA tix fraction ofthe aerosol) ‘ron oxide ~"/Bmgins (respirable | 1 mains (lume) { } I “essoProp Pus - USA. Revised O7102/20001Page 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDI ' (* NA | 4 FIRST AID INHALATION: inhaled, remove to fresh air. Ifnot breathing give ertfcialresptration, preferably mouth-to-mouth If breathing Is dificult give oxygen. Only trained personnel should administer oxygen Got medical altenton, INGESTION: ‘Get macica atention, EYES: Flush eyes immediately wit lage amounts of walar for atleast 15 minutes. LR upper and lower lds occasionally. Get madical attention, SKIN: Incase of contact, immediately tush skin with plenly of soap and water or atleast 16 minutes, Remove ‘contaminated clothing and launder before reuse, Seek medical ltontion if tetion persists. SFIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLASHPOINT (METHOD) None LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vivy Not avatiablo UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% viv): Not avaabio AUTOLIGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not available ‘SPECIAL HAZARDS: Nona, EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: {Use appropriate media for surrounding fre. ‘SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Fe fhtes shoud wear self contsined breathing apparatus and ful protective cahing wen fing chemical HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: See Hazardous Thermal Decomposition Products. 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES ‘Weer epecified protective equipment Prevent from entering sewers or waterways. Sweep, Scop, 0° vacuum Up ‘pil, while faking care not to disperse dust in the aic. Placa in suitable containers) for reuse or disposal. ZL_HANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING: ‘Avold contact wit skin end eyes. Avoid breathing dust if exposed to high dust concentration, leave erea. Jnmedialely. Use only in a well ventlated area Wash fiands before eating and smoking, ‘STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Keep away from incompatible materials. Keep containar tightly closed, in a cool, well vantlated pleco, 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION ‘SPECIFIC ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Local exhaust, PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Chemical resistant gloves. Chemical resisiant goggles. Coveralls. Appropriate respiratory protection shall be worn ‘When apaled engineering contsols are not adequate to protect against inhelalion exposure. Dust respirator (NIOSHIMSHA air purifying resplcator with high efficiency particulate fie. 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: Solid ‘COLOR: Brown to gray ‘ODOR: Odatless ‘ODOR THRESHOLD: Not available SPECIFIC GRAVITY: Not available ‘TerroProp Plus -USA- Revised o7/22008Pege 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.VAPOR PRESSURE: Not available \VAPOR DENSITY (air= 1) Not avaiable EVAPORATION RATE: Not avaliable [BOILING POINT: Not avaiable FREEZING POINT: Not avaiable lt Not avaiable MISCOsiITY (F): Not avalabio ‘SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Insoluble 40 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY STABILITY: Stable undar normal temperatures and pressures. INCOMPATIBILITY/CONDITIONS OF REACTWITY: Halogens, Combustible materials. Metals. Metal salls. Poroxkdes, Reducing agents, Strong oxidizers. HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: ‘Thermal decompostion (destructive fires) yields elemental oxides. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: ‘Will not occur. ‘14 TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES SHRONIC EFFECTS: Prolonged or repeated inhalation may cause respiratory aliments SENSITIZATION: Netknown, CARCINOGENICITY: None ofthe components of this product have bea sid 9s carcinogenic by IARC, NTP or OSHA. (ARG: International Agency for Research on Cancel) (NTP - National Toxicology Program) (OSHA - Occupational Safely & Heath Acmnitaten (US), MUTAGENICITY: Nation REPRODUCTWE TOXICITY: Nat non 42 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION No spectic Information avaliable, 43 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS WASTE DISPOSAL: Disposal should be made In accordance with national and loca regulations. Consult local waste authorities for Pene 1 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: ‘SKIN CONTACT: Repeated and prolonged contact may cause dermatitis, drying or ‘racking of skin due to defatting solvent properties. ‘SKIN ABSORPTION: A components) ofthis product can be absorbed through the skin upon direct contact, possibly resuiting in toxic effects similar to those of inhalation. EYE CONTACT: ‘Causes moderate imitation. INHALATION: Inhalation of high concentrations may cause headache, nausea, giddiness and shortness of breath. Prolonged, repeated, or high exposures may cause inilaion to the respialory tact (nose, mouth, mucous membranes), visual. disturbances, and eye damage. In extreme cases, visual disturbances and ocular ‘damage may occur. INGESTION: Harmful if” swallowed. May cause severe gastrointestinal c BOILING POINT: 815-110°C 760mm Hg FREEZING POINT: 74°C Souuaury n water Hnscblo 40_STABILITY AND REACTIVITY STABILITY: ‘Stabie under normal temperetures and pressures. INCOMPATIBILITY/CONDITIONS OF REACTIVITY: May react violenlly with strong bases, reducing and oxidizing agents. Metels, Metal oxides. May react violently wilh water HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Chlorine. Hydrogen chloride, Flamimable hydrogen gas. Carbon monoxide, Carbon dloxide. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not oceur. 41 TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ‘CHRONIC EFFECTS: Erosion of teeth, Prolonged or repesed ihalation may cause respirator eiiments. Visual mpaiments, SENSITIZATION: Not known, ‘CARCINOGENICITY: "None ofthe components ofthis product have been sted as carcinagenis by IARC, NTP or OSHA. (ARC Intemational Agency for Research on Cancer) (NTP = National Toxiclogy Program) (OSHA - Ocsupational Safety & Haalth Adminisation (US), MuTAGENoITY: Not known REPRODUCTIVE TOXIGITY: Not known, 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION ‘This materials expected tobe toxic to aquatic lite. 43 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Waste DisPosAL: ‘Consul local waste authoritios for direction andlor approvals prior to disposal Disposel should be made in ‘accordance with national and local regulations, 44. TRANSPORT INFORMATION LAND TRANSPORT (DOT) Proper Shipping Name: HYDROCHLORIC ACID Hazard Class-Primay: 8 UNID No. un 1769 Packing Group: " Hydrocal Ald, 31-88% - USA. Rovsad 13107/2007/Page 3 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED‘Subsidiary Risk: NA Reportable Quantity (RQ): 5000 pounds Emergency Response Guide #: 157 AIR TRANSPORT (ICAOMATA) Proper Shipping Name: HYDROCHLORIC ACID Hazard Class - Primary: 8 UNAD No.: UN 1789 Packing Group: " MARINE TRANSPORT (IMDG/IMO) Proper Shipping Name: HYDROCHLORIC ACID Hazard Ciass - Primary: 8 Packing Group: W Ems: FASB ULATOR ION SARA TITLE Ml: SECTION 302304 “This product doos not contain substances listed in Appendix A and B as an Extremely Hazardous Substance. SECTION 311/312 Immediate ‘SECTION 313 ‘This product contains the folowing substance(s) which appear onthe List of Toxic ‘Chemicals:, Hydrochloric acid CASH 7647-01-0 TTSCAINVENTORY: The substances in this product are Included on or exempted from the TSCA 6b) Inventory (40 CFR 710). CALIFORNIA PROP 65: None of the chemicals on the curcent Proposition 65 Ist are known tobe presentin this product. PRIORITY POLLUTANTS: 46 OTHER INFORMATION ISSUE DATE: 7/42/2007 PREPARED BY: By Services Environmental Group REFERENCES: ‘Suppliers’ Literatur. Dangerous Properiss of industrial Materials, oth ed; N, ving Sax, 1996. ‘Suspect Chomieals Sourcebook ‘The information contained herein fs based on data considered accurate. However, no wartanly is expressed or impled regarding the accuracy of these data or the resuls to be obtained from the use thereof. Vendor ‘assumes no responsibilty fr Ioury to vendeo or third parsons proximalely caused by the material f reasonable Salely procedures are not adhered to as stipulated in the data sheet. Additionally, vendor assumes io ised by abnormal use of the material even if umes the risk n his use ofthe material esponsiblity for Injury to vendeo or thied persons proximately Teesonsble éefaly procedures are followed. Furtheimore, vend Hysrostlove Aci, 21-98% - USA Revised 13107/2007/Page 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.2 BJ SERVICES COMPANY MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET 4 PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product Name: GLFC-5B Item Number: 396374 Product Uso! Geliant - Water ‘Supplier, BJ Services Company 11211 FM 2920 Tomball, TX 77975 (2619351-8191 IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: (800) 424-9300 for CHEMTREC. (703) 527-3887 for International His HAZARD INDEX HEALTH. 1 FLAMMABILITY: 1 REACTIVITY: 0 PERSONALPROTECTION: hh 2. COMPOSITIONIINFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS. lAtkanes /Alkenes [Guar gum 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: __Inhelation. Skin contact. Eye contact, ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: INHALATION: May cause contral nervous system deprossion. INGESTION: Product has a low order of acute oral toxicity, but minute amounts aspirated into the lungs during ingestion may cause sovere pulmonary injury or death EYE CONTACT: May cause mid eye iritation, SKIN CONTACT: May causo ml ‘skin initation. Prolonged contact may cause drying of skin. EXPOSURE LIMITS: [HAZARBOUS COMPONENT ——_JAGGIA TLV i Aken |smoms lGuergim : ps 4 FIRST AID MEASURES INHALATION; inhaled, remove to fresh ar. not breathing give artificlal respiration, preferably mouth-o-mouth, i bresthing is ifieut give oxygen. Only vained personnel should administer oxygen Get medical ellention. GLFC.58-USA- Revised 27/1012008"Pag0 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.INGESTION: DO NOT induce vemting. Get medical attention! f vomiting occur aspiration, EYES: In case of contac, immediately fush eyes with plenty of water for atleast 15 minutes and get medical attantion. SKIN: Flush skin with water or sosp and water, if vallable, fora least 16 minutes, Remove contaminated clothing and ‘shoes. Seek modical attention If irtation persists. SFIRE FIGHTING MEASURES keep hood lower than hips to prevent FLASHPOINT (METHOD): > 200°F (SECC) LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vivy Not appicable! UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vii: Not applicabi AUTO-IGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not avallabio‘applicabie ‘SPECIAL HAZARDS: None. EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: ‘On small fires, dry chemical, dry sand, or CO2 may also be etfective in targe quantities. For large fre, water spray ‘r fog. Foam. ‘SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: ‘Cool exposed containers wth water spray. Fio-fghters should wear solt-contained breathing apparatus and ful protective clothing when fighting chemical fires. HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: (Oxides of carbon. & ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES: Dike to contain. Cover spit with absorbent material. Scoop absorbed material into a suitable container for disposal. ZLHANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING: ‘Avoid contac with skin and eyes. Do not inhale vapors, STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Keep container closed when not a use. Keep away from ignition sources. SB EXPOSURE CO} ERSONAL, Cc) SPECIFIC ENGINEERING CONTROLS: ‘Adequate ventilation should be provided fo Keep concentrations below acceptable exposure limit. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: ‘Appropriate respiratory protection shall be worn when applied engineering controls are not adequate to protec! ‘against intalation exposure, Safety glasses. Neoprane gloves. Rubber gloves. 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: Liquid ‘COLOR: Light brown, Tan ‘ODOR: Mild Hycrocarbon ‘ODOR THRESHOLD: Not avalablotappicable SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 4.08-1.09 VAPOR PRESSURE: Not evalebletapplicabie VAPOR DENSITY (air= 4) Not avalsblefepplicablo EVAPORATION RATE: Not avatablelapplicabie BOILING POINT: Not avalablelapplicable FREEZING POINT: Not avallabletapplicable pH: Not avalable/applicable VISCOSITY (F): Not avalable/applicabie GLFC-58- USA. Revised 2711072008Page2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDSOLUBILITY IN WATER: Insoluble 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY STABILITY: Stable. INCOMPATIBILITY/CONDITIONS OF REACTIVITY: ‘Strong oxidizers HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: ‘Carbon monoxide. Carbon dioxide. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Wil not occur 11 TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ‘CHRONIC EFFECTS: None kro sensmzamion: Not non ccaRciNOGENtcITY: None of the components of this product have been listed as carcinogenic by IARC, NTP or OSHA. (IARC- International Agency for Research on Cancer) (NTP - National Toxicology Program) (OSHA - Occupational. Satay @ Heat acminsiaton (US) MUTAGENICITY: Notknown REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY: Not known, 42 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION No specific information available 43 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS WASTE DISPOSAL: As local regulations may vary, al waste must be disposed/recyclediraclaimed in accordance with federal, etate, ‘and local environmental control regulations. 14 RT INFORMATION LAND TRANSPORT (DOT) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED UN No. NA AIR TRANSPORT (ICAOIIATA) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED UNID No. NA MARINE TRANSPORT (IMDG/IMO) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED GLFC-98.- USA Revsed Z7/I072006Pag83 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.UND Nox NA 418 REGULATORY INFORMATION SARA TITLE I: SECTION 902/904 THis product does not contain substances listed in Appendix A and B as an Extremely Hazerdous Substance. SECTION 311/312 Immediate SECTION 313, ‘This product does not contain ingredients (ata level of 1% or greater) onthe List of Toxte Ghemicals. TSCAINVENTORY: The substances inthis product are included on or exempted from the TSCA 8(b) Inventory (40 CFR 710) CALIFORNIA PROP 65: ‘This product does not contain substances which require ‘warring under California Proposition 66. 418_OTHER INFORMATION ISSUE DATE: 12/44/2004 PREPARED BY: BJ SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP REFERENCES: ‘Suppliers Literatur. ‘Suspect Chemicals Sourcebook Guide to Oceupationel Exposure Values - 2004, American Conference of Governmental Industriel Hygienists, 2004. Dengerous Properties of Industial Materials, th ed; N. ving Sax, 1996. “The information contained herein is based on data considered accurate, However, no warranty is expressed of implied regarding the socuracy ofthese data or the results to be obtained from the use thereot ‘assumes no responsibilty for jury to vendes or thd persons proximately caused by the material if reasonable safely procedures are not adhored to as sipulated in the data sheet Additionally, vendor assumes no esponsibility for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal use of the material even if ‘reasonable safely procedures are followed Furtharmore, vendee assumes the riskin his Use of te materia GLFC59- USA. Revised 271072006392 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDSECTION PRODUCT NAME: STEM NUMBER: ‘CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION: PRODUCT USE: ‘SUPPLIER: ‘ADDRESS: EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER BJ SERVICES COMPANY Region MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET ENERAL INFORMATION GBW-18 488224 Sodium persulfate Breaker - Water By Services Company 41211 FM 2020 Tomball, TX 7376 (800)424-9300 for CHEMTREC (202}483-7646 Alaska and International PREPARED BY: BJ Services Environmental Group (281)351-8131 DATE PREPARED: December 13, 2000 Supersedes: March 9, 1999, HMIS HAZARD INDEX HEALTH: 4 FLAMMABILITY: 4 REACTIVITY: 4 PERSONAL PROTECTION: h SECTION Il- HAZARDOUS. ENTS HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS CASH PERCENT HAZARD. ‘Sodium persulfate 1115274 >99 Oxidizer SECTION Ill - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLASHPOINT (METHOD): UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT(s BY VOL): LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT(% BY VOL): AUTO-IGNITION TEMPERATURE: EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: EXPLOSION DATA: HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Incombustible NA NA NA Water, dry powder, CO2, and other inert materials Evacvate personnel to safely area. If smoke and fumes can not be avoided, use proximity suits and sell-contained breathing apparatus. NE. Incombustible SECTION IV - HEALTH HAZARD DATA PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: ‘Skin end eye contact, inhalation SKIN CONTACT: May cause iitation. (GAW-18 - USA. Revised 2511072006Pag0 1 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDSKINABSORPTION: _Not absorbed by skin. EYE CONTACT: ‘Airborne dust may iritate eyes. INHALATION: Inhalation of airborne dust at high levels may produce shortness: ‘of breath in allergic persons. INGESTION: Not an expected route of entry CHRONIC OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: Continuous contact may cause skin dermatitis, EXPOSURE LIMITS: HAZARDOUS COMPONENT ACGIH TLV ‘OSHA PEL Sodium persulfate NE. NE. CARCINOGENICITY, REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS: Not listed as carcinogenic - IARC, NTP, or OSHA ‘TERATOGENICITY, MUTAGENICITY: No effects listed, TOXICITY STUDIES: LD(60) 895 mgykg (oral rat) tc(6o) NE. SECTION V - FIRST AID PROCEDURES FOR EYES: Immediately flush with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation persists, contact a physician. FOR SKIN: Wash thoroughly with water. If irtation occurs and persists, obtain medical attention. FOR INHALATION: Remove to fresh air. If breathing has stopped, give artical respiration. Keep person warm, quiet and get medical attention FOR INGESTION: Give plenty of water, Induce vomiting! Never give anything to an unconscious person. Calla physician SECTION VI- PHYSICAL DATA APPEARANCE AND ODOR: —_ White crystalline powder, odorless SPECIFIC GRAVITY: NE VAPOR PRESSURE: NA VAPOR DENSITY (eir=1) NA EVAPORATION RATE: NA. BOILING POINT: NA FREEZING POINT: NA SOLUBILITY IN H20: 70.2g/00g at 20°C pi: NA ‘SECTION Vil - REACTIVITY DATA CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS: Reacts with acids, alkalis, heavy metals and ‘eductants to release oxygen. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Does not polymerize HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUGTS: _Decomposes when stored under conditions of ‘excessive heat andior moisture, generating heat ‘and causing the release of oxides of sulfuric acid USA. Revised 26110/2006Pago 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.‘and oxygen which supports combustion. SECTION Vill - SPECIALIPERSONAL PROTECTION VENTILATION: ‘The use of mechanical ventilation is recommended ‘whenever this product is used in a confined space. Where engineering controls are not feasible, assure use is in an ‘area where there is natural air movement. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: ‘Where there is inadequate ventilation, respirators with fiters and/or sorbents are recommended. PROTECTIVE GLOVES: Rubber or neoprene EYE PROTECTION: Goggles OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Eyewash botties or other rinsing equipment should be easily accessible SECTION IX - HANDLING PRECAUTIONS. LEAK AND SPILL PROCEDURES: Sweep up and place In suitable containers for reuse or WASTE DISPOSAL: disposal. If this product becomes a waste it does not mest the equirements of a RCRA hazardous waste. Always dispose of according to local/statefederal regulations, HANDLING & SPECIAL EQUIPMENT: Avoid contact with combustible materials. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place away from incompatible materials. Keep bags or fiber drums dry at all times. SECTION X - REGULATORY INFORMATION ‘SHIPPING INFORMATION PROPER SHIPPING NAME: ‘Sodium persulfate HAZARD CLASS; 5A UNINA NUMBER: UN1605, PACKING GROUP Wr*PG": PGI ‘SUBSIDIARY RISK: NA REPORTABLE QUANTITY (RQ): NA. EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDE #: 140 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION SARA TITLE II SECTION 302/304 SECTION 311/912 ‘SECTION 313, ‘This product does not contain ingredients listed as an Extremely Hazardous Substance, Immediate This product does not contain ingredients (at a level of 1% or greater) on the List of Toxic Chemicals. OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION ‘TSCA INVENTORY: CALIFORNIA PROP 65: All of the components ia this appear on the TSCA inventory. ‘None of the chemicals on the current Proposition 86 list are known to be present inthis product. GBW.18 - USA. Revised 26/1072006/Pag0 3 ‘UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEO‘The information contained herein Is based on date considered sccurate.. However, no warranty is expressed or Implied regarding the accuracy of these data or the results to be obtained from tho use thereof. Vendor ‘assumes n0 responsibly for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by the matorial if reasonable ‘safely procedures are ot adhered to as stipulated in the data sheet. Additionally, vendor assumes no responsibly for Injury to vandee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal use of the material even if Teasonsbie safely procedures are folowed, Furthermore, vendee assumes the risk n his use of the material (GBW.A0 -USA- Revced 26/1072008"Pag0 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDz BJ SERVICES COMPANY Rego MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET TIFICATION Product Name: FRW-20 tom Number: 488499 Product Use: Friction reducor ‘Supplier ‘BJ Services Company 44214 FM 2920 ‘Tomball, Texas 77375 (281)381-8131 IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: (800) 424-9300 for CHEMTREG (703) 527-3887 for International HMI HAZARD INDEX HEALTH: 4 FLAMMABILITY: 2 REACTIVITY: 0 PERSONALPROTECTION: 2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS, sis Comparant Percent |Hydrotreated light distillate | 10-30 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: _Eye contact. Inalation, Skin contact, ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: INHALATION: May cause respiratory tractiitation. INGESTION: Not likely exposure route, May cause gastrointestinal problems. EVE CONTACT: May cause eye iritation SKIN CONTACT: Prolonged contact may cause drying of skin Prolonged contact may cause mid iitation, EXPOSURE LIMITS: | HAZARDOUS COMPONENT jACoHTTL | OSHA PEL "L666 inition) JLB fora |200 mgim3, skit JNA ina NA |Hetoeated oh state 4 FIRST AID MEASURES INHALATION: inhale, remove fom srea tore air. Get medical anton respatory tation dovoopsorifbesthng ocomes dieu INGESTION: Do not Induce voting, unless crected to do so by aphysctn Rinse mut out with water, Din pleny of FRW.20- USA-Resed 2011/2008/Page 1 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED‘water, Seek medical advice, EYES: Flush eyes with plenty of water and get medical attention if iritation persists ‘SKIN: ‘Gently brush away excess material. Flush skin with plenty of water. Remove contaminated clothing and launder ‘before reuse. Obtain mecical atenton if intation develops or persists folowing exposure. SFIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLASHPOINT (METHOD): 141-2005 LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vi: Notavailabio UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% viv Not available ‘SPECIAL HAZARDS: EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Foam, Carbon dioxide. Dry chemical. For large fre, watar spray or fo. ‘SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Firefighters shoul wear self.contained bresthing apparatus and full protective clothing when fighting chemical fies, HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: ‘Oxides of carbon. Oxides of sult. 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES Evacuate area - war other workets of spill Wear proper protective equipment as specified in Section 8, Caution = surfaces can become vary slippery. Small spls ~ Cover spi with absorbent material Scoop absorbed material Into a suitable container for disposal. Large spills - Recover product to suitable containars or vessel for reuse If possible, oF for disposal. Prevent from entering sewers or waterways. 7_HANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING: ‘Avoid contact with skin and eyes, Use only in a well ventilated area. Do not inhale vapors. ‘STORAGE REQUIREMENTS ‘Keep container tightly closed, in coo}, well ventiated place. Keep evray from Ignition sources, Keap away from incompatible materials. 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION ‘SPECIFIC ENGINEERING CONTROLS: ‘The use of mechanical ventilation Is recommended whenever this product Is used Ina confined space, Where. engineering contcis are not feasible, assure use is in an area where there is natural air movement PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: ‘Appropriate respiratory protection shall be worn when applied engineering controls are not adequate to protec! ‘against inhalation exposure. Chemical resistant goggles. PVC gloves, Coveralls, 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: Emulsion COLOR: Opaque, Of-vhite ‘O00R: Slight ‘ODOR THRESHOLD: Not available ‘VAPOR PRESSURE: Not available VAPOR DENSITY (air= 1) EVAPORATION RATE: BOILING POINT: FREEZING POINT: pH VISCOSITY (F): 676.0 cps @ 750 SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Disporsibla 40 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY ‘STABILITY: FRW.20 -USA. Revised 20111/2000Pag0 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDStable under normal conditions of use, INCOMPATIBILITY/CONDITIONS OF REACTIVITY: ‘Contact with oxidizing agents, HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: ‘Oxides of carbon and sulphur. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. 44 TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ‘None known, SENSITIZATION: Notknown, ‘CARCINOGENtGITY: None ofthe components ofthis product have been sted as carcinogenic by IARC, NTP or OSHA. (ARC- Intemational Agency for Research on Cancer) (NTP = Navonal Toxicology Program) (OSHA. Occupational Salety & Health Adinistatin (US) MUTAGENICITY: Notknown REPRODUCTIVE ToxtciTY: Not known 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION No specie information availabe, 43 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS WASTE DISPOSAL: Disposal should be made in accordance with natonal and local regulations SPORT INFORMATION LAND TRANSPORT (DOT) Proper Shipping Name: ‘COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID, N.O.S, (NOT REGD IN CONTAINERS <118 GALS) UNIO No: NA 1093 Hazard Class - Primary: ‘Combustible Liquid Hazard Class - Secondary Packing Group: m Reportable Quantity (RQ): Emergency Response Guide #: 428 AIR TRANSPORT (ICAOIIATA) Proper Shipping Neme: ‘COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID, N.O.S. (NOT REG'D IN CONTAINERS <119 Gals) UNIID No. NA1993 Hazard Class - Primary: ‘Combustible Liquid Hazard Class - Secondary: Packing Group: i MARINE TRANSPORT (IMDG/IMO) Proper Shipping Name: ‘COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID, N.O.S. (NOT REG'D IN CONTAINERS <119 GALS) UN Nos NA 1908, Hazard Class - Primary: Combustible Liquid Hazard Class - Seconda Packing Group: MH Ems: FRRW/20-USA- Revised 20/1 72000;Pag¢ 3 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED15 FORMATION ‘SARA TITLE! ‘SECTION 202/304 This product doas not contain substances listed in Appendix A and B as an Extremely Hazardous Substance. SECTIONS11/312 Immediate, Fire SECTION 313 ‘Ts product doss not contain ingredionts (at a fovel of 1% or greator) on the List of Toxic Chemicals ‘TSCA INVENTORY: The substances in this product are included on or exempted from the TSCA 8(b) Inventory (40 CFR 710). CALIFORNIA PROP 65: Substances knovin tothe State of California to cause cancer are present in this product. PRIORITY POLLUTANTS: None 46 ORMATION ISSUE DATE: 1172012000 PREPARED BY: ‘BJ Services HSE Department REFERENCES: Supplier's Literature, ‘The information conteined herein Is based on data considered accurate, However, no warranty Is expressed or implied regarding the accuracy of these data or the results to be obtained from the use thereof. Vendor ‘assumes no responsibilty for injury to vendeo or third porsons proximately caused by the material If reasonable salety procedures are rot adhered to as stipulated In the data shoot. Additonally, vendor assumes no ‘esponsibility for Inlury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal uso of the material even if reasonable safely procedures are followed. Furthermore, vendee assumes the risk n his use ofthe material FRW.20--USA- Revised 20/1172000/Paye 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED,. BJ SERVICES COMPANY ean MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET RODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product Name: Ferrotrol 300L Rem Number: 00081, 424531 Product Use: {ron contro! ‘Supplier By Services Company 11211 FM 2920, ‘Tomball, Texas 77375, (231)351-8131 IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: (800) 424-9300 for CHEMTREC (703) 527-3887 for International Hvis HAZARD INDEX HEALTH 2 FLAMMABILITY: i REACTITY: ° PERSONAL PROTECTION: | 2 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS Hazardous Component Hisar 1 citi acd ‘S_HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: Eye contac Ingeston, Skin contact. ‘ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: INHALATION: Inhalation of eoluton mist may cause respiratory tract itaion. INGESTION: Ingestion may cause ination to the mouth, tht and esophagus. Ingestion of large quantities, ‘may cause abdominal peln, nausea end vomiting EYE CONTACT: May cause savere Intalio or burns to the eyes. May cause permanent eye damage. ‘SKIN CONTACT: Mey cause mid skin eitation EXPOSURE UMTS: acenTiy — JL Gian) U580voray (NA ina ma 3000 mah at 4 FIRST AID MEASURES INHALATION: IWinheted, remove from area to fresh alr. Get medical attention it respiratory lation develops or if breathing ‘becomos dificult INGESTION: Fetrovel 300, - USA- Revised 1602/2007/Pag0 1 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED. HtRinse mouth with water several times. Do not induce vomiting, Give victim plenty of water, Obtain medical attention immediately EYES: {In case of contact, immediately fush eyes with plenty of water fr at least 15 minutes end get mecicsl attention SKIN: Wash with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing and launder before reuse. Get medical attention i Initation persist. SFIRE FIGHTING MEASURES: FLASHPOINT (METHOD): None LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vy Not avatstio UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT (ib viv} Not avaiable ‘SPECIAL HAZARDS: None. EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use appropriate media for surrounding fre. ‘SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Fite fighters should wear self-contained breathing apparatus and fl protective clothing when fighting chemical thes, HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: ‘See Hazardous Thermal Decomposition Products, 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES ‘Wear specified protective equipment. Small spils- Cover spl with absorbent material. Scoop absorbed material Into a suitable containe: for disposal. Lerge spi - Dike to contain. Prevent from entering sewers or waterways Recover product to suitable containers oF vessel fr reuse, f possible, or for disposal, ‘7_HANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING: ‘Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Wear specified protective equipment ‘STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Keep container tightly ciosed, in @ cool, well ventiated place. Keep away from Incompatible materials, ce ECTION SPECIFIC ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Use only in a well vntiated area, PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: ‘Chemical resistant goggles. Coveralls. Rubber boots. Rubber gloves. 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: Liquia ‘COLOR: Clear, colorless to pale yaliow ‘ODOR: None’ ‘ODOR THRESHOLD: Not avallable VAPOR PRESSURE: Not available ‘VAPOR DENSITY (aic= 1): Not avalable EVAPORATION RATE: <1 BOILING POINT: >212F FREEZING POINT: Not avalable pH 08 VISCOSITY (F): Not available SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete 410 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY Feirotol 300. -USA- Revised 1502/20071Page 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.STABILITY: Stable under normal conditions of use, INCOMPATIBILITY/CONDITIONS OF REACTIVITY: ‘Stiong slkals. Song oxidizers, Contact with some metals producas flammable hydrogen gas. Metal nitatos. HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: ‘Carbon monoxide, Carbon dioxide HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. ‘14 TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES: CHRONIC EFFECTS: trot yn ow Ce ee Re, Satine a 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Cie Acid is expected to be ready biodegradable. Itis not known to cause significant environmental impact ‘although pH depression can occur when spied to water bodies, 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS WASTE DISPOSAL: Disposal should be made in accordance with national and local rogulaions 44 TRANSPORT INFORMATION LAND TRANSPORT (DOT) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED Hazard Ciges - Primary: UNIID No.: NA Packing Group: ‘Subsidiary Risk: A Reportable Quantity (RQ): N/A Emergency Response Guide #: N/A AIR TRANSPORT (ICAOMIATA) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED. Hazard Class - Primary: UNID No. NA Packing Group: Ferrel 004 - USA. Revkead 15102"2007/Pege 9 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDMARINE TRANSPORT (IMDG/IMO) Proper Shipping Name: NOT RESTRICTED Hazard Class - Primary: Packing Group: Ems: 18 REGULATORY INFORMATION ‘SARA TITLE Mt SECTION 302/304 This product does not contain substances listed In Appendix A and B as en Extremely Hazardous Substance, SECTION 311/912 Immediate SECTION 313 ‘This product does not contain ingredionts (ata level of 1% or greater) on the List of Toxic Chemicals. TSCAINVENTORY: The substances inh product are included on or exempted from the TSCA &(o) Inventory (40 GFR 710) CALIFORNIA PROP 65: None of he chemicals on the current Proposition 65 tis ere known to’be present in this product, PRIORITY POLLUTANTS: 16 OTHER INFORMATION ISSUE DATE: ozrt4mo07 PREPARED BY: 4 Services Environmental Group REFERENCES: CCINFO Web information Service, Canadian Cento for Occupational Health and Safely, 2006. ‘Dangerous Goods Regulations, 47th ed., International Air Transport Associaton, 2006. ‘SAX Dangarous Properties of Industilal Materials ‘Supplier's Literature. “The information conteined herein is based on data considered eccurate. However, no warranty Is expressed or Implied regarding the accuracy of these data or the results to be obtained from the use thereof. Vendor ‘assumes no responsibilty fr lury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by the material i reasonable safely procadures are not adhered to as stpulated In the data sheet. Additonal, vendor assumes no responsibilty for injury to Vendee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal use ofthe material even i reasonable safety procedures ere followed Furthermore, vendee assumes the isk.n hs use ofthe materia Fetrovol300L- USA- Revised 161022007/P 298.4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.BJ SERVICES COMPANY Region MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET SECTION | - GENERAL INFORMATION PRODUCT NAME: Clay Treat-3C ITEM NUMBER: 488137, 488163, 488195 CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION: ‘An aqueous solution of a quaternary emmonium ‘compound and polymers PRODUCT USE: Clay Control — KCI sub SUPPLIER: BJ Services Company ADDRESS: 44211 FM 2620 Tomball, TX 77375 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER (800}424-9300 for CHEMTREC (703)527-3887 for International PREPARED BY: BJ Services Environmantal Group (281)351-8131 DATE PREPARED: February 19, 2004 ‘Supersedes: August 4, 2000 HMIS HAZARD INDEX HEALTH: 3 FLAMMABILITY: 9 REACTIVITY: 0 PERSONAL PROTECTION: SECTION Il - HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS HAZARDOUS CASH PERCENT HAZARD COMPONENTS Tetramethyl ammonium 76-57-0 40-60 Toxic chloride SECTION Ill - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLASHPOINT (METHOD): Not flammable UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT% BY VOL): NA. LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT(% BY VOL): NA. ‘AUTO/IGNITION TEMPERATURE: NA. EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: May use water spray, carbon dioxide, dry chemicat ‘or chemical foam to fight fre. ‘SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: None EXPLOSION DATA: evaporated to dryness and exposed to fire, may ‘support combustion HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: ‘May emit nitrogen oxides, hydrochloric acid and ‘carbon monoxide. SECTION IV - HEALTH HAZARD DATA PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: Skin and eye contact ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: Clay Treat 3.6 USA- Revised 41420067098 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDSKIN CONTACT: May cause itation. SKIN ABSORPTION: _Not absorbed by sk EYE CONTACT: May cause irtaion. INHALATION: ‘Aqueous solution, nota ikely route of entry. INGESTION: Ingestion may cause dizziness, nausea, and shortness of breath (icotine-ke symptoms). Acts as a ganglionic blocking agent and vasodilator. May be fatal f swallowed. CHRONIC OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: May cause skin ritation, especially to open cuts and scrapes. EXPOSURE LIMITS: HAZARDOUS COMPONENT [ACGIH TLV, OSHA PEL "Fetramethy! ammonium chloride [ NE. NE. CARCINOGENICITY, REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS: Not listed as carcinogenic - IARC, NTP, or OSHA ‘TERATOGENICITY, MUTAGENICITY: No effects listed. TOXICITY STUDIES: LD(60) 84 mg/kg (50% solution, oral-ral) Leo) NE. SECTION V - FIRST AID PROCEDURES FOREYES: Immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 16 minutes, lining lower and upper eyelids occasionally. Get medical allention immediately. FOR SKIN: Flush skin with water or wash with mild soap and water if available. Remove contaminated clothing. If iitalion persists, contact a physician. FOR INHALATION: Remove to fresh air. if breathing is labored, give oxygen. If breathing has stopped, give artifical respiration. Keep person warm, ‘quiet and get medical attention. FOR INGESTION: IMMEDIATELY call a physician. Only induce vomiting at the direction of a physician or poison control center person. NOTE TO PHYSICIAN: No specific antidote known (symptoms similar to Nicotine). The physician's judgment should be used to control ‘symptoms and clinical condition. SECTION VI- PHYSICAL DATA APPEARANCE AND ODOR: Colorless to light yellow liquid with sight odor, ‘SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 1.02 VAPOR PRESSURE: NE. VAPOR DENSITY (air=1): NE. EVAPORATION RATE: NE. BOILING POINT: ‘App. 102°C FREEZING POINT: Not known ‘SOLUBILITY IN H20: Miscible pH 5-10 SECTION Vil - REACTIVITY DATA (lay Tent. -USA. Revised 04/1072006Page 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDCHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS: Oxidizers HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Does not polymerize HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: In fre conditions: carbon monoxide, hydrochloric ‘acid and nilrogen oxides. SECTION Vill - SPECIAL/PERSONAL PROTECTION VENTILATION: The use of mechanical ventilation is recommended ‘whenever this product is used in a confined space, Where engineering controls are nol feasible, assure use is in an area where there is natural air movement. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Mist type respirator if exposed to mists. PROTECTIVE GLOVES: Rubber or neoprene. EYE PROTECTION: Goggles OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: _ Eyewash bottles or other rinsing equipment should be easily accessible, SECTION IX - HANDLING PRECAUTIONS LEAK AND SPILL PROCEDURES: Dike or contain spil fo prevent material from entering ‘waterways. Pump large spils into salvage containers, Soak up resiiue or small spils with absorbent pads, cay, oF dit and place in salvage containers. WASTE DISPOSAL: If this product becomes a waste It does not meet the requirements of a RCRA hazardous waste, Always dispose of according to local, state and federal regulations. HANDLING & SPECIAL EQUIPMENT: Avoid contact with skin, eyes and clothing. Do not eat or drink wile handing this product. Wash thoroughly after handling STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: ‘May be stored al ambient temperatures and pressures. SECTION X - REGULATORY INFORMATION ‘SHIPPING INFORMATION PROPER SHIPPING NAME: ‘Toxic, liquids. organic, n.0s. (contains tetremethyiammonium chloride) HAZARD CLASS: Gt UN/NA NUMBER: UN2810 PACKING GROUP WI"PG": PGi ‘SUBSIDIARY RISK: NA. REPORTABLE QUANTITY (RQ): NA. EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDE#; 163, ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION SARA TITLE Il ‘SECTION 902/004 This product doos not contain ingredients listed as an Exlremely Hazardous Subslance. SECTION 311/812, immediate SECTION 313 ‘This product doos not contain ingrodionts (at a level of 1% or greater) on the List of Toxic Chemicals. (lay Teal 3. -USA- Revised 04/1020081Pa9e3 LUNOONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDOTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION, ‘TSCA INVENTORY: All of the components in this product appear on the TSCA inventory. CALIFORNIA PROP 65: "None of the chemicals on the current Proposition 66 list are known to be present in this product. ‘The information contained herein is based on data considered accurate. Howover, no warranty is expressed oF limped regarding the accuracy of these data or tha results to bo obtained from the use thereef. Vendor ‘assumes no responsibilty for injury to vendee or third porsons proximately caused by the materia If reasonable safely procedures are not adhered to as slpulated In the data sheet. Additonally, vendor assumes no, responsisliy for inury to vendee or tied parsons proximately caused by abnormal use of the materiel even if reasonable safely procedures are folovied. Furthermore, vendee assumes the risk in his use ofthe material (Cay Treat -C-USA. Rovised o410/2008/Pego 4 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.: BJ SERVICES COMPANY "ae MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET tODUC" -OMPANY IDENT! IN Produet Name Clay Master-5C item Number 9000, 488576 Prouel Use Gly conta Sopot By Serves Conpeny 112411 FAM 2820 Tomball, Texas 77375 281/351-8191 IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: (800) 424-9300 for CHEMTREC (703) 527-3887 for International Hills HAZARD INDEX HEALTH: 1 FLAMMABILITY: 4 REACTIVITY: 0 PERSONAL PROTECTION: 2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS {Hazardous Component 7 nee E “Hazard [Conplocpeyanine sat HabaTO.SAA i oad 3 RDI IFICATION PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: _Inhalaton Skin contact. ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE EFFECTS: INHALATION: — Not allkely exposure route. Inhalation of solution vapor or mist may causa mld respiratory tract lnitation INGESTION: Nota ikoly exposure route. Ingestion may cause mld irlation fo the mouth throst and esophagus. EYE CONTACT: May cause oye irtation [SKIN CONTACT; Protonged contact may cause mil iritation EXPOSURE LIMITS: HAZARDOUS COMPONENT ~~ JACOIH TLV JOsHA PEL [LC natn ~JLDSO ay \compiex poyamino salt NA ia Na NA 4 FIRST AID MEASURES, INHALATION: {inhaled remove fom area to fresh air. Got medical attention if respiraory lation develops orf breathing becomes dificult. Clay Maslr-£0- USA- Revised S04/2010Pe90 1 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED.INGESTION: Rinse mouth with watar several times. Do not Induce vomiting. Give vetim plenty of water, Obtain mecical atition Immediately. EYES: In case of contact, immediately flush eyos with plenty of water for atleast 1 minutes and get medical attention SKIN: Incase of contact, immedietely fush skin wih plenty of soap and water for at least 15 minutes. Remove contaminated clothing and launder before reuse. Get medical attention i tation persists. S FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLASHPOINT (METHOD): None LOWER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% vi Not applicable UPPER EXPLOSION LIMIT (% viv): Not applicable AUTO-IGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not applicable ‘SPECIAL HAZAROS: Product may bur in fire conditions. EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Water fog, carbon doxlde, foam, dry chemical ‘SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Fire-ighters should wear selF-contalned breathing apparatus and fll protective clothing ven fighting chemical fives, Cool exposed containers with walor spray HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: ‘Oxides of carbon and nitrogen, 8 ENTAL RELEAS! URES ‘Wear specified protacive equipment. Smal splls- Cover spi with absorbent material Scoop absorbed material into a suitable container for aisposal. Large opis - Dike to contain. Prevent from entering swers or waterways Recover produc to suitable contalners or vessel for reuse, If possible, or for disposal ‘7_HANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING: ‘Weer specified protective equipment. Uso only in a well ventilated area, ‘STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: ‘Keep container tightly closed, in @ cool, welt ventilated place. Keep away from Incompatible materials. Keep away from heat SEXP! 01 \L PROTECTION SPECIFIC ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Use only in a wall vonilated area, Local exhaust. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: ‘Appropriate respiralory protection shalibe worn when applied engineering contols are not adequate to protect ‘agalnst Inhalation oxposure, Chemical resistant gogales. Rubber gloves, Coveralls. 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL STATE: Liquid COLOR: ‘Clear ember ‘opor: ‘Swoot ‘ODOR THRESHOLD: Not avaiable ‘SPECIFIC GRAVITY: ttt. VAPOR PRESSURE: Not available VAPOR DENSITY (lt= 1) Not avalable EVAPORATION RATE: Not avallabla BOILING POINT: Not avalabla FREEZING POINT: 40°C pH eo VISCOSITY (F} Not avalablo ‘SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Soluble 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY. ‘Clay Mesle-5¢--USA- Revised 37082010 Page 2 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTEDSTABILITY: Sable under normal conditions of use. INCOMPATIBILITY/GONOITIONS OF REACTIVITY: ‘Strong oxidizers HAZARDOUS THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: ‘Oxides of carbon and nitrogan. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur 44. TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ‘SHRONIG EFFECTS: Not determined ‘SENSITIZATION: Not known, ‘CARCINOGENICITY: "None of tho components of this product have been listed as carcinoganic by JARO, NTP or OSHA. (IARC- {nternatonal Agency for Research on Cancer) (NTP - Nalional Toxicology Program) (OSHA - Occupatfonal ‘Safety & Health Administration (US)) MUTAGENICITY: Not known, REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY: Not known. 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION No spedic information avaiable. ‘Skelotonoma costalum, ECBO (72 h)=4671.5 mg/L ‘carta tonsa, LEO (48 t)=30.58 mall. ‘Soophthaimus maximus, LC5O (98 h)=42.93 mg/L ‘Corephium volutator, LC50 (240 h)=1349.8 mal. 43 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS WASTE DISPOSAL; Disposal should be made in accordance with national and local regulations Consult local waste euthories for

You might also like

• Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  

  From Everand

  Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  Margot Lee Shetterly

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (895)
• The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  

  From Everand

  The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  Mark Manson

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (5794)
• ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES - CLOSURE Question Without Notice 1284 - Supplementary Information

  

  Document8 pages

  ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES - CLOSURE Question Without Notice 1284 - Supplementary Information

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• • Magazines
  • Podcasts
  • Sheet music
• Minister Environment Investigate BPA Over Clearing

  

  Document1 page

  Minister Environment Investigate BPA Over Clearing

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Notes From Cruise Ship Meeting 22 Jan 15

  

  Document3 pages

  Notes From Cruise Ship Meeting 22 Jan 15

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• EP Lodgement Nov 20131

  

  Document2 pages

  EP Lodgement Nov 20131

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Yawuru Expert Group Consolidated Report On Buru Energys TGS14 Program ID 48650

  

  Document105 pages

  Yawuru Expert Group Consolidated Report On Buru Energys TGS14 Program ID 48650

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Legislative Council Question On Notice Thursday, 20 February 2014

  

  Document3 pages

  Legislative Council Question On Notice Thursday, 20 February 2014

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Government of Western Australia: Water Management

  

  Document2 pages

  Government of Western Australia: Water Management

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• 42 Psxsdnztls 1 W

  

  Document18 pages

  42 Psxsdnztls 1 W

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Operations Update 77565356459954233

  

  Document5 pages

  Operations Update 77565356459954233

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Legislative Council Question On Notice: Thursday, 20 February 2014

  

  Document2 pages

  Legislative Council Question On Notice: Thursday, 20 February 2014

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• ASX Announcement: Ungani 3 Well Update

  

  Document2 pages

  ASX Announcement: Ungani 3 Well Update

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Kimberley JDAP - Agenda - No 4 - Shire of Broome-1

  

  Document136 pages

  Kimberley JDAP - Agenda - No 4 - Shire of Broome-1

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Gasbag 16 April 2013

  

  Document1 page

  Gasbag 16 April 2013

  Hands Off Country

  No ratings yet
• Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  

  From Everand

  Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  Phil Knight

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (537)
• Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  

  From Everand

  Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  Angela Duckworth

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (588)
• The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  

  From Everand

  The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  Sarah M. Broom

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (98)
• Principles: Life and Work

  

  From Everand

  Principles: Life and Work

  Ray Dalio

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (599)
• Yes Please

  

  From Everand

  Yes Please

  Amy Poehler

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (1891)
• The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  

  From Everand

  The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  Meik Wiking

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (400)
• Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  

  From Everand

  Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  Chris Voss

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (838)
• Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  

  From Everand

  Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  Ashlee Vance

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (474)
• A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  

  From Everand

  A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  Dave Eggers

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (231)
• Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  

  From Everand

  Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  Jay Sekulow

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (137)
• The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  

  From Everand

  The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  Siddhartha Mukherjee

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (271)
• Fear: Trump in the White House

  

  From Everand

  Fear: Trump in the White House

  Bob Woodward

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (738)
• Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  

  From Everand

  Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  Gilbert King

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (266)
• The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  

  From Everand

  The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  Ben Horowitz

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (345)
• On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  

  From Everand

  On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  Naomi Klein

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (74)
• The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  

  From Everand

  The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  Thomas L. Friedman

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (2259)
• Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  

  From Everand

  Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  Doris Kearns Goodwin

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (234)
• The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  

  From Everand

  The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  George Packer

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (45)
• The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  

  From Everand

  The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  Brené Brown

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (1090)
• Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  

  From Everand

  Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  Frank McCourt

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (440)
• Steve Jobs

  

  From Everand

  Steve Jobs

  Walter Isaacson

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (806)
• Bad Feminist: Essays

  

  From Everand

  Bad Feminist: Essays

  Roxane Gay

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (1016)
• The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  

  From Everand

  The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  Jeannette Walls

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (1713)
• John Adams

  

  From Everand

  John Adams

  David McCullough

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (2409)
• The Outsider: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  The Outsider: A Novel

  Stephen King

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (1839)
• The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  M.L. Stedman

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (789)
• Brooklyn: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  Brooklyn: A Novel

  Colm Toibin

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (1937)
• The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  

  From Everand

  The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  Viet Thanh Nguyen

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (121)
• The Woman in Cabin 10

  

  From Everand

  The Woman in Cabin 10

  Ruth Ware

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (2322)
• Little Women

  

  From Everand

  Little Women

  Louisa May Alcott

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (104)
• A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  Fredrik Backman

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (4609)
• Wolf Hall: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  Wolf Hall: A Novel

  Hilary Mantel

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (3811)
• Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  Jennifer Egan

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (792)
• The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  

  From Everand

  The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  Stephen Chbosky

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (2104)
• The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  Garth Stein

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (4200)
• The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  John le Carré

  Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

  3.5/5 (104)
• A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  

  From Everand

  A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  Betty Smith

  Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

  4.5/5 (1929)
• Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  

  From Everand

  Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  Carmen Maria Machado

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (821)
• Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  

  From Everand

  Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  Jesmyn Ward

  Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  4/5 (1103)