Professional Documents
Culture Documents
American Apparel.
Tao Lin has become a figurehead of a group of writers who have come to be
known by the term Alternative Literature or Alt-Lit. The Alt-Lit scene is largely
defined as being an online community of writers who advertise, self publish and
interact as a community predominantly via social media forums and websites.
Their work is exemplified in novel form, by the use of thinly disguised
autobiographical material, the noted influence of recreational drug use and by
the use of internet motifs such as transcripts of dialogue from chat rooms and
Instant messaging services such as Gmail chat.
Huw Nesbitt in his review on The Quietus states that Shoplifting From American
Apparel is not an exposition of an existential crisis and that the absence of
narrative shouldn't be mistaken for an allegorical anti-narrative. 1 He maintains
that everything that exists in Shoplifting . . . is so neutered, so self-involved, so
purposeless, that it couldn't possibly be against anything and that Shoplifting is
a critique without end or goal; an infinite insult aimed at the entire universe that
affirms nothing but would happily send everything to hellfire. 2
But I would disagree with this. In this essay I shall argue that shoplifting is a
carefully crafted set of contradictions. I shall explore two in particular that
1 Huw Nesbitt, 'Tao Lin's Shoplifting From American Apparel Reviewed', The Quietus (2009)
<http://thequietus.com/articles/02767-tao-lin-s-shoplifting-from-americanapparel-review> [30/03/2014] (para. 5).
2 Huw Nesbitt (para. 5)
In this way the social interaction and emotional fulfilment Sam seeks has become
a simulacra operating through the medium of the internet that bares no relation
to traditional social norms. His inability to reconcile his confident internet
persona and the person he is when directly interacting with people is a paradigm
of the modern condition. This subtle but firm social commentary contradicts
Nesbitts assertion that Shoplifting is a critique without end or goal.7 Whilst Lin
certainly does not condemn the dogmatic use of social media, he firmly asserts
its limitations as a social tool.
through a New York Times supplement asking each other which would you rather
have? Or which would you rather be?9 Sam believes that consumerism and
wealth will empower him to break the boredom and monotony of his life; [Sam]
thought about working hard and becoming rich and living alone in a giant house
in Florida. Loneliness and depression would be defeated with a king size bed, an
expensive stereo, a drum set, a bike [and] an unlimited supply of organic
produce and coconuts. Sam feels his alienation lies in his lack of money and
therefore his inability to consume.
But this affectation with consumerism soon breaks down. During emotionally
challenging times Sam and Sheila are detailed as st[anding] talking near the
front doors while looking at each others shoes. 10 Within a chapter the shoes
have gone from a beacon of hope to an emblem of Sams failure to commit to
people emotionally. Sam later rebukes the concept of capitalist consumerism by
arbitrarily beginning to shoplift from NYU and American Apparel, the incident
from which the book significantly takes its title. Sam steals in an offhand way and
shows little concern when caught. The manager at the store rebukes Sam saying
Dont steal from us [...] steal from some shitty corporation. We have fair-trade
labor. I mean fair labor [sic] 11. The fact that the manager initially calls it fairtrade labour before correcting himself is significant, it demonstrates Lins
cynicism towards American Apparels pretence of corporate morality, implying
via this Freudian slip that they consider workers a commodity, perhaps tradable
in themselves.
9 Shoplifting, p. 13
10 Shoplifting, p. 15
11 Shoplifting, p. 19
In conclusion these contradictions between desire and action, and thought and
action, form the basis of a very subtle critique of American society as a whole
and Lins generation in particular. While I would not interpret the text as strictly
allegorical, as Lin refuses to force an interpretation upon the reader, the tone
created by these contradictory paradigms betrays an attitude towards society
that is in a subtle way critical of its adherence to consumerist norms and the
apathy of a generation that colludes in it.