Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B. Fertility Rate: The amount of children per woman in the world has
dropped from 4.7 to 2.5 but because people are living longer and the
infant mortality rate has dropped the population has continued to grow
steadily. (Africa went from 6.7 to 4.7, Asia went from 5.4 to 2.2, Europe
went from 2.3 to 1.6, Latin America and the Caribbean went from 5.3
to 2.2, North America went from 2.3 to 1.8, Oceania went from 3.4 to
2.4)
Infant Mortality: The infant mortality rate in the world has dropped
from 89 to 38 since 1970 due to increased knowledge of prenatal and
postnatal care. (Africa went from 139 to 62, Asia went from 91 to 34,
Europe went from 27 to 6, Latin America and the Caribbean went from
86 to 18, North America went from 21 to 5, Oceania went from 43 to
21)
Life Expectancy: The life expectancy for the world population has
grown from 58 to 71 years due to increases in medicine technology
and health sciences. (Africa went from 45 to 59, Asia went from 57 to
71, Europe went from 70 to 78, Latin America and the Caribbean went
from 60 to 75, North America went from 71 to 79, Oceania went from
66 to 77)
C. The sex ratios havent changed much compared from 1970 to today
but the age of the population has changed. In 1970 the majority of the
population was below 20 years old and today the majority is between
20-40 years and the overall life expectancy has risen with it.
D. Cambodia, Laos, Rwanda, and Nepal have made the most progress in
reducing maternal mortality rates & Peru, Egypt, China, Bangladesh,
and Tanznia have made the most progress in reducing child mortality
rates. These countries had limited health care in the beginning, most of
them are underdeveloped but have displayed great progress, and
many were among the worst places in the world at one point so
although theyve improved they are still higher than the world average.
Population Growth Explained with IKEA Boxes~
I disagree with Hans Roslings conclusion that only by raising the living
standards of the poorest, in an environmentally-friendly way, will population
growth stop at 9 billion people in 2050. It doesnt really make sense to me
that if we raise the living standards of the poorest people on earth that
population growth will stop. I feel like the people would actually have larger
families because they would be able to afford supporting them better than
they would be able to with their current living standards with less money and
resources. So instead of what Hans Rosling believes, I believe this would
actually result in the worlds population increasing rather than causing
growth to stop.