Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHEM 2311L-1
6. Students must verify OLOLC supplies, chemical inventory, and instrumentation abilities
with Mrs. Oldendorf on the Topic Selection Form before formulating the experimental
plan.
7. Students are required to use one of the following analytical instruments in the
independent project: GC/MS, FTIR, UV-Vis, or the Polarimeter may be used for
analytical analysis.
8. Although scientific research must reflect original thoughts and ideas, research must build
on other research. Students must include a references section to demonstrate scholarship
to their audiences. The proposal and proposal references are to be written using
professional American Chemical Society (ACS) style.
9. Each student must visit the Writing Center before February 27th to simulate the thorough
peer-review process that scientific papers must pass for conference presentation and
publication. The Writing Center is located on the second floor of the Library Commons
on Didesse Drive. The peer-reviewer will sign and date the draft. This draft is due with
the final draft on February 27, 2014. Failure to provide this draft with the appropriate
date/signature will result in a 10-point deduction from the proposal grade. Forging
signatures and dates will result in a zero.
10. Recurrent writing, spelling, and grammatical errors will result in point deductions.
11. Students in advanced chemistry courses at Our Lady of the Lake College are expected to
present scientific projects in a professional manner. Unprofessional writing,
unprofessional formatting, and excessive use of unnecessary jargon will result in a point
deduction.
Grading Rubric
Title Page
5 Points
Problem Statement
20 Points
LiteratureReview
20Points
Methodology&
Procedure
40Points
References/Grammar
15Points
5points
The title page contains all of the
required elements: project title,
name, course/semester/year,
department & school, due date, and
origin.
20 points
The section includes a researchable
problem statement that is relevant
to organic chemistry, background
information on the problem, and a
brief explanation of what has been
done to address the problem. The
proposal demonstrates original
thought. 1 page in length.
20 points
Information is gathered from
multiple, research-based sources.
The section is well organized,
and demonstrates logical
sequencing and structure.
Detailed conclusions are reached
from the evidence offered.
Information is cited appropriately
and in ACS format. 2 pages in
length.
40points
The student has considered
the key issues for
the project and understands
the scope of the
challenges they are likely
to face. A well thought-out, safe
experimental procedure is
presented, and the correct
methodology is detailed. The
experimental procedure accounts
for OLOLC chemical & supply
inventory, and instrument
capabilities. 2 pages in length.
15points
All references and citations are
correctly written and present. The
proposal is free from grammatical
and writing errors.
34points
The title page most of the required
elements: project title, name,
course/semester/year, department &
school, due date, and origin.
02points
The title page contains little-to-none of the
required elements: project title, name,
course/semester/year, department &
school, due date, and origin.
12-19 points
The section includes a researchable
problem statement that may be distantly
relevant to organic chemistry,
background information on the problem,
and a brief explanation of what has been
done to address the problem. The
proposal demonstrates some original
thought. Less than 1 page in length or
exceeds 1 page in length.
12-19 points
Information is gathered from multiple
sources. The section is well organized,
but demonstrates illogical sequencing
or structure. Conclusions are reached
from the evidence offered. Information
is cited in ACS format, but with some
errors. Less than 2 pages in length or
exceeds 2 pages in length.
0-11 points
The section includes a researchable
problem statement that is irrelevant to
organic chemistry, no background
information on the problem, and no
explanation of what has been done to
address the problem. The proposal
demonstrates little-to-no original thought.
Significantly less than 1 page in length or
significantly exceeds 1 page in length.
0-11 points
Information is gathered from a limited
number of sources. Weakly organized
with no logical sequencing or structure.
There is some indication of conclusions
from the evidence offered. Information is
cited, but has many errors. Significantly
less than 2 pages in length or
significantly more than 2 pages in length.
2039points
The student has considered
some key issues for
the project and understands
the scope of the
challenges they are likely
to face. A safe experimental procedure
is presented, and the methodology is
presented in some detail. The
experimental procedure accounts for
OLOLC chemical & supply inventory,
and instrument capabilities. Less than 2
pages in length or exceeds 2 pages in
length.
019points
The student has not considered
key issues for
the project and does not understand
the scope of the
challenges they are likely
to face. An unsafe experimental
procedure is presented, and the
methodology is presented in little detail.
The experimental procedure does not
account for OLOLC chemical & supply
inventory, and instrument capabilities.
Significantly less than 2 pages in length
or significantly more than 2 pages in
length.
07points
Reference, citation, grammatical, and
writing errors detract significantly from
the proposal.
814points
Some references or citations are missing
or incorrectly written. The proposal
contains some grammatical and writing
errors.