Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No learning
objectives stated.
Group given no
indication of the
task(s) they were
being asked to
undertake. No
checks for prior
knowledge.
(1 mark)
Learning objectives
stated in rudimentary
form. Group given
limited indication of
the task(s) they were
being asked to
undertake.
Rudimentary attempt
to check for prior
knowledge.
(2 marks)
HD
Learning objectives
stated but did not
fully capture
activity. Group
given a good
indication of the
task(s) they were
being asked to
undertake. Prior
knowledge
checked.
Learning
objectives clearly
stated and used.
Group given a
clear indication of
the task(s) they
were being asked
to undertake.
Prior knowledge
checked and acted
upon, e.g. through
a motivational
connection to
prior knowledge.
Learning objectives
very clearly stated, used
and reviewed. Group
given a comprehensive
indication of the task(s)
they were being asked
to undertake. Prior
knowledge checked and
acted upon with clear
connections made to
prior knowledge.
Successfully/
innovatively gains
groups attention.
(4 marks)
(5 marks)
Successful
engagement of
audience by using
ICT through
interactive
activity. ICT
selected
challenged the
target audience to
actively engage in
content.
Activity is innovative
and tasks engage
audience in creative
thought. Successful and
prolonged engagement
of audience by using
ICT through interactive
activity. ICT selected
challenged the target
audience to actively
engage in content and
reflect on their learning.
(3 marks)
Used ICT to
engage the
audience in
active
discussion and
participation
/10 marks
No attempt to
engage audience
by using ICT or
consider ICT
application.
Presentation only.
(2 marks)
Surface attempt to
engage audience by
using ICT. ICT
selected has some
relevance for target
audience. Activity is a
presentation but
audience is asked to
consider and answer
some pertinent
questions.
Good attempt to
engage audience by
using ICT through
interactive activity.
ICT selected
challenged the
target audience to
actively engage in
content.
(6 marks)
(4 marks)
(8 marks)
(10 marks)
Encouraged
the audience
to consider
how ICT
contributed to
learning
/5 marks
No attempt to
encourage the
audience to
consider ICT
contribution to
learning.
Surface attempt to
state and review the
use of ICT in the
classroom.
(2 marks)
(1 mark)
(3 marks)
Excellent attempt
to monitor and
facilitate the
audience in
considering how
ICT contributed
to the learning in
the classroom
context.
(4 marks)
CHECKLIST
ACADEMIC LITERACY: The overall grade awarded for the assignment cannot be greater than that awarded for the Academic Literacy component.
Criteria
Students are expected to
demonstrate a high
standard of academic
writing. To score a high
grade, standard Australian
English should be used to
communicate key ideas
clearly and concisely.
F
Insufficient evidence of ability
displayed. There are substantial
errors in:
HD
Comments:
Overall Grade:
Date:
Signed: