38K views

Uploaded by Eugene Nikolaychuk

Corporate Finance Case Study Solution

- Ocean Carriers - Case Study Solution
- ameritrade
- Ameritrade Solution
- Ocean Carriers
- Ameritrade Case Consolidated
- Ocean Carriers Excel
- Ameritrade Final
- Cost of Capital at Ameritrade ()
- Ameritrade
- Ameritrade Case Solution
- Ocean Carriers Case Study
- AmeriTrade Case Study
- 103260670 Case 1 Ocean Carrier
- Analysis of the Cost of Capital at Ameritrade
- Ameritrade Case Solution
- Ocean Carriers
- Ameritrade Case Solution
- Ameritrade Case Solution
- Ameritrade questions
- Case Study Debt Policy Ust Inc

You are on page 1of 6

Sorry for my second delay with the case – it is all the preparation to university

exams. I shall try to finish Friendly Cards in time.

So I used to make parallels from cases to our real life and economic situation in Ukraine. At the

time we do not have such companies as Ameritrade in Ukraine, because this kind of business

does not have it’s customers right now. This is a new thing to our country, and as usual, all the

new things are taken distrustfully.

I can recall only one example : it is FOREX, but it actually deals with the currency exchange

rates, buying and selling currency. The only same thing – all the processes are being held online.

1. What factors should Ameritrade consider when evaluating the proposed advertising

program and technology upgrades?

Ameritrade needs a cost of capital to evaluate new projects. Firms maximize their value

by taking all positive NPV projects.

E ( CFi )

NPV = ∑ i =0,1, 2, ...

i (1 + r )

* i

r * is the discount rate

To calculate an NPV, we need a discount rate. In the A-Rod case we used 8%. In the

Ocean Carriers case we used 9%. In this case we will learn how to determine an

appropriate rate.

If Ameritrade analysts use a discount rate that is too high, good projects may be rejected.

If they use a discount rate that is too low, bad projects may be accepted.

Also the Ameritrade analysts should consider, that their company’s internal discount rate

was often used as 15%, but some managers felt appropriate the rate of 8-9%. At this time,

the external discount rate, used by Credit Swiss First Boston was 12%. Good

observation.

So actually computing the NPV earlier, Ameritrade analysts accepted only the best

projects which fitted their high requirements. Now at the end of your analysis, we see

that Ameritrade has a cost of capital close to 22%. This high hurdle rate means that

Ameritrade should only accept projects with a very high potential rate of return (as

long as they are of similar risk levels).

2. How can the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) be used to estimate the cost of capital

for a real investment decision? (Note: A real investment decision here is contrasted

from a financial investment decision. We are talking about real projects, with investment

in people and technologies, etc.)

Because we are talking about risks, we should think about systematic and versatile non-

systematic? risks. Systematic risks usually depend on overall economical situation,

government steps, state economic policy and law base risks. In the US this kind of risk is

comparatively low. But in Ukraine it will be much higher because of unstable economy,

government policy and laws. That is why computed cost of capital would be higher, if

this company was situated in Ukraine. That seems reasonable to me.

Ameritrade’s cost of capital should reflect a risk premium to account for the uncertainty

of the expected future cash flows in addition to reflecting the time value of money.

RF is the risk-free return, reflecting the time value of money. Textbook material

explaining the CAPM is available on my website. The figure below may help to

summarize:

The CAPM provides a useful framework for determining the discount rate by defining

the risk premium above. The diagram illustrates expected return for a stock, RS . We

want the expected return (the appropriate discount rate) for investments in various assets,

which are financed by a combination of equity and debt, so we use the subscript A in

place of S. In slope-intercept form, the expected return, or appropriate discount rate, may

be given as:

r * = RF + β AAmeritrade ( RM − RF )

βAAmeritrade is called beta of the assets of Ameritrade, and represents the risk of

Ameritrade. A company of average risk gets a beta of 1.0.

RM is the return of the average-risk company, or equivalently, the return of a broad-

based portfolio of companies, like those listed on the New York Stock Exchange

(NYSE).

3. What is the estimate of the risk-free rate RF that should be used in calculating the cost

of capital for Ameritrade?

Since the projects being contemplated are long-term projects, we should use long-term

rates. Since the projects are in the future, we should use current (at the time of the case)

yields, not historical rates.

In my opinion, we should use the risk-free rate equal to yield of 20-year US government

securities, because it is long-term capital investment. We may use 30-year rate, but we

are investing in technology, and concerning the speed of technological enhancements, 20-

year rate is optimal. So it is 6,69%. Sounds reasonable to me.

4. What is the estimate of the market risk premium, RM − RF , that should be used in

calculating the cost of capital for Ameritrade?

Typically analysts use the stock market return minus U.S. government bond returns.

Unlike the bond market, where the current yields are the unbiased market prices for

bonds whose cash flows are in the future, we don’t have a reliable estimate of where the

stock market will move in the future. Stock brokers have a conflict of interest; if they are

optimistic, and can persuade people of their optimism, then more funds should flow into

the stock market and their commissions and salaries increase. Thus we typically use

historical spreads over a long period of time, covering many business cycles, and suggest

that with no better information, we anticipate the future to be like the past. Also, large

stocks tend to better estimate the market than small stocks.

That is why we may use the difference between US Government Securities rate (6,69%)

and historical Large Company Stocks annual returns. But we have 2 numbers: during

1950-96 and 1929-96. The difference between them is 1,3%. I think that we should use

“younger” value of 14%, because the years 1930-1949, of course, were under market

economy, but at the same time there were not so stable laws, a Second World War

passed, many companies at that time worked for government orders, so this number may

be a bit out of overall tendencies. I appreciate your thoughtfulness. You are quite

perceptive. The opposite side of this argument is that we don’t know what the

future will bring. Perhaps we will have another period of world war, or terrible

global market conditions. If such a scenario is not unreasonable, then we shouldn’t

exclude past data that relates to such times.

RM − RF =14%-6,69%=7,31%.

5. In principle, what are the steps for computing the asset beta in the CAPM?

A cost of capital is a weighted average of the cost of debt and equity. Likewise, the asset

beta is the weighted average betas of debt and equity. We use market value proportions

of debt and equity (see CAPM, p. 476).

D E

βA = βD + βE

D+E D+E

Empirical studies of corporate debt returns suggest it would be better to assign some

market-related risk to corporate debt; and use estimates ranging from 0.20 to 0.30. We

will compute both.

To get βE , the equity beta for Ameritrade, we would normally run a regression of equity

returns on stock market returns. That is, we would estimate the slope of the line that best

fits:

Unfortunately, Ameritrade had their IPO (Initial Purchase Offer) in March of 1997, so

there is not enough data at the time of the case to calculate a reliable beta estimate. So

instead, we will look at comparable firms. Firms in the same industry pursuing the same

types of projects will have the same sorts of risks, thus their asset betas will be

approximately the same. The returns we calculate for these firms, based on stock price

movement, dividends, and stock splits, are their equity betas. These are influenced by the

degree of leverage each company is using (recall that higher leverage leads to higher

ROE, EPS and DPS, but also leads to greater variability in earnings). Knowing the

amount of debt in their capital structures (at market values), we can calculate the asset

beta for each comparable firm. Then we will average these to use as a proxy for

Ameritrade’s asset beta.

Please see spreadsheet work. This is very good. I would just make two observations,

however: 1) the debt to total capital ratios in Exhibit 4 are for the period 1992-1996.

Therefore you should only use equity returns from the same period. 2) The return

for the very first period is not a useful number, because you are implicitly

subtracting 0 as the previous price of the stock.

6. Exhibit 4 provides various choices of comparable firms. Which firms do you recommend

as the appropriate benchmarks for evaluating the risk of Ameritrade’s planned advertising

and technology investments? Determine the betas for these firms.

Let us agree that Charles Schwab is a comparable firm. Their price changes, dividends,

and stock split information for 1992-1996 is in Exhibit 5. If there were no stock split, the

return, compared to the previous period, is given by:

Pt − Pt −1 + Dt

Rt = . For example, if the price the previous period was $100, then went

Pt −1

up to $104, and in addition had a dividend of $8, the return would be +0.12, or 12%. In a

short time period, the returns will be much closer to 0.

If there is an x for y stock split, use the formula:

x x

Pt − Pt −1 + Dt

y y . To make calculating this efficient, we can set x and y equal to

Rt =

Pt −1

1 for those periods when there is not a stock split, then we can just use the second

formula. Here are the first few rows for Schwab

Copy the Rt values into Exhibit 6 alongside the appropriate dates, then regress the

Schwab returns against the value-weighted NYSE returns for the same period. The slope

of the line is the equity beta.

Do this for the other comparable firms. Calculate the asset betas using the formula in

question 5 (twice, once with βD = 0 and once with βD = 0.25 ). Average the results.

This should be a good estimate of Ameritrade’s asset beta. Finally, put these results back

into the equation in #2 to estimate Ameritrade’s cost of capital.

Please see spreadsheet calculations.

r* for debt beta = 0 is 20,1%

r* for debt beta = 0,25 is 20,4%.

It is higher than usually used rate, but this is long-term project and we need to be sure

that we would not accept a bad project. DONE!!!!

Very good! 98 – 5 late

- Ocean Carriers - Case Study SolutionUploaded byGeorge Kolbaia
- ameritradeUploaded bysaleem2412
- Ameritrade SolutionUploaded byRashed Tarique
- Ocean CarriersUploaded byMarc de Neergaard
- Ameritrade Case ConsolidatedUploaded byyvasisht3
- Ocean Carriers ExcelUploaded byToshalina Nayak
- Ameritrade FinalUploaded byTarek Dandach
- Cost of Capital at Ameritrade ()Uploaded byTom Ziv
- AmeritradeUploaded bysanz08
- Ameritrade Case SolutionUploaded byBhawna Khosla
- Ocean Carriers Case StudyUploaded byJennifer Johnson
- AmeriTrade Case StudyUploaded byTracy Phan
- 103260670 Case 1 Ocean CarrierUploaded byKristen Robertson
- Analysis of the Cost of Capital at AmeritradeUploaded byLiran Harzy
- Ameritrade Case SolutionUploaded bysanz08
- Ocean CarriersUploaded byclassmate
- Ameritrade Case SolutionUploaded byVinoth_iimr
- Ameritrade Case SolutionUploaded byAbhishek Garg
- Ameritrade questionsUploaded bymilan979
- Case Study Debt Policy Ust IncUploaded byWill Tan
- Analysis ameritradeUploaded byBhawna Khosla
- Ocean CarriersUploaded byHarita Kuppa
- Debt Policy at Ust Case SolutionUploaded bytamur_ahan
- Ameritrade CaseUploaded byEricaTsai
- Ocean CarriersUploaded bywoheduoleyetu
- Ocean Carriers - Final SheetUploaded byandroidDownloadOnly
- Debt Policy at Ust IncUploaded byapi-3719687
- NetFlix.com, Inc.Uploaded byyousafkhalid486
- RJR Nabisco ValuationUploaded byShivani Bhatia

- ++997_100603-1156_OILUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- Phnc Unaf Update June 7 2010Uploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- 1638_120123-0915_OILUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- Roland Berger Steel 2007Uploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- Ukraine Macro Presentation CommerzUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- Citibank - Basics of Corporate FinanceUploaded bysahil_lovezu
- maxim_3_11_uaUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- BB 9700 manualUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- CDO HandbookUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk
- Sensitivity AnalysisUploaded byEugene Nikolaychuk

- col century pacificUploaded bySteve Hatol
- 20120103 Partners Group_ Research Flash_DirectsUploaded byAndr Ei
- Causes of Poverty in pakistan (HILAL)Uploaded byS.M.HILAL
- Fixed income securities numericalsUploaded byNatraj Pandey
- Lamina de Val ITUploaded byKiomara Rios
- C126 to CIFs for Trading in Binary OptionsUploaded byRusMartin
- implied vol fundaUploaded byprabinseth
- Oracle MantasUploaded bycrejoc
- DB QUANT Market TimingUploaded byjojotrader
- Hotel DevelopmentUploaded byiran1412690
- JIM / UTECH individual CaseUploaded byrishtavia
- Dedollarization Imf August 2010Uploaded byVMSAA
- Developing a Risk Management System for Information Systems Security IncidentsUploaded byAdonis
- TBCh02Uploaded byMikko Yamaguchi
- Security Analysis.pdfUploaded byArpita Gupta
- Citibank - Ratio AnalysisUploaded bySanchit Kumar
- Exercise 1 FullUploaded byDoanxuan Hoi
- Corporate Finance & Decision MakingUploaded byNataraj Chittari
- Fedai Final EditedUploaded byNeha Soni
- WSI Fact Sheet FINAL 3-31-08Uploaded byMatt
- Bill Gross Investment Outlook Apr_03Uploaded byBrian McMorris
- CG. Ownership Concentration, Foreign Shareholding, Audit Quality, And Stock Price Synchronicity - Evidence From ChinaUploaded byElena Dobre
- Statement of cash flow by KiesoUploaded bySiblu Hasan
- Methodology Financial and Economic Project Analyses Decision Making Tool en 2Uploaded byAlishare Khalander Basha
- Monnet Ispat Q4FY11-1Uploaded byamazing19in
- REITSUploaded byDouglas Slain
- MM ZG627 EC-2R FIRST SEM 2017-2018.docxUploaded byUDAYAN BIPINKUMAR SHAH
- 611246740(1)Uploaded byWilliam Zhao
- bookkkkk2(2)Uploaded byshabywarriach
- Berger PaintsUploaded byAmit Pandey