Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This week in Algebra the Core Math Idea has been that the
behavior of a graph can be predicted based on the
operations in the numbers of the function.
I have found that it is best to look at how a function shifts by
reviewing its parent function first, and working towards how
the graph and/or scale changes afterward to depict the
newly given function. A very simple example of this could be
taking f(x)=(x+3)-15. This may have seemed a little daunting
to us (at least a little while ago), however now we just take
the parent function of x^2 and know what type of graph that
this will create. We then take the (x+3) and move the graph
three points to the left, as it would take three more to equal
what once took three less. In terms of the fun store you need
three more dollars for the same amount of fun which you
would have once gotten it. You then have to move the graph
vertically down 15 because of the (-15) that is the Y
intercept. That makes what seems like a very challenging
graph at first sight to become very easy. Below is another
example of a function that at first appears daunting, but by
following the above steps becomes very easy.
This represents the two for one day in which the fun was
impacted. Mason's thinking was that because you would get
twice as much fun for any amount of money, that he could
take the original function and simply double all of the y
values. This is correct and the right way to think about such
a day. The equation for it would be 2f(x) because you are
doubling the y values of the original function.
This graph depicts the three scenarios all on the same scale,
and they turn out to be different graphs. Of course I had
suspected for the parent function to be different from the
other two but I had not expected a difference between the
other two. Looking back you can see differences within the
original picture which leads me to believe that I was not
careful enough in my looking but that I rushed into my
thoughts due to the shape of the curve being the same
between all of Mason's graphs. I wondered how this could
be, but then realized that it had to do with the graph being a
parabola and not a straight line. Because the slope is a
curve, it can not change in the same way that a linear
function would, working directly with easy numbers. I was
confident now that linear functions or functions with a
straight line would behave in the way which I had assumed
Extension:
I am wondering what will happen with functions which use
division before them or within parentheses as we have yet to
work on such an idea. I personally believe that it is the same
thing but essentially opposite to what was spoken about in
my blog, and therefore probably does not need to be
learned, however I am curious and would love to know what
you guys think. My general thought is f(x/2) is going to be
the same thing as f(1/2x) and we already know how to solve
that. I could be wrong however, and therefore would love
some input on that.