Curd v. Francisian Management Doc.

4
Case 4:06-cv-03609-CW Document 4 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JEREMY CURD, No. C-06-3609 MMC
10
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT
11 PREJUDICE, APPLICATION TO
United States District Court

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

For the Northern District of California

12
FRANCISCAN MANAGEMENT, (Docket No. 3)
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
Before the Court is plaintiff’s application, filed June 6, 2006, to proceed in forma
17
pauperis. Plaintiff has not completed the application in full. In particular, plaintiff has not
18
set forth the date of his last employment and the “amount of gross and net salary and
19
wages per month” received, the amount of his monthly expenses, or the amount of his
20
debts.
21
Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, without
22
prejudice. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with his complaint, plaintiff must, no later than
23
June 30, 2006, file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses
24
the deficiencies noted above, or pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. If, by June 30,
25
2006, plaintiff has not submitted an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis, or
26
paid the filing fee, the Court will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
Dated: June 9, 2006 MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com