A mentally impaired student was sent home with a broken hand On April 22, 2013. He was unable to tell his parents what happened. Surveillance equipment in the school was not working at the time. Without proper funding, this equipment and maintenance can become cost-prohibitive.
A mentally impaired student was sent home with a broken hand On April 22, 2013. He was unable to tell his parents what happened. Surveillance equipment in the school was not working at the time. Without proper funding, this equipment and maintenance can become cost-prohibitive.
A mentally impaired student was sent home with a broken hand On April 22, 2013. He was unable to tell his parents what happened. Surveillance equipment in the school was not working at the time. Without proper funding, this equipment and maintenance can become cost-prohibitive.
Michigan Dept. of Special Education 608 West Allegan St. Lansing, MI 48909
Dear Mr. Hove,
It is my belief that educational systems should provide a safe environment. Special education requires additional safety precautions due to the vulnerability of this student population and the nature of the environment in which special education is provided. Surveillance equipment facilitates the process by which suspicious, inappropriate, or violent behavior from staff can be examined. Without it, the students are at risk and this becomes a liability for the school. According to the World health Organization (2013), children with disabilities are 3.7 times more likely than non-disabled children to be victims of any sort of violence, 3.6 times more likely to be victims of physical violence, and 2.9 times more likely to be victims of sexual violence. Children with mental or intellectual impairments appear to be the most vulnerable, with 4.6 times the risk of sexual violence than their non-disabled peers. My non-verbal and mentally impaired child attends the Crawford, Oscoda, Ogemaw, Roscommon Intermediate School District (C.O.O.R. ISD), which is a special education school in Roscommon, Michigan. On April 22, 2013 he was sent home with a broken hand and in severe pain; but he was unable to tell me what happened. Upon requesting information from the school in regards to the supervision present at the time of the incident and what technical surveillance video could be reviewed, I was informed that the particular surveillance equipment in that area was not working at the time. The staff member is still being investigated. While the behavior of the school staff may not always be in the schools immediate control, the maintenance of their surveillance equipment should be. Without proper funding, this equipment and maintenance can become cost-prohibitive. It was indicated to me that these issues were attributed to limited financial resources within the budget. I am requesting additional funding for C.O.O.R. ISD, so that the status of this matter may be rectified and to assist in the re-instatement of a safe educational environment. Additionally surveillance equipment can be used as a protective modality for the school and a tool for policy improvements and should be standard practice. Sincerely, Cheryl Veres, RN