([Commonweaith of Pennsyh [DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION | 335 Market St, Harrisburg, PA 17196-0333 ] ‘Overall Rating Cateeory Txempiary (Minimum of | Superior (Minimum ofS Poin) | Saltactory (Winimam of | Unsatisfactory (@ Poin) 12 Points) 4 Poiats) ‘Grteria for Rating | The candiateconsisemy | Te eandite wally and “Thecandidatesomeiimes and | Tho candidate rary or ver and and doroughly| cexiensvely demonstrates indatos | adequately demonsrates | inappropriately or superfctally demonstrates indicators of | of perormance. indicators of performance. | demonsrates indicators of performance perforrance| Rating @ indicate number) Note: This assessment instrument must be used @ minimum of two times. A satisfactory rating (1) in each of the 4 categories, resulting in 2 minimum total of at least (4) points, must be achieved on the final summative rating to favorably complete this. assessment. Justification for Overall Rating: Miss Welder as shown tat se is ready to move on to er own classroom, She has crealed engaging activities for the students and made learning fun and exciting for them. She was able to observe many teachers and used the information she gained from those observations to her advantage in planning her lessons, Miss Weiner was abl observe TEP ‘meetings and has created her own mock IEP using IEP plus. She is a very hard working individual with set goals and exceeds any expectations that an employer would have ofa professional Weidner Marissa A Student Teacher/Candidate’s Last Name First Middle Social Security Number DistricwIU School Interview/Conference Date School Year: Required Signatures: oS ae «few supervisorievaluatol A722 AC ZA Date: Student/Teacher 5 Candidate: Date: (Confidential Document) PDE-430 5