Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3/18/14
Prof. Andy Lau
Introduction:
We designed a zero energy home for a family of four, fulfilling the requirements of a 1,200 sq ft
limit and a $185,000.00 budget.
Summary Table:
Location
Philadelphia, PA
House size
1194 sq ft
Number of floors
Number of occupants
Number of bedrooms
4.95 kW
yes
Type of windows
yes
Total Cost
$184,993
An aerial view of the first and second floor of the physical model of our ZEH.
.
The laundry room and the first floor
bathroom located on the northeast
portion of our house.
This is one of the kids bedrooms in our house. It includes a bed, end table, desk, and large
closet. It is located on the southwest corner of the house above the kitchen. The other bedroom
room is very similar and is located adjacent to this room on the northwest corner of the house.
Conclusion:
In this project we learned a lot about engineering design. In the form study research we
did, we learned about how surface area and south wall area can affect the efficiency of the
home. The more surface area a home has, the greater the heat loss there can be. Because
heating a home costs both money and energy, the less heating that needs to be done, the
better. Most zero energy homes are not very large because of this reason. The larger the
house, the more energy needed to keep it running. In order to take this into account in our own
design, we kept the house under 1,200 square feet. This size is large enough to comfortably fit
everything we need without being too large. In addition, the form study taught us about varying
the height of the south wall area, the greater the area of the wall, the more sunlight can come in;
therefore, reducing both the amount of lighting needed in the house and the amount of heating
needed to be done. In order to maximize the south wall area, we made our house two floors.
For the interior design of the house we used our knowledge of where the sun will be to know
where to place our rooms. On the east side of the house we have windows looking into the
family room so it will be bright and welcoming in the early morning hours. We have all the
bedrooms on the west side of the house so the people arent woken up in the morning by the
bright sun. Also, in order to make the space in the family room feel even bigger and more open,
we made the ceiling go all the way up to the second story and had a half wall opening into the
kitchen. We kept the bathrooms in the same area in order to reduce the amount of plumbing
throughout the house. When we completed the ZEH calculator we were around $7,000 over
budget, so we had to adjust certain things on our home. The main change we made was
reducing the windows on our house. This was incredibly challenging because we wanted to
keep our house aesthetically appealing, but at the same time within budget. After removing
several windows from the West, East, and South sides of the house we were roughly
$2,000 over budget. Despite all of these changes, we were still over budget, so we had to
be very conservative with the appliances we selected to be in our home. After the final
changes, our house came out to be $184,993; just under budget. Obviously, the ZEH
calculator took flexibility to work with, but in the end we managed to create a successful
ZEH. The appliances we did include were researched to make sure we got the best deal. One
example is the washer we chose to use in our home, which is the Whirlpool WFW88HEA+. This
washer resides on EnergyStars list of efficient washers and it was chosen because of its low
fixed cost of $985, and its low operating cost of $107 per year. Both costs are very economically
practical for this family, where other washers may have lower operating costs, their initial cost
creates too big of gap for those washers to overcome. In addition to the economic advantages,
the MEF is 3.32 and the water factor is 2.7, meaning the washer uses little water and is very
efficient with its water usage, especially when compared to others. In addition to selecting
appliances, we also had to make selections on PV panels. Since the low budget was one of our
major concerns, we tried to get the most watts per dollar out of solar panels. This led us to
choose the ReneSola Jc250M-14/Bb solar panel, which are 250 W solar panels. After doing
some math, we figured we needed 30.28 square meters of solar panels (to meet 4.95kW),
which was 23 panels. Unfortunately, not all of these panels could face South, so some had to be
placed on the East roof, which is not optimal but they still receive 85% of sunlight. Although this
project created many obstacles, we managed to create a successful design that meets the ZEH
requirement and fit within the budget, along with learning invaluable lessons regarding ZEHs.