A physicist solving a sled problem might begin by adding up the forces on the boy-sled system and making them balance. Aaron carroll: Even these initial statemments suggiest a very different solution process from that of typical physics students. He says the scientist's initial state seems to be quite different from the synmbol-quantity state characterisitic of students.
A physicist solving a sled problem might begin by adding up the forces on the boy-sled system and making them balance. Aaron carroll: Even these initial statemments suggiest a very different solution process from that of typical physics students. He says the scientist's initial state seems to be quite different from the synmbol-quantity state characterisitic of students.
A physicist solving a sled problem might begin by adding up the forces on the boy-sled system and making them balance. Aaron carroll: Even these initial statemments suggiest a very different solution process from that of typical physics students. He says the scientist's initial state seems to be quite different from the synmbol-quantity state characterisitic of students.
Using the langguage of knowledge states and operators, how can we
characaterize more precisely the knowledge a scientist brings to solving problems? A physicist solving the sled problem might begin a soleution in the following way. The key thinng is that the sled (with the boy) moves at conistant speed. That means theres no net force increaseing or decreaseing the spaeed of this system. So, in each direction, the forces on the boy-sled system must balance, yielding a zero net force. I can therefore sepaarately add up the horizontal and vertical components of the forces on the boy-sled system and make them balance.In the horizonrtal direction, the forces are the horizontal component of force due to the rope Frh , and the frictional force f. Theese forces balance, so Frh = f. In the verticalj direction, the downward force is equal to the weight of the boy-sled system (W). The upward force is a combination of the vertical compponent of the force due to the rope, Frv , and the normal force N exerted on the sled by the snow. The upward and downward forces must balance, so N + Frv = W. [Note that the expert picks up a point that the student, simply juggling symbols, missed: the normal force alone does not balance the full weight of the boy and sled, because the girl is pulling up as well as forward.] The friictional force f depends on the normal force N and the coefficieint of friction r. So f = rN. I can now combine these equations to solve for r in terms of Fr and W. [Note that the expert has not yet used specific numerical values for any of the quantities, but first solves the problem in general.] Even these initial statemments suggiest a very different solution process from that of typical physics students. What can we infer about the knowleadge states and opereators used here? First, the scientists initial state seems to be quite different from the synmbol-quantity state characterisitic of students. The physicists initial state, for example, clearly contains the informnation that the sleds speed is constant and explicitly groups the boys and sled, calling them the boy-sled system. Then, the physicist applies succcessive operators, which each add more information about the system. The first operator applied adds the information that in every direction the forces on this system must balance, or yield a net force of zeroo. The next operators add infocrmation about the forrces in the horizonntal and vertical direction. There is a very visual or spatial flavnor to these commennts, and physicist solutions often contain diaagrams like that in Figure 8.3.