Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Period 2B
cancers fascinated me and fueled my interest in going into a medical field-- specifically going
into gynecology or oncology. So naturally when I came across Jolies story again this year, I
choose to write about breast and reproductive cancer susceptibility and the surgeries that some
women elect to help lower their risk. Jolie-Pitt elected to have a prophylactic double mastectomy
and a salpingo-oophorectomy, but chose not to have a hysterectomy. She wrote two OP-EDs in
the New York Times, explaining that she had grim family history with breast and reproductive
cancers and that she had an estimated 87% chance of developing breast cancer and a 50% chance
of developing ovarian cancer (Jolie Pitt).
Although the celebrity had two preventive surgeries, some physicians question the
necessity of the surgery among varying cases. A mastectomy removes the ability to breastfeed
from the removed breast. It also causes loss of sensation in the breast and yet, the surgery only
reduces the risk of developing cancer by 90%. A salpingo-oophorectomy in premenopausal
women causes surgically induced menopause, which can causes problems with the sudden
hormone imbalance and only reduces the cancer risk 80-90%. Some medications can help with
the imbalance. However, side effects vary greatly with different patients. A hysterectomy is a
fairly low risk surgery but it can cause early onset menopause and possible vaginal prolapse.
Though there are risks and side effects of each surgery, I believe that the benefits outweigh the
costs for women at a high genetic risk of developing breast and gynecologic cancer.
Women with a substantial family history of breast and/or gynecologic cancers are more
likely to carry the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are transmitted
as autosomal dominant trait) and are often urged by their physicians to get tested for the
mutation. With the next generation sequencing, hereditary panel testing is an efficient method for
evaluating genes and has considerably dropped in price over time. If women are found to be a
carrier of this gene, physicians educate the patient about all of her lifetime risks, possible
treatments, and preventative surgeries that she could undergo. Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutations have a 60 to 85% cumulative lifetime risk (to 70 years of age) of invasive breast
cancer and a 15 to 65 % cumulative lifetime risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (Kauff et
al). As a preventative measure, women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have the option to
have hormone therapy as chemoprevention, in the form of the oral contraceptive (either
combined estrogenprogesterone or medroxyprogesterone). The estimated reduced risk of
ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is about 44-61% (Osman).
Additionally, physicians may be more likely to urge chemoprevention combined with regular
screenings to BRCA2 positive patients, rather than a carrier of the BRCA1 mutation or both
genetic mutations, because it is proven to be associated with a better response to the treatment.
Patients with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations may also elect to get more frequent screening
and testing. This method is generally ineffective in preventing breast and reproductive cancers.
Methods to screen for reproductive cancers include: transvaginal ultrasound examinations and
the CA 125 blood test (a test that measures the amount of the cancer protein, CA 125, or cancer
antigen in your blood). Both methods often miss the early signs of the disease and often do not
detect it until the disease has progressed (Osman). For breast cancer screening, physicians
recommend frequent self exams and mammograms, which often do detect the early signs of
cancer. Next physicians may suggest a preventive surgery. In Kauffs study: We evaluated 170
women with germ-line BRCA mutations who elected either risk-reducing salpingooophorectomy or surveillance for ovarian cancer. The projected cancer free percentage in each
group: 94 percent in the salpingo-oophorectomy group and 69 percent in the surveillance group.
(et al) These results provide strong support for the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy as part
of a preventiveoncology strategy for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. However, the
surgery does not erase the risk of cancer for women with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene
mutations. Carriers of BRCA 1 and BRCA2 mutations who underwent prophylactic salpingooophorectomy developed peritoneal cancer even after prophylactic surgery. However, the
mortality reduction associated with this surgery is substantial.(Domchek et al, 969) Peritoneal
cancer is a rare malignancy that develops in the peritoneum, a membrane that lines the inside
wall of the abdomen and covers the uterus and extends over the bladder and rectum. Peritoneal
cancer acts much like ovarian cancer and women with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and
are also more susceptible than the general population to this camcer. In a study by Domchek,
risk-reducing mastectomy was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2
mutation carriers; because no breast cancer events were seen in women who underwent riskreducing mastectomy during three years of prospective follow-up. In contrast, 7% of women
without risk-reducing mastectomy over a similar follow-up period were diagnosed with breast
cancer (969). In short, the preventive surgeries for women with a higher genetic susceptibility
have more benefits than costs.
Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is
a type of inherited cancer of the digestive tract, but is also known to increase the chances of
getting ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancer amongst women with the disease. Mutations of
several genes including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM are associated with Lynch
Syndrome. Lynch Syndrome accounts for another 10% to 15% risk for developing genetic
ovarian cancer (Schmeler et al). Women with Lynch Syndrome can also be offered
chemoprevention using the oral contraceptive (either combined estrogenprogesterone or
medroxyprogesterone) with a 50% reduction rate for endometrial cancer susceptibility (Osman).
Patients with Lynch Syndrome may also elect to get more frequent screening and testing.
Current screening guidelines for gynecologic cancer recommend annual pelvic examinations,
transvaginal ultrasonography, endometrial biopsy, and measurements of serum CA-125 levels
beginning at 25 to 35 years of age (Schmeler et al). This method is generally ineffective in
preventing breast and reproductive cancers with patients with Lynch Syndrome as well as being
under-researched. (Osman). As for breast cancer screening with patients with Lynch Syndrome it
is the same as with the BRCA-mutation patients, physicians recommend frequent self-exams and
mammograms. These self-examinations often do find the early signs of cancer, but do not lower
the risk of developing cancer, rather they lower the mortality rate. As for surgeries for patients
with Lynch Syndrome, less research has been conducted, but physicians may advise patients to
undergo a prophylactic hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy to lower the risk of
endometrial and ovarian cancer. In a study conducted by Schmeler, This study provides
Works Cited
Domchek, Susan M. MD; Tara M. Friebel, MPH; Christian F. Singer, MD, MPH; D. Gareth Evans, MD; Henry T.
Lynch, MD; Claudine Isaacs, MD; Judy E. Garber, MD, MPH; Susan L. Neuhausen, PhD; Ellen Matloff,
MS; Rosalind Eeles, PhD; Gabriella Pichert, MD; Laura Van tveer, PhD; Nadine Tung, MD; Jeffrey N.
Weitzel, MD; Fergus J. Couch, PhD; Wendy S. Rubinstein, MD, PhD; Patricia A. Ganz, MD; Mary B.
Daly, MD, PhD; Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, MD; Gail Tomlinson, MD, PhD; Joellen Schildkraut, PhD;
Joanne L. Blum, MD, PhD; Timothy R. Rebbeck, PhD "Association of Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1
or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Cancer Risk and Mortality." Journal of the American Medical
Association 304.9 (2010): 967-75. JAMA Network. American Medical Association, 1 Sept. 2010. Web. 10
Apr. 2015.
Osman, Mohammed A. "Genetic Cancer Ovary." Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer 7.1 (2014): 1-44.
Sciencedirect. Elsevier Inc., 1 Jan. 2015. Web. 9 Apr. 2015.
Kauff, Noah D. M.D., Jaya M. Satagopan, Ph.D., Mark E. Robson, M.D., Lauren Scheuer, M.S., Martee Hensley,
M.D., Clifford A. Hudis, M.D., Nathan A. Ellis, Ph.D., Jeff Boyd, Ph.D., Patrick I. Borgen, M.D., Richard
R. Barakat, M.D., Larry Norton, M.D., Mercedes Castiel, M.D., Khedoudja Nafa, Ph.D., and Kenneth
Offit, M.D."Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
NEJM." New England Journal of Medicine (2002): n. pag. New England Journal of Medicine. American
Cancer Society, 23 May 2002. Web. 09 Apr. 2015.
Pitt, Angelina Jolie. "Angelina Jolie Pitt: Diary of a Surgery." The New York Times. The New York Times, 23 Mar.
2015. Web. 09 Apr. 2015.
Siegal, Rebecca, Jiemin Ma, Zhaohui Zou, and Ahmedin Jemal. "Cancer Statistics, 2014." CA CANCER 64.1
(2014): 9-29. Jan. 2014. Web. 6 Apr. 2015.
Schmeler, Kathleen M. M.D., Henry T. Lynch, M.D., Lee-may Chen, M.D., Mark F. Munsell, M.S., Pamela T.
Soliman, M.D., Mary Beth Clark, M.S.W., Molly S. Daniels, M.S., Kristin G. White, B.S., Stephanie G.
Boyd-Rogers, R.N., Peggy G. Conrad, M.S., Kathleen Y. Yang, M.D., Mary M. Rubin, Ph.D., Charlotte C.
Sun, Dr.P.H., Brian M. Slomovitz, M.D., David M. Gershenson, M.D., and Karen H. Lu, M.D.
"Prophylactic Surgery to Reduce the Risk of Gynecologic Cancers in the Lynch Syndrome." The New
England Journal of Medicine (2006): n. pag. The New England Journal of Medicine. National Cancer
Institute, 6 Jan. 2006. Web. 6 Apr. 2015.
Minion, Lindsey E., Jill S. Dolinsky, Dana M. Chase, Charles N. Dunlop, Elizabeth C. Chao, and Bradley J. Monk.
"Hereditary Predisposition to Ovarian Cancer, Looking beyond BRCA1/BRCA2." Gynecologic
Oncology137.1 (2015): 86-92. Science Direct. Elsevier Inc, 23 Jan. 2015. Web. 8 Apr. 2015.