Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.
2
2
Background
Currently in the United States, disease conditions are shifting from
acute conditions to more chronic diseases that are greatly influenced by
nutrition. As of 2012, the number of adults suffering from one or more
chronic diseases has reached 117 million, about one half of the population
(Centers for Disease Control [CDC], 2014a). One of these most prevalent of
these diseases, obesity, has a direct link with nutrition and 78.6 million
adults are currently obese in America (CDC, 2014b). This state directly
contributes to the risk of developing a range of comorbidities including heart
disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Those suffering
from type 2 diabetes in 2012 was estimated to be about 9.3% of the
population (CDC, 2014c). Further concerning about this statistic is that 8.1
million of these people are believed to be undiagnosed increasing their risk
of complications or even death (CDC, 2014c). Another common chronic
condition, heart disease, accounts for roughly 610,000 deaths per year
making up a fourth of deaths in the US (CDC, 2014d). Alongside the physical
and emotional burden of these diseases, the financial cost of their treatment
is staggering. The CDC (2014a) estimates that eighty four percent of
healthcare spending is on this half of the population suffering from chronic
diseases. With the majority of these chronic illnesses, nutrition plays a key
component in both their development and treatment. Furthermore, of the
top four causes of death in the US three (diseases of the heart,
3
cerebrovascular disease, and malignant neoplasms) have been discovered to
have nutrition as a key determinant (Kris-Etherton et al., 2014).
4
4
that the average number of hours devoted to specific nutrition topics was
only 19.8 hours on average for medical school (Kris-Etherton et al., 2014).
Another survey saw similar results on the decline of medical schools with
dedicated nutrition classes and even found the average number of hours
dedicated to nutrition slightly less at 19.6 hours; this average has also
declined alongside the decrease in dedicated nutrition courses (Adams,
Kohlmeier, & Zeisel, 2010). A study examining specific objectives directly
relating to course curriculum found that 156 of the 1757 reported by medical
schools in their study were related to nutrition; however, upon further review
by the research team only 49 of those objectives explicitly discussed
nutrition (Nowson, Wells, & Perlstein, 2015). Another article examining
graduate medical education found similar results with only 26% of
respondents having a formal nutrition curriculum; furthermore, only 23% of
program directors said their nutrition education goals were met (Daley et al.,
2015).
Despite this lack of nutrition education students are receptive to the
subject of preventative medicine and see its value in medicine. A survey of
students at Marshall University Medical School found that students were very
receptive to nutrition education and felt underprepared by their current
curriculum. Roughly 90% agreed or strongly agreed they had an obligation
to help their patients improve their health including the use of nutritional
means; however only 25% agreed that they were satisfied by their nutrition
education. Only 40% agreed or strongly agreed they felt confident about
5
5
2.
6
6
7
7
be run on the patient where they will receive a sheet with the
resulting lab values. Upon making their diagnosis, they will create a
dietary guideline for the patient to follow including example meals to
help the patient meet that guideline. Lastly, they will also include any
medications that might be required depending on the severity of the
condition.
a. Materials required will include textbook, reference articles,
imaginary patient backgrounds, and lab values of relevant tests
prepared
Student Assessment Methods
1. Written tests using short answer and multiple choice questions will be
used to assess student knowledge of particular nutrients and disease
states. Short answer questions will involve imaginary patient
backgrounds and require students to diagnose and develop treatment
plans. Short answer questions will be used to assess more specific
knowledge regarding particular aspects of diseases or nutrients.
2. Peer evaluations upon completion of group problem based learning will
assess each students ability to work as a team and properly seek out
and integrate information. Final assessments of patients will also be
taken into account with how well the team was able to analyze the
patients condition and develop a treatment plan.
3. Students will also be tested on mock patient interactions which will be
observed and assessed by both teachers and the mock patients.
Teachers will assess technique and bedside etiquette while mock
8
8
9
9
10
10
changed to better develop each students ability to counsel patients and be
updated as more studies are done regarding nutritions role in wellbeing.
Program Evaluation Methods
Early on it would be extremely helpful to gauge the current state of
medical students nutrition knowledge by both surveying each of the current
classes. As each new class comes through the program assessments could
be made on each classs confidence in various aspects of the new
curriculum, their ability to convey this information to patients, and how they
feel about the current amount of time provided to the subject. It would also
be helpful to use curriculum mapping to measure the amount of time spent
on the various aspects of nutrition and related diseases aiming for the goal
of a minimum of 25 hours to meet the Institute of Medicines
recommendation. It would also be extremely beneficial to have someone
with extensive nutrition background either currently on staff or to hire to
develop a short standardized assessment for current students. The results of
this test could then be compared to the understanding displayed by
subsequent years on how the program is progressing from prior to its
implementation. This overall assessment could possibly be replaced by STEP
results should nutrition be incorporated into the test in coming years;
however, this overall test would provide a good assessment of long term
retention of information of nutrition information while it is mixed in alongside
the current curriculum.
11
11
References
Adams, K. M., Kohlmeier, M., & Zeisel, S. H. (2010). Nutrition education in US
medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Academic
medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges,
85(9), 1537.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014a). Heart Disease Facts.
Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/index.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014b). Adult Obesity Facts.
Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014c). 2014 National Diabetes
Statistics Report.
http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014d). Heart Disease Facts.
Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm
Daley, B. J., Cherry-Bukowiec, J., Van Way, C. W., Collier, B., Gramlich, L.,
McMahon, M. M., & McClave, S. A. (2015). Current Status of Nutrition
Training in Graduate Medical Education From a Survey of Residency
Program Directors A Formal Nutrition Education Course Is Necessary.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 0148607115571155.
Hardman, W. E., Miller, B. L., & Shah, D. T. (2015). Student Perceptions of
Nutrition Education at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of
12
12