Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Paramyxoviruses are a group of viruses that include the agents of human measles (rubeola), mumps, and
respiratory diseases, as well as canine distemper. Visuals Unlimited/Corbis.
531
Measles (Rubeola)
The measles (rubeola) rash as seen on a childs face. CNRI/Photo Researchers, Inc.
532
Measles (Rubeola)
WORDS TO KNOW
AEROSOL: Particles of liquid or solid dispersed as a
suspension in gas.
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, the rise of individualism and the popularity of self-help movements in
the United States and Western Europe provided a new
challenge to public health officials. Individuals began to
take control of their own heath care and, in essence, some
control and responsibility was wrested away from the
physician and other health care workers. This presented
a special challenge to public health agencies because a
manifestation of the movement toward self directed
health care also involved the rejection of traditional vaccinations such as the MMR vaccine.
Over the last decade, many parents further rejected
using the MMR vaccine out of fears that the vaccine was
linked to autism.
The newspaper article by Mark Porter and commentary below demonstrate different aspects of the scientific
and social debate over the MMR vaccine. The article also
demonstrates the attempts by scientific community to be
both self-correcting and to discipline breeches of ethics.
The commentary offers a view that although the original
research linking the MMR vaccine to autism appears
tainted, the vigorous investigation might lead to future
benefits in the way vaccines are developed and tested.
Mark Porter is is a medical doctor who provides regular advice and commentary on medical issues for radio
and television programming in the United Kingdom.
533
Measles (Rubeola)
A United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) doctor vaccinates a child against measles as part of a
national immunization campaign in the Philippines in February 2004. Jay Directo/AFP/Getty Images.
534
next year. If found guilty of serious professional misconduct Dr. Wakefield, 50, faces being struck from the medical register. The GMC decided to bring a case against the
doctor contrary to normal procedures. It usually only
brings charges when it receives a complaint, but in this
case it acted without one, following a two-year
investigation.
Why we all owe Wakefield a debt of thanks
COMMENTARY
DR ANDREW WAKEFIELD has had a spectacular fall
from grace.
Eight years after sparking worldwide concern about the
safety of the MMR vaccine, his research has been
rejected by the journal that originally published it, and
most of his fellow researchers have distanced themselves
from his conclusions.
A promising career in the UK has come to an abrupt end
and he has left the country. To cap it all, he is set to be
charged with professional misconduct by the General
Medical Council. While intrigued by Wakefields theory
that exposure to the measles virus could predispose some
children to autism, I have always felt that he was wrong
to cast doubts on the safety of MMR without more
evidence.
But just because we didnt see eye to eye it doesnt mean
that I am comfortable with the public pillorying that he
has recently endured. Indeed, I am distinctly uncomfortable with it. We need mavericks like Andrew Wakefield,
and his plight can only stifle the sort of independent
INFECTIOUS DISEASES: IN CONTEXT
Measles (Rubeola)
thinking required to make major breakthroughs in medicine. History has taught us that there is a fine line
between being dismissed as an eccentric and being
lauded as a genius. Nobel Prize winner Dr. Barry Marshall is a case in point.
At first Dr Marshalls claims that stomach and duodenal
ulcers were caused by an infection (H.pylori) and could
be treated with antibiotics, rather than a lifetime of acid
suppressing drugs, were treated with derision.
But he persevered.
Fifteen years later his discovery has transformed the lives
of millions of patients and he has become one of medicines most distinguished academics.
While Dr. Wakefield has achieved notoriety rather than
eminence, his enthusiasm left me in little doubt that he
really did believe he had stumbled across something that
questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine. Time may
have proved him wrong, but back in 1998 when he first
raised the possibility, we simply didnt have enough data
to back the bland reassurances issued by the Department
of Health.
Thanks to him sticking his head above the parapet, we
now know far more about the MMR vaccine than we
ever would have known had he not questioned its safety.
And I suspect the resulting scepticism, both lay and
professional, that now surrounds the introduction of
new vaccines will benefit us all in the long-term.
Mark Porter
PORTER, MARK. DO CTOR WHO SPARKED T HE MMR
D EB A TE FA CE S MIS CON DUCT CH A RG E. T HE E VENI NG
ST AN DARD. JUN E 1 2, 2 0 0 6.
IN CONTEXT: SCIENTIFIC,
POLITICAL, AND ETHICAL
ISSUES
With regard to a potential connection between the measles,
mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR vaccine) and autism, scientists at the National Immunization Program (NIP) at Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that the weight of
currently available scientific evidence does not support the
hypothesis that MMR vaccine causes autism. CDC recognizes
there is considerable public interest in this issue, and therefore
supports additional research regarding this hypothesis. CDC is
committed to maintaining the safest, most effective vaccine
supply in history.
As of May 2007 the CDC further states that, there is no
convincing evidence that vaccines such as MMR cause long
term health effects. On the other hand, we do know that
people will become ill and some will die from the diseases this
vaccine prevents. Measles outbreaks have recently occurred in
the UK and Germany following an increase in the number of
parents who chose not to have their children vaccinated with
the MMR vaccine. Discontinuing a vaccine program based on
unproven theories would not be in anyones best interest.
Isolated reports about these vaccines causing long term health
problems may sound alarming at first. However, careful review
of the science reveals that these reports are isolated and not
confirmed by scientifically sound research. Detailed medical
reviews of health effects reported after receipt of vaccines have
often proven to be unrelated to vaccines, but rather have been
related to other health factors. Because these vaccines are
recommended widely to protect the health of the public,
research on any serious hypotheses about their safety are
important to pursue. Several studies are underway to investigate still unproven theories about vaccinations and severe side
effects.
SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Immunization Program
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Web Sites
535