Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intelligences
My
MI
strengths
are
spread
out
over
five
categories.
My
top
category
is
intrapersonal.
My
other
strengths
from
highest
to
lowest
are
visual/spatial,
Musical,
kinesthetic
and
logical.
My
two
weaknesses
are
linguistic
and
naturalistic.
I
see
these
strengths
and
weaknesses
very
clearly
in
my
daily
life.
I
tend
to
struggle
a
little
with
collaboration
and
working
with
groups,
which
can
be
a
challenge
teaching
middle
school.
I
meet
with
my
core
team
or
professional
learning
committee
daily
and
while
I
am
learning
to
be
more
involved
it
has
been
a
struggle
for
me
at
times.
I
tend
to
get
frustrated
easily
with
others
when
they
cant
see
the
logic
and
simplicity
in
any
given
task.
I
dont
seem
to
have
these
struggles
much
when
working
with
students
in
my
class,
just
when
working
with
peers.
When
I
think
about
teaching
to
other
peoples
strengths
and
weaknesses
I
feel
it
is
important
to
do
both.
I
try
to
provide
options
for
my
students
that
will
reach
each
of
their
strengths
while
also
teaching
them
to
work
through
their
weaknesses.
Providing
reading
tasks
for
visual
learners,
listening
tasks
for
audible
learners,
and
hands
on
tasks
for
kinesthetic
learning
are
just
a
few
things
I
try
to
incorporate
into
my
daily
lessons.
Website
Discussion
After
viewing
the
three
websites
I
think
Dales
Cone
of
Experience
and
The
Universal
Design
for
Learning
give
examples
of
what
takes
place
within
Blooms
Taxonomy.
I
dont
know
if
that
is
what
they
were
meant
to
do
but
in
my
opinion
that
is
what
I
see.
Looking
at
it
from
that
perspective
I
can
see
Blooms
lowest
level,
knowledge
or
remembering
can
be
tied
to
the
learning
that
is
taking
place
when
using
activities
from
top
of
Dales
Cone
and
the
bottom
level
of
UDL.
This
pattern
seems
to
follow
at
all
levels
of
Blooms
Taxonomy.
For
example
students
would
be
using
the
highest
order
thinking
skills
when
it
is
a
personal
experience
or
when
they
are
creating
something
from
all
the
experiences
they
learned
at
the
lower
levels.
TIP
Theory
I
chose
the
Mathematical
Problem
Solving
Theory
by
A.
Schoenfeld
because
I
teach
math.
The
website
states
the
theory
is
primarily
applied
to
college
level
math
however
I
find
it
relevant
to
middle
school
as
well.
I
think
this
theory
is
useful
to
my
teaching
because
students
must
have
a
solid
foundation
in
problems
solving
from
a
young
age
to
be
successful
when
they
get
to
the
college
level.
I
also
believe
this
theory
is
useful
in
the
light
of
the
new
college
and
career
readiness
standards.
Students
need
to
be
able
to
work
through
a
variety
of
problems
showing
multiple
ways
for
reaching
their
conclusions.
About udl. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.cast.org
Mathematical problem solving. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/tip/schoen.html