TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

1ST CHALLENGE TO ALL KRISHNA BELIEVERS:=

IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT CHRISTIANITY TRIES TO PROVE JESUS FROM HEBREW
BIBLE WHICH THEY RENAME AS OT.
EXTRMIST BELIEVE THAT JESUS CAN BE PROVED FROMTHOUSAND VERSES OF OT.
BUT MODERATE CHRISTIANITY BELIEVES THAT THERE ARE ONLY APPROXIMATELY 40
VERSES WHICH INDICATE JESUS.
SOME OF THEM EVEN DECREASE THE NUMBER OF VERSES.
BUT JUDAISMCLAIM THERE IS NOT A SINGLE VERSE WHICH PROVES JESUS.
THE DEBATE GOES ON.
BUT ONE THING IS CLEAR. IF JESUS CANNOT BE PROVED FROM OT THEN
JESUS CANNOT BE CRISTOS OR MESSIAH.THIS IS WHY JESUS IS ALWAYS
TRIED TO BE PROVED FROM OT, AND NO LEGITIMATE CRHISTIAN SECT
CLAIMS THAT JESUS IS INDEPENDENT FROM OT.

WE KEEP IT ASIDE WHETHER JUDAISM IS RIGHT OR

CHRISTIANITY IS RIGHT IN THIE DEBATE.WE ALSO
KEEP IT ASIDE WHETHER ARGUMENTS OF
CHRISTIANITY FROM OT ARE CORRECT OR THEIR
REFUTATIONS BY JUDAISM ARE CORRECT.
BUT WE ASK TO PROVE KRISHNA FROM THE TEXT OF
FOUR VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHADS , THE OT OF HINDUISM.
THE REST OF THE BOOKS ARE APOCRYPHA OF HINDUISM.
SO ANY PROOF FROM APOCRYPHA OF OT OF HINDUISM IS
NOT ACCEPTABLE.
EITHER PROVE KRISHNA FROM 4 VEDAS OR 10 UPNISHADS OR DISBELIEVE IN
KRISNA.

2ND

CHALLENGE TO ALL KRISHNA BELIEVERS:=

IF A PERSON BELIEVES IN 4 VEDAS ,AND 10 UPNISHUDS

BUT DISBELIEVE IN KRISHNA,RAMA ETC ALL POST VEDIC

AND POST UPNISHUD CHARACTERS AS FICTIOUS

CHARACTERS OR HERETIC CHARACTERS WHO DESTROYED
VEDIC RELIGION OR BELIEVE THEM AS HISTORICAL
CHARACTERS WITH FALSE CLAIMS ASCRIBED TO THEM ,
ETC THEN THE QUESTION IS WHETHER SUCH A PERSON IS
HINDU OR NOT?
IF SUCH A PERSON IS A HINDU THEN THIS MEANS POST
VEDIC AND POST UPNISHUIC GODS ARE JUST
FABRICATIONS AND NOT PART OF VEDIC AND UPNISHUDIC
HINDUISM.
IF SUCH A PERSON IS NOT A HINDU, THEN THIS MEANS ALL
PRE KRISHNA AND PRE RAMA HINDUS WERE NOT HINDUS
SINCE THEY DID NOT BELIEVE IN THESE POST UPNISHUDIC
CHARACTERS.

3RD CHALLENGE TO ALL KRISHNA BELIEVERS:=

IF A PERSON BELIEVES IN 4 VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS ,
AND REGARDS A NUMBER OF WORKS OF POST
UPNISHUDIC BOOKS LIKE MAHA BHARTA,GITA RAMAYANA
ETC. AS FABRICATIONS, THEN IS SUCH A PERSON A HINDU.
IF HE IS THEN THIS MEANS THAT THESE WORKS ARE NOT A
PART OF HINDU HOLY SCRIPTURES [VEDAS AND 10
UPNISHUDS] , AND IF NOT THEN FABRICATIONS.
IF HE IS NOT THEN THIS MEANS THAT ALL THOSE HINDUS
WHO WERE BEFORE THESE WORKS CEASE TO BE
HINDUS.?? SINCE THEY DID NOT BELIEVE IN THESE WORKS.
HOW COULD THEY WHEN THESE BOOKS WERE NOT
WRITTEN ,?
4TH CHALLENGE TO ALL KRISHNA BELIEVERS:=

IT MAY BE CLAIMED THAT INITIALLY HINDUS WERE PURE

ARYA AND ONLY BELIEVED IN VEDAS. BUT WHEN GITA ETC.
WERE WRITTEN OR KRISHNA ETC WERE BORN IT BECAME
NECESSARY TO BELIEVE IN THESE BOOKS AND THESE
CHARACTERS AS WELL.
THIS IS THE BEST POSSIBLE RESPONSE WE HAVE
SUGGESTED FROM A KRISHNA BELIEVER OR GITA BELIEVER
ETC.
BUT THEN ONE HAD TO ADMIT THAT HE HAD TESTIFIED
THAT KRISHNA WAS GOD. LET HIM STATE THIS TEST SO
THAT ONE CAN TEST THE VERY TEST HIMSELF. IF HE IS
UNABLE TO DO SO THEN THIS MEANS
HE IS BELIEVING IN KRISHNA WITH OUT ANY REASON. THIS
IS NOT ONLY UNVADIC BUT ALSO UNUPNISHUDIC AS WELL.

5TH CHALLANCE :=
IS THERE A SINGLE PROPHECY IN THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS
OF 4 VEDAS AND IN THE TEXTS OF 10 UPNISHUDS ABOUT
KRISHNA? IF SO THEN PLEASE CITE THE REFERENCE. IF
NOT THEN KRISHNA CANNOT BE BELIEVED WITH OUT
THERE TESTIMONY OR PROPHECY OR BOTH.

[ BORROWED FROM A SCHOLAR OF HINDU SANSKRIT SCRIPTURE WITH THANKS]