Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
14
ore
38
60
35
8
12
-
Competene
transversale
Competene profesionale
8. Coninuturi
8.1 Curs
Curs introductiv: pozitionarea cursului Managementul
Resurselor Umane in cadrul programul de master, prin
raportare la activitatea unui psiholog Industrial
Organizational
Alinierea proceselor de RU
Metode de predare
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prelegere interactiv
Prezentare studii de
caz
Prelegere interactiv
Prezentare studii de
caz
Prelegere interactiv
Prezentare studii de
caz
Observaii
Cursul este preponderent
aplicativ ceea ce nseamn c
materialul predat se
concentreaz asupra tehnicilor i
procedurilor principale pentru
diversele procese de RU i att
la curs ct i la seminarii
studenii vor lucra n grupuri de
proiect pentru a pune n aplicare
aceste tehnici i proceduri
Prelegere interactiv
Prezentare studii de
caz
Prelegere interactiv
Metode de predare
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Tehnici de interviu
Interviu pentru identificarea job description i
job specification
Interviu cu rol diagnostic pornind de la studii
de caz construite de grupurile de proiect
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Tehnici de interviu
Interviu pentru identificarea job description i
job specification
Interviu cu rol diagnostic pornind de la studii
de caz construite de grupurile de proiect
Activitate de lucru pe proiectul de grup
Stabilirea temelor de proiect
Discutarea principalilor pai n abordarea
proiectului de grup
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Descoperire dirijat
Descoperire dirijat
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Descoperire dirijat
nvare prin sinergie
Descoperire dirijat
nvare prin sinergie
Descoperire dirijat
nvare prin sinergie
Observaii
nc din prima sptmn de
curs studenii au format grupuri
de proiect n care vor lucra pe
tot parcursul semestrului.
Sarcina principal a grupului
este s implementeze ntr-o
organizaie unul dintre procesele
de RU discutate la curs.
Pe parcursul semestrului
grupurile de proiect vor fi
implicate n mai multe activiti
practice n funcie de tema
studiat i de teme pe care le
identific problematice i
consider c ar trebui
aprofundate
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Studii de caz,
Joc de rol,
Descoperire dirijat
Prezentri, ntrebri
i discuii
Bibliografie obligatorie:
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: best
practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262. Doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
Cascio, W. F. (2006). The Economic Impact of Employee Behaviors on Organizational Performance. California Management
Review, 48(4), 41-59.
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639-683.
Lievens, F., Sanchez, J. I., & De Corte, W. (2004). Easing the inferential leap in competency modeling: the effects of task-related
information and subject matter expertise. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 881-904.
Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee
performance: a latent growth modeling approach. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 427-450. Doi: 10.1111/j.17446570.2011.01215.x
Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 441.
Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency
modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 703-740.
Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O. (2001). Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all.
Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 107-116. Doi: 10.5465/AME.2001.4614990
Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2007). The Impact of Making Targeted Dimensions Transparent on Relations With Typical Performance
Predictors. Human Performance, 20(3), 187-203. Doi: 10.1080/08959280701332992
Steel, P., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2009). Using a meta-analytic perspective to enhance job component validation. Personnel
Psychology, 62(3), 533-552. Doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01147.x
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2003). 360-Degree Assessment: Time for Reinvention. Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 2(3), 297-311. Doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2003.10932156
Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Ployhart, R. E. (2008). Developments in the criterion-related validation of selection procedures: a critical
review and recommendations for practice. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 871-925. Doi: 10.1111/j.17446570.2008.00133.x
Bibliografie opional:
Ali El-Hajji, M. (2011). Job Evaluation by Committees: An Analytical Study. International Journal of Management, 28(3), 730739.
Bonder, A., Bouchard, C.-D., & Bellemare, G. (2011). Competency-Based Management-An Integrated Approach to Human
Resource Management in the Canadian Public Sector. Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 1-10.
Brown, M., & Benson, J. (2003). Rated to exhaustion? Reactions to performance appraisal processes. Industrial Relations
Journal, 34(1), 67-81. Doi: 10.1111/1468-2338.00259
Chagnon, R. J. (2011). Career Paths: Charting Courses to Success for Organizations and Their Employees by Gary W. Carter,
Kevin W. Cook, and David W. Dorsey. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 806-808. Doi: 10.1111/j.17446570.2011.01226_2.x
Coordination activities of human planners during rescheduling: case analysis and event handling procedure, 49, buh 2101-2122,
International Journal of Production Research (Taylor & Francis Ltd 2011).
Dierdorff, E. C., & Surface, E. A. (2007). Placing peer ratings in context: systematic influences beyond ratee performance.
Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 93-126. Doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00066.x
Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: a meta-analytic
path analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 865-897. Doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01230.x
Grigoryev, P. (2006). Hiring by Competency Models. Journal for Quality & Participation, 29(4), 16-18.
Huang, J. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2011). Beyond personality traits: a study of personality states and situational contingencies in
10.4 Curs
10.5 Seminar/laborator
Evaluarea intragrup:
participarea activ n realizarea
proiectului de grup; Studenii
care primesc 0 la evaluarea
intragrup pierd automat i
punctajul din evaluarea
intergrup
Evaluarea intergrup:
Se realizeaz pe baza
prezentrii proiectului de grup
Evaluarea cadrului didactic:
Se realizeaz pe baza
prezentrii proiectului de grup
i a raportului scris pentru
organizaie
Se realizeaz pe baza
prezentrii, n funcie de:
ct de bine este documentat
tehnica prezentat
corectitudinea pailor de
implementare a tehnicii
respective
exerciiile i metodele alese
pentru a transmite informaia
colegilor
Prezentri proceduri RU pe
parcursul semestrului
proiect de grup
Evaluarea cadrului
didactic
70%
10%
30%
30%
30%
..........................
...............................
...................................