You are on page 1of 2

7462 Project Four Rubric

Criteria

Yes

Yes
but

Missing

Application 1. The submission used ALICE as its delivery application.


2. The submission has at least a 90-second long animation using ALICE.
3. A title and student name as author/creator is included in the submission.
4. CONTENT is about a short story with a beginning, middle and ending parts.
5. CONTENT is about a story on developing a professional identity.
6. CONTENT should have at least 2 or more story characters.
5. CONTENT should address the topic pertaining how one deals with issues, manages challenges
and identify supporting resources in developing a professional identity.
6. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear.
7. Images are used that originated from the application library or pictures owned by the creator.
8. Interactive conversations in the form of voiceover or texts are used.
9. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, and minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics.
10. The submission is an .mp4 or .wmv file format.
Reflection 1. The submission file contains reflection of the experience in creating the project.
2. CONTENT included contains an introduction about the project.
3. CONTENT included contains an information about the target audience of the project you created.
4. CONTENT included contains an information about challenges in creating the content of the project.
5. CONTENT included contains an information about challenges in creating an ALICE based project.
6. CONTENT included contains a description of an instructional activity that one can use this ALICE
based project.
7. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear, supports the submission, and demonstrates
alignment with the expectations.
8. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with accurate citations.
9. File naming protocols are followed.
Peer-Reviewed Article - 1. The submission file contains information about finding an appropriate
URL of an online tutorial in creating an ALICE based project.
2. A copy of a peer reviewed article (pdf) on an example of an ALICE based project is included in this
submission.
3. CONTENT included contains on your assessment of the value of the peer-reviewed article included
in this submission.
4. CONTENT included contains a description on steps used and followed in finding the appropriate
peer reviewed article included in this submission.
5. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear, supports the submission, and demonstrates
alignment with the expectations.
6. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with accurate citations.
7. CONTENT included contains a reference section.
8. All APA entries and citations for this submission adhere to accurate APA formatting.
9. File naming protocols are followed.
Online Tutorial 1. The submission file contains information about finding an appropriate URL of an
online tutorial in creating an ALICE based project.
2. CONTENT included a URL link to an online tutorial in creating an ALICE based project.
3. CONTENT included contains on your assessment of the value of the online tutorial in creating an
animated project using ALICE is included in this submission.
4. CONTENT included contains a description on steps used and followed in finding the appropriate
online tutorial in creating an ALICE based project is included in this submission.
5. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear, supports the submission, and demonstrates
alignment with the expectations.
6. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with accurate citations.
7. File naming protocols are followed.
TOTAL

1
5
2
3
4
4
4

0
3
1
2
2
2
2

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2
3
3
2

1
1

0
0

2
1
1
2
2
2
3

0
0
0
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1

0
0

0
0

1
2
1
1

0
1
0
0

0
0
0
-1

1
3

0
1

0
0

1
80

NOTE: 20 points for this project is allotted for global assessment of the submission that bring the total points to a 100.

This should be accompanied by your assessment of its value as a background reading material (1-page). Need to
include a narrative on what steps did you use to find your chosen article.
Missing

Global
Criteria

Brief Description

Accuracy
and
Relevance
Content

The CONTENT included in this


submission is accurate and relevant
given the learning goals and
objectives of the project.

Presentation
of Ideas

The quality of the PRESENTATION


of ideas is clear, supports each
section, and aligned with the learning
expectations for this project.

Applications
to Practice
or Context

This submission demonstrated


appropriate CONNECTIONS by
learners to their professional
development needs, context or
practice.

Quality of
Writing

The quality of WRITING is excellent


with good use of the language,
minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with
accurate citations.

TOTAL
POINTS

There are
missing
sections and
overall
submission
needs
improvement

All Sections
are present
but needs
rework in all
sections

All sections are


present but
needs rework
in some
sections

Acceptable
but can be
improved

Good
evidence of
scholarly
work by a
graduate
student

20

You might also like