Based on these ratings, is Organization A or Organization B more innovative? describe why the organization of your choice is more innovative than the other. In regards to complexity, the two organizations are very different from each other.
Based on these ratings, is Organization A or Organization B more innovative? describe why the organization of your choice is more innovative than the other. In regards to complexity, the two organizations are very different from each other.
Based on these ratings, is Organization A or Organization B more innovative? describe why the organization of your choice is more innovative than the other. In regards to complexity, the two organizations are very different from each other.
Type of Organization: Schools Organization A __Westminster Christian Academy__ Organization B __Covenant Christian School__ Criteria
Organization A Organization B Rating Rating
The power in the organization is widely
1 distributed throughout the organization The individuals in the organization have a wide range of expertise across many areas 2 of specialization.
Formal policies and procedures
are de-emphasized and 0 somewhat de-valued.
Communication in the organization flows quickly due to many "inter-laced" interpersonal networks
Uncommitted resources are
common and in good supply.
Question:.
Based on these ratings, is Organization A or Organization B
more innovative? Using Roger's terminology, describe why the organization of your choice is more innovative than the other.
The two organizations I chose are both schools I am
very familiar with. The first, Westminster Christian Academy, is the school at which I teach. The second, Covenant Christian School, is the school my children attend and is also a school that I have worked with by providing them with some professional development training. Organization 2, my childrens school is, plain and simple, more innovative. It was a bit disconcerting to discover so quickly through the simple questions how different the two schools are from an innovation standpoint. My gut feeling before I actually thought about how to answer the questions was that they would score similarly and I would rank both as fairly innovative. However, that was not the case and it was even more disappointing to realize that the school I actually work with wound up getting such low marks. Initially, This seems to be a contradiction with Rogers on p. 411 where he says the size-to-innovativeness relationship holds across a large number of investigations. Organization 1 is much larger than Organization 2 but this may not imply it is actually large, but only relatively large. On the other hand, the degree of centralization the chart indicates, suggests that there is a higher concentration of power in Organization 1 than in Organization 2. If Rogers thesis holds, that in centralized organizations, top leaders are poorly positioned to identify operational-level problems or to suggest relevant innovations to meet those needs, then it becomes more clear why Organization 1 appears more innovative than Organization 2 In regards to complexity, the two organizations score about the same. This is the only area where they do yet if the scale was more broad I would have scored Org 1 slightly lower than Org 2. However, the leadership of
each organization influenced the ranking in each. The
degree to which the leadership, rather than the organizational members, grasp the value of innovations separates the two. Still, the nod goes to Org. 2 on the innovation scale. Formalization scores give Org 2 a definite mark of separation as the bureaucratic structure in Org 1 is much higher than 2. It again becomes obvious why Org 2 is considered more innovative. Faculty at Org 2 have said things more freely and in greater amount things like We get to try things here. Its ok if things get a little messy or we dont go by the script. (Honestly, it is this very attitude and approach that makes this school the one my wife and I chose for our children.) Teachers at Org 1 are now working in a relatively new building yet many who worked in the old school building still recall fondly the higher degree of interconnectedness that a smaller building forced. Upon moving to a larger campus faculty have found it harder to achieve the same level of interpersonal networks. Finally, when it comes to organizational slack, Org 1 lags behind Org 2 considerably. This comes down to pure dollars as the debt incurred by building a new campus for Org 1 has essentially dried up every uncommitted resource. This organization is larger but the slack is not there and while Org 2 is considerably smaller it does have more uncommitted resources as a percentage of operating budget.