Professional Documents
Culture Documents
YOUNG:
INTELLECTUALLY DISINGENUOUS, SHOWING CULTURAL HEGEMONY, SUPPORTING
RACISM AND OTHER CONDUCT INIMICAL TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND FREE PRESS
because now that Ayotte is an elected official -- i.e. a United States Senator
as opposed to a backwoods country-assed Recorder of Deeds mind you 1 -- I
run video of her at will, in her offices and in any public space, and that's a
fact, jack. So the Court didn't want any of THAT information in the Record so it
claimed to have ruled on the Pleadings and then the Court tried to send my
offer of proof SD video card of me running video in another office back to me
in the mail, so I sent it right back to the Court Wednesday. To hell with that: I
will not have him whitewashing the record just because an unsavory Negro
journo is ruffling feathers. See Commonwealth Constr. Co. v. Red Clay Consol.
Sch. Dist, 2010 Del. Super. LEXIS 489 (2010).
On a motion for judgment on the pleadings, if matters outside
the pleadings are presented and not excluded, the motion is
converted to a motion for summary judgment and is disposed of
as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. 3 When such
materials are presented the Court must give all parties a
reasonable [*5] opportunity to present all pertinent material
needed for a motion for summary judgment.
2. Failed to address the Advisory Opinion by the Attorney General who wrote,
in a 2011 Advisory Opinion: http://tinyurl.com/pgao5uj
But in 2011, when everyone has a cell phone, and most cell phones
have camera, even video, capability, that time has arrived. To attempt
to ban recording is as pointless as trying to prevent citizens from
taking notes.
CONCLUSION The DOJ should advise its client public bodies that to
outright prohibit any recording of public meetings is highly risky. The
law is evolving in a more permissive direction.
To which I ask, why is Judge Young (and the Defendants)
moving backwards?
Perhaps SCOTUS will help address this in a year or two.
1 See Appendix A.
From Iacobucci:
In the next decade, the SJC narrowed this definition of disorderly
conduct to encompass only activities not implicating the lawful
exercise of a First Amendment right. .
And
Boulter's repeated demands that Iacobucci cease recording do not
change the disorderly conduct calculus. A police officer is not a law
unto himself; he cannot give an order that has no colorable legal basis
and then arrest a person who defies it. So it is here: because
Iacobucci's activities were peaceful, not performed in derogation of any
law, and done in the exercise of his First Amendment rights, Boulter
lacked the authority to stop them. Id at 678.
5. Downplayed all of my professional background as stated in my Complaint
in favor of writing that Plaintiff holds himself out to be a type of guerrillastyle journalist. No Your Honor, if you were only going off of my Complaint
you know exactly how I project myself: As a trained journalist and
former escrow attorney who has made millions for the banks that
Defendant McKenna protects in her registry of Deeds. Complaint Para
2 reads:
Plaintiff is a former daily news reporter and escrow attorney who has
closed several dozen commercial real estate purchases and refinances.
He as successfully tried several First Amendment Jury Trial and has
operated several politically and legally-charged online journals over the
past decade, most notably Chris Kings First Amendment Page and
Mortgage Movies Journal. He has millions of website and movie hits,
thousands of followers and his work has appeared in alternative and
major press.
6.
about him, and he is further aware that his image was posted throughout
the building. Plaintiff carries a Canon but he is not some sort of dangerous
black man who should be on a wanted poster. He is a mortgage industry
professional who has worked for major and small press. He is the new face
of journalism in the Modern Era, much as he was in 1998 when he advised
the Court of his right to run video in a Courtroom, which obviously worked
or you wouldnt be seeing this today:
. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVNVyijeQKU
APPENDIX A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rl4tS0W7RcQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLS0N_hH-cc
Here one of her constituents said that Ayotte Is pleasant and sweet and full
of shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXlHu2002Vc
As such, Plaintiff is returning to the Court his Offer of Proof Video that
demonstrated him doing exactly what he wanted to do in Kent County, in
King County, Washingtons Registry of Deeds.: Only Dirty Deeds Recorders
Like Kent County DE's Betty Lou McKenna Restrict Media Access and
Cameras https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uPuF-Z_Ft42
2 This record on Appeal will be as full as it should be, the Courts disdainful
commentary regarding Plaintiffs detailed Motion for Reconsideration
nothwithstanding.