Energy Automation Systems, Inc. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al Doc.

34

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Motion GRANTED

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

ENERGY AUTOMATION )
SYSTEMS, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3-06-1079
)
XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, d/b/a ) Judge Aleta Trauger
BADBUSINESS BUREAU and/or ) Magistrate Judge Juliet Griffin
BADBUSINESSBUREAU.COM )
and/or RIP-OFF REPORT and/or )
RIPOFFREPORT.COM, and ) JURY DEMAND
EDWARD MAGEDSON a/k/a ED )
MAGEDSON, )
)
Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS

MOTION TO LIFT STAY ON DISCOVERY FOR LIMITED PURPOSE OF
DISCOVERING JURISDICTIONAL FACTS

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), Plaintiff Energy Automation Systems, Inc. (“EASI”)

moves the Court for leave to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Lift the Stay on Discovery

for the Limited Purpose of Discovering Jurisdictional Facts (Doc. No. 24). A copy of EASI’s

Reply is attached to this Motion as Exhibit A.

Defendant Xcentric Ventures, LLC’s (“Xcentric”) response (Doc. No. 31) contains

inaccuracies that necessitate a reply and clarification. Specifically, instead of addressing EASI’s

request for discovery, Xcentric argues that no “factual disputes” remain and the Court should

dismiss the suit. EASI should be provided the opportunity to address Xcentric’s reliance on an

inappropriate standard for the instant motion. EASI respectfully requests the opportunity to

Case 3:06-cv-01079 Document 34 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com