CM/ECF?
Query
Reports
Utilities
Logout
HABEAS,PROSE
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
REED v. LARIVA
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Date Filed: 07/13/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
MICHAEL HOWARD REED represented by MICHAEL HOWARD REED
04414-048
TERRE HAUTE - FCI
TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 33
TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808
PRO SE
V.
Respondent
LEANN LARIVA
Warden represented by LEANN LARIVA
.
PRO SE
Date Filed # Docket Text
07/13/2015 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL HOWARD REED. RECEIPT #IP046652 in the amount of $5.00 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(AAM) Modified on 7/14/2015 (AAM). (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/14/2015 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM) (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/16/2015 3 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Reed shall have through August 10, 2015 in which to show how he can satisfy the foregoing standard to proceed with his challenge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. **SEE ENTRY** Copy to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/16/2015.(AH) (Entered: 07/16/2015)
Case #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/18/2015 19:16:39
PACER Login: Client Code:
Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
Billable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.10
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District of Indiana
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
vs.
)
2:15−cv−00212−JMS−MJD
)
LEANN LARIVA
)
Defendant(s).
)
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of magistrate judge's availability.
A United States magistrate judge of this court is available
to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a
final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any
other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily
consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to the currently assigned magistrate judge, or you may
withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding
consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.
Consent to magistrate judge's authority.
If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United
States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and
all post−trial proceedings, they should sign their names below (electronically or otherwise). Should this case
be reassigned to another magistrate judge, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. NOTICE: This document is eligible
for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a
magistrate judge in the Case Management Plan.
Parties' printed names
Signatures of parties or attorneys
Dates
Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED:
This case is referred to the currently assigned United States magistrate judge to
conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge
assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent
Original Title
2 15-Cv-00212- Doc 3 MS-MJD 2215 Michael Howard Reed 7 13 15
CM/ECF?
Query
Reports
Utilities
Logout
HABEAS,PROSE
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
REED v. LARIVA
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Date Filed: 07/13/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
MICHAEL HOWARD REED represented by MICHAEL HOWARD REED
04414-048
TERRE HAUTE - FCI
TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 33
TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808
PRO SE
V.
Respondent
LEANN LARIVA
Warden represented by LEANN LARIVA
.
PRO SE
Date Filed # Docket Text
07/13/2015 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL HOWARD REED. RECEIPT #IP046652 in the amount of $5.00 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(AAM) Modified on 7/14/2015 (AAM). (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/14/2015 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM) (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/16/2015 3 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Reed shall have through August 10, 2015 in which to show how he can satisfy the foregoing standard to proceed with his challenge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. **SEE ENTRY** Copy to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/16/2015.(AH) (Entered: 07/16/2015)
Case #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/18/2015 19:16:39
PACER Login: Client Code:
Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
Billable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.10
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District of Indiana
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
vs.
)
2:15−cv−00212−JMS−MJD
)
LEANN LARIVA
)
Defendant(s).
)
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of magistrate judge's availability.
A United States magistrate judge of this court is available
to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a
final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any
other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily
consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to the currently assigned magistrate judge, or you may
withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding
consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.
Consent to magistrate judge's authority.
If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United
States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and
all post−trial proceedings, they should sign their names below (electronically or otherwise). Should this case
be reassigned to another magistrate judge, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. NOTICE: This document is eligible
for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a
magistrate judge in the Case Management Plan.
Parties' printed names
Signatures of parties or attorneys
Dates
Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED:
This case is referred to the currently assigned United States magistrate judge to
conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge
assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent
CM/ECF?
Query
Reports
Utilities
Logout
HABEAS,PROSE
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
REED v. LARIVA
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Date Filed: 07/13/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
MICHAEL HOWARD REED represented by MICHAEL HOWARD REED
04414-048
TERRE HAUTE - FCI
TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 33
TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808
PRO SE
V.
Respondent
LEANN LARIVA
Warden represented by LEANN LARIVA
.
PRO SE
Date Filed # Docket Text
07/13/2015 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL HOWARD REED. RECEIPT #IP046652 in the amount of $5.00 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(AAM) Modified on 7/14/2015 (AAM). (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/14/2015 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM) (Entered: 07/14/2015)
07/16/2015 3 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Reed shall have through August 10, 2015 in which to show how he can satisfy the foregoing standard to proceed with his challenge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. **SEE ENTRY** Copy to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/16/2015.(AH) (Entered: 07/16/2015)
Case #: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/18/2015 19:16:39
PACER Login: Client Code:
Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
Billable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.10
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District of Indiana
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
vs.
)
2:15−cv−00212−JMS−MJD
)
LEANN LARIVA
)
Defendant(s).
)
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of magistrate judge's availability.
A United States magistrate judge of this court is available
to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a
final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any
other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily
consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to the currently assigned magistrate judge, or you may
withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding
consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.
Consent to magistrate judge's authority.
If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United
States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and
all post−trial proceedings, they should sign their names below (electronically or otherwise). Should this case
be reassigned to another magistrate judge, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. NOTICE: This document is eligible
for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a
magistrate judge in the Case Management Plan.
Parties' printed names
Signatures of parties or attorneys
Dates
Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED:
This case is referred to the currently assigned United States magistrate judge to
conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge
assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such
reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent
Case 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD Document 3 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION MICHAEL HOWARD REED, Petitioner, vs. LEANN LARIVA, Warden, Respondent.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD
Entry Directing Further Proceedings
Michael Howard Reed is confined in this District and brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his conviction for possessing a firearm and ammunition while he was a fugitive from justice. That conviction was entered in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota in No. 4:09-cr-0076-DLH-1. The conviction was affirmed on appeal by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in No. 10-2010 on March 23, 2011. Reed may seek a remedy under 2241 only if a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 was or would be inadequate or ineffective to bring his habeas claim. 28 U.S.C. 2255(e). His habeas claim appears to be that he is actually innocent of the offense of which he was convicted because there was insufficient evidence to support the jurys verdict. To satisfy 2255(e), Reeds claim for relief must (1) rely on a new, retroactive case not available when he moved under 28 U.S.C. 2255 that (2) interprets a statute in a way that (3) decriminalizes the crime of conviction. See Brown v. Rios, 696 F.3d 638, 640 (7th Cir. 2012); In re Davenport, 147 F.3d 605, 61012 (7th Cir. 1998). Reed shall have through August 10, 2015 in which to show how he can satisfy the foregoing standard to proceed with his challenge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. IT IS SO ORDERED.
07/16/2015 Date: __________________
Case 2:15-cv-00212-JMS-MJD Document 3 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
Distribution: MICHAEL HOWARD REED 04414-048 TERRE HAUTE U.S. PENITENTIARY Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 33 TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808