Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decimals
Evidence of Learning
Week 35
Yes/
Developin
g
12, 25
No
Evidence of Learning
Week 35
Yes/
Developin
g
2,7,18,21
,
22
No
2, 6, 10,
7, 8, 24
4, 5, 24
16, 23
Fractions
Australian Curriculum
Outcome
22
6, 20
Operations and
Calculations
Equations
1,3,8
11,19,
1,3,9,25
11,13,15,
Money
16,22
Roman Numerals
13
17
Conversion of units
17,20
9,14
12,18,23,2
4
Time
2 D shapes
21
10
15
Shape
14
Data Representation:
Graph
19
Areas that have been demonstrated as being achieved, developing or in need of further explicit learning will be assessed
against the Australian Curriculum (ACARA), Year 4 Mathematics Curriculum Stand.
2D Shapes
The student demonstrated good reasoning ability of 2D shapes in question
10 week 35 where they had to assess if they could trace a shape without
lifting the pencil off the page. It looks like the student attempted this 3
times before coming to a conclusion. Also the student displayed sound
knowledge of shapes and cross section of shapes by correctly naming the
triangle in question 14 week 36. Note that triangle was misspelt, this will
lead to further discussion regarding students literacy ability.
Mapping and coordinates
The student displays a basic knowledge of direction and bearing through
correctly answering question 6 week 35. However question 19 week 36
the student answered incorrectly. Further investigation needed to attain
fluency of concept.
Data representation: Graph
The student was able to read and interoperate different data features of the
graph in question 4 week 36. The student was able to self-correct the answer
by drawing 2 lines either side of the N represented on the bottom section of the
graph, correcting Dec to Nov. The following question was answered incorrectly
however it is believe to be a typo error more than a reading error as most year 4
students have firm knowledge of the calendar months. Follow up by asking the
student to repeat months to confirm if misconception exists.
Decimals
The student will need explicit teacher of the decimal concept. Out of 9 decimal
questions no correct answers were given. Questions were basic addition,
multiplication, subtraction of decimals. This is believed to be directly related to
the students misconception of place vale of number and decimal by the
response to question 7 week 35 where they added the decimal numbers
together rather than assigning them different place values. 0.03 + 8 + 0.2 = 8.5
Fractions
The student has displayed no knowledge of fractions as only 1 question
was attempted and that being a true of false answer. Of further interest in
question 8 week 36 is the symbol > greater than. Further investigations
into the students knowledge of greater than or less than or equal to
symbols is required in the connection of concepts.
Conversion of Units
The student did display some knowledge of conversion of units in question 17
week 35 in comparing grams to KG and to be noted it was a visual question. The
student will need explicit teaching in conversion of Litres to mL, m to mm and km
to m as answers were either incorrect or questions were not attempted. Question
12 week 36 is of interest as to how they came to the conclusion of 300km,
whether they multiplied the 5 cyclists by 20km to get 100km then multiplied the
100km by the 3 cyclist to arrive at the answer of 300km. Further discussion
would be beneficial here regarding the students mathematical process and also
of importance their comprehension of the question.
Money
Of the 2 money questions neither was attempted. Question 16 week 36 was
division which the student has displayed limited knowledge of the concept
discussed previously above , with the second question 22 week 36 being basic
subtraction. As both questions are directed at money calculations is would be the
students misconceptions surrounding decimals that would add to their confusion
of money calculations. Further explicit teaching is required in this area.
Roman Numerals
There are 2 question regarding roman numerals and both were answered
incorrectly, however the student did display knowledge of correctly
identifying C as 100, X as 10 and L as 50 but misinterpreted the order of
Learning Priorities
Based on the results from the maths mental sample of work and assessed
against the Australian Curriculum the students has exhibited some
mathematical fluency and conceptual knowledge of the Australian
Curriculum mathematic areas , halving, doubling, basic addition,
subtraction and multiplication, number ordering. This is the students
foundation of mathematical knowledge to build future connections from; it
should be the basis of student development in the development of new
mathematical connections. Further explicit teaching will need to occur in
providing an alternative conception of student misconception in Decimals,
fractions, rounding, place value, basic division, conversion of units, class
and properties of shapes, money and order of operations in Roman
numerals. The students errors in this test are the focal point of future
teaching and learning. Ryan and McCrae describe it as an opportunity
Knowledge of the common mathematical errors and misconceptions of
children can provide teachers with an insight into student thinking and a
focus for teaching and learning (as cited in Bell et al, 1985).
In regards to the students misspelling and comprehension of word
problems it would be beneficial to test the students literacy ability to see
if it is limiting their mathematical development as described by VileniusTuohimaa, Aunola & Nurmi, 2008 as Mathematics performance and
reading skills have been shown to be closely related. For example, Light
and DeFries (1995) showed that difficulties in arithmetic were associated
with reading ability development.
Pedagogy Changes
Classroom Assistance
Use of SSO
Assistance from parents/ caregivers to help and model
Explicit teacher direction and scaffolding
Reflection
Smith and Goodwin, 1997(as cited in Brady, p11) state Student centred
assessment involves being in constant conversation with the children
about the sense they are making of the world, what it is that they are
learning and doing and for me developing relationships with students is a
powerful predictor for success and fulfilment.
I connected with the purpose and principles for reporting being a parent of
3 school age children, as stated by Brady and Kennedy (2012. P, 100)
The ultimate purpose of reporting is to enhance student learning
Investigation Questions
What assessment tools does the mentor teacher utilize for different
curriculum areas?
How does assessment practice inform the teaching and learning cycle and
what impact has it has on reporting.
References
ACARA Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d.).
The Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved on 13th April 2014
from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/Curriculum/F10#level4