International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, April 2015 Vol. 6, No.

4, ISSN: 1837-7823

On Generalized almost Lorentzian Manifolds

L K Pandey
D S Institute of Technology & Management, Ghaziabad, U.P. - 201007
dr.pandeylk@rediffmail.com
Abstract
In 1989, K. Matsumoto [1] introduced the notion of manifolds with Lorentzian paracontact metric structure
similar to the almost paracontact metric structure which is defined by I. Sato [6], [7]. Also in 1988, K. Matsumoto
and I. Mihai [2] discussed on a certain transformation in a Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold. In 2011, R. Nivas and
A. Bajpai [3] discussed on generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifolds. Recently, the auther [4], [5] studied
generalised Lorentzian para Sasakian manifolds
T. Suguri and S. Nakayama [8] considered D-conformal deformations on almost contact metric structure.
In this paper generalized almost LP-Sasakian manifold, generalized almost LSP-Sasakian manifold and
generalized almost LP-Co-symplectic manifold have been discussed and some of their properties have been
established. Generalized D-conformal transformation in a generalized LP-Contact manifold is also discussed.
Keywords: Generalized almost LP-Sasakian manifold, generalized almost LSP-Sasakian manifold, generalized
almost LP-Co-symplectic manifold, generalised D-conformal transformation.

1.

Introduction

Let be an odd ( = 2 + 1) dimensional differentiable manifold, on which there are defined a tensor
field of type (1, 1), contravariant vector fields , covariant vector fields , where = 3,4,5, ( 1), and a
Lorentzian metric , satisfying for arbitrary vector fields , , ,
= + 1
=3 () ,

(1.1)

= 0,

( ) = 1,

, () = 0,

rank =
(, ) = (, ) + 1
=3 () (), where () = (, ),

(1.2)

`(, ) ( , ) = `(, ),
Then will be called a generalized Lorentzian Para-Contact manifold (a generalized LP-Contact manifold) and
the structure (, , , ) will be called generalized Lorentzian Para-Contact structure.
Let D be a Riemannian connection on , then we have
(1.3) (a)

1
( `)( , ) + ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )() =3 ()( )() = 0

(b) ( `) ( , ) + ( `) ( , ) = 0
(1.4) (a)

1
( `)( , ) + ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )() =3 ()( )() = 0

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, April 2015 Vol. 6, No. 4, ISSN: 1837-7823

(b)

( `) ( , ) + ( `)( , ) = 0

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold (a generalized
LP-Sasakian manifold) if
(1.5) (a)

1
( )() 1
=3 () ( , ) =3 = 0

(b)

1
( `)(, ) ( , ) 1
=3 () ( , ) =3 () = 0

(c)

= + 1
=3 ,

This gives
(1.6) (a) ( `)(, ) `(, ) 1
=3 () = 0
(b) ( `) ( , ) ( , ) 1
=3 () = 0
1
(c) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 () ( )( ) ( , ) =3 () = 0

On this manifold, we have

(1.7) (a) ( )( ) = ( , )
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = `(, )
A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian manifold (a
generalized LSP-Sasakian manifold) if
(1.8) (a)

1
( )() 1
=3 () `(, ) =3 = 0

(b)

1
( `)(, ) `(, ) 1
=3 () `(, ) =3 () = 0

(c)

= + 1
=3

This gives
(1.9) (a) ( `)(, ) ( , ) 1
=3 () = 0
(b) ( `) (, ) `(, ) 1
=3 () = 0
1
(c) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )( ) `(, ) =3 () = 0

On this manifold, we have

10

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, April 2015 Vol. 6, No. 4, ISSN: 1837-7823

(1.10) (a) ( )( ) = `(, )

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = ( , )
Nijenhuis tensor in a generalized LP-Contact manifold is given by
`(, , ) = ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )

(1.11)

`(, , ) (( , ), )

Where

2.

Generalized Almost Lorentzian Para-Co-symplectic manifold

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost LP-Co-symplectic manifold if

(2.1)

( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) 1

=3 (){( )( ) + ( )( )}
1
1
=3 (){( )( ) + ( )( )} =3 (){( )( ) + ( )( )} = 0

3.

Generalized almost Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold

(a generalized almost LP-Sasakian manifold) if

1
(3.1) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) 2( , ) 1
=3 () 2( , ) =3 ()

2( , ) 1
=3 () = 0
Therefore, a generalized almost LP-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized almost LP-Sasakian manifold if
(3.2) (a)

( )( ) = ( , )

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = `(, )
(c) = + 1
=3
Barring X, Y, Z in (1.11) and using equations (3.1), (1.3) (b) , we see that a generalized almost LP-Sasakian
manifold is completely integrable if
(3.3) ( `)( , ) + ( `)( , ) = ( `)( , )

4.

Generalized almost Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian manifold

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized almost Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian

manifold (a generalized almost LSP-Sasakian manifold) if

(4.1) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )
1
1
2 `(, ) 1
=3 () 2 `(, ) =3 () 2 `(, ) =3 () = 0

11

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, April 2015 Vol. 6, No. 4, ISSN: 1837-7823

Therefore a generalized almost LP-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized almost LSP-Sasakian manifold if

( )( ) = `(, )

(4.2) (a)

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = ( , )
(c) = + 1
=3
Barring X, Y, Z in (1.11) and using equations (4.1), (1.3) (b), we see that a generalized almost LSP-Sasakian
manifold is completely integrable if
(4.3) ( `) ( , ) ( `) ( , ) ( `)( , ) = 2( `)( , )

5. Generalized D- Conformal transformation.

Let the corresponding Jacobian map B of the transformation b transforms the structure (, , , ) to the
structure (, , , ) such that
(5.1) (a) =

(b) ( , ) = g (, ) 2 1
=3 () ()

(c) = (d) ( ) = ()
Where is a differentiable function on , then the transformation is said to be generalized D-conformal
transformation. If is a constant, the transformation is known as D-homothetic.
Theorem 5.1 The structure (, , , ) is generalized Lorentzian Para-Contact Structure.
Proof. Inconsequence of (1.1), (1.2), (5.1) (b) and (5.1) (d), we get
2
(, ) = g (, ) = ( , ) + 1
() ()
=3

= ( , ) + 1
=3 { ( )}{ ( )}
This gives
(5.2)

(, ) = ( , ) + 1
=3 ( ) ( )

Using (1.1), (5.1) (a), (5.1) (c) and (5.1) (d), we get
(5.3)

1
= = + 1
=3 () = + =3 { ( )}

Also
(5.4)

= = 0

Proof follows from equations (5.2), (5.3) and (5.4).

Theorem 5.2 Let and be the Riemannian connections with respect to h and g such that
(5.5) (a) = + (, )

and

(b) `(, , ) (( , ), )
Then
1
1 1
(5.6) 2 = 2 [2 {1
=3 () (Y) + =3 (Y) (X) =3 ( G) (X) (Y )}
1

+( 1) 1
=3 {( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + ( 1) =3 { ()( ) + ()( )

()(1 )() ()(1 )()}]

Proof. Inconsequence of (5.1) (b), we have

12

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, April 2015 Vol. 6, No. 4, ISSN: 1837-7823

2
(( , )) = { g (, ) 1
() ()}
=3

Consequently
(5.7)

( , ) + (, ) = () g (, ) + g ( , ) + g (, )

2
1
() () + 2 ( )() () + 2 ( )() () + 2 ( ) () +
=3 {2()

2 ( ) ()}
Also
(5.8)

( , ) + (, ) = g ( , ) + g ((, ), ) + g (, (, ) +

2
g (, ) 1
( ) () + 2 () ((, )) + 2 ( ) () + 2 ((, )) ()}
=3 {

Inconsequence of (1.3) (a), (5.7) and (5.8), we have

1

()g (, ) 2() 1
=3 { () ()} ( 1) =3 {( )() () + ( )() ()} +

(5.9)

( 1) 1
=3 { ((, )) () + ((, )) ()} = `(, , ) + `(, , )
Writing two other equations by cyclic permutation of , , and subtracting the third equation from the sum of the
first two. Also using symmetry of ` in the first two slots, we get
(5.10)

2`(, , ) = 2 1
=3 {() () () + () () () () () ()} (

1) 1
=3 [ (){( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + (){( )() ( )()} +
(){( )() ( )()}]
This implies
(5.11)

2(, ) = 2 1
=3 [() () + () () ( ) (X) (Y)] (

1
1) 1
=3 [{( )() + ( )() 2 ((, ))} + ()( ) + ()( ) ()( )(Y)

(Y)(1 )(X)]
(5.6) follows from (5.11) and (5.5).

References
.

[1] Matsumoto, K. (1989) On Lorentzian Paracontact Manifolds, Bull. Of Yamagata Univ.,Nat Sci.,Vol. 12,
No.2, pp. 151-156.
[2] Matsumoto, K. and Mihai, I. (1988) On a certain transformation in a Lorentzian Para-Sasakian Manifold,
Tensor N. S., Vol. 47, pp. 189-197.
[3] Nivas, R. and Bajpai, A. (2011) Study of Generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian Manifolds, Journal of
International Academy of Physical Sciences, Vol. 15 No.4, pp. 405-412.
[4] Pandey, L. K., (2014) Generalised LP-Sasakian manifolds, International journal of computational
Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 20-25.
[5] Pandey, L. K., (2014) A Note on Generalized almost Para-Sasakian Structure, International journal of
Computational Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 4-9.
[6] Sato, I. (1976) On a structure similar to almost contact structure I, Tensor N.S.,30, pp. 219-224.
[7] Sato, I. (1977) On a structure similar to almost contact structure II, Tensor N.S.,31, pp. 199-205.
[8] Suguri, T. and Nakayama, S. (1974) D-conformal deformation on almost contact metric structures, Tensor
N. S., 28, pp. 125-129.

13