Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Dean F. Tan
2nd Sem AY 2012-2013
1st Sem AY 2014-2015
NOTE: Let it be known that this is just a guide; not complete nor perfect. Feel free to correct or supplement whatever is needed. But I am
hoping that this will help you in studying the subject. -IBYANG-
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
SC, CA
Sandiganbayan Civil: forfeiture of illegally acquired properties
CTA
Sharia District/Lower Court [PROPERTY RELATIONS] parties involved are Muslims
RTC land registration cases: uncontested
MTC
- Ordinary procedure (claim less than 300/400, exclusion/inclusion of voters)
- Summary [NO TRIAL] (Rule 70: Unlawful detainer and Forcible entry, claims less than 100/200
[except probate], small claims)
Should dismissal under Rule 17, Secs. 1 and 2 be included in CNFS No.
CNFS is required for substantial amendment
o Jurisdiction
Ibyang |
Venue
Venue
Real (location)
Personal (residence)
Mixed (location or residence)
vs.
Jurisdiction (Summons)
Rem (Due process)
Personam (acquire jurisdiction over the defendant)
Quasi-in-rem (ex. Rules 57, 68, 69) (Due process)
o Venue
Exclusivity of venue (in writing, before filing, agreed by the parties, use of word/s of exclusivity)
Improper venue: MTD (Rule 16, Sec. 1, c); XPN: Summary Procedure and Small claims
If not objected to: deemed waived
If MTD is granted: dismissal without prejudice; remedy refile
If MTD is dismissed: file an answer within the balance remaining, raise the issue as an affirmative defense,
proceed with trial, appeal an adverse decision and assign it as an error; if TGAD, Rule 65
FAVORITE BAR QUESTION: Venue if outside the Phils. (where property is located or where plaintiff resides)
-
Parties
Joinder of parties
Indispensable party: (Rule 3, Sec. 2 in relation to Rule 16, Sec. 1, g)
Class suit (common and general interest)
Distinguished from derivative suit (filed by minority stockholder;
ground for dissolution of corp) and citizen suit (environmental
laws)
Q: Is there a class suit in labor cases? Yes, ROC is suppletory
Death of a party: Rule 3, Sec. 16 and 20 in relation to Rule 86 and 87
(abandon mortgage, file against estate, foreclose property and apply for a
claim against estate)
o Cause of Action
Joinder of COA (Rule 2, Sec. 5/Rule 3, Sec. 6)
Splitting of COA (Act of forum shopping that may lead to litis pendentia
and eventually, to res judicata)
Cause for dismissal with prejudice: remedy, appeal
May be amended to confer jurisdiction (amendment as a matter of right)
Equity applies if there is no law applicable
o
Additional Notes:
Cert. of Non-Forum Shopping (a condition precedent; may be dismissed without prejudice; remedy: refile)(Rule 7,
Sec.5)
Acts of non-forum shopping (litis pendentia, res judicata, splitting of COA)
o AM/CP/FD DC/SS/SP-CA-R/FJ (Act of malpractice committed by a party by filing different suits in
different courts either successively or simultaneously, involving same parties, cause of action,
relief for the purpose of securing favorable judgment)
o Dismissal with prejudice: appeal
GR: Signed by the parties; EXCEPTION: Lawyer has authority and personal knowledge
Ibyang |
Q:
-
PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
Should be considered in preparation of pleadings.
Nature: Temporary, effective during the pendency of the action; provisional.
Purpose: protect the property, status quo (last actual, peaceable, uncontested status of the parties), to
secure payment of obligation.
Available in all courts (ancillary jurisdiction) except support pendent lite
Q:
Is the list (Rule 57-61) exclusive? No.
(Temporary Environmental Protection Order, delivery of legitime, support, visitational rights, witness protection
order, production/inspection orders, temporary protection/restraining orders, hold departure order)
1.
Q:
REMEDIES:
a.
b.
c.
d.
2.
MTC
MTQ denied: MR in 15 days [Rule 65, Sec. 4] Denied: Certiorari to RTC within 60 days
(Rule 65, Sec. 4 in relation to Rule 37) MR within 15 days (Rule 37) Appeal to CA
(Rule 41) MR (Rule 37 in relation to Rule 52) Appeal to SC within 15 days (Rule 45)
MR (Rule 52)
*Rule 65 plus TRO or injunction (Sec. 7)
*MR is required in certiorari
RTC
MTQ denied MR within 15 days (Rule37) Certiorari to CA within 60 days (Rule 37 in
relation to Rule 65, Sec. 4) MR (Rule 52) Appeal to SC (Rule 45) MR (Rule 52)
CA
MTQ denied MR (Rule 37) Certiorari to SC (Rule 65) MR (Rule 52)
SC
MTQ denied MR (Rule 52)
REQUIREMENTS: verified application, bond, grounds, affidavit
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
Rule 65
-
Matter to consider: GAD, no plain, adequate, speedy relief nor appeal and Rule 41, Sec.
1
GR: Hierarchy of courts; EXCEPTION: special compelling reasons (SC)
Material dates rule
MR is required except in 10 scenarios
Motion to extend time is prohibited; fixed and non-extendible
Requires CNFS
Correlate to Rule 46 (affidavit of service)
Ibyang |
64
65
45
a.
COA/COMELEC
[in relation to
R112] - > SC
a.
Ombudsman
(criminal), SB,
CTA, CA > SC
a. SB, CA,
CTA, RTC
> SC
Subject to
Doctrine of
Heirarchy of
courts
RTC:
Purely
questions
of law.
43 in relation
to R43
a. QJB and
Ombudsman
(admin) >
CA
List is not
exclusive.
XPN: NLRC
(R65 to CA
within 60
days)
b. RTC > CA
30
c. MTC >
RTC
d. QJB - >CA
60
Certiorari
Certiorari
Requires MR,
subject to 10
xpns.
42 RTC
appellate
a.
MTC/RTC
> CA
41 RTC
original
a. RTC/MTC
(land
registration,
contested)
> CA
40
MTC > RTC
COURTS
b.
MTC/RTC
-> SB
15
15
15
15/30
15/30
Petition
for
Review on
Certiorari
Petition for
Review
Petition
for
Review
Notice of
Appeal/
Record on
Appeal
Notice of
Appeal/Record
on Appeal
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Law,
except 13
Law/Facts
Law/Facts
Law/Facts
Law/Facts
ISSUES/QUESTION
Consti
Consti
Consti
Statute
Statute
Statute
Statute
BASIS
Original parties
Does not require MR
Mode of appeal
Period is extendible
Rule 65
Court/tribunal must be impleaded
Requires MR, 10 xpns
Mode of review
Not extendible
Rule 37 not extendible, except in special and compelling reasons
Rule 52/53, extendible only in SC.
Ibyang |
5.
6.
7.
Co-ownership
Quasi-in-rem/Personal, real, mixed action
Non-probate proceeding: compulsory heirs may file
Rule 74, Sec. 1, if a compulsory heir later on disagrees.
STAGES:
o Determination of co-ownership
o Partition
(Appealable through record on appeal)
8.
9.
KINDS:
o Direct Sec. 1
o Indirect Sec. 3
o Criminal penal in nature; attacking the integrity of the court
o Civil non-compliance with lawful order
o Out of court indirect
o In court direct
Remedy for direct contempt: Sec. 2
Contempt is inherent power of courts
Contempt power of QJB: Sec. 12
Where to file: governing law of the QJB, if none, RTC
Contempt power of NLRC/LA: Sec. 218 of Labor Code; Federico vs. NLRC (2012)
Ibyang |
FILING OF PLEADINGS
-
SUMMONS
-
Define
Distinguished from subpoena (definition, purpose, who issues, kinds)
Ground for MTD: Lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant
Actions of the court for such ground:
o Grant dismiss without prejudice (Refile)
o Deny answer
o Issue an alias summon
MODES OF SERVICE
o Personal (handing/tendering plus affidavit of service)
o Substitute (residence or office)
o Extraterritorial
Foreign juridical entity without agent: through DFA (personal, publication plus mail,
electronic means)
If there is MERGER of corporations: To the original corp, UNLESS prevailing corp
assumes liability of the original.
Effect of amendment
o Appeared (answer already filed) no need to reissue summons EXCEPT if
amendment is substantial
o Not yet appeared reissue summons
Motion to admit answer is equivalent to motion to extend time
Motion to extend time: voluntary submission UNLESS to question the courts jurisdiction
REMEDIES AFTER SUMMONS BEFORE FILING OF RESPONSIVE PLEADING (including Motion for summary judgment,
provisional remedies, intervention)
a. Motion to Dismiss (Rule 16)
Omnibus and litigated motion
Subject matter: all initiatory pleadings
GR: Prohibited in Summary Procedure
EXCEPTION: Lack of jurisdiction over subject matter and brgy. conciliation (condition
precedent)
EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION: Small claim (MTD is absolutely prohibited)
Prohibited in envi cases, absolute.
Dismissal with prejudice: Sec. 5 plus litis pendentia (REMEDY: Appeal)
Dismissal without prejudice: All the rest, refile (GR) or amend (also see Rule 41, Sec. 1)
EXCEPT: Lack of jurisdiction over subject matter and failure to state cause of action
(ADDITIONAL REMEDY: Amend to confer jurisdiction, as a matter of right)
DISTINGUISH Rule 16 from Rule 33 (nature, when filed, grounds, if granted, if denied)
DISTINGUISH Rule 16 from Rule 50 (court, what is to be dismissed)
Ibyang |
10
Q: Can you amend a pleading if there is MTD? Yes, MTD is not a responsive pleading.
Q: Can you amend after judgment? Yes, provided that its not final and executory.
b.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Summary Judgment
Intervention
- ancillary
- REMEDY if denied: Appeal or file a separate action
- Not applicable to Summary Procedure, small claims, creditors of estate
- Applicable to envi cases
h. Modes of Discovery
- Rule 23-28 is not an exclusive list
- Subject to the courts discretion.
- Define; purposes (7 + obtain full information)
- Kinds: Rule 23-28
- Habaes Data/Amparo: Rule 27 applies
- Rule23 in relation to rule 134
Q: Are the modes applicable to criminal cases? Yes, only in suppletory character (Rule 27 does not apply because
of Rule 116, Sec. 10 AND Rule 23 does not apply because of Rule 119, Sec. 12 and 13)
i.
-
Rule 23
Deposition is evidence (object, documentary, testimonial), in case of admission
Taking of deposition (oral/written, videotape in case of child witness)
o How (filing, examination of witness [Rule 132, Sec. 3-18], transcribed and
presented to deponent, signed, sealed, and filed to court)
o Who may take deposition
Use of deposition: Sec. 4
(Impeachment: Rule 132, Secs. 11 and 13)
Effect of death of deponent: remains as an evidence (Rule 130, Sec. 47; no violation in
using hearsay evidence)
Ibyang |
11
Objections: officer should not UNLESS granted by the court in the order to take
deposition
LIMITATIONS: privileged communications, tends to harass or annoy
ii. Rule 24
Petition filed to any court
iii. Rule 25
Distinguish from Rule 23
Answer should be verified: If not, summary judgment (R35 or Rule 29, Sec. 5)
REMEDY for actionable document: File answer with specific denial under oath
LIMITATIONS: privileged communications, tends to harass or annoy
iv. Rule 26
- Answer should be verified: If not, R34 judgment on the pleadings
v. Rule 27
- Distinguished from subpoena duces tecum (how, purpose, when available, nature)
- Matters to consider: production and surveying provided its not privileged
- Correlate with Rule 130, Sec. 24
- Applies to AMparo, Data, envi
- Rule 130, Sec. 3, (b) distinguished from R27
R27
Mode of discovery
Motion
No prior knowledge of the questions/subject matter
R130
Exception to best evidence rule
Notice
Requesting party has prior knowledge
vi. Rule 28
- Applicable to parties only
- Distinguish Rule 28 and Rule 101 (nature, purpose, form, who may file)
- Rule 29: Effects
DEFAULT
-
Distinguish Motion to Declare Defendant in Default (MTDDD) vs. Order of Default (OD)
vs. Judgment by Default (JD)
Process of MTDDD (REQUIRES: acquisition of jurisdiction, failure to respond, proof of
failure, motion, notice, hearing)
Q: When can there be an Order of Default? Non-response to initiatory pleadings and Rule 25
Effects of OD? Lose standing, can still be a witness, admissions are extrajudicial
admission, entitle to receive notice, judgment order, substantial amendments
Q: Effect if there is substantial amendment? OD is lifted.
REMEDY FOR ORDER OF DEFAULT (EX MTC)
o Motion to lift OD, verified, based on FAME, affidavit of merit
o Motion to admit answer + answer
o If denied, MR (R65, Sec. 4 plus TRO or injunction) [because interlocutory
order] RTC MR (R37) CA (R41) [because judgment of RTC is final] MR (R52)
SC (R45) MR (52)
Judgment by default: judgment rendered by virtue of order by default after
presentation of evidence ex parte
REMEDIES FOR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT: (MTC)
o Before it becomes final and executory MR/MNT/Motion to set aside judgment
by default (FAME, verified, affidavit of merit) RTC (R65 plus TRO or injunction)
MR (R37) CA (R41) MR (R52) SC (R45) MR (R52)
o Final and Executory
Ibyang |
12
ANSWER
-
Lack of is not a ground to dismiss because clerk of court is directed to set the pre-trial if
plaintiff fails to move (AM 03-1-09)
Mandatory but can be waived if lack of it is not raised during trial.
Distinguished from R118 (who inititates, when, main purpose, pretrial brief, effect of
non-appearance, signature in PTA, effects)
Rule of appearance on parties: personal
Non-appearance of plaintiff: dismissal with prejudice unless otherwise ordered
(Principle of non-suited)
Preliminary Conference in Summary Procedure: does not require ex parte motion, does
not require brief unless ordered by the court.
Preliminary Conference in CA (Rule 48)
Matters to consider: 1-day, 1-witness rule, Most Important Witness Rule, JDR, Judicial
Affidavit Rule
EFFECTS/REMEDIES FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT
o Order allowing = MR R65 MR Appeal
o Order allowing plus presentation of evidence ex parte = MR/Motion to set
aside R65 + TRO R52 Appeal
o Order allowing plus presentation of evidence plus judgment which is not final
and executory = MR/MNT R65 MR Appeal
o Judgment becomes final and executory
i. R38 MR R65 MR Appeal
ii. R47 MR R65 MR Appeal
iii. R65 MR Appeal
iv. Collateral Attack (separate action attacking the judgment)
13
KINDS: In absentia, inverted, ex parte, one-sided, impartial, de novo, public trial, trial by
commissioner
Order of trial (Sec 5)
Inverted trial happens if defendant files an answer with affirmative defense
NO TRIAL: summary procedure, small claims, r34, r35, compromise, MTD (grounds
raised is for dismissal with prejudice), r17, s3 except non-compliance with order of the
court.
Evidence not marked are deemed waived unless allowed by the court
Rule 132, Section 4-8
Offer of testimony: Rule 132, Section 35
Offer of evidence: Rule 132, Section 34
Offer of examination: Rule 132, Section 5-8
Judicial Affidavit Rule: written testimony of witness (lack of, witness will not be allowed
to testify)
Types of objection to testimony/evidence (Leading: suggesting answer, Misleading:
contrary to testimony, Argumentative, Hypothetical, No basis, Calling on conclusion,
Narrative, Immaterial, Irrelevant)
Actions of court: Rule 132, Section 38 and Section 40 (Section 40: remedy for excluded
testimony; to be able to attach to records for appeal)
Resting the case: after all evidence were presented by plaintiff; done by plaintiff
14
NOTE: Let it be known that this is just a guide; not complete nor perfect. Feel free to correct or supplement whatever is needed. But I am
hoping that this will help you in studying the subject. -IBYANG-
Ibyang |
15