Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LGU
name LANTAWAN
Region
LGU type
ARMM
Municipality
Principal Indicator (PI)
score
No.
(1)
PFMIP Proposal
(2)
Timing
(S/M term)
(3)
Status
(FI/II/NI)
(4)
(5)
2012
(6)
2014
(7)
Budgeting
NI
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
2
3
N
Action addressing comprehensiveness and transparency concerns (CD 2)
1
2
3
N
Cash Management
Installation of E-NGAS
Cash management
Cash Management
NI
NI
FI
LGU
name LANTAWAN
Region
LGU type
ARMM
Municipality
Principal Indicator (PI)
score
No.
PFMIP Proposal
(2)
(3)
(1)
N
Cash Management
Timing
(S/M term)
Status
(FI/II/NI)
2012
(6)
2014
(7)
(4)
S
(5)
II
NI
1.5
1.5
FI
Creation of ICU
Internal Audit
2
3
N
CSO's Accredetation by SB
Citizen's participation
2
3
N
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Column 1: Indicate reference number of each PFMIP Proposal.
2. Column 2: List down PFMIP proposals grouped by critical dimension (CD)
3. Column 3: Indicate the principal Indicator (PI) Number for each CD that id being addressed by each of the PFMIP proposal. Refer to the
LGU
name LANTAWAN
Region
LGU type
ARMM
Municipality
Principal Indicator (PI)
score
No.
PFMIP Proposal
Timing
(S/M term)
Status
(FI/II/NI)
2012
2014
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Public Financial Management Assessment Tool (PFMAT) for the List of Pis.
4. Column 4: Indicate S (Short Term) for measures that will be implemented within 12 months, and M (Medium Term) for measures that wil
be implemented from 12 months to 3 years.
5. Column 5: Reflect the status of implementation. Indicate FI (Fully Implemented) if PFMIP proposal has been fully implemented; II
(Implementation Initiated) if implementation has been initiated; and NI (Not Implemented) if measure has not been implemented.
6. Column 6 to 8 and 10 will only be accomplished during the PFMAT reassessment year
7. Column 6 and 7: 201X refers to the initial assessment score and 201Y refers to the reassessed score during the monitoring.
8. Column 8: Reflect the changes in indicator score [+(improvement) or - (decline).], which is computed by comparing the Reassessed Sco
and Baseline Score.
9. Column 9: Indicate the date when completion of PFMIP proposal was achieved in the case of fully implemented measures and start of
implementation in the case of initially implemented measures.
10. Column 10: Indicate whether measures are:
a. Not identified in the original PFMIP
b. Changes in the nature of the PFMIP proposal; or
c. Changes in the implementation timing (IT)
11. Other proposed PFMIP actions not classified by LGUs into CDs 1 to 7 covers PFMIP proposals that LGUs could not classify as into CDs 1 to
It will be up to the Ros to classify them appropriately into CDs 1 to 7.
(1)
Prepared by:
Approved by:
ROBEN J. MUSTAPA
MPDC
RUSTAM M. ISMAEL
Municipal Mayor
Income
class
al Indicator (PI)
score
Change
(8)
Comments
Date
achieved
(9)
(10)
changes in IT
0
0
changes in IT
changes inIT
2012
Income
class
al Indicator (PI)
score
Change
(8)
0
Comments
Date
achieved
(9)
2015
(10)
changes in IT
2013
Income
class
al Indicator (PI)
score
Change
(8)
Comments
Date
achieved
(9)
implemented; II
en implemented.
monitoring.
ng the Reassessed Score
RUSTAM M. ISMAEL
Municipal Mayor
(10)