AMM033

22
15-17 2551

SUS 409
A Study of Springback Action in Semi-Circle Shape Bending of Ferritic Stainless Steel
Plate SUS 409 by Finite Element Method Compare with Experiment Method
1 2 3
1,2

10800 1 head_kk@yahoo.com 2 chn@kmutnb.ac.th
3
26120
vichitb@swu.ac.th

SUS
409
Damper
Exhaust Pipe 105 x 120 x 10 mm,
30.5 mm 0.5 mm
30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm
500 Ton
ABAQUS V.6.4-1

SUS 409

Abstract
The objective of this research is to compare the springback
behavior in semi-circle shape bending of ferritic stainless steel
plate SUS 409 analyzed by finite element method with
experiment. The workpiece for this research is a car damper
exhaust pipe. Its dimension is 105 x 120 x 10 mm, bending
radius 30.5 mm and tolerance 0.5 mm. The parameter effecting
springback in forming process is radius of punch which are
included of 3 radius sizes 30.0, 30.5 and 31.0 mm. The 500 tons
hydraulic press machine was used to perform the forming
process. Meanwhile, the ABAQUS V.6.4-1 software was used for
206

forming process such the simulation, and considered as plane

strain problem.
The results show that the springback action in semi-circle
shape bending of ferritic stainless steel plate SUS 409 by finite
element method conforms to experiments which the forming
forces are almost the same. In addition, there is no springback
effect and dimension of the workpiece deformed is in tolerance.
1.

2 22

2.

SUS 409

3.
3.1








(Elastic Springback)



(Buckling)

1 r
z

1
3.2 (Springback)



2

(Elastic
Recovery)

2
t , e ,

r , R p0.2 0.2%









-

2 22

207

4.

SUS 409

4.1
(Finite Element Method Simulation)
4.1.1
SUS 409
10 mm (Specimens) 3
ASTM E8M-01
l55R4502
SUS 409 1

3
1
SUS409
Youngs Modulus (E) ; GPa
186.67
0.3
Poissons ratio ()
Yield strength ; MPa
252.22
Strength coefficient (K) ; MPa
592.1
Strain hardening exponent (n)
0.1812
4.1.2
ABAQUS V.6.4-1

Tooling
3
4.1.2.1 (Pre-Processing)
1
10 x 52.5 mm 30.5 mm 40.5 mm
2
30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm 40.0, 40.5 41.0 mm


4 1
208

4 1

SUS 409



0.1
2
0.5 mm
2,139
2,266
4.1.2.2 (Processing)

4.1.2.3 (Post-processing)

SUS 409

5 6

5 1

2 22

4.2.2

(Checking Fixture)
A-G 9

6 2
4.2 (Experiment)
4.2.1
SUS 409
105 x 120 x 10 mm
7
8

9
5.
5.1
5.1.1

34

FEM (Punch radius 30.5 mm)

FEM (Punch radius 30.0 mm)
FEM (Punch radius 31.0 mm)

( mm )

33

32

r 31.0 mm

31

r 30.5 mm
r 30.0 mm

30

29

28
A

7
10
30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm
40.0, 40.5 41.0 mm
10 30.0, 30.5
31.0 mm 40.0, 40.5 41.0 mm
30.5 mm 40.5 mm

0.03
0.33% D
A G

8
2 22

209

0.66% A G
D

5.1.2

4000

3000
(kN)

5.2.2

Punch Load (radius 30.0 mm)

Punch Load (radius 30.5 mm)
Punch Load (radius 31.0 mm)

2
10.0 mm 30.5 mm 40.5 mm

(mm) (mm)
(kN)

2000

1000

30.5

0
0

10

20

30

40

40.5

3,500

50

(mm)

11
30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm 40.0,
40.5 41.0 mm
11
30.0 mm 3,661.67 kN, 30.5
mm 3,695.64 kN 31.0
mm 3,784.54 kN

2
30.5 mm 40.5 mm
3,500 kN
5.3

5.3.1

EXP ( Punch radius 30.5 mm )

FEM ( Punch radius 30.5 mm )

34

5.2
5.2.1

( mm )

33

EXP ( Punch radius 30.5 mm )

34

( mm )

33

31

r 30.5 mm

30

r 30.5 mm

29

28

32

r 30.5 mm

31

30

13
30.5 mm 40.5
mm

29

28
A

12
30.5 mm 40.5 mm
12
SUS 409
30.5 mm
0.16

210

32

13
30.5 mm
40.5 mm

0.16 0.62%
A G D

2 22

5.3.2
3 10.0 mm
30.5 mm 40.5 mm

(kN)

(kN)
(%)

FEM
3,500

3,695.64

195.64

5.59

3
30.5 mm
40.5 mm
195.64 kN 5.59%
6.
6.1
6.1.1

30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm

40.0, 40.5 41.0 mm
30.5 mm
40.5 mm
0.1%
3,695.64 kN
6.1.2
500 Ton 30.5 mm 40.5
mm
0.44%
3,500 kN
6.1.3

30.5 mm
40.5 mm
0.04%
5.59%
6.2

30.0, 30.5 31.0 mm 40.0,

40.5 41.0 mm



30.5 mm 40.5
mm

30.0,
30.5 31.0 mm
31.0 mm
30.0 mm

1. .
. :
, 2538.
2. William F. Hosford and Robert M. Caddell. Metal Forming
Mechanical and Metallurgy. Englewood Cliffs : PrenticeHall, 1993.
3. . . (
.) :
, 2543.
4. .
.
: ,
2542.
5. R. W. Rowe, et al. Finite-element Plasticity and
Metalforming Analysis. London : Cambridge University
Press, 1991.
6. Annika Nilsson, Lars Melin, and Claes Magnusson. Finite
- element simulation of V-die bending : a comparison with
experimental results. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology. 65(1997) : 52-58.
7. H. Livatyali and T. Altan. Prediction and Elimination of
Springback in Straight Flanging Using CAD Methods.
Part-1 Journal of Materials Processing Technology.
117(2001) : 262-268.
8. Li-Ping Lei, Sang-Moon Hwang and Beom-Soo Kang.
Finite Element Analysis and Design in Stainless Steel
Sheet Forming and its Experimental Comparison.
Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 110(2001) :
70-77.

2 22

211