1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Modeling and Simulating a Surface Marine Vehicle in an External Uniform Earth's Magnetic Field Using of...
8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

WIV of Two Tapered Circular Cylinders in Tandem Arrangement

14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nonlinear Surge Response of Tension Leg Platform under Wave Excitation
20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIVACE - A Simple Numerical Model of Hydrodynamic Energy Harnessing from Hydraulic Currents
25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identification of Offshore Jacket Damaged Members by Using Reduced Wavelet Component Energy
28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dynamic Coupled Analysis of Semi-Submersible Platform: Case Study Iran-Amirkabir
30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
API
31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 ...

32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Evaluation of CPT Cone Factor in South Pars Field, Persian Gulf
41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xx
42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59
43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
""
45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Epan
47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CFD
50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SES FSI
57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VOF
58 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60 ...
60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

...
65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 ...

66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scale Effect on Form Drag of Small Waterplane Area Ships,With Oval Shape of Gondola
67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Delft3D-Flow
69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Wave Energy in Anzali Port (Iran
71 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flow3D
72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PSO LM
74 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Design of Chamber and Wells Turbine for an Oscillating Column of Water for Extracting Wave Energy from ...

75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Evaluation of Wave Energy Potentials in Chahbahar Port Using Two Methods of Water-Wind Model ...
76 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Numerical Comparison Between Diffraction Theory and Morison Equation in Predicting Wave Force - Case Study: ...

81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prediction of Wave Spectrum Using Artificial Neural Network
82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VOF
84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


85 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Effects of Bank and Shallow Water on The Flow Pattern Around Hull of LNG Carrier Using Cfd
89 . . . . . . . Adi Maimun - Mehdi Nakisa - Yit Siang Ang - Pauzi Ghani - Agoes Priyanto - Yasser Razak - Fatemeh Behrouzi

90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A Numerical Analysis of Hydrofoil Operation Near the Water Surface and Development of A Method to Calculate...

94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Optimum Design of Crp Propeller Using Open-Prop Software
103 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SES
105 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
107 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- PVL
108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

109 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

111 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRP Azipod
112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRP
113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Air Cavity Ships
118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


119 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
128 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DNV ABS
129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vibration Investigation of Cylindrical Pipes With Sigmoid, Power Law and Exponentially Graded Material
133 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A-B517

135 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5083 PEO
137 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

138 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

139 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On The Effect of Substrates Type in Fracture Strength of Adhesively Bonded DCB Joints by a Cohesive Zone ...

144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Numerical Analysis and Optimization of Top-Hat Stiffened Composite Plate Panels Used in GFRP Ship Structures...

146 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PVC ...
148 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PVC VIP
149 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

151 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

152 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


153 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HSLA 100
154 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Study on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Rolled Alloy 5083 H112 After Heat Treating at ...
155 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

V
156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASTM A517 AISI 316L ...
157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
T
158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

161 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )RCS
162 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... FEMM
164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( :)
166 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A New Plan for Marine Green Energy System; Gravity Buoyancy System in Deep Waters
167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


170 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5083 M-ARB
171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SMA
175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )GMAW
176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2007
178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

185 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


187 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QuikSCAT
189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PSO
190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

192 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

194 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( AHP-FUZZY )
196 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40
197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(( )AHP )

198 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 91 94
199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( : )
202 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 ( )ANP ...
203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CMMS
204 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HSE ()
207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electrical Installation Criteria for Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System and Class Approval Requirements

211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: ...
213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VAR
217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


219 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

225 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMEA
227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

( )B. dussumieri
228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

229 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )CCA
230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )PAHs ...

231 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
232 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OSIS
233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOOA-HD
235 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


...
236 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
237 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

238 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()
240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( ) 44
241 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( ) " " " ...
242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 m.khaleghian@aut.ac.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir

.

.

.
ABS API
.
.

1 navid7991@yahoo.com

2 panahi@rahiran.ir

.

.

.
.

1 tabeshpour@sharif.edu

2 akhavatmostafa@yahoo.com

.
.

.
.

.

: )1( 2

3

1.Steel Jacket Platform

2.Vibration Control
)3.Tuned Mass Damper (TMD

1 2

1 Kurosh.tafi@gmail.com
2 massood@gmail.com
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir

) (
.
150


.

. )
(

Ansys 12 .

1 2

1 seyedmorteza.motahari@yahoo.com

2 sayyaadi@sharif.ir
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com

.
.

. .

.
.
. .
.

.

1 2

1 abaiee.mohammad@aut.ac.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
3 babaiy@aut.ac.ir

.

.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
:

1 matinnikoo@alumni.com
2 zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir

) 1(IWA
.

2 .
.
3
.

.
) 3( ) (

.
:

)1.Incremental Wave Analysis (IWA

2.Push-Over Analysis
3.Uncertainty Parameters

Modeling and Simulating a Surface Marine Vehicle in

an External Uniform Earth's Magnetic Field Using of
FEMM Software
Abdulkhaled Zareei1, Hassan Sayaadi2, Hamid Mehdigholi3
1

M.Sc. Marine Engineering, Sharif University of technology; Azareei@Alum.Sharif.edu

Associate Professor of Sharif University of technology, School of Mechanical Engineering; Sayyaadi@Sharif.edu
3Assistant Professor of Sharif University of technology, School of Mechanical Engineering; Mehdi@Sharif.edu
Center of Excellence in Hydrodynamics and Dynamics of Marine Vehicles, Sharif University of Technology

Abstract
With recent advances in electromagnetic sensor technology, the war time
threat to shipping posed by electromagnetically triggered mines is becoming
more significant and consequently the need to understand, predict and reduce
the electromagnetic signature of ships is growing. The detection threat arising
from this induced magnetic signature has been known for many years, and
consequently, ships are generally fitted with degaussing coils. The main aim of
investigation of new methods for modeling magnetic signatures of marine
vehicles due to their moving in earth's magnetic field is the sophisticated
procedure of modeling the details of structure and then meshing the model. So
in this paper we will focus on a simple but practical model which fulfill our
expectations. The work presented in this study is concerned with the magnetic
signature resulting from the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material of a
marine vehicle. For our purpose, we are using the open source FEMM program.
FEMM is a suite of programs for solving low frequency electromagnetic
problems on two dimensional planar and axisymmetric domains. Whereas, our
case is to magnetostatic problem.

Keywords: Earth's Magnetic Field, FEMM, Magnetic Finite-Element

Models, Surface Marine Vehicles

1 tabeshpour@sharif.edu

2 seif@sharif.edu

) (TLP .
.
.

.
.
.
MATLAB
.
SNATELP
.

10

I

2

1
1

hosseini@dena.kntu.ac.ir
2

Zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir

I

.
.

.

I
. I

.
.

1.ABAQUS

11

1 mahmood_8c@yahoo.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir

SVM
.
1961 .
.
SAP2000 .
6 2
5 %40.5
. )
(
.

: SVM
SAP2000

12

1 2

1 H.shiri@deltaoffshoregroup.com
2 Alireza.sadeghi@civil.uut.ac.ir
3 Hossein.hashemi@civil.uut.ac.ir

) (Touchdown Zone .


.

.
) (FEA
.



.
:

13

1 2 3
1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 farnoosh_shafi@aut.ac.ir
3 z.haghayeghi@aut.ac.ir
4 has.saghi@stu-mail.um.ac.ir

.
.

. .
.

.

.
.

14

WIV of Two Tapered Circular Cylinders in Tandem

Arrangement
Mostafa Zeinoddini1, Vahid Tamimi2, Mohammad Saeed Seif3
1

Associate Professor, K.N.Toosi University, Zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir

M Sc. in Marine Structures, K.N.Toosi University, VahidTamimi@sina.kntu.ac.ir
3
Professor, Center of Excellence in Hydrodynamics and Dynamics of Marine Vehicles,
Sharif University of Technology, seif@sharif.edu
2

Abstract
In many practical situations, the cylinders are found in a specific
arrangement

and

have

different

transverse

vibration

response

from

isolated cylinders. In the most simplified case one can consider two
rigid circular cylinders with the same diameter in tandem arrangement.
In this simple configuration the upstream cylinder is fixed and the
downstream cylinder is flexibly mounted. In the present study the cross
flow

and

inline

vibration

amplitudes

(of

the

downstream

tapered

cylinder) of two tapered circular cylinders in tandem arrangement are

presented. The single degree of freedom vibrating system (i.e. the
downstream cylinder either in transverse or stream-wise directions) has
a low mass-damping parameter ( m 0.0408 ). The Reynolds number,
*

based on mean diameter of the cylinders, ranges from 1,400 to 19,600

and the reduced velocities vary from 1 to 22. Various separations (S/D)
from 2 to 7 are studied. The trend of transverse responses of the
downstream tapered cylinder in tandem arrangement is generally the
same as that of the uniform cylinder. This implies that the introduction
of three-dimensionality to the flow field and more irregularity in vortex
shedding from the upstream (tapered) cylinder does not have any
significant effect on the downstream tapered cylinder responses.

Keywords: WIV, Tapered Cylinders, Tandem Arrangement, Transverse Vibration

15

1 2
1

a.golbaz@sina.kntu.ac.ir
2

h_golpour@yahoo.com
3

zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir

.

.
... .

.
.
...
.
17 API
. API

RSR
.
:

 16

1 2 3

1 hashemzare4927@gmail.com
2 said.mazaheri@gmail.com
3 mahmood.akbarpour@yahoo.com
4 arminaziminejad@gmail.com

. SACS 5.3

.
.
PLAXIS.3D FOUNDATION
.

. 1
) ( 2 3
.

: ...
1.Stress
2.Uplift or Settle
3.Displaciment

17

1 2

1 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
2 mehdizdf@yahoo.com
3 meysam_baali@yahoo.com

.
.


.
7

.
.

 18

1 2 3

1 hedayatimajid64@gmail.com
2 said.mazaheri@gmail.com
3 )( abasianhamid@yahoo.com
4 abbasimajid@yahoo.com

.


.


.

19

1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 saeed.barzegar.v@aut.ac.ir

.
.

.


.

.
.
:

1.FLUENT

20

Nonlinear Surge Response of Tension Leg Platform

under Wave Excitation
Mohammad Reza Tabeshpour1, Rahim Shoghi2
1

Center of Excellence in Hydrodynamics and Dynamics of Marine Vehicles, Mechanical

Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology; tabeshpour@sharif.edu
2
Graduated Student; rahim_shoghi@yahoo.com

Abstract
This paper presents the dynamic motion responses of a tension leg
platform (TLP) in regular sea waves obtained by applying three
methods in time domain using MATLAB software. Surge equation of
motion of TLP is highly nonlinear because of large displacement and it
should be solved with large perturbation parameter in time domain. In
this paper Homotopy perturbation technique (HPM) is used to solve
highly nonlinear differential equation of surge motion. Also numerical
method (MEM) is used for solving nonlinear equation of motion and
ordinary differential equation (ODE) is used for linear equation of
motion. Calculated responses by analytical HPM are compared with
those obtained from both linear and nonlinear equation of motion. The
platform was modelled as a rigid body restrained by mooring lines.
Linear

Airy

wave

theory

and

Morison

equation

were

used

for

calculating the wave forces on the platform. The results were obtained
as responses in surge are compared in time and frequency domain.
Achieved values represent good accordance between results of HPM
and numerical method.

Keywords: Tension Leg Platform, Perturbation, Morison Equation

21

1 2

1 gamirinia@yahoo.com
2 bagher@iust.ac.ir
3 said.mazaheri@gmail.com

.

.
.

.
.
) ( . ANSYS-AQWA
.

.
.
:

22

1 2

1 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
2 mehdizdf@yahoo.com
3 meysam_baali@yahoo.com

.
.

.
.
.

.

.

23

1 2 3

1 seif@sharif.edu
2 mehdi@sharif.edu
3 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
4 dastan@mech.sharif.edu

.
.

.

.

. .

24

1 2

1 Msaybani@aut.ac.ir
2 Hasani@gmail.com
3 Aut.s.dehesh@gmail.com

.


.

.

25

VIVACE - A Simple Numerical Model of

Hydrodynamic Energy Harnessing From Hydraulic
Currents
Hamed Ashuri1, Saeid Niazi2, Keyvan Sadeghi3
1

Department of civil engineering, Hormozgan university, hamedashuri@gmail.com

Department of mechanical engineering, Hormozgan university, s.niazi@hormozgan.ac.ir
3
Department of civil engineering,Hormozgan university, ksadeghi@hormozgan.ac.ir

Abstract
A simple system of VIVACE (Vortex Induced Vibration Aquatic
Clean Energy) was investigated based on the numerical modeling of
VIV

phenomenon.

To

this

end,

the

numerical

solution

of

two

dimensional Reynolds Averaged NavierStokes (RANS) equations is

obtained for a circular cylinder laterally supported by a spring and a
damper and free to oscillate in the transverse direction to determine the
amplitude of oscillation for a given diameter of cylinder. The Steger
and Warming flux vector splitting implicit scheme is used to solve the
governing RANS equations along with an appropriate turbulence model
of k- . Comparing the numerical results by other valid results such one
presented in Khalak and Williamson (1996), the proposed numerical
solution was able to provide fair results in terms of lift coefficient and
amplitude of oscillation. Faradays electromagnetic law of induction
was employed to calculate the harnessing energy from the system. FFT
(Fast

Fourier

dimensional

Transformation)

amplitude

analysis

from which

the

was

done

main

period

on
of

the

non-

transverse

oscillation required in governing formulation was collected.

Keywords: Vortex- Induced Vibration Aquatic Clean Energy, RANS

Equations, Lift Coefficient, Finite Difference Method

 26

1 2

1 seyyedali_saaa@yahoo.com
2 shjavadm83@yahoo.com
3 phd.st_habibi@yahoo.com

.
.
. ) (ABAQUS
. 7075-T6 Wrought Aluminum 101 2
4
1/5
. 90
90 180 .
0/7 .
.

27

1 tabeshpour@sharif.ir
2 manigriffin@gmail.com

.
25 .
.
) (
.
.


.
.

28

Identification of Offshore Jacket Damaged Members

by Using Reduced Wavelet Component Energy
Sajad Shahverdi1, Mohammad Ali Lotfollahi Yaghin2, Behrouz Asgarian3
1

PhD Candidate, Hormozgan University; sajad_shahverdi@yahoo.com

2
Professor, University of Tabriz; lotfollahi@tabrizu.ac.ir
3
Associate Professor, K.N.Toosi University of Technology; asgarian@kntu.ac.ir

Abstract
Identification of damage has become an evolving area of research in
last few decades. Damage in a system causes a change in the dynamic
properties of the system. The structural damage is typically a local
phenomenon, which tends to be captured by higher frequency signals.
Most of vibration-based damage detection methods require the modal
properties that are obtained from measured signals through the system
identification

techniques.

However,

the

modal

properties

such

as

natural frequencies and mode shapes are not such a good sensitive
indication

of

structural

damage.

Identification

of

damaged

jacket

platform members, based on wavelet packet transform is presented in

this paper. The jacket platform is excited by simple wave load.
Dynamic

signals

are

measured

from

the

finite

element

software

package. The dynamic signals first decomposed into wavelet packet

components.

Then

by

eliminate

some

of

the

component

signals

(eliminate approximation component of wavelet packet decomposition),

component

energies

of

remained

signal

(detail

components)

are

calculated and used for damage assessment. This new method called
Detail Signal Energy Rate Index (DSERI). The results show that
reduced wavelet packet component energies are good candidate indices
which are sensitive to structural damage.

These component energies

can be used for damage assessment including identifying damage

occurrence and can find the location of damaged elements.

Keywords: Offshore Platform, Damage Detection, Wavelet Transform, DSERI

29

n.sharifinasab@mppc.ir

) (Offshore :
1 2 .

.


.
.

) Fusion Bonded Epoxy(FBE

FBE .
: FBE

1.Anti Corrosion Coating
2.Concrete Weight Coating

30

Dynamic Coupled Analysis of Semi-Submersible

Platform: Case Study Iran-Amirkabir
Mojtaba Ezoji1, Ahmad Gharabaghi2, Hamzeh Gol Zaroudi3
1

MSc in Marine Structural Engineering, Sahand University of Technology,

Tabriz, Iran, mojtaba.ezoji@gmail.com
2
Associate Professor, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.
3
MSc in Marine Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology,
Tehran, Iran, H.golzaroodi@gmail.com

Abstract
Amir-Kabir platform is a GVA4000 type semi-submersible platform
installed in deep water part of Caspian Sea in order to extract its
hydrocarbon resources. In this study, the members of Amir-Kabir
platform are modeled by beam and shell elements. Morison and
diffraction theories are used to calculate the wave loads on these
members of platform considering relative geometry of them to the
wave length.
After verification of the developed model for a similar platform, the
frequency domain analysis is performed. The results are presented for
the

heave,

surge

and

pitch

motions

in

various

environmental

conditions. It is shown that by increasing the wave period, the spectrum

of platform's heave motion gets closer to the wave spectrum and by
increasing the wave height, the spectrum of platform's surge motion
gets closer to the desired environmental spectrum. This means that the
wave height plays more important role in the surge motion of platform
and the period is more effective in its heave motion.

Keywords: Semi-Submersible Platform, Coupling Analysis, Frequency

Domain Analysis, Mooring Lines

31

API

2

1
1

Mezzati@sina.kntu.ac.ir

Zeinoddini@Kntu.ac.ir

.
.


.
.

API
. X70 D/t =22
d/D =0/45 .
API
.
API
...
.
:

 32

1 2 3

1 javad.emamgholizadeh@Gmail.com
2 mgharabaghi@sut.ac.ir
3 K_abedi@sut.ac.ir
4 Sedaaghi@sut.ac.ir

.
) (
. 2.37-5.06 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.0
2.0 . ) (1IP
.
)0.50.20.00

)2.01.0

.
) (CF2
. CF

1.0 2.0 ) (IL3
CF .

: 4

1.Image Processing
2.Cross-Flow
3.In-Line
4.Vortex Induced Vibrations

33

1
1

Mezzati@sina.kntu.ac.ir
2

Zeinoddini@Kntu.ac.ir

.
.
.
.

. X70
D/t =22 .
.
) ( ) (
.
.

34

1 saeid.tah@gmail.com
2 mgharabaghi@sut.ac.ir

.
1 Ansys . GVA4000
.
2 3
.
100 1000
) (RAO
. 400 1000
. 400 RAO
.

: RAOs

1.AQWA
2.Design Modeler
3.ANSYS Workbench

35

1 2

1 hedayatimajid64@gmail.com
2 stableboat.90@hotmail.com
3 aleshtar@yahoo.com

.
.
0/1 1
.

.
.

 36

1 2 3 4

1 seif@sharif.edu
2 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
3 mehdi@sharif.edu
4 mohajernasab@mech.sharif.edu
5 dastan@mech.sharif.edu

.
.

.
.


.
.
.

.
:

37

1 tabatabai_civil@yahoo.com
2 hamidz@aut.ac.ir

50
.
.
20 .
1
.
.



.

1. Marina

38

1 a_lotfollahi@yahoo.com
2 jmaengineer@yahoo.com

)( .
.

.
)
( .

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
:

39

1 2 3

1 mehdi5arabi@yahoo.com
2 mahmood@sharif.ir
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4 panahi@rahiran.ir

.

FLOW3D.V.9.3 .
.
. )( .


.
M. Ram Babua & S. Narasimha Raob
. 2 1/5
30 0/084
. RNG .
100 .
5/76 .
: CFD

40

1 )( mojtabaghanbarian@yahoo.com
2 )( arsoltankoohi@gmail.com

.

.
:


.



.
:

41

Evaluation of CPT Cone Factor in

South Pars Field, Persian Gulf
Babak Ebrahimian1, Vahid Movahed2, Aida Nazari3
1

Head of Infrastructure Department, Petroleum Industry Research Engineering

Company (PIRECo.), Tehran, Iran; ebrahimian@pireco.ir
2
Geotechnical Engineer, Petroleum Industry Research Engineering Company
(PIRECo.), Tehran, Iran; movahed.v@pireco.ir
3
Geotechnical Engineer, Petroleum Industry Research Engineering Company
(PIRECo.), Tehran, Iran; nazari.a@pireco.ir

Abstract
In the current study, the results of numerous piezocone penetration
tests performed in various locations of South Pars Gas & Oil field,
Persian Gulf, Iran, were used to evaluate undrained shear strength of
marine clay of the site using cone factors. Comparison of variation of
undrained shear strength and PCPT results in depth was shown that
cone factor can be a useful parameter to determine undrained shear
strength, indirectly, from cone tip resistance. It was observed that there
is a relatively strong correlation between undrained shear strength of
soil and cone tip resistance. With studying the variations of cone
factors in depth, an average value of Nk=18 and Nkt= 21 were proposed
for South Pars field. In addition, the results were demonstrated the
importance of taking the effect of pore water pressure into account for
determining cone factor. Moreover, it was showed that cone factor is
rather

dependent

consolidation

ratio

to

over-consolidation

increased

both

cone

ratio

of

factors

soil.

As

decreased

overwith

descending rate.

Keywords: Piezocone Penetration Test, Undrained Shear Strength, Cone

Factor, Marine Clay, Over-Consolidation Ratio, South Pars Field, Persian Gulf

42

xx
3

1 2

1 D_maleki90@yahoo.com
2 massood@gmail.com
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir

T, K, x, y


xx
.
ANSYS 12
,

. ) ( .



xx .
: xx

43

59


3

1 2

1 Yarehonar@Yahoo.com
2 S.K.Shariati@Gmail.com
3 Ahonaryar@Yahoo.com

. 59

50 .
1 2

3 .
4

.



.
5 .
:
1.GZ
2.Heel
3.Trim
4.Ballast
5.Paramarine

44

1 2 2 2 2
2

1 turbodesign.iut@gmail.com
2
3 fatemeh.ghomi92@gmail.com

1
2
.
.




.
80 ) 42 (

.
:

1.Planing
2.Jetsprint

45

""

1 2 3

1 ahadian@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
2 mkalantar@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
3 katayoun_hosseini@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
4 farzadsw@gmail.com

"" .

.

.
.
.

.
1
.
.
GPS+INS
MEMS GPS .
: INS GPS
1.Position and Heading Angle

46

1 2

1 h.zakerdoost@gmail.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir

.
ITTC-57
.
.
0/408
.
.
.

47

Epan
4

1 2 3

1 Moghadas14@gmail.com
2 Ebrahimi.amin@gmail.com
3 S.K.Shariati@gmail.com
4 Behzadzakeri04@gmail.com

.

.
Epan

Bladrunner 51 .

Maxsurf .
1300 .
20 knot .

52.7 cm ) 130cm(
. Epan
.
.
:
Bladrunner51

48

1

sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com

.
.
) (

. .
2
.

1.Endurance
2.Paramarine

49

1 taghipoor@aut.ac.ir
2 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir

.

.
.
)(

. .
-
.
.
) (
.
.
.
:

50

CFD


1 2

1 mohsen.siahmansouri@gmail.com
2 khahani.somaye@gmail.com
3 a-ghanbari@tabrizu.ac.ir

.

.
.
.
1
.
2 .
CFD .
.
:
CFD
)1.Median and/or Paired Fin (MPF
2.Knife Fish

51

sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com

.

.
.
1

.

1.Paramarine

52

AUV

3

1 2

1 aasoleimani86@gmail.com
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir
3 ar.mostofi@gmail.com

.
1

.

.


. 2 .

.
.
.
AUV .
: AUV

1.Computer-Aided Design Packages

)2.Non Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS

53

1 efroughifar@yahoo.com
2 seif@sharif.edu

.
:
) ( .
.
.

.

.
.

 54

1 2

1 m.karimian@ut.ac.ir
2 aykoma@ut.ac.ir
3 p.karimi@ut.ac.ir

.

. .
.


.
.

.
.
.

55

1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 m.omidali@aut.ac.ir

) (2

. 1
.

. ) (
. 8 6 4 10
15 10 5 0 20 .

: 2

1.Fluent

56

1 2

1 aminzare62@gmail.com
2 ehsan_selahi@yahoo.com
3 iraj_rajabi@yahoo.com

.
. :
6 100 .3*106
.


.

.

.

57

SES
FSI
3

1 2

1 mahdirishehri@gmail.com
2 adnan.eghtesad@gmail.com
3 ali_dehghanian@yahoo.com

.
On-Cushion
.
.

... .



.

.



.
: SES ) (FSI CFX

58

)(VOF
2

1 Pooya.mech@gmail.com
2 Mohsengood@gmail.com

.
.
1VOF

.
.

40 .
.
20
.
:

1.Volume of Fluid

59

1 2

1 mo.mohammadi@aut.ac.ir
2 akbari.karim@aut.ac.ir
3 khedmati@aut.ac.ir

.

.


.
.

.

.

60

60

3

1 2

1 mahyar857447013@gmail.com
2 amin.rasooli.z@gmail.com
3 a.mostashfi@me.iut.ac.ir

.
.

.
60 1/5
0/11 0/33
.
.


.

61

1
1

ab_ebrahimi@cmu.ac.ir
2

ma_shahbakhsh@yahoo.com

.
) (
.

. .
1 .
.
2 3
.
4 5/5
.
.

1.Computational Fluid Dynamics

2.Finite Volume Method
3.Volume Of Fluid

62

1 2

1 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
2 ehsanyari_mechanical@yahoo.com
3

.
.
DTMB4119 HSP .
80

.

.

63

1 rezababakhani59@yahoo.com
2 jafarisaeed58@yahoo.com

.

.
.
.

.
.

.

64

1 jmz114@gmail.com
2 )( i.mabna@gmail.com

.
.



.
16 .

1.HYSUCAT

65

1 reza.mohammadzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 shila.ariana@aut.ac.ir

.
.
100 .
1
1992/1/1 2003/9/31 .
2
3 . 4
5
.

.
:

1.Significant Wave Height
2.Gumbel
3.Weibull
4.Grouped Data
5.Ordered Data

 66

1 2

1 a.jahanbakhsh@me.iut.ac.ir
2 azimian@cc.iut.ac.ir
3 arzamani@cc.iut.ac.ir

) (
) ( ) (


.


.
.
NACA2312 5

. NACA0009
0
NACA4412 NACA4415
0 .
.

: 1 2

1.Panel Method
2.Hydrodynamic Images
3.Vortex

67

Scale Effect on Form Drag of Small Waterplane Area

Ships, with Oval Shape of Gondola
Mohammadreza Arabyarmohamadi1, Pouya Molana2, Abdollah Sakaki3
1

PHD, member of marine engineering faculty, MUT university of technology;

yar440m@gmail.com
2
B.Sc. in shipbuilding, MUT university of technology; molana.p@gmail.com
3
B.Sc. in shipbuilding, MUT university of technology; sakaki0068@gmail.com

Abstract
The first systematic model series of hulls with small waterplane area was
designed and tested in Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute in the middle of
the 1980s.
We design new model series of hull with oval cross section shape and test it in
kowsar towing tank of shiraz. krylov series was intended to cover a broad range
of Froude numbers, hull aspect ratios, design drafts, and spacing between hulls.
In the present paper, these test results are analyzed by accounting for the scale
effect in the form drag.
Illustrative results are also given for the influence of the cross-section hull
shape and strut configuration on the residual resistance. Factors influencing the
residual resistance of ships of this type are discussed.

Keywords: Small Waterplane Area Ships, Residual Resistance, Form Drag,

Scale Effect

68

)( fazelinia_aa@yahoo.com

.
.

.
60
C B 0.8

.
.

.
. PLC
.
.
:

69

Delft3D-Flow
1 2

1 a_em_civil@yahoo.com
2 m.tajziehchi@yahoo.com
3 shaghaiegh.r@gmail.com

.
Delf3D- Flow .
.

28 6 .
.
.
500 25
0/33 .
.

: Delft3D-Flow

70

1 2

1 a_em_civil@yahoo.com
2 m.tajziehchi@yahoo.com

3 kgb.1357@yahoo.com

.
Delft3D-Flow .
.
1/36
6 .

.

.

.
: Delft3D-Flow

71

Wave Energy in Anzali Port (Iran)

Sanaz Hadadpour
Postgraduate student, Iran University of Science and Technology;
sanaz.hadadpour@yahoo.com

Abstract
Nowadays, renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and ocean energy,
without negative environmental impacts, are considered. Wave energy is a kind
of renewable energy resource with high power density considered especially in
coastal regions. In this study, a third generation spectral model, SWAN model,
has been used to simulate wave parameters that are required for the estimation
of wave energy in Anzali. For this purpose, QuikSCAT wind field was used as
the wind input in the SWAN model. The model results were calibrated and
verified with buoy recorded data. After verification of the model, wave
characteristics in the entire study region were produced. First, annual energy
was calculated in the study area; and second, the seasonal variations in this area
were investigated. It was found that the most energetic waves are occurred in
winter and its contribution to the total annual energy is 44%. Average wave
energy, its maximum value is about 1.2 kW/m, is different from the maximum
wave energy considerably. Furthermore, a linear regression was employed and
the relationship between the maximum and average wave energy for Anzali
domain was found.

Keywords: Wave Energy Estimation, SWAN, Anzali

72

Flow3D
2

1 mohammadhosainshafie@gmail.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir

.
.
.
FLOW 3D 4 1
.

] [Xing-kaeding 2004 .
FLOW 3D

.

73

1 2

1 Mortezajazaeri@gmail.com
2 Katayoun_hosseini@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
3 Ashkan.ojaghi@gmail.com

1

. CFX

2 .
2
. 0/273 0/831

1 6 .

.
.
:

1.Shape Function
)2.VOF (Volume of Fluid

74

PSO LM

homayoon.ahmadvand@gmail.com

.

.
PSO LM .
2011
PSO .

. LM PSO
.
LM PSO.

: PSO LM

75

Design of Chamber and Wells Turbine for an

Oscillating Column of Water for Extracting Wave
Energy from Anzali Port
Ahmad Sedaghat1, Ahmad Reza Zamani2
1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology,

Isfahan 84156-83111, I.R. of Iran, sedaghat@cc.iut.ac.ir
2
Subsea R & D Center, Isfahan University of Technology,Isfahan 84156-83111,
I.R. of Iran, arzamani@cc.iut.ac.ir

Abstract
Renewable

energies

such

as

wave

energy,

despite

rapid

technological progress and potentials in Iranian waters, are yet require

careful studies. Recent developments of marine energy in the world can
manifest itself for energy demands in Iran. In this paper, the procedure
for design of Wells turbine and Oscillating Water Column (OWC)
containers

are

explained.

Experimental

wave

measurements

from

Anzali port is used to design the system of OWC. Optimum sizes of the
OWC container and Wells turbine are derived for using the maximum
accessible wave energy in Anzali port.

Keywords: Wave Energy, Oscillating Column of Water System, Wells

Turbine, Anzali Port

76

Evaluation of Wave Energy Potentials in Chahbahar

Port Using Two Methods of Water-Wind Model and
Wave Measurements
Ahmad Sedaghat1, Ahmad Reza Zamani2
1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology,

Isfahan 84156-83111, I.R. of Iran, sedaghat@cc.iut.ac.ir
2
Subsea R & D Center, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111,
I.R. of Iran, arzamani@cc.iut.ac.ir

Abstract
Renewable

energies

such

as

wave

energy,

despite

rapid

technological progress and potentials in Iranian waters, are yet require

careful feasibility studies. Recent developments of marine energy in the
world can manifest itself for implementing marine energy absorber
devices in Iran. In this paper, the average annual wave power of
Chabahar port is determined using two approaches. A wave-wind
model and three months experimental data are used for comparison.
The wave-wind model predicts the annual wave power 4.746 kW/m2
(approximate method) and 8.621 kW/m2 (accurate method), which are
higher than the measurements. This suggests that further improvements
in modeling and more measurements should be obtained for correct
evaluation of Iranian marine energy.

Keywords: Wave Energy Potential, Water-wind model, Chabahar Port

77

1 2

1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 shirafkan@aut.ac.ir
3 hmd.nazari@gmail.com

.

.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.
:

78

1
1

Reza_yousefi41@yahoo.com
2

Rshafaghat@nit.ac.ir

.
) (
.
1
.
.
K


.

.
:

1.Ansys Fluent

79

1 Faranak.akbari@gmail.com
2 Info@am-arasteh.com

.
2 .
6.3.26

3 . .
1390

.

0/1 0/4 .



.
:

1.Fluent
2.CFD : Computational Fluid Dynamics
3.VOF : Volume of Fluid

80

1 )( stableboat.90@hotmail.com
2 mcmory@gmail.com

.
.
) (Marou .
.
10 RHIB .

.
) (
.

.
.

81

Numerical Comparison between Diffraction Theory

and Morison Equation in Predicting Wave
Force - Case Study: Persian Gulf Bridge
Saeed Darvishi Alamouti1, Amir Davazdaemami2
1

MSc Student, University of Tehran; Saeed_darvishi@ut.ac.ir

Master of Science, Sahel Consulting Engineers; a_demami@yahoo.com

Abstract
Evaluating hydrodynamic forces on marine structures is so important
to design safe and reliable structure. One of the most important forces
is wave force that should be considered in both constructing sequence
and

after

construction

stability

analysis.

Wave

force

on

slender

members can be calculated using Morison equation but when the size
of a structural body or member is sufficiently large diffraction theory
should be used. In this paper wave forces on cylindrical members of the
Persian Gulf Bridge are evaluated using both Morrison equation and
diffraction theory and results are compared. This paper also describes
numerical method adopted in developing a program for modeling wave
force on cylindrical members. The total wave forces are calculated with
linear segments, but without the curve fitting technique. Numerical
program written in MATLAB language is used for this purpose.
Results show that diffraction theory predicts wave forces larger than
Morison equation (even 30% larger), because Morison equation ignores
the convective acceleration component in the inertia force calculation.
It also ignores lift forces, slam forces, and axial Froude-Krylov forces.

Keywords: Diffraction Theory, Morison Equation, Wave Force, Cylindrical Pile

82

Prediction of Wave Spectrum Using Artificial

Neural Network
Homayoon Ahmadvand1, Saeid Shabanlou2, Farough Raissi3
1

Department of Physical oceanography, Faculty of Marine Science, Khoramshahr university

of Marine Science and Technology, Khoramshahr, Iran; homayoon.ahmadvand@gmail.com
2
Department of water Engineering, Kermanshah branch of Islamic Azad university,
Kermanshah, Iran; saeid.shabanlou@gmail.com
3
Department of maritime transport, Faculty of maritime economics and management,
Khoramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khoramshahr, Iran;
farough.raissi@gmail.com

Abstract
Hindcasting of wave parameters is necessary for many applications in
coastal and offshore engineering and is generally made with the help of
sophisticated numerical models. Different forecasting methodologies have been
developed using the wind and wave characteristics. In this paper, artificial
neural network (ANN) is used to forecast the wave spectram in the
southeastern part of Caspian Sea. To determine the effective parameters,
different models with various combinations of input parameters were
considered. By sensitivity analysis was found that wind speed, wave period
were to be the best inputs. Furthermore, results also indicated that using the
difference between wave and wind directions didnt show better performance.
Furthermore, Comparison between wave spectrum of ANN with ISSC and
Neumann spectras showed that the ISSC spectrum with little deviation is more
appropriate than Neumann spectrum. Finally, wave parameters were calculated
by ISSC spectrum.

Keywords: Wave Spectrum, Artificial Neural Network, Wave Parameters,

Caspian Sea

83

1 2

1 milad.zabihi88@yahoo.com
2 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
3 mkazeminezhad@inio.ac.ir

.



.
1 .

' M5

.

.
: ' M5
1.Wave Reflection

84

)(VOF
2

1 Pooya.mech@gmail.com
2 Mohsengood@gmail.com

.

.
VOF1
.

.
.
.

.
.
:

1.Volume of Fluid

85

1 h.ardalan@wri.ac.ir
2 a.shanehsazzadeh@eng.ui.ac.ir

.
15
. 8 25 .

.
1/8
4 6 . 82 0/5
.

.
.

86

1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir

30
. 3104
. RNG k-

.




.


.
.
:
1.Strohal Number

87

1 2

1 ahmadi_m@civileng.iust.ac.ir
2 meysam_bali@civileng.iust.ac.ir
3 zabihi@civileng.iust.ac.ir

. .

.
. .

) (M5

.
.
.

:
M5

88

1 amin_ghelbash@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
2 mnouri@iust.ac.ir

180 0/7 .


.

.
.
.
.

.

89

The Effects of Bank and Shallow Water

on the Flow Pattern Around Hull
of LNG Carrier Using CFD
Adi Maimun1, Mehdi Nakisa2, Yit Siang Ang2, Pauzi Ghani3,
Agoes Priyanto3, Yasser Razak3, Fatemeh Behrouzi4
1

Prof. Dr., UTM; adi@fkm.utm.my

PhD student, UTM; nmehdi5 or ysang4@live.utm.my
3
Senior Lecturer, UTM; pauzioragoesor Yasser@fkm.utm.my
4
Master student, UTM; bfatemeh5@live.utm.my
2

Mech. Eng. Faculty, University Technology Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Abstract
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) tanker often travels through shallow waters
with visible banks for its operations.
Manoeuvring of vessel in restricted water is relatively difficult and exposed to
higher risk level. Asymmetric flows around the ship when the ship travel close
to bank may results in sway force and yaw moment on ship and because of the
changing the velocity and pressure contours around the hull, lead to potentially
dangerous situations. This research work will consider to behaviour of a LNG
carrier in confined water taking into account the ship bank interaction effects.
Hull hydrodynamic forces and moments and ship-bank interaction affected on
wake pattern around and behind the ship hull is investigated using
computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and further validate by model test
experiment that they have been performed in towing tank of Marine Lab. in
University Technology Malaysia.

Keywords: Bank Effect, Shallow Water, Flow Pattern, LNG Carrier, CFD

90

1 zamanirad@sharif.edu
2 seif@sharif.edu

.

.
.. 1
.
.

.
.

.
.

1.CFX

91

1 2

1
2
3 ehsan_rajabiani@yahoo.com

LS-DYNA
. MMALE1
.

.

.

: ALE

1.Multi Material Arbitrary Eulerain Lagrangian

 92

1 2
1

iranjvs@yahoo.com

2 torabi_us@yahoo.com
3 mrrovvati2000@yahoo.com

.

21 .

2011
.
2011
0/2 m/s 0/4 m/s .

.

: 21

93

1 2

1 abbpor@sharif.edu

2 seif@sharif.edu
3 ali_ahmadi@mech.sharif.ir

.

.

.


.

.

.
.
:

94

A Numerical Analysis of Hydrofoil Operation Near the

Water Surface and Development of a Method to
Calculate the HYSUCAT Dynamic Performance in the
Conceptual Design Phase
Abdol Hossein Nowruzi1, Masoud Torabi Azad2, Mohammad Saeed Seif3,
Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi4
1

Master of Physical Oceanography, North Tehran Azad University, 82.hosein@gmail.com

2
Associate Professor of Physical Oceanography, North Tehran Azad University
3
Professor, Center of Excellence in Hydrodynamics and Dynamics of Marine Vehicles,
Sharif University of Technology, seif@sharif.edu
4
M.s.c, Naval architecture and marine engineering department, Amirkabir University

Abstract
In this paper, after studying different Drag reduction technologies
and HYSUCAT development necessity, a research has been done to
attain

method

for

predicting

hydrodynamic

performance

of

the

HYSUCAT crafts at the conceptual design phase. On the other hand, as

the first step, 4 hydrofoil sections were chosen to be calculated by
numerical calculation software called Autowing2.3 . Then, numerical
results were used to validate analytical equations of hydrofoil operation
just beneath the water surface. The pressure distribution and forces
acting on E654 Eppler foil section were calculated. Finally, with
composing

foil

calculations

and

planing catamarans hull analytical

calculations, a performance prediction of the HYSUCAT boat is done

in calm water situation. As a result, Resistance reduction rate of 30
percent attained for a sample catamaran model "Ghazal".

Keywords: Resistance Reduction, HYSUCAT1, Autowing, Modern Hulls,

Dynamic Performance
1.HYdrofoil SUpported CATamaran

95

1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 seif@sharif.edu

. IMO
.
.
.
.
.
4/6
.
.

96

1 2

1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 seif@sharif.edu
3 panahi@rahiran.ir

....

.

.

.

97

1 2 3
1 a.bolghasi@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 shr_mirhosseini@aut.ac.ir
4 fayzi@aut.ac.ir

. .
1 .
.
.
.

.

. .

1.Broaching

 98

1 2 3

1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 sahar.jafari@gmail.com
3 seif@sharif.edu
4 ali_dehghanian@yahoo.com

.

.


. .

.
.

99

1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir

1

.

2 .

.
3


4 .

1.Interceptor
2.Lift
3.Heave
4.Proposing

 100

1 2

1 mo.mohammadi@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 akbari.karim@aut.ac.ir

.

.
DDS-079 .
GZ-
.


.
.

101

1 sm.mahdavi@aut.ac.ir
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir

.

.

.
.

.
.

.

102

1 am_javan@yahoo.com
2 hmd.aero@gmail.com

1 .
.



.
.

.
ANSYS-CFX
.
:

1.Routing Factor

103

Optimum Design of CRP Propeller Using

Open-Prop Software
Mehdi Gheisary
System Design Engineer, Marine Industries Organization;
mehdi.gheisary@gmail.com

Abstract
Common practice in marine vessels such as surface ship and submersible
vehicle is utilizing the propeller and motor to generate the trust. The
performance of the vehicle is directly influenced by propulsion system
efficiency. To increase the efficiency of propulsion system, the propeller design
must be taking into consideration.
This paper presented the CRP propeller design based of Propeller Vortex lifting
Line theory. The propeller is designed for a surface ship according to
parameters in Benjamin-Y.-H.-Chen. After the code is validated with forward
propeller hydrodynamic parameters, the after propeller will be designed. Also
the parametric design methodology is used to choose the best revolution speed
and diameter for propellers.

Keywords: Contra Rotating Propeller, Open-Prop Software, Propulsion,

Design

104

1 m.ashourian@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir

.
2 ... .

.
. 20
10 .
.
.
.

: 3

1.Rim Driven Thruster

2.Ducted Thruster
3.Fluent

105

SES
2

1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir

SES .


.
SES 2/91 20
. ) 1:16
(
.

: SES

 106

) (
4

1 2 3

1 iea852@yahoo.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
4 saman.tarbiat@gmail.com

1926
.
.
1 2
.

.
.
.

.
:

1.Wicker
2.Fehlner

107

1 2

1 h.khatamnejhad@desa.ir
2 b.jafari@desa.ir
3 Mohammad.eftari@gmail.com

.


.



.
%58

. %58

.
:

108

PVL
1 2

1 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
2 farzamallafchi@yahoo.com
3 ehsanyari11@gmail.com

PVL1 .
) (VLM2 .
PVL PRVL3
.
.
.
.
PRVL
.

VLM PVL :

1.Propeller Vortex Lattice

2.Vortex Lattice Method
3.Propeller-Rudder Vortex Lattice

109

1 2

1 yousefifard@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 mirsalim@csr.ir

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

 110

1 2 3 4
1 iea852@yahoo.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
4 hajizadeh@mech.sharif.edu
5 sina-2823711@aut.ac.ir

1926
.

.
.

.

.
.

.
: )( )(

111

1 2

1 shamsi@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mazinanimm@gmail.com

.
.


.

.
.
.

.

 112

CRP Azipod 1
3

1 2

1 delkhosh3292@gmail.com
2 mghasab@gmail.com
3 )( hashemi.ahmad@gmail.com

CRP Azipod .
.
.
CRP
Azipod . CRP Azipod
.
. .

.
CRP Azipod .

: CRP Azipod

1.Azipod Contra-Rotating Propeller

113

CRP
4

1 2 3

1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 smohamadi@iust.ac.ir
3 mkalantar@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
4 rasool_ra@yahoo.com

CRP .
CRP .

.
.

.

.
.

.
Solid Work Fluent

.
: CRP

 114

1 2 3

1 moslem_seddighi@yahoo.com
2 Fazeli@ISA.ir
3 Kheradmand @mut-es.ac.ir
4 ffarhadzadeh@yahoo.com

.

.

.
.

.


.
:

115

1 2

1 svch_2020@yahoo.com
2 shirzadi@mut-es.ac.ir
3 h-behbahani@mut-es.ac.ir

.
.
.
DC

.

.
.
.

... .
:
HTS

 116

1 2 3

1 a_saghafi@dinamotors.com
2 541354@gmail.com
3 a_nasiri@dinamotors.com
4 mscmechanic@hotmail.com

.

.


.

117

1 2 2
1 ramezani_mojtaba@yahoo.com
2

.

.
.

.

118

Air Cavity Ships

3

1 2

1 meysamshariat@yahoo.com

2 vnejati@yahoo.com
3 bzafarmand1@yahoo.com

.
.

.


.

.

119

1 arashonline65@aut.a.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir

) (VG

. VG

. VG
) ( ) (FVM .
VG
VG
.
) (ST .
VG VG VG
) (ST . VG

.
:

 120

1 2

1 m_moonesun@yahoo.com
2 hamid_ameri_122@yahoo.com
3 mehrshad.mj@gmail.com

.
.
.
12 .
.
.
15
.
.

) ( .

.
.
.

121

1 2 3

1 samankermani@yahoo.com
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 msaybani@aut.ac.ir
4 reza.jeddi@gmail.com

)( )
( .
.
NACA-2412 5
0 25 .

. 20
.
.
41/3 .
.

.
:

 122

AUV1
4

1 2 3

1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 robab_bahadori@yahoo.com
3 mostafapour@iust.ac.ir
4 m.kamran66@yahoo.com

.

.
.
.
2 .
.
3 4
.
.
:

1.Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
2.Sting Mount
3.Pure Pitching
4.Pure Heaving

123

1 2 3

1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 mnavid@iust.ac.ir
3 saeed_foshat@mecheng.ac.ir
4 mohamad_rastan@mecheng.ac.ir

.
.

.
.
.
.
%41.681
.

.
.

124

1

2

1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir

.

.

2


3

.

1.Interceptor
2.Lift
3.Drag

125

1 A.zareinezhad@gmail.com
2 F.pourfattah@mut-es.ac.ir

Clark
.
SimpleC
Quick .
Spalart .

.
.
) (h/c 0/2 1 .

.

: Clark

 126

1 2

1 m.omidali@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 rhgoudarzi@aut.ac.ir

.
.

.

.

.
) (CZM
. T
7/25 .

.
: T

127

1 2 3

1 mahmood_rafie@yahoo.com
2 hessam.mohammadi@yahoo.com
3 )( Vshahramfar@yahoo.com
4 )( A_zeylabpour@yahoo.com

.
.
.
.

.
Ansys

)
( .
.
.

128

) (
2

1 a.marandi@ics.org.ir
2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir

.

.
. )(


.

129

DNV ABS
2

1 raalashti@nit.ac.ir
2 ali_ahmadi1366@yahoo.com

.
.

.

.

.
DNV ABS
.
DNV .

 130

1 2 3
1

milad.noorabadi@ymail.com
2

m.najafi85@yahoo.com
3

a_nobakhi@inio.ac.ir

eskandari@mut.ac.ir

) ( )
( .

.
.

.
. .

131

1 mrzarei@cmu.ac.ir
2 Daniel.nematy@yahoo.com

. .

.

.
1
.
. 10 100 .

.
2 .


.
:
1.Superstructure
2.ANSYS

 132

1 2 3

1 hamed.hoss@gmail.com

2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir
3 abbpor@sharif.edu
4 Farhood.Azarsina@mun.ca

.
.
DNV
1
.
.

1.Wagner

133

Vibration Investigation of Cylindrical Pipes With

Sigmoid, Power Law and Exponentially Graded
Material
Omid Rahmani1, Maryam Moghaddami2
1

Assistant Professor, University of Zanjan; omid.rahmani@znu.ac.ir

2
Student, University of Zanjan; m.moqadami@gmail.com

Abstract
Functionally

graded

materials

have

different

attractive

properties

such as high strength and high stiffness. Thus they have attracted much
attention in aerospace, automotive and marine industries. In this paper
free vibration of a functionally graded cylindrical shell composed of
stainless steel and nickel has been studied. The influence of the volume
fraction, the influence of the FGM configuration and the effects of
geometric parameters on the frequency characteristics for P-FGM, SFGM and E-FGM cylindrical shells are studied. The analysis was
carried out with Loves shell theory and Rayleigh-Ritz method. The
study shows that for all P-FGM, S-FGM and E-FGM shells and for all
construction of constituent materials the frequency characteristics are
similar to homogeneous isotropic cylindrical shell and the natural
frequencies lie between those for a stainless steel and nickel cylindrical
shells. To validate the analysis, results for simply supported cylindrical
shells are compared with an article. The comparisons show that the
present results agreed well with those in the paper.

Keywords:

Vibration,

Functionally

Graded

Functionally Graded, Exponential Functionally Graded

Pipes,

Sigmoid

 134

1 2

1 pouria_bahrami@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir

. ) (
.
.

.

.
.

.
,
.
:

135

A517-B
1 2

1 - ali_yuve@yahoo.com
2 Mohsen_khb@yahoo.com
3 hopo51@yahoo.com

A517-B . A517-B
.
.
.


.
806 811 722 748.
.
32 110 .
689
0/46 0/58
ASME .

.
) ,PT,UT,RTMT (VT
.
: A517-B

136

1 saedrezvani@gmail.com

2 )( shahroozmasoomi@yahoo.com

.
.

.
9
200 .

.
.

: ABAQUS

137

5083 PEO
5

1 2 3 4

1 ali_yuve@yahoo.com
2 jafarnia_v62@yahoo.com
3 Tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
4 payman.poufarzaneh@gmail.com
5 a_jahandideh@yahoo.com

1
Al5083
.
10-30 0/07 50-1500
15 3
Al5083 .
.
-Al2O3 .
.
600 .

: PEO

1- PEO: . Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation

 138

1
3

1 2

1 Ashkan.babazadeh@gmail.com
2 Fadavie@aut.ac.ir
3 dehghanian@aut.ac.ir

.
.
.



. ASTM-D412-a98
.
Instron 8802

.
.
.
.

.
:
1.Skirt

139

jahanmard.vr@gmail.com

.

.
.

.

.

.

 140

1 2

1 jalili@yazduni.ac.ir
2 mim.mohsen@yahoo.com
3 mosal@yazduni.ac.ir

.
.
.

.
GL
.

.

141

1 2 3
1 sh_abtahi@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 shr_mirhosseini@aut.ac.ir
4 fayzi@aut.ac.ir

. .

.

.

.
.


.
:

1.ANSYS

142

I

2

1 88130017@aut.ac.ir
2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir

.
I .
I

.
.
I

.

: 1 I 2

1.Lateral-Torsional Buckling
2.I-Girder
3.Corrugated Webs

143

1 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
2 mdtafty@aut.ac.ir

1
.

.
.

2 .
.

.

.
:

1.Orthotropic
2.Ansys

144

On the Effect of Substrates Type in Fracture Strength

of Adhesively Bonded DCB Joints by a Cohesive Zone
Model Analysis
Ashkan Babazadeh1, Mohammad Reza Khedmati2, Ruhollah Hadipoor Gudarzi3
1

MSc. Student, Amirkabir University of Technology; Ashkanbabazadeh@aut.ac.ir

2
Associate Professor, Amirkabir University of Technology; Khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3
PHD candidate, Amirkabir University of Technology; Rohadi@mail.com

Abstract
A debonding comparative study between Adhesively Bonded Composite
Joints and single material joints and software convergence using predetermined crack growth fracture mechanics based Continuous/Discrete
Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) is performed using ANSYS commercial
software. A nonlinear spring element is first introduced and then by means of
mode I cohesive law (Mode I is an opening mode where the loadings are
normal to the crack) cohesive strength C, fracture energy GIC and cohesive
stiffness KIP are calculated for the mentioned nonlinear spring element. This
spring serves as the adhesion of the joints.
Composite Joints are the joints that are made between two different materials,
(here Aluminum-Steel, Aluminum-Composite and Steel-Composite) whereas
single material joint are simply joints made between similar materials.
Similar adhesive fracture energy is considered for different joints to examine
resistance of joints against opening normal to the crack, flexural rigidity of
substrates shows direct influence of on the required force to open substrates.

Keywords: Adhesive Bonding, Composite Joint, CZM, DCB, Fracture Energy

145

1 2

1 Mosb.zebardast@aut.ac.ir
2 Fmorshed@aut.ac.ir
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir

.

.
.

. 2 3
. ] [4
.

1.Hat-Type Stiffened Panels

2.Maximum Sterss
3.Tsai-Wu

146

Numerical Analysis and Optimization of Top-Hat

Stiffened Composite Plate Panels Used in
GFRP Ship Structures
Moslem Najafi1, Mohammad Hossein Karimi2, Milad Nurabadi3
1

MSc in Mechanical Eng., Marine Industrial Organization; moslem.najafi85@yahoo.com

PhD Student in Marine Eng., Marine Industrial Organizations; mhkcom480@yahoo.com
3
MSc in Composite Eng., Marine Industrial Organizations; miladn113@yahoo.com

Abstract
The top-hat stiffened plate panels used in Glass Fiber Reinforced
Plastics (GFRP) marine structures have attracted considerable attention
due to their advantageous properties over traditional stiffened plate
panels. However, the anisotropic properties of composite materials also
make the top-hat stiffened plate panels performance more complex to
analyze. This paper aims at developing a Finite Element (FE) model for
top-hat stiffened plate panels in order to optimize the design of these
structures. The analysis is carried out using ANSYS finite element
software and structural response of the top-hat stiffened plate panels
under uniform pressure loading is determined. An optimization study
for the structural response is carried out by changing the lamination of
the top-hat stiffeners and patch size. The method was then validated by
comparing the FE model with previous experimental results of top-hat
stiffened

plate

panels.

The

correspondence

between

the

predicted

numerical and the experiments results prove the accuracy of these

models, which have also been applied to the real marine structures. The
developed FE models can in the future be used to model top-hat
stiffened plate panels with various materials and more lamination to
determine the effects of these factors on structural strength, and to
achieve structural optimization.

Keywords: Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics (GFRP), Top-Hat Stiffened Plate

Panels, Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

147

1 Amir.Sajedi021@aut.ac.ir
2 Mojtaba@aut.ac.ir

40
.
... .


.


.
.
1/2

.
:

148

PVC VARTM
1 2 3 4

1 tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
2 Halimi-fa@yahoo.com
3 ali_yuve@yahoo.com
4 Mohamadkhani_me@yahoo.com
5 payman.pourfarzaneh@gmail.com

.
.
.
.
VARTM
.

.
.
: 1VARTM

1.Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding

149

PVC VIP
5

1 2 3 4

1 tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
2 Asadi_pa61@yahoo.com
3 hopo51@yahoo.com
4 Mohsen_khb@yahoo.com
5 Sh1391yf6@yahoo.com

.
.
.
.
VIP
. VIP
.

.
.
: 1VIP

1.Vacuum Infusion Process

150

1 sshabani@cc.iut.ac.ir
2 shamsi862620@gmail.com

.

.
.

.


.

.
.
CATIA V5
ANSYS

.
.
:

151

1 2

1 kiasat@aut.ac.ir
2 s.modaber@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir

.


.
.

C .
E
.

.

.
:

 152

1 2

1 kiasat@aut.ac.ir
2 s.modaber@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir

.
.

.
.


.



.

153

Behzadi52@yahoo.com

.

.




.

1.Cycle of Life
2.Recycling

 154

HSLA 100
4

1 2 3

1 m1mirzaei@gmail.com
2 a_yazdipour@yahoo.com
3 zangenek@yahoo.com
3 hamid_arabi20@yahoo.com

P-GMAW1 HSLA100 .
10Cm/min 15Cm/min 50Hz
100Hz .
.
50Hz .
10Cm/min
41J 50Hz 20J .
50 Hz HAZ.

: P-GMAW HSLA100

1.Pulse -Gas Metal Arc Welding

155

Study on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties

of Rolled Alloy 5083 H112 after Heat Treating at
Different Temperatures
Saeid Akhavan1, Ali Saghayan Nejad2, Mohamadreza Toroghi Nejad3
1

M.S.c Metallurg, Isfahan University of Technology; s_a_metallurg@yahoo.com

M.S.c Metallurg, Isfahan University of Technology; Ali.saghayan@gmail.com
3
Dr. Metallurg, Isfahan University of Technology; Toroghii@cc.iut.ac.ir

Abstract
Generally control of micro structure for improvement of material properties
is very important. Hence, several researches have been done to improve
structure and mechanical behavior of materials in sub-micron grain size at
recent years. Grain atomizing is an effective and economical method to
improve the mechanical properties of materials. In this study a thickness
reduction of about 85% was applied on Aluminum 5083 H112 sheet by cold
rolling. Then samples were heat treated at different temperatures. The micro
structure changes were tested by optical microscopes. In order to analyze the
mechanical properties; the samples were applied to mono-axis tensile, hardness
and wear tests. Also the investigation of fracture surface of samples after
tensile tests and microstructure was done by SEM.The results showed that the
critical temperature in micro-structure changes is 250 c. Also at this
temperature a static recrystalization takes place which starts at 200c.The result
of wear test showed that friction coefficient near to static recrystalization
process increase slightly which in accordance with temperature increase it
starts to decrease. Samples hardness by effect of heat treatment at 250c,
increase then it starts to decrease. Also the fracture surface results show that a
mixture of tear ductile dimples at recrystalization temperature leads to rupture.

Keywords : Recrystalization, Aluminum 5083 H112, Hardness, Structure

156

V

2

1
1

E_Moayerifar@Yahoo.com
2

ESMM_1648@Yahoo.com

.
.
V

. V
.

.


V .
: V

157

ASTM A517 AISI 316L

3

1 2

1 payman.shayanfar@yahoo.com
2 M.shamanian@gmail.com
3 M.kasiri@pmt.ac.ir

ASTM A517 AISI 316L
.
ER 309MoL .
.
.
25

A517 316L .

158

T

3

1 2

1 Imehdi@aut.ac.ir
2 Azadnavid@aut.ac.ir
3 Zabihpoor@yahoo.com

.
.
) (GAMW1 T
.
Ansys
.
.
.
.
.

.
.

T .
:
1.Gas Metal Arc Welding

159

1 ehsan_rajabiani@yahoo.com
2

TNT 178

.
Ls-Prepost 2.4 LS-DYNA ALE
.
.

: LS-DYNA

160

AUV


mmahdavikhah@yahoo.com

.

.

.
.


.

: AUV

161

mmahdavikhah@yahoo.com

.

.

.


%10 .

.

162

) 1(RCS

sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com

. ) (RCS

. RCS
.
RCS . RCS

RCS
.

: ) (RCS

1.Radar Cross Section

163

1 sanadgolnezami@gmail.com
2 Hsahami15@gmail.com

.

.

.

.
.

AHP



.

164

FEMM

1 2

1 Azareei@Alum.Sharif.edu
2 Sayyaadi@Sharif.edu
3 Mehdi@Sharif.ir

. Degaussing
.

.
.

.
) ( .
Degaussing .
.
.
Degaussing .
.
:

165

Mohammadamin64@yahoo.com

.


.

.

.
.

166

) : (
3

1 2

1 Samira.Babaei@aut.ac.ir
2 ttaghikhany@aut.ac.ir
3 Shila.Ariana@aut.ac.ir

1

. SACS

.
2 3 .
Matlab
.

4 .
LQG5
.
:
LQG
1.SATMD: Semi Active Tuned Mass Damper
2.Passive Tuned Mass Damper
3.MR: Magneto Rheological
4.Ground Acceleration Record
5.Linear Quadratic Gaussian

167

A New Plan for Marine Green Energy System;

Gravity Buoyancy System in Deep Waters
Mohammad Moonesun1, Behrouz Asadi2
1

Faculty of marine technology, Maleke-ashtar University of Technology (MUT),

ShahinShahr, Iran; m_moonesun@yahoo.com
2
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IAU), Tehran, Iran;
Behrouz_asadi84@yahoo.com

Abstract
This essay is about an innovative plan for generating electric energy by gravitybuoyancy (GB) method. This plan is based on the positive and negative buoyancy
principle. This principle is discussed here.
This plan is a backup and reserve system beside other new energy generation
systems such as wind, tide, solar and sea wave system. This system can be
combined as an efficient unit for energy generation. GB method can generate
electric energy by using the depth of water in sea, lake or water well. For
assessment and approval the application of this system, a small prototype has been
built in laboratory and its specification has been presented here. In this paper
provided results from energy produced by laboratory sample with the presented
specific and effective parameters in system efficiency was surveyed by numerical
analysis methods.
This system has a buoyant volume, ballast tank and two vertical rods for vertical
ascent and descent. There are some installation for diving and surfacing such as
high pressure air system and solenoid valves.
The buoyant volume has negative buoyancy when dives and has positive buoyancy
when surfaces. Vertical movement of this volume causes rotation of two circular
devices that result in rotation the axis of an electric generator. This generator
produces electric energy. Concept of this method is dive by downward gravity
force and ascent by upward buoyancy force. On the other hand, if the system has
negative buoyancy (weight more than buoyancy) will dive to the depth and if the
system has positive buoyancy (weight less than buoyancy) it will ascent to the
surface of water.
This method is very efficient in compared to other systems because it is
independent from the geographical location, season and weather. The more depth
of water causes greater efficiency in this method.

Keywords: Green Energy, New Energy, Electric Energy, Gravity Buoyancy

(GB), Marine, Dive, Ascent, Positive Buoyancy, Negative Buoyancy

 168

1 2 3

1 Sahar.jafari@gmail.com
2 c.shifte@yahoo.com
3 behnam.sadeghzadeh@gmail.com
4 Seif@sharif.edu

.
... .

.

.

...
.

...

.
:

169

1 2 3
1 m.fallahpour@stu.ac.ir
2 bakhshi@nit.ac.ir
3 raalashti@nit.ac.ir
4 hamidgorji@nit.ac.ir

1

2 .
. AIP 3.

.
4 .

5
.

.
: ) (AIP

)1.Air Independent Propulsion (AIP
2.Snorkeling
)3.Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC
4.Liquid Oxygen
5.ABAQUS 6.10

170

1 2

1 Negahdari@cmu.ac.ir
2 shafizadeh@cmu.ac.ir
3 amirenayat90@gmail.com

.
.

.

... .

) 1(MHD .
2
.

.
.
: MHD MHD
MHD
1.MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC
2.Maxwell Theory

171

5083 M-ARB
4

1 2 3

1 s_a_metallug@yahoo.com
2 Ali.saghayan@gmail.com
3 tahvilian2008@yahoo.com
4 b_movahedy@yahoo.com

) (M-ARB
) (
. M-ARB 6 ) (4/8
5083 . ./25
) (ODF .
5083 3/5
.
. M-ARB S
M-ARB .


.

.
.
: 5083

 172

1 2

1 maryam_rad1362@yahoo.com
2 k_lari@iau-tnb.ac.ir
3 info@am-arasteh.com

5 1992 1996
Woods Hole 26
34/4
21/4 .

. 10 20
150 500
. 600
20 %6 .
1000
60 .

.

173

1 2 3
1

e_moayerifar@yahoo.com
2

shoja_R@yahoo.com

esmm_1648@yahoo.com

gh.zirehpour@gmail.com

.




.


.

.

 174

1 2 3

1 amir.givkay@gmail.com
2 shabakhty@yahoo.com
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4

. 110 70 150
.
SACS
ANSYS

.
70

110 150


.
:

175

SMA

1 2 3

1 amir.givkay@gmail.com
2 shabakhty@yahoo.com
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4

SMA .
150 K
SMA .
ANSYS

.
SMA
)(

.
SMA
) (
.
:
SMA

176

) (GMAW
2

1 mmhossein@gmail.com
2 mm.keshavarzi@aut.ac.ir

.

.

.

.


)( .
)(
.
1/5
2
.

: GMAW

177

1 2

1 Majidmeh.119@gmail.com
2 a_izadi@aut.ac.ir
3 behrouzmahdipour@yahoo.com

.

.

.
.
.

.

178

2007
2

1
1

Hossein.behnam@gmail.com

2 Fhb@sci.ui.ac.ir

.
. 2007

52/8 -56/5 26/5 -27/3
.

.

% 85
.
12
.

179

1 abbpor@sharif.ir
2 p.taaeb@gmail.com

.



. ""
" "1
. 3/89
0/49
.

.
.
:

180

1 yoosefabad@gmail.com
2 IT saeeid@gmail.com

.
) ( .
) (
.
.
.

100
.


.

30 .
:

181

1 2 3 4
1 narges_nazemiyeh@yahoo.com
2 afshinma2000@yahoo.com
3 elnaz_pashmi_83@yahoo.com
4 iman.jamaatlou@gmail.com
5 )( rsoheilifar@ee.kntu.ac.ir

.
.

.
.
ORTRAN MATLAB

.
.

182

1 2

1 mehdi.nazari83@yahoo.com
2 .gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir

3 6
.
40 .
80
.



.

183

1 2

1 m.karimi66@aut.ac.ir
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir
3 msaybani@aut.ac.ir

...
.

.

.

.

Mike 7369.7
425
.
:

184

1 2

1 mostapha_solgi@yahoo.com
2 torabi_us@yahoo.com
3 k_lary@yahoo.com

.
.
.
Mike21 SW HD .
12 ) 1992
(2003 ) ( .
Mike Zero
.
30
.


.

: 21 HD

185

1 esmaeili@cmu.ac.ir
2 sazarmsa@gmail.com

.

.
.

.

. MT
.

.
6/9 0/95
.
:

186

1 2

1 hrmoradi@modares.ac.ir

2 sobhesaleh@yahoo.com
3 m.majidynik@yahoo.com

.
.

.
CTD 15
.
.

187

) ( maziargholami@yahoo.com

)(
.
0/25 0/5
2006 -2010
.
0/25 .
.

) 0/8 ( .


.


.
:
1.QuikSCAT : NASA Quick Scatterometer

 188

1 2 3

1 Boshra_vafaie@yahoo.com
2 Sanatgaran2@yahoo.com
3 Torabi_us@yahoo.com
4 v_chegini@inco.ac.ir

.


. CTD
23 .
Excel Surfer
.
.


.

189

QuikSCAT

1 2 3
1

Jafari65_ebrahim@yahoo.com
2

Mhmoeini@gmail.com

Majid.jandaghi@gmail.com

Babak.akbarzade@gmail.com

.
.
QuikSCAT .
12 0/250/25 .


.
SWAN .
Topex GFO-1
.

.
: SWAN
GFO-1 Topex QuikSCAT

190

PSO

3

1 2

1 hsaiedy@yahoo.com
2
3

.
.
) 1(MCPP
) (
. NP_hard
) 2(IPSO 10
100 1500
3 .

)1.Multiple Container Packing Problems (MCPP

)2.Improved Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (IPSO
)3.Bee Algorithm (BA

191

1 2 3

1 banihashemi.seyyedali@gmail.com

2 a.amin135555@yahoo.com
3 S_ghasemei99@yahoo.com
4 amirsyousefi@yahoo.com

.
.


.

.




.

 192

1 2 3

1 n.saidi@kmsu.ac.ir
2
3 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
4

.
.
.
.

.


)
(
.
:

193

1 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
2

.
.

.

.
" "
" "
.

.

194

a.sadrzadeh@ine.uut.ac.ir

"
" ) 1(MCP )
( 2

.

. 9
100 2000 .
.

2000
.

1.Multiple Container Packing

2.Imperialist Competitive Algorithm
3.Meta-Heuristic

195

1 2

1 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
2 n.saidi@kmsu.ac.ir
3 hassanport53@yahoo.com

.

.

.



. )(
.

196

AHP-FUZZY
) (
2

1 )( m.nemati.m@gmail.com
2 )( hasan.savalan56@gmail.com

.


.

) ( F-AHP .
.




.

: F- AHP

197

40
3

1 2

1 m_moonesun@yahoo.com
2 hamid_baziyan@yahoo.com
3 sakontmnt@gmail.com

.
40 .
.
.
.


. .




.
. .
:

198

)) (AHP (

1 2

1 mohammad_izadi2006@yahoo.com
2
3 MBA

.
.

.

.
.


.

AHP .
. AHP
.
:

199

4 91 94

1
Mohsen_hj@yahoo.com

4 ) 87 (90
4 .

1 2ARIMA .
ARIMA

5 6 .

.
. 7
8
.
91 94 .

. . .
.
: PACF ACF ARIMA
1.Times Series Method
2.Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average
3.Trend Analysis & Decomposition
4.Holt Winters' Method
5.Trend Component
6.Seasonal Component
)7.Autocorrelation Function (ACF
)8.Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF

200

1 Ir_khodadadi@yahoo.com
2 mehrvash_alidoosti@yahoo.com

.

.

.



.

.

201

1 2

1 b.jafari@desa.ir
2 h.khatamnejhad@desa.ir
3 Mohammad.eftari@gmail.com

.
.
.

.
.

) (


.

202

) : (
2

1 Moradi.narjes@gmail.com
2 Ghasemi.a@stpc.ir

.

.

.
1380 1389
120 .

.

. .
:

203

) (ANP

) : (
2

1 m.hasanzadeh2@yahoo.com
2
a_danehkar@yahoo.com

.

.
.

.
.
BOCR .
. 0/1
" "" " "
" " "" " " "
.
.

.
:

 204

CMMS
4

1 2 3

1 mosaybiali@yahoo.com
2 a_nasiri@dinamotors.com
3 v_hosseini@dinamotors.com
4 m_mojoudy@dinamotors.com

)(CMMS

. CMMS

) (
.
CMMS
.
.
.
.

: CMMS

205

1 esmaeili.m@aut.ac.ir
2 imehdi@aut.ac.ir

.

.

.
.

.

.

206

1 2

1
2 nikfarjam1400@yahoo.com
3

.


.
.
.

.

207

HSE
)(
3

1 2

1 sedighehhejri@yahoo.com
2
n_jaafarzadeh@yahoo.com
3 shahryar_gholizadeh@yahoo.com

HSE SWOT .



SWOT

HSE .
. 10
) ( 10 ) (

.
.
: HSE QSPM SWOT

208

kohansal@pgu.ac.ir

. .

.
.

.
.
.
.



.
.
:

.


.
:

209

1 2

1 amin.gashmardi@gmail.com
2 aharandi@gmail.com
3 panahi@rahiran.ir

.



.


AHP .

210

1 bardharari@yahoo.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir

)(

) ( .
.


.
.
.

: OCDI NAVFAC 300

211

Electrical Installation Criteria for Bridge

Navigational Watch Alarm System
and Class Approval Requirements
Kaveh Milani1, Hassan Reza Safari2
1

Surveyor, Iranian Classification Society; k.milani@ics.org.ir

Managing Director, Iranian Classification Society; h.r.safari@ics.org.ir

Abstract
The

purpose

of

Bridge

Navigational

Watch

Alarm

System

(BNWAS) or Dead Man Alarm is to monitor bridge activity and detect

operator disability which could lead to marine accidents. The carriage
requirement for Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System (BNWAS)
was entered into force from 2011.01.01 with amendment of SOLAS
Reg. V/19.2.2 in accordance with IMO Res.MSC.282 (86). This paper
is intended to provide technical information regarding the requirements
related

to

categories

the
of

electrical
ships

installation

including

new

criteria
ships

of

and

BNWAS

existing

for

ships.

all
The

BNWAS installation criteria for class approval can be related to two

important points which are: BNWAS Type Approval and BNWAS
Drawing Approval. BNWAS Type Approval is back to BNWAS
product itself which shall be built and tested according to the IMO
resolutions
standards

A.694
and

(17),

A.813

MSC/Circ.982

(19),

their

regarding

associated

guidelines

for

international
ergonomic

criteria for bridge equipment and layout while the BNWAS Drawing
Approval shall includes; BNWAS Type Approval, BNWAS interfacing
with

other

equipments,

arrangement

of

BNWAS

components

and

details of BNWAS power supply as electrical installation criteria.

Keywords: Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System, BNWAS,

Dead Man Alarm, Class Approval Requirements

212

1 2

1 )(1384-1389 Mottaki.ir@gmail.com
2 Morteza.Sabziyan@gmail.com
3 Hadi.Sabziyan@gmail.com

1958
. 1982
101 1982
. 1988
.
1851





.


.

.
:

213

:




z.madani@inio.ac.ir

.
.
.

.


.


.
:

214

1 )( hmousavi_atu@yahoo.com
2 )( zmostaani@gmail.com

.


.

.

.
.


.

215

sh.madani@inio.ac.ir

.

.
20
. .

.

.


.

216

1 parisabazdar@yahoo.com
2 pejmanzad@rahiran.ir

.

1350 1389 .

.


.

.

217

) (VAR1

Rezaeear@yahoo.com

.

) (VAR 1370-89 .

.
1 0/64 .
1
0/36 .
0/29 .

1 0/29
.
:

1.Vector Auto Regressive

218

efroughifar@yahoo.com

.


.

.
.

Pvelit
.
Catia .

219

malbdr@cc.iut.ac.ir

.
.
.
1FMECA 2FMEA
.

.
.

1.Failure Mode and Effect Critical Analysis

2.Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

220

1 e_razavi@irisl.net
2 ezzati@irisl.net

.

.
.

.
.



.
.

. )( .
.

.
.
:

221

HSE masoud3508@yahoo.com

1
2 .

.

) (




.

:

1.SMS
2.ISM Code

 222

1 2
1 yaghoobi.khy@gmail.com
2 hossein_shahmirzaee@yahoo.com
3 hemmatdar_m@yahoo.com

.

.
.
.
.

 223

1 2

1 mafi@civileng.iust.ac.ir
2 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
3 mkazeminezhad@iust.ac.ir

.

.

.

.

.
1
2 .

1.Bayram et al
2.Inman and Bagnold

224

hossein_talebnezhad@yahoo.com

.
) ( .

.
" " 16%
34% .
.
" "
.
1

. "
" .

:
)1.Under Keel Clearance (UKC

225

1 2

1 Hadi.sabziyan@gmail.com
2 Dr_m.sabzian@yahoo.com
3 Z_sabzian@yahoo.com

.

.

.


.

.

 226

1 2 3

1 Masoudtarahomi@gmail.com
2 Msayebani@aut.ac.ir
3
4 Aut.s.dehesh@gmail.com

.
...
.


.
.

: marine salvage

227

FMEA

eng_enayati @yahoo.com

FMEA .


. CFT
.

.
.

.
.
.

: FMEA RPN

228

) (B. dussumieri
2

1 oceanography.sina@gmail.com
2 ash35552@ yahoo.com

) (PAHs
. 1390

) (Mudskipper:Boleophthalmus dussumieri
) ( .
PAHs HPLC . PAHs
3384/34-113/50ng g-1 dw 46/64-3/99 ng g-1dw.
.
PAHs
.
.
PAHs . B. dussumieri

PAHs.

229

1 2 3 4 5
7

1 hnsaravi@yahoo.com
2 najafpour_s@yahoo.com
3 n_pourang@yahoo.com
4 r_pourgholam@yahoo.com
5 maryam_rezaei_83@yahoo.com
6 asieh_makhlough@yahoo.com
7 mafraei@yahoo.com

1389
) 50 10 100(
.
50 100 .

.
100 100 75 .

) (ISQG .

) (ISQG.
:

230

)(CCA

1 2 3 4
7

5 6

1 hnsaravi@yahoo.com
2 najafpour_s@yahoo.com
3 n_pourang@yahoo.com
4 soly_abd@yahoo.com
5 younesipourh@yahoo.com
6 asieh_makhlough@yahoo.com
7 maryam_rezaei_83@yahoo.com

24 ) (
1388 .
) (20m ) (>50m
.
) (sand .


.
:

231

)(PAHs


3

1 2

1 parisa_pyracantha@yahoo.com
2 ghasemi.m45@gmail.com
3 ghobakhlo@pmo.ir

.
) 16 (EPA ) (PAHs .
16 ) (PAHs
. 1388 10
-20 .
.
8 .
1 2 .
) (PAHs 70 . 8
6 ) (PAHs .
PAHs
. tPAHs

.
:

 232

) (
CMECS
SWOT )(GIS
4

1 2 3

1 - maryamnoory2003@yahoo.com
2 MBA nory_noshin@yahoo.com
3 samanenoory@yahoo.com
4 f_owfi@yahoo.com

) (

. ) (CMECS

) SWOT
( .
CMECS

) GIS ( .
22 20
CMECS III .


) ( .
:
) ( ) (CMECS
SWOT )(GIS

233

OSIS
3

1 2

1 Javad.Rezvandoost@gmail.com
2 Shafiee@modares.ac.ir
3 Pooya.Ranjbar@gmail.com

.

.

.


.
OSIS1
.
.
OSIS
. .
:
OSIS
1.Oil Spill Information System

 234

1 2

1 farahani_pilot@yahoo.com
2 masumejahanpanah@yahoo.com
3 savari53@yahoo.com

.
5 )
( .
%4 .
0/8
3 .
63 . 11
12 12 5
.
.

.
32 )
( 27142327 20
.

235

NOOA-HD
4

1 2 3

1 f_owfi@yahoo.com
2 ma_rabbani2002@yahoo.com
3 sheyda.dadashi@yahoo.com
4 saraordo@yahoo.com

)
( ) TPH (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
) PAH (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

)
( . 4
) (1386-88
) (138890 NOOA-HD GIS .

) (
.

 236

" : "
3

1 2

1 mo_bolouke@yahoo.com
2
3

90
.
.

.
. .

.

.

. .

.
:

237

) (


alimanidari@aut.ac.ir

.




.
TOWS1
.

.

: TOWS

1.TOWS= Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses and Strengths.

 238

1 2 3

1 nasser-saeidi@yahoo.com
2 hassanport53@yahoo.com
3 khodabakhshi.abd@pmo.ir
4 mousavi.jorf@gmail.com

.



.


.

239

1 2

1 Amirkh@shahroodut.ac.ir
2 Adjami@shahroodut.ac.ir

.

.
.
) (
.

.
SAP2000 .
.


.

: SAP2000

 240

)(
2

1 2

1 Behrouz.khosheghbal@gmail.com
2

.

. -


.
.
) (MADM
)(AHP
.
44/96 %45
.
) 33/38 (%33 ) 21/66 (%22
.
:

241

) (
44
4

1 2 3

1 MBA kouhsari@anzaliport.ir
2 dr_nopasand@yahoo.com
3 m_dostar@yahoo.com
4 amin.ghafarzadeh2010@gmail.com

1 .


. .

.
.

.
95

.
:

1.BOT

 242

) ( " "
" " " "
4

1 2 3

1 .mostafa.malaki@ymail.com
2 dr.edalatian@yahoo.de
3 sohrabi.sohrabi@yahoo.com
4 amin.ghafarzadeh2010@gmail.com

.
.