1) Read the main decision and resolution in Belgica vs.
Ochoa, Jr. In your assessment discuss which of the two resolutions of the Court is the more correct disposition of the controversy subject matter of the case. 2) Read the decision and resolution of Republic VS. Mangotara. Resolve whether there was a correct appreciation of the pertinent principles and doctrines applied to the case in connection with jurisdiction. 3) Recent supervening events in the form of press pronouncement by Senators Bong Revilla and Jinggoy Estrada to the effect that their cooperation were coopted by Malacaang for the conviction of impeached Chied Justice Renato Corono. Resolve whether the judgment of conviction is a valid judgment in the light of the supervening event. 4) Did the letters of Atty. Estelito Mendoza affected the finality of decision rendered in the FASAP case? Why or why not? 5) In the league of Cities case were the changes in the violation or disposition of the case an actual instance of flip-flopping? why or why not? 6) Do you think there was an abuse of the legal processes resorted to by Atty. Abrenice (re: Abrenica vs. Law Firm of Abrenica, etc.)? why or why not? 7) Compare and analyze the cases of (a) Vinuya vs. Executive Secretary; (b) Banda vs. Ermita; and (c) Public Interest Center vs. Roxas as to which of them can be appropriately considered as a class suit. 8) Decide whether the ruling made by the Supreme Court in De Castro vs. Judicial and Bar Council is an acceptable ruling. Why or why not?