LGU Scorecard on Health DCF For Municipalities

LGU Name: MUNICIPALITY OF DALAGUETE

Province Name:

CEBU

Region:

Profile Year:

2014

VII

Population data to be used: 2010 Census Data projected to 2014

The LGU Scorecard on Health is an annual survey being conducted by the Department of
Health for purpose of identifying reform interventions on health services provided by the
LGUs. The indicators are stratified based on the strategic thrusts and strategic instruments
of Universal Health Care ( Kalusugang Pangkalahatan ).
Instructions:

Please fill-up the form by putting the required data for numerator, denominator and
computed value.

Encircle Not Applicable if the indicator is not applicable to the component city or
municipality, or No Data if applicable but data is not available.

Refer to the given formula per indicator to derive the computed value.

Fill-up the remarks portion of each indicator when the computed value exceeds the
acceptable value.

Only the computed value will be inputted on the online DCF, however, numerator and
denominator data still needs to be supplied in this manual DCF to facilitate data review.

Signing the Certification Page must mean that the data entered herein has been
reviewed and validated by the Municipal Health Oficer.

I. Efficient Health Sector Spending

A. Increase LGU Investment for Health
1) Percentage of Municipal Budget Allocated to Health
A. Total Municipal Budget Allocated to
Health, Nutrition & Environment

14,453,617.07

X 100 =
B. Total Municipal Budget

120,000,000.0
0

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Municipal Budget PS, MOOE, and CO

Target 2016: 15%

DCF for Municipalites Page 1 of 15

12.04%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 50%

Remarks:
2) Percentage of MOOE Allocated to Health
A. Total MOOE in Municipal Health Budget

1,639,343.88

X 100 =

11.34%

B. Municipal Budget Allocated to Health

14,453,617.0
7

Services

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

MOOE for health from the regular funds (IRA + locally-generated sources)

Target 2016: 45%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 80%

Remarks:

3) Percentage of Municipal Health Expenditures

A. Total Municipal Expenditures on
Health, Nutrition & Environment

14,156,080.3
4

X 100 =

97.94%

B. Total municipal budget allocated 14,453,617.0

7

to health, nutrition & environment

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Target 2016: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 75% and 100%

Remarks:

II. Governance for Health Internal Management Support System

A. Adequate Human Resource for Health
4) Rural Health Physician to Population Ratio
A. Total Population

65,770

DCF for Municipalites Page 2 of 15

X 100 = 1 RHP :65,770

A. Number of Rural Health Physicians

Notes:

Formula: A/B

2016 Target: 1 rural health physician : 20,000 population

Acceptable computed value: between 1 rural health physician : 1,000 population

and 1 rural health physician : 75,000 population

Remarks:

5) Rural Health Midwife to Population Ratio

A. Total Population

65,770

X 100 = 1 RHM:2860
B. Number of Rural Health Midwives

23

Notes:

Formula: A/B

2016 Target: 1rural health midwife : 5,000 population

Acceptable computed value: between 1 rural health midwife : 500 population and 1
rural health midwife:75,000

Remarks:

6) Rural Health Nurse to Population Ratio

A. Total population

65,770

X 100 =
B. No. of Rural Health Nurses

1 PHN :
21,923

Notes:

Formula: A/B

Target 2016: 1rural health nurse : 20,000 population

Acceptable computed value: between 1 rural health nurse: 1,000 population and 1 rural
health nurse:75,000 population
DCF for Municipalites Page 3 of 15

Remarks:

B. Essential Drugs/Medicines
7). Percentage of NHTS-PR Members w/ Chronic Hypertension Given Anti-hypertensive
Drugs Listed in the DOH Complete Treatment Pack (ComPack) Program
A. No. of NHTS members w/ chronic
hypertension in the municipality given
antihypertensive drugs listed in the
DOH Compact Program

118

X 100 =

B. Total Number of NHTS-PR

members in the municipality
with chronic hypertension

46.64

253

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

DOH Compack Program: This will only include anti-hypertensive & anti-anginal agents

Data Source: LGU Records

2016 Target: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 100%

8). Percentage of NHTS-PR Members with Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM II) Given Antidiabetic Drugs Listed in the DOH Complete Treatment Pack (ComPack) Program
A. No. of NHTS members w/ DM II in the
municipality given anti-diabetic drugs
listed in the DOH Compack Program

B. Total No. of NHTS-PR members

in the municipality w/ DM II

15

X 100 =

37.5%

40

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

DOH Compack Program: This will only include anti-diabetic agents

Data Source: LGU Records

2016 Target: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 100%

DCF for Municipalites Page 4 of 15

Remarks:

C. Health Emergency Management

9). Does the Municipal Health Emergency Preparedness, Response and Recovery Plans
(HEPRRP) met all the 6 criteria of an operational HEPRRP?
If No, specify the criteria that were met

No

Notes:
65,770

Data Source: LGU Records

An LGU must meet ALL the 6 criteria of an operational HEPRRP: Plan is available and
signed; complete; revised/updated; tested; integrated into LDRMP; and funded.

2016 Target: All 6 criteria of an operational HEPRRP are met

Remarks:

D. Support to Health Human Resource

10).

Does the LGU provide full hazard pay, subsistence & laundry allowance to its

health workers under the Magna Carta for Public Health Workers?
Yes

If NO, Specify the Magna Carta Benefits Provided

Notes:
Data Source: LGU Records
2016 Target: hazard pay, subsistence and laundry allowances are provided in FULL

Remarks:

E. Client Satisfaction Survey

11).

Percentage of LGU managed health facilities in the municipality with client

satisfaction survey or feedback mechanism installed.

A. Number of LGU Managed Health Facilities
in the Municipality with Client Satisfaction
Survey or Feedback Mechanism Installed
DCF for Municipalites Page 5 of 15

X 100 =

None

B. Total Number of LGU Managed Health

Facilities in the Municipality
Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Data Source: LGU Records

2016 Target: 100% of LGU managed health facilities have a client satisfaction survey
or feedback mechanism installed

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 100%

Remarks:

F. Blood Voluntary Program

12).

Blood Donation Rate

A. Number of Volunteer Non- remunerated

Blood Donors in the Municipality

0
X 100 =

B. Total No. of Population in the Municipality658

X 1%
Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Only non-remunerated blood donations initiated or assisted by the LGU (communitybased mobile blood donations) will be considered

Data Source: LGU Records and Hospitals

2016 Target: 1% of the population (e.g., 10 per 1,000 population)
Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 20%

Remarks:

DCF for Municipalites Page 6 of 15

III.Scaling-up Public Health Intervention for MDGs

A. Disease Free Zone Initiatives
13.Percent Coverage of Target Population in Endemic Area(s) with Mass Treatment for
Filariasis
A. No. of Persons Given Mass
Drug Administration
X 100 =

No Data

B. Total Population (2 years old & above)

in endemic area

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

Endemic area*is a province with a prevalence of 1% or higher. All municipalities under

the endemic province shall report mass treatment.

Reference FHSIS

NOH Target 2016: 85%

Acceptable computed value: between 40% and 100%

Remarks:
14.Annual Parasite Incidence for Malaria
A. No. of Malaria Cases in the Population
X 100 =

No Data

B. Total Population in Endemic Area

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Endemic area may be a barangay or municipality. Thus, the population of the

implicated barangay, or municipality should be used as denominator.

Reference: FHSIS

NOH Target 2016: < 0.8/1000

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 20 per 1,000 population

DCF for Municipalites Page 7 of 15

Remarks:

B. Intensified Disease Prevention and Control

15.TB Case Detection Rate (All Forms of TB*)
A. No. of All Forms of TB Cases
Identified in 2014

104

X 100 =
B. Estimated No. of All Forms of TB

57.46%

181

Cases for the Year

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

All Forms of TBrefers to new smear positive, new smear negative, relapse and extra
pulmonary TB

To compute for Estimated number of all forms of TB cases for the year: Total
population X 0.00275

Reference: Quarterly Reports; NTP Registry

NOH Target 2016: 90%

Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100%

Remarks:

16.TB Treatment Success Rate

A. No. of Cured + Completed Treatment Among
Registered All Forms of TB cases

92

X 100 =
B. Total No. of Registered All Forms of

100

TB Cases in the Same Period

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Reference: Quarterly Reports; NTP Registry

DCF for Municipalites Page 8 of 15

90.38%

NOH Target 2016: 90 %

Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100%

Remarks:

C. Child Health
17.Percentage of Fully Immunized Child
A. No. of Infants Given BCG,OPV3,
DPT3/Penta3,Hep B3 & Measles
Vaccine Before 12 Months of Age

1415

X 100 =
B. Total Population x 2.7%

79.68%

1775

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

NOH Target 2016: 95%

Acceptable computed value: between 30% and 100%

Remarks:
18.Percentage of Infants (0-6 months old) Exclusively Breastfed
A. No. of Infants (0-6 months old)
Exclusively Breastfed

1084

X 100 =
B. Infants Age 6 months seen

1282

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

NOH Target 2016: 70%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 100%

Remarks:

D. Maternal Health
19.Percentage of Facility-Based Deliveries
DCF for Municipalites Page 9 of 15

84.56%

Number of mothers delivering at:

A1. RHU and BHS

979

A2. Hospitals/Private Clinics

337

B1. Home

146

B2. Other places

Percentage of Facility-based Deliveries

A. Total Number of Facility-Based
Deliveries (A1 + A2)

1316

X 100 = 89.46%
B. Total Number of Maternal

1471

Deliveries in the LGU (A1 + A2 + B1 + B2)

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Must be in a health facility with birthing capacity*

Other places is defined as non-health facility places like vehicles (tricycle, taxi etc)
and outside of the dwelling place

Reference: Local Civil Registry as reported in FHSIS

NOH Target 2016: 90%

Acceptable computed value: between 5% and 100%

Remarks:
20) Contraceptive Prevalence Rate for Modern Family Planning Methods*
A. No. of Women of Reproductive Age
Who Are Using (or whose partner is using)
Modern Family Planning Method

1354

X 100 = 16.74%
B. No. of Women of Reproductive Age
(12.3% of total population)

8090

Remarks:

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

DCF for Municipalites Page 10 of 15

Modern family planning methods*: pills, implanon, IUD, condom, injectables, NFP
(cervical mucus,BBT, symptothermal, SDM/cycle beads, LAM), BTL and vasectomy.

NOH Target 2016: 65%

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 100%

Remarks:
21) Percentage of Functional Community Health Teams
A. No. of Functional Community
Health Teams in the LGU*
X 100 =

None

B. No. of Targetted Comunity Health

Teams in CCT NHTS-PR* Areas in the LGU
Remarks:
Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Please refer to the attached Consolidation Template (see page 12)

Conditional Cash Transfer National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction

NOH Target 2016: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 1% and 100%

Remarks:

E. Management of Non-Communicable Disease

22) Proportion of Adults 25 y.o and Above with Condition Managed for Hypertension
A. No. of Adults 25 y.o. and Above with
Condition Managed for Hypertension
in the Municipality
X 100 =
B. Total Number of Adults 25 y.o. and
Above with Hypertension in the Municipality
Remarks:
Notes:
DCF for Municipalites Page 11 of 15

Formula: A/B X 100

Reference: Target Client List

2016 Target: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 100%

Remarks:
23) Proportion of Adults 25 y.o and Above with Condition Managed for Diabetes Mellitus
(DM II)
A. No. of Adults 25 y.o. and Above with
Condition Managed for DM II in the
Municipality
X 100 =
B. Total No. of Adults 25 y.o. and Above
with DM II in the Municipality
Remarks:

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Reference: Target Client List

2016 Target: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 0% and 100%

Remarks:

F. HIV & AIDS

24) Percentage of HIV & AIDS Local Response Core Criteria Adopted at the Municipality
A. No. of HIV & AIDS Local Response Core
Criteria Adopted by Municipality
X 100 =
B. 4 HIV & AIDS Local Response Core
Criteria Set

Remarks:

DCF for Municipalites Page 12 of 15

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

4 HIV & AIDS core criteria set: LGU multi sectoral coordinating body on HIV & AIDS with
representation of Key Afected Populations; LGU HIV & AIDS multi-sectoral work plan to
include Monitoring & Evaluation; Social Hygiene Clinic or Facility Providing STI Services;
and Local HIV & AIDS related policies

Reference: Target Client List

2016 Target: 100%

Acceptable computed value: between 25% and 100%

G. Environmental Health
25) Percentage of Households with Access to Safe Water
A. Total No.of Households with
Access to SafeWater (Level I, II, III) 12,137
X 100 =
B. Total No. of Households

82%

14,760

(Actual updated survey)

Notes:

Formula: A/B Xx 100

Reference: FHSIS

NOH Target 2016: 88%

Acceptable computed value: between 20% and 100%

Remarks:

2014 households projected estimate

13,241

26) Percentageof Drinking Water Sources complying with Microbiological Standards

A. Water Samples from Drinking
Water Source Tested Negative
for E. Coli (Levels I, II & III)

9047
X 100 =

B. All Water Samples from Drinking

14,760

Water Sources (Levels I, II & III)

DCF for Municipalites Page 13 of 15

61%

Notes:

Formula: A/B x 100

Source of Data: LGU Records

2016 Target: 100% of all collected samples negative for E. Coli

Minimum standard sample of collections is 20% of all drinking water sources. The LGUs
are expected to conduct random testing at least once a year.

Acceptable computed value: between 20% and 100%

Remarks:
27) Percentage of Households with Sanitary Toilet Facilities
A. Total No.of Households with
Sanitary Toilet Facilities

12,137
X 100 =

B. Total No. of Households

14,760

Notes:

Formula: A/B X 100

Reference: FHSIS

NOH Target 2016: 90%

Acceptable computed value: between 20% and 100%

Remarks:

DCF for Municipalites Page 14 of 15

82%

Certification Page
(for Component Municipalities)

Part 1. On Accomplishing the DCF (for MuniciplaHealth Officers & Financial Officers)

LGU Name: MUNICIPALITY OF DALAGUETE

Date Accomplished: March 31, 2015

This is to certify that the data provided in the LGU Scorecard Data Capture Form
are final and correct to the best of our knowledge. We understand that the data we
provided in the LGU Scorecard Data Capture Form will be the basis in producing the
LGU Report Card on Health.
SIGNED:
Note: Affix your signature above printed name. Indicate your office & position
opposite your name.
Name

Office & Position

JOSE EDGAR V. ALONSO M.D. Dalaguete Municipal Health Office-Municipal Health Officer
Part II. On Review of DCF (For the PHO and CHD-PHTL)

This is to certify that the undersigned have reviewed the data provided in this
LGU Scorecard Data Capture Form.

Remarks:
DCF for Municipalites Page 15 of 15

SIGNED
Note: Affix your signature above printed name. Indicate your position opposite
your name.
Name

Office & Position

DCF for Municipalites Page 16 of 15