Difference between Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalytic Theory and
Carl Roger and Abraham Maslows Humanistic theory
Both Psychoanalytic and Humanistic theories differ from one another in many ways. Their contradictive views on psychology are indeed evident. One most prominent difference is their views on human nature and the impact of society. Psychoanalytic psychologist views humans as inherently bad. They believe that we are all born with an evil and selfish monster within ourselves - the id. The id operates solely on the pleasure principal, it only desires to get immediate pleasure and avoid pain, not being considerate about moral values or how harmful it may be to others (McLeod, 2008). According to Freud, the ids way of thinking is completely out of touch with reality. Meaning, it seeks unrealistic ways to fulfill its cravings. They believe that, deep down in our unconscious mind, we are all lusting for the most revolting and disgusting pleasures and those we are aware of only the safe and filtered versions of our original erotic and destructive compulsions. To them, society is seen as an anchor that instills moral values the ego and superego into men. For example, as an infant grows up, his interaction with his parents and the society, leads to the development of the ego and superego, which helps him in coping successfully with the world (Lahey, 2009; Larsen & Buss, 2012; McLeod, 2008). Humanistic psychologist on the other hand, views human nature as fundamentally good. They have a relatively positive view on men, and criticize the psychoanalytic point of view. Instead of being born wicked, they feel that humans are basically born upright. They believe that everyone has the ability to grow and mature into proper beings, and make use of their full potential (Boeree, 2000, Larsen & Buss, 2012). They emphasized that a person has the free will and plays an important role in shaping how they behave. Their views on society, is far less favorable. They believe that society is the destructive force onto the once virtuous human being. To them, society harms and destroys a persons inherent tendency to be good and mature (McLeod, 2007).