You are on page 1of 4

1

,15(1):14,1994

**

A Study of the Fischer's


Sumiya

Based
widely

on

believed

protrusive
been

the

table
apparently

path.

it

-0.1.
is

data

of

its
of

and
is

outside

of

the

that

the

difference

device

longer

in

such
length

angle

between
5Kin

average.

path

inclinations

be

compared.

As
that

the
lateral

the

as

mechanical

and

steeper

lateral

result

, it

angle

the
both
and

paths

are

protrusive

protrusive

shown

that

of
not

has

than

sagittal

condylar

path

were
the

been

has

recalibrated

average

value

of

zero.
Tracings

inclinations

it

inclination

electronically

was
is

pantograph,
in

and

measured

measurement.

Thus,

although

sagittal

Fischer's

pantograph

condyles.

between

Takayama**

to

concluded

mechanical

paths,

is

is

condylar

by

protrusive

the

sagittal

it

tracing

path

value

plane,

Therefore,

than

the

condylar

and

Hisao

extraoral

observed

placed

is concluded

the

difference

reference

is

on

The

various

angle
is

by

lateral

angle

the

longer

reproduce

sagittal

horizontal

angle

which

measured

Fischer's

study,

same

Fischer's

to

that

as

this

Fischer's

study,

results

condylar
known

In
to

the

Hobo*

Angle

different

condylar

are

lateral
in
path

drawn

condylar

on

the

paths

inclination.
inclinations

recording
are

drawn

Through
is not

this

necessary

articulator.

kunde1935;45:867-99.(

.
Fischer .)

11,

Fischer's angle [Rudolf Fischer, Swiss dentist,


Zurich, Switzerland] : eponym for the angle formed

by the intersection of the protrusive and nonworking

side condylar paths as viewed in the sagittal plane.

, 5.

Fischer R.: Beziehungen zwischen den Kiefer-

.2

bewegungen and der Kauflachenform der Zuhne.


Schweizerische Monatsschrift fur Zahnheilkunde,

Zurich 1926; 74. Fischer R.: Die Offnungs bewegun-

gen des Unterkiefers and ihre Wiedergabe am Artikulator. Schweizerische Monatsschrift fur Zahnhei-

**

,
1

15

11994

. 1 ,

,
1

, Gysi

36.2.,Guichet

40.5. .
12

-0.1.

10. ,

,
1

.
,

3 ,

.

Gysi
37.5.,Guichet
41.8.,

9.5.

,
2

5.

,
.

, .

.

,

, 5.,

, 3

, ,(1)

, ,

.1.,

(2)

,Aull(1965)

8%,

10mm(34%)
.

1) The grossary of prosthodontic terms, 6th edition.


The Academy of Prosthodontics, J Prosthet Dent

71: 43-112, 1994.

2)

3)

510mm
,

10mm(

4)

),

3mm

:1994.

14,7-12,1993.

,1

23mm

5)

19:647-665,1955.

.1
3

15
33:225-236,1989.

6)


,88
36

7)

8)

Gysi,A. and Kohler,L.: Handbuch


kunde

IV, Scheff, Berlin

Schwarzenberg:
9)

:45,1992.

Lundeen,H.C.
ment patterns

der Zahnheil-

u. Wien, Urban

u.

1-171, 1929.
and Wirth,C.G.:
engraved

Condylar

in plastic

move-

blocks.

Prosthet Dent 30: 866-875, 1973.


10)

,2
,

36:434-442,1992.

11994

You might also like