You are on page 1of 1

Freedom has is double-edged sword in everybodys life.

So, if we leave the


children to do every things they want, they will spoil their morals. In On the
other hand, if we restrict them in all their childhood life, they will also
revenge from their parents in the future. In my opinion, balancing between
freedom and restrictions is the best choice we can do.
All of us need and want the freedom in all our life, but in childhood period
there are no responsibilities, so kids will do anything they think inof. This will
fall cause them in many problems. For example, injurinjurey themselves,
make relationship with bad guys and do not respect their parents. Freedom
in this period of life has is meaningless. In European countries, if the mother
hits his her kid, the governments may steal take his her child from her.
In On the other hand, no body like restrictions. This word averse anyone who
heard hears it. Restrict the child to do his activities and games is an assault.
Preventing kids do fom eating sweets, going to their friends and spending his
their holyday in anywhere they wants are is also an assault. Moreover, some
countries in Africa torture the children especially girls to eat some kinds of
food to make them fit to marry them in the future. This kind of restriction I
think is a high level of an assault.
Finally, limited the freedom is the best choice to do, ; this will make an
excellent Generations generations of children which can shoulderloads the
responsibilities in the future.

You might also like